[HN Gopher] Urchin Software Corp: The unlikely origin story of G...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Urchin Software Corp: The unlikely origin story of Google Analytics
       (2016)
        
       Author : cpeterso
       Score  : 246 points
       Date   : 2024-08-09 20:32 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (urchin.biz)
 (TXT) w3m dump (urchin.biz)
        
       | holman wrote:
       | I can't really explain how _cool_ Urchin was. I think it was one
       | of the first truly analytical software I used -- not just from a
       | web traffic point of view, but it was a site that used and
       | presented _data_. The graphs, the maps, even the two-column UI
       | was stuff a lot of web developers copied and riffed on back then.
       | It really opened my mind up to a lot of things: design, software
       | as a service (and installable software), even acquisitions in
       | general. Strangely had a large impact on my future career.
        
       | davidwinters wrote:
       | I was so excited to switch from Webtrends to Urchin and back when
       | I still loved Google I was delighted that they bought it out and
       | made it free. Now I wish Google had never touched them.
        
         | PaulStatezny wrote:
         | > Now I wish Google had never touched them.
         | 
         | Would you be willing to elaborate?
        
           | cqqxo4zV46cp wrote:
           | I don't think "Google bad" needs elaboration in 2024.
        
             | jonas21 wrote:
             | Many of the things people think are bad about Google in
             | 2024 (trackers, targeting, slurping up user data, etc) came
             | from Urchin.
        
               | taf2 wrote:
               | The bad IMO originated from double click
        
               | jlarocco wrote:
               | I'm not so sure.
               | 
               | Google already had a reputation for slurping up user
               | data, even in 2008 before they bought DoubleClick. It's a
               | no brainer that a targetted advertising company can
               | target ads better if they have as much information about
               | the users as possible.
               | 
               | In 2008, DoubleClick's over the top, obnoxious
               | advertising (banner ads, punch the monkey, etc.) was
               | slowing down in favor of Google's more discrete
               | advertising and data collection. They may have caught on
               | and turned it around eventually, but Google bought them
               | up first.
        
           | davidwinters wrote:
           | After the switch to Google Analytics the heat map feature was
           | dropped pretty quickly and it was one of the features I
           | really enjoyed. I also think it would have been better for us
           | in the long run to have paid for a service that let us
           | maintain control over our data.
        
             | greenavocado wrote:
             | Yandex Metrica has free heatmap
        
         | fellowniusmonk wrote:
         | Oh man, what a shift moving from webtrends to urchin. Between
         | that and following the regular "google dance" on the
         | webmasterworld forums what a time to be alive.
        
         | egorfine wrote:
         | > Now I wish Google had never touched them.
         | 
         | It is incredible how out of touch with reality GA has become.
         | Nothing is called what it used to be, and not a single straight
         | report with simple familiar figures. Everything is abstracted
         | to the point of it being useless. I am pretty sure I understand
         | what happens with the GA team today [1]
         | 
         | We run self-hosted Matomo for analytics. One of the bonus
         | points, besides actual sane reports is that Matomo can see
         | about ~40% more traffic due to being invisible to blockers
         | while being fully GDPR compliant and providing full privacy for
         | visitors.
         | 
         | [1] https://www.joelonsoftware.com/2001/04/21/dont-let-
         | architect...
        
       | cut3 wrote:
       | I remember switching from some cgi script web counter to urchin
       | and it was incredible the insights it unlocked. Good nostalgia
       | hit.
        
       | rgrieselhuber wrote:
       | Had a chance to meet Brett at the Google offices shortly after
       | the acquisition. Really nice guy, had a lot of good advice about
       | being a founder.
        
       | spydum wrote:
       | Worked at a hosting company in those years.. urchin was the GOAT.
       | we ran it for every customer, and relied on it heavily for
       | billing our customers. It was crazy fast and elegant. Nothing
       | came close
        
       | aeyes wrote:
       | I'm very surprised that they signed up whole ISPs and got away
       | with it.
       | 
       | I wasn't able to process the daily logs of the tracking pixel of
       | the site I was operating on Urchin 5 within 24 hours. I had a
       | beefy server with a 16 drive raid array but the log processing
       | never used multiple cores.
       | 
       | By that time Google had aquired them, support didn't exist
       | because they wanted you to switch to Google Analytics and it was
       | basically 30k down the drain.
        
       | Lammy wrote:
       | > Our first tradeshow ever, circa 1997.
       | 
       | Pardon my one nitpick: the computer in the photo (PowerMac1,1)
       | was introduced 1999-01-05.
        
         | pixelesque wrote:
         | Further backed up by the fact that the photos show "Urchin 3.0"
         | signs, and the article mentions: "In 1999, Brett Crosby, VP of
         | Sales and Marketing, was casting about trying to get Urchin 2.0
         | noticed."
        
       | ot1138 wrote:
       | I loved this retell. Brings back the old days, especially the
       | Google and Yahoo parties of the late 2000's. Those were crazy.
       | They literally carried one of my employees out of a basement rave
       | who had passed out from drinking too much.
        
