[HN Gopher] Logitech F710 gamepad, allegedly contributed to Tita...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Logitech F710 gamepad, allegedly contributed to Titan submersible
       implosion
        
       Author : type0
       Score  : 16 points
       Date   : 2024-08-11 19:58 UTC (3 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.tomshardware.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.tomshardware.com)
        
       | q_andrew wrote:
       | Something I noticed in the lawsuit (complaint 5.12) I haven't
       | heard mentioned about this story:
       | 
       |  _Other than TITAN, no commercial manned submersible has ever
       | suffered an implosion (only early military submarines have done
       | so)._
       | 
       | That's a pretty damning statement if true. As a land-dweller, I
       | thought implosion was the main concern when using new submarines.
        
         | jmount wrote:
         | I think the idea is: implosion is so scary they work really
         | hard to engineer it out (as long as you don't go beyond your
         | max depth).
        
           | actionfromafar wrote:
           | _" The carbon fibre and titanium, there's a rule you don't do
           | that. Well, I did."_ (Found the quote on WikiPedia.)
           | 
           | It seems insane to me. It's easy to be an armchair anything,
           | but I don't understand why you would do such a thing. It's
           | not like a submersible needs to be light weight, either.
        
             | ethbr1 wrote:
             | I believe because it was substantially cheaper to fabricate
             | than a traditional metal hull.
        
             | rich_sasha wrote:
             | It is insane, but not _entirely_ pointless. A metal
             | submersible is heavy and negatively buoyant, whereas you
             | want it to be positively buoyant (then add removable
             | ballast).
             | 
             | The way you add buoyancy is expensive fancy aerated
             | concrete, or something like that, and a lot of it, since
             | it's not that buoyant. But it is pressure resistant.
             | 
             | By making it out of CF, you save on that cost.
             | 
             | Not a worthwhile cost cutting exercise but at least there
             | is some reason for it.
        
         | sitharus wrote:
         | It is, so it's taken really seriously. The hulls are made from
         | material with well characterised gradual failure modes -
         | bending and deforming rather than sudden failure. This means
         | metals with thoroughly inspected welds and joints to ensure no
         | internal voids, and a process of gradually diving deeper to
         | check the hull meets the design requirements.
         | 
         | Using materials that fail plastically and gradually increasing
         | depth trials means the failure mode is hopefully deformation
         | rather than complete failure, and will happen at the highest
         | depth as possible so a quick surfacing can be achieved.
         | 
         | Submarines, along with space, are an area where innovative new
         | methods need a lot of testing before you commit human life to
         | it.
        
           | jemmyw wrote:
           | If I remember the early reporting correctly, this submarine
           | had plastic deformation on every dive. So it was already
           | failing, they just didn't do anything about it.
        
       | dlachausse wrote:
       | The Navy uses Xbox controllers in some of their submarines...
       | 
       | https://www.theverge.com/2018/3/18/17136808/us-navy-uss-colo...
        
         | syvanen wrote:
         | Yes, as one way to control cameras on top of masts. Replacing
         | periscopes. Not really a comparable to actually steering the
         | boat. Here's a video from a submarine tour where you can see
         | the Xbox controller in action:
         | https://youtu.be/0StWrXoN8nI?si=Hf5eoGOU-jxDNa2x
         | 
         | (Edit: added link to video)
        
           | meowster wrote:
           | Pretty good video if anyone wants to watch it all the way
           | through, otherwise the Xbox controller part starts at 8:38.
        
       | jmount wrote:
       | I thought one of the narratives was that Nargeolet was a
       | depressed Judas-goat used to bring in the other passengers.
        
       | andrewflnr wrote:
       | There's no new evidence in the article, about the gamepad
       | specifically or anything else as far as I can tell. We've already
       | argued the implications of the gamepad a dozen times over.
       | 
       | > The lawsuit acknowledges the root cause of the implosion may
       | never be known and does not place sole blame on any one factor.
        
       | teruakohatu wrote:
       | With so many other factors that contributed to the implosion in a
       | big way, this detail seems insignificant.
       | 
       | It was a cramped vessel, wireless may have been safer because
       | nobody could yank a cable out, or get twisted up in a cable. It
       | was probably communicating wirelessly over a couple of feet or
       | less in a RF interference free environment.
        
       | kstrauser wrote:
       | If so, I feel bad for Logitech about that. I don't recall them
       | advertising for that use case.
       | 
       | "This part wasn't adequate for the task!" "Well, yeah. Our
       | Submarine Parts division doesn't sell their stuff at Target."
        
       | somat wrote:
       | It keeps being brought up. I suspect as a sort of character
       | assassination technique. Sort of the disaster analysis version of
       | bike-shedding. "well I don't know much about the physics of
       | carbon fiber in high pressure environments, but I know a cheap
       | gamepad when I see one." However, I expect that such a commercial
       | off the shelf gamepad to be probably the most reliable well
       | tested piece of equipment on the sub. it is highly unlikely to go
       | bad and is super easy to carry a spare.
       | 
       | Also no analysis I have seen actually knows how the sub was
       | controlled or bothers to explain how you would do it better than
       | a gamepad. If I had to guess, the motors and ballast controls
       | went into an array of controller boards in a rack somewhere. the
       | control circuity(probably something like i2c or canbus) tied into
       | a central microcontroller. and then a laptop or tablet is used
       | for the human IO(gamepads and screens). There probably was not
       | much redundancy in the system, but I am not sure that is a bad
       | thing, redundancy massively complicates the design and introduces
       | new error conditions. (look into the causes of the US Navy
       | destroyer John S. McCain collision, it was a highly redundant
       | controller system. and the helmsman failed to realize he had no
       | control, it was really a training issue) often it is better to
       | just have the ability for manual control. that is, go back to the
       | rack of motor controllers and manually start twisting knobs and
       | jumping wires. but none of this matters, because it is not what
       | failed.
       | 
       | It cheapens the narrative to go after stupid superficial things
       | like the gamepad, that did not cause or contribute to the fault
       | rather than what actually caused the engineering failure.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-08-11 23:02 UTC)