[HN Gopher] The most cited authors in the Stanford Encyclopedia ...
___________________________________________________________________
The most cited authors in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Author : bbor
Score : 5 points
Date : 2024-08-11 04:03 UTC (18 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (schwitzsplinters.blogspot.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (schwitzsplinters.blogspot.com)
| bbor wrote:
| Fascinating list that I thought yall would enjoy! If you're not
| yet aware, https://plato.stanford.edu is as close to
| "philosophical canon" as it gets in modern American academia.
|
| Shoutout to Godel and Neumann taking top spots despite not really
| being philosophers, at least in how they're remembered.
| Comparatively, I'm honestly shocked that neither Bohr nor
| Heisenberg made the cut, even though there's multiple articles on
| quantum physics... Turing also managed to sneak in under the
| wire, with 33 citations.
|
| The bias inherent in the source is discussed in detail, and I
| would also love to hear HN ideas on how to improve this project,
| and how to visualize the results! I'm not the author, but this is
| right up my alley to say the least, and I'd love to take a crack
| at it.
| defrost wrote:
| > and how to visualize the results!
|
| There's bound to be something to be teased out from who
| referenced whom and when.
|
| Eg: (random example)
| https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graham_Priest had a great many
| students from the 1980s onwards, coinciding with the rise of
| plato.stanford.edu personal computers and the internet.
|
| He's come in at #51 or so likely on the back of a generation of
| philosophy students with technology crossover writing up early
| articles on plato and throwing in a citation to Priest.
|
| I'm in no way implying this is undeserved, just as an example
| of some of the weighting bias coming from the era when many
| plato stub articles originated.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2024-08-11 23:00 UTC)