[HN Gopher] Surgeons Cut a Giant Tumor Out of My Head. Is There ...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Surgeons Cut a Giant Tumor Out of My Head. Is There a Better Way?
        
       Author : melling
       Score  : 123 points
       Date   : 2024-08-14 16:39 UTC (4 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.bloomberg.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.bloomberg.com)
        
       | xyst wrote:
       | https://archive.ph/3axkV
        
       | ChrisMarshallNY wrote:
       | Back in '96, I had a pretty serious craniotomy.
       | 
       | Took me a couple of months to learn to walk and chew gum at the
       | same time, but I was pretty much 100% recovered, in five years.
       | 
       | One of best days of my life, was when my neurosurgeon said "I
       | never want to see you again."
       | 
       | They did it the old-fashioned way. Scalpel and Black-and-Decker
       | circular saw.
        
         | adin8mon wrote:
         | A family member of mine had to go through something similar,
         | the old-fashioned way. I've never felt more scared for someone
         | else than on that day.
        
         | Loudergood wrote:
         | Brain plasticity is amazing.
        
           | aborsy wrote:
           | So long as they are young!
        
             | loa_in_ wrote:
             | That's a myth. Brain plasticity was never properly studied
             | beyond 26 years of age.
        
             | fredgrott wrote:
             | nope, neurons are fully regenerable including into old age.
        
         | tomcam wrote:
         | Wow. Genuinely grateful you got through it so well.
        
           | ChrisMarshallNY wrote:
           | So am I. It was a ... _tense_ ... time of my life.
        
         | blackeyeblitzar wrote:
         | Is it actually a black and decker? It isn't some sort of
         | special FDA approved medical saw? Is that even a thing?
        
           | bluefirebrand wrote:
           | What would the difference be in your mind?
           | 
           | As long as the blade is suitable for cutting bone and it's
           | all sterilized, what would make it medical grade over
           | carpenter grade?
           | 
           | My Dad was the manager of a tool store for decades. He has
           | had a lot of knee problems and he has a funny story about his
           | knee surgeon coming into the store looking for a drill bit to
           | drill out a stripped screw. He jokingly asked if the stripped
           | screw was in someone's knee, and sure enough it was.
        
             | robertlagrant wrote:
             | > what would make it medical grade over carpenter grade?
             | 
             | In my experience, about $50000.
        
             | acchow wrote:
             | My woodworking equipment has a certain amount of jitter and
             | give. It seems to have precision to about 1-1.5mm. I
             | imagine medical grade machine cutting would have higher
             | precision?
        
               | vasco wrote:
               | Probably, but when you're watching these surgeries as a
               | layman for the first time it's surprising how much
               | fumbling around they seem to do. I have a few pieces of
               | metal inside me so took more of an interest at some
               | point, and even those surgeons admit their job is mostly
               | carpentry on hard mode.
        
               | wbl wrote:
               | My grandfather was an orthopod and an amateur carpenter.
               | The skills really do transfer.
        
               | soared wrote:
               | Next time you go under ask your surgeon to take pictures
               | and videos. Very interesting to see inside your body!
        
               | vasco wrote:
               | I even kept the metal rods they had in my leg in between
               | surgeries that would otherwise be thrown out!
        
               | ChrisMarshallNY wrote:
               | A friend of mine got a hip replacement, and asked for the
               | old hip.
               | 
               | They refused to give it to him. They said it was "medical
               | waste," and they weren't allowed to deal with it, except
               | in whatever federal manner was required.
        
             | KMag wrote:
             | As long as it survives an autoclave and doesn't leave
             | behind any debris in the site, it seems fine.
        
             | davrosthedalek wrote:
             | You will have a very hard time sterilizing a carpenter
             | grade saw.
        
