[HN Gopher] Evidence for ~12-h ultradian gene programs in humans
___________________________________________________________________
Evidence for ~12-h ultradian gene programs in humans
Author : XzetaU8
Score : 65 points
Date : 2024-08-10 12:13 UTC (10 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (www.nature.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (www.nature.com)
| Mistletoe wrote:
| Let me help everyone that doesn't know the word like me.
|
| "Ultradian rhythms are biological cycles that repeat throughout a
| 24-hour day, with periods ranging from fractions of a second to
| several hours. They are different from circadian rhythms, which
| complete one cycle per day, and infradian rhythms, which have
| periods longer than a day."
| markhahn wrote:
| https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultradian_rhythm
|
| in short: cycles faster than a day. ultra- (more, greater),
| -dian (daily). analagous to circadian (cycle per day).
| morsch wrote:
| _Approximately_ per day, more specifically. I never made that
| connection, interesting.
| gnobbler wrote:
| Ultra feels like an awkward way to phrase it. Faster (tachy?)
| might make more sense
| kevin_thibedeau wrote:
| That would mix Greek with Latin.
| shermantanktop wrote:
| I can't hear you, the television is too loud. Now I'm
| going to get into my automobile that I bought with
| cryptocurrency and drive to Minneapolis.
| gnobbler wrote:
| in medicine, we start our frankenwords with 2 mixed
| languages and go up from there
| m463 wrote:
| Pharma goes to infinity (or is it zero?)
| markhahn wrote:
| Always first look at the raw data.
|
| Look at the scatter of the dots in raw expression plots (figure
| 1e dots). Maybe that's normal for this field, but adjacent scores
| are all over the place, usually >50% different. That is: very
| noisy. Imagine the confidence intervals!
|
| Maybe there's signal there, but to my eye, the basic acquisition
| technique is horrifyingly noisy.
|
| This is only a short period and trivial N, but I also don't see
| anything systematic in the raw data related to sleep/wake phases.
| echelon wrote:
| Only three study participants, bucketing expression into 4-hour
| intervals, lots of fancy math to massage the data...
|
| I didn't like this paper.
| ineedaj0b wrote:
| it's certainly a thing. everything has cycles. if it's most
| animals it'll be in humans. similar to how we knew animals
| could grow muscle from stretching, but we thought humans
| didn't.
|
| we now know we can grow muscle from stretching (it's not fun or
| easy) but it is a thing. needed a better study design. i think
| these results are from the last 2-3 years.
|
| this is a small study but was probably done for dirt cheap to
| prove it was somewhat workable. They can acquire better funding
| now to look for other cycles going on
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2024-08-10 23:01 UTC)