             | HeyLaughingBoy wrote:
             | It would need to be survive an autoclave, for one thing. It
             | would need to be possible to actually clean it, not shed
             | bits of paint and plastic into the patient's skull,
             | material compatibility with antiseptics, etc.
             | 
             | If I thought about it for a few minutes, I'm sure I could
             | create a long list of requirements for a suitable saw.
        
           | rich_sasha wrote:
           | A friend is a neurosurgeon and they use some special saw that
           | stops as soon as there's no hard tissue providing resistance.
           | So you press it hard into the skull, and when it's done
           | chewing through the bone, it immediately stops.
           | 
           | Apparently the scariest bit for the junior doctors to learn
           | to use, somehow.
        
             | jajko wrote:
             | Same or very similar stuff is used to cut plaster casts for
             | broken bones. You see that small circle rotating next to
             | your veins in legs and there is suddenly some tension in
             | the room. Especially when saw seems to keep stopping when
             | cutting through plaster for no good reason, causing some
             | confusion for the doctor and making him lean more heavily
             | into it.
             | 
             | Afterwards they realize that harder resin casing was
             | layered with soft fabric by previous orthopedic surgeon in
             | previous hospital, so the thing actually worked as intended
             | (but if you keep pressing power button and leaning into it
             | it will keep cutting). Talking about hospital equipment in
             | Switzerland, 2 weeks ago after a nasty paraglider crash
             | landing.
        
               | ZeroGravitas wrote:
               | Cast saws are different, they don't affect skin as
               | demonstrated by this youtuber with a high speed camera:
               | 
               | https://youtube.com/watch?v=Bx1AiQdMQro
               | 
               | edit: though actually I googled the skull saws which I
               | wasn't familiar with and they might work on a similar
               | principle, found someone talking about using them in
               | autopsies anyway.
        
               | PhasmaFelis wrote:
               | That's strange. Cast saws don't need to stop like that;
               | they can't cut skin even running at full speed. Your grey
               | matter is not as tough as your skin and you wouldn't want
               | to touch it with even a gentle power tool, though, so it
               | makes sense that brain-surgery saws would be different.
               | 
               | I'm forever grateful to the doc who actually pressed the
               | running sawblade into his hand to prove that it's
               | harmless, instead of just saying "don't worry, it's safe"
               | while going to town on my leg with a power tool.
        
             | jac241 wrote:
             | That is known as the perforator drill bit - https://www.red
             | dit.com/r/toolgifs/comments/z2zikm/cranial_pe...
             | 
             | Used to make burr holes so that the dura can be stripped
             | away from the skull using the Penfield 3 instrument.
             | 
             | Then what's used is what's known as the B1 with footplate
             | to create the bone flap - https://www.researchgate.net/publ
             | ication/323134344_Exposure_...
             | 
             | Here is an example of the drill system - Midas Rex MR8 -
             | https://www.ebay.com/itm/125960633809
             | 
             | Here's a video of a surgeon performing the pterional
             | craniotomy, probably the most common craniotomy for things
             | like aneurysms, -
             | https://www.neurosurgicalatlas.com/volumes/cranial-
             | approache...
        
             | gumby wrote:
             | You mean the bonesaw-through-the-chest scene in
             | _Reanimator_ was not accurate?
        
           | ChrisMarshallNY wrote:
           | Nah... that was a joke.
           | 
           | But their tools look surprisingly like standard hardware.
           | 
           | Lot more pricey, though.
        
             | OJFord wrote:
             | 'x grade' stuff is usually just about testing &
             | certification, it's not that it is actually necessarily any
             | different from the 'standard' model.
        
       | bearsnowstorm wrote:
       | A counterpoint on focused ultrasound for essential tremor - just
       | because you don't penetrate the brain with a physical object
       | doesn't mean you don't have side effects - as usual, benefits
       | come with risks
       | 
       | https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaneurology/fullarticle/2...
        
         | vasco wrote:
         | This article isn't accessible so it's hard to see what you
         | mean. Do you have a link to the full thing?
         | 
         | Found a similar previous one
         | https://movementdisorders.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.100...
         | where out of 10 patients, 7 had issues:
         | 
         | > Tremor significantly improved in all patients. Seven
         | experienced mild adverse effects, including 2 with transient
         | gait impairment and a fall, 1 with dysarthria and dysphagia,
         | and 1 with mild dysphagia persisting at 3 months.
         | 
         | Also can't access the full pdf either though.
        
       | melling wrote:
       | The FDA approved histotripsy mentioned in the article to treat
       | liver tumors is available at NYU Langone.
       | 
       | https://nyulangone.org/news/nyu-langone-cancer-specialists-u...
        
       | yarg wrote:
       | Either sonic or photonic attacks from every direction at once,
       | resonating at the tumour site.
       | 
       | You'll also need to bolster the immune system to aid in recovery.
        
         | kuhewa wrote:
         | > You'll also need to bolster the immune system to aid in
         | recovery.
         | 
         | This eats the brain
        
           | tomcam wrote:
           | How?
        
             | mschuster91 wrote:
             | I guess they're referring to the brain (and, by extension,
             | the eyes!) being an "immunoprivileged zone" [1]... the
             | brain-blood-barrier makes a lot of "everyday" stuff for the
             | rest of the body pretty complex affairs for everything CNS
             | related.
             | 
             | [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immune_privilege
        
           | atlas_hugged wrote:
           | Wait, what???
           | 
           | Where on earth did you hear that?
           | 
           | Source?
        
             | DiscourseFan wrote:
             | https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0087469/
        
       | rishabhjain wrote:
       | I wonder how is it different than radiosurgery? Machines like
       | Cyberknife, Gammaknife also treat brain tumours in non invasive
       | way
        
         | suddenseizure wrote:
         | I wouldn't call radiation non invasive, it ages the surrounding
         | brain tissue a lot.
         | 
         | For people with faster growing tumors like GBM the tumor will
         | usually kill them before the side effects of radiation hit.
         | 
         | But for people with slower growing tumors like
         | oligodendroglioma, the side effects of radiation can force them
         | to quit their job and go on disability, years before they
         | actually die of the cancer.
         | 
         | The better we get at treating these tumors and extending
         | patients' lives, the more important it will be to avoid
         | radiation as long as possible to ensure that extra quantity of
         | life also has quality.
        
           | OJFord wrote:
           | In medicine/surgery, 'invasive' is a bit of a term of art,
           | meaning that implements physically enter the body. 'keyhole
           | surgery' (a small incision with a scope and tiny tooling
           | pushed through) for example is often described as 'minimally
           | invasive'.
        
             | FireBeyond wrote:
             | Yes. Even placing stents during cardiac catheterization
             | (PCIs or angioplasty) is 'minimally invasive' because
             | typically access is achieved by the femoral artery and
             | snaked up (the femoral comes "direct" from the heart, for
             | all intents).
             | 
             | Yes, you blow up vessels with a balloon and leave a metal
             | sheath in them, but as you say, minimally invasive, because
             | you didn't crack the chest to do it.
        
           | pknomad wrote:
           | I didn't realize how aggressive GBM could be until watching
           | this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VSLPq010Q-o
           | 
           | That much growth in 4 months is eye watering.
           | 
           | > The better we get at treating these tumors and extending
           | patients' lives, the more important it will be to avoid
           | radiation as long as possible to ensure that extra quantity
           | of life also has quality.
           | 
           | This is a good point.
        
         | HeadsUpHigh wrote:
         | Radiosurgery has it's limits and also horrible side effects esp
         | in CNS tumors. If the tumor can be accessed without damaging
         | too much healthy tissue and it's a histological type that has
         | clean borders you are probably better off cutting it out.
        
       | vsuperpower2021 wrote:
       | article fails to load text partway through. why are websites so
       | bad at doing this?
        
         | Muromec wrote:
         | To make sure you watch ads
        
       | Ylpertnodi wrote:
       | Should have asked this question beforehand?
        
       | vanderZwan wrote:
       | > _The key is knowing exactly where to aim. While the MRI machine
       | took readings, Elias ran a test at a low intensity to see if he
       | could gently heat up the spot on Doby's thalamus he was
       | targeting. Satisfied with the result, he then proceeded to blast
       | an area millimeters wide with 6,000 joules of focused sound
       | energy for a few seconds. A graph on his monitor showed the
       | temperature jumping to about 60C (140F). Everything around it
       | stayed at a normal 37C. Other than a brief sensation of heat
       | inside his head, Doby said he didn't feel a thing. Elias repeated
       | the process three more times, checking the tremor after each. By
       | the fourth, it was gone._
       | 
       | Leaving it at "knowing where to aim" is severely underselling the
       | problem, because then the next step is _how_ to aim.
       | 
       | Back in 2003 when I still studied physics I attended a talk back
       | by a Dutch biomedical researcher who worked on shock wave
       | lithotripsy - a procedure where ultrasound is used to break
       | kidney stones. So same idea as this, except kidney stone
       | 
       | So what he pointed out was that the human body is not a medium of
       | uniform density, so the way the sound waves propagate is hard to
       | calculate.
       | 
       | Worse, the human body tends to _move_ , even when the patient is
       | under anesthetics. Even if you sedate someone enough to lie
       | perfectly still, the heartbeat means blood vessels grow and
       | shrink, breathing causes miniscule motions that can throw off the
       | ultrasound beams.
       | 
       | Maybe this is specific to kidney stones though, maybe kidneys are
       | just a lot more "floppy" organs and maybe kidney stones move a
       | lot. Maybe the brain is a lot more "stable" in the skull. And I
       | suppose the method of destruction is different (kidney stones
       | need to be _shattered_ by ultrasound waves, whereas this method
       | uses heat), so that might also be an influence.
       | 
       | I'm not being critical of this technology btw, just trying to
       | point out that the engineering problems involved are likely a lot
       | more interesting than that this article is suggesting.
       | 
       | [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lithotripsy
        
         | saas_sam wrote:
         | Interesting. Maybe part of the solution is better predicting
         | and controlling the motion inside the human body. I could
         | imagine using a method to guarantee a particular organ be at a
         | certain place at a certain moment: perhaps by accelerating the
         | body a certain way to shove the organ into a position for a
         | moment. Or maybe by injecting microscopic machines to surround
         | and hold an area still. Someone will figure it out.
        
         | kelsey98765431 wrote:
         | Science needs more cadavers! Bring out ya dead
        
         | FiatLuxDave wrote:
         | In radiation therapy, respiratory gating is a common method to
         | deal with the problem of breathing movement:
         | https://www.oncolink.org/cancer-treatment/radiation/support/...
         | 
         | I was not aware of respiratory gating being used in SWL. So, I
         | did a brief search and saw that the efficacy of gating had
         | definitely changed over the years:
         | 
         | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7858616/ (1994)
         | 
         | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22471349/ (2012)
         | 
         | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38515108/ (2024)
         | 
         | So, it looks like that engineering problem has been worked on a
         | lot since that talk in 2003.
        
         | randerson wrote:
         | I once had to have a Heart MRI, which was fascinating because
         | movement normally messes up an MRI. For the heart, they attach
         | a pulse monitor and the MRI machine pauses its movement for a
         | split second each time the heart beats.
        
       | pknomad wrote:
       | I'm a bit confused on the use of word non-invasive in this
       | context.
       | 
       | I was under the impression that non-invasive meant no cutting of
       | tissue. Even if ultrasound separated the cancerous tissue from
       | the healthy tissue - how would the surgeons get it out of the
       | head without cutting into the skull? I also thought some surgeons
       | used diluted hydrogen peroxide irrigation for removing potential
       | neoplastic cancerous tissues post excision?
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-08-18 23:01 UTC)