         | golergka wrote:
         | Somehow, even on the opposite side of the globe software
         | company parties also were not very timid. I spent a whole
         | morning in 2009 in an ambulance and then in hospital with my
         | colleague who passed out in a bar after a full night of
         | drinking.
        
           | _the_inflator wrote:
           | For maybe different reasons or circumstances. Nevertheless
           | cheers, mate.
           | 
           | VC backed passing out was way different and not in the
           | somewhat elitist sense that prevails in Europe.
           | 
           | Play hard, party hard mixed with friendly and open nerd frat
           | house mentality in California is one of a kind compared to
           | then cold and dark winters in Europe. People forget that
           | there is essentially always sun, a huge difference.
           | 
           | Some had a 17:00 party break every weekday, loud music and
           | food 17:00 sharp no exceptions, a phenomenon what became
           | after work parties in Europe, but were more or less barbecue
           | parties for casual idea sharing and bonding.
           | 
           | Catering costs for a month alone would have killed every
           | startup or company in EU.
           | 
           | And then imagine special occasions somewhere else. These
           | people knew how to have a good time - to pass out one way or
           | the other.
           | 
           | Happy times.
        
             | golergka wrote:
             | Europe is big. Some parts get almost as much sun as
             | California, and get hotter in the Summer. And other parts,
             | like Russia, where the described events took place, have
             | deeply ingrained alcohol culture not that far from frat
             | mentality.
        
         | davidcbc wrote:
         | Sounds like something better left in the past
        
       | mkmk wrote:
       | > The UTM, or Urchin Traffic Monitor, was an early method for
       | augmenting Apache (or IIS, etc.) log files with cookies, such
       | that unique visitors could be established.
       | 
       | Of course, "utm" lives on today as a standard prefix for link
       | tracking parameters, even outside of google analytics
        
         | ThinkingGuy wrote:
         | Thanks for that info. I've wondered for years what the meaning
         | of the utf parameter was.
        
           | userbinator wrote:
           | Given its purpose, I always thought it was "user tracking
           | mark" or similar.
        
         | tyingq wrote:
         | Many of them described for GA:
         | https://support.google.com/analytics/answer/10917952
        
       | heraldgeezer wrote:
       | Love reading stories like this! Thank you.
       | 
       | I DO know about Yellow Dog Linux as it was the Linux officially
       | supported on a PS3 console!
        
       | shombaboor wrote:
       | UA to GA4 finally got us to abandon google analytics for cookie
       | free cloudflare completing the cycle
        
         | millipede wrote:
         | UA transition shook me out too. Who breaks backwards
         | compatibility??
        
       | ErikAugust wrote:
       | What about defunct startup shirts? Like, I'd wear that Urchin
       | shirt.
        
         | codetrotter wrote:
         | That sounds like a potential business idea even. Although
         | realistically I guess eBay and Craigslist already has that
         | covered :p
        
       | Dwedit wrote:
       | Oh, that domain I block. I still have no idea what they actually
       | do, but they sound really scary.
        
       | gumby wrote:
       | That picture of their first computer, a sparcstation, brought
       | back memories.
       | 
       | Our first computer at Cygnus was a sparcstation that was actually
       | a "prototype" (probably PVT since it had all the housing etc) for
       | the first sparcstation. I think Andy B had given it to John. It
       | worked fine and lasted for years.
       | 
       | When the author said they'd started the company on a 10K
       | investment I knew they were my kind of people.
        
       | chatmasta wrote:
       | (2016)
       | 
       | (In case anyone else is surprised by the line in the article that
       | the "10th anniversary of the acquisition has recently passed.")
        
       | Terretta wrote:
       | Urchin is not Google advertising's only origin story...
       | 
       | See also "A Brief History of NetGravity":
       | 
       |  _In October 1999, DoubleClick purchased NetGravity in a stock
       | deal valued at $530m. The NetGravity product line is now
       | completely incorporated into the DoubleClick portfolio of
       | advertising management products. The original founders and
       | management team have all left to pursue new opportunities.
       | NetGravity, having helped to create the multi-billion dollar
       | internet advertising market, has essentially ceased to exist._
       | 
       | -- https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41206733
       | 
       |  _DoubleClick rebranded NetGravity AdServer as DART Enterprise...
       | On March 11, 2008, Google acquired DoubleClick for $3.1 billion.
       | In June 2018, Google announced plans to rebrand its ads
       | platforms, and DoubleClick was merged into the new Google
       | Marketing Platform brand._
       | 
       | -- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DoubleClick
        
         | jsjohnst wrote:
         | > Urchin is not Google advertising's only origin story...
         | 
         | Further because that leaves out the Overture / Inktomi part of
         | Google's revenue origin story...
        
           | ec109685 wrote:
           | Yahoo bought them.
        
             | jsjohnst wrote:
             | Sure, but what did Yahoo also do? They settled the patent
             | suit that was jeopardizing Google's IPO. What were those
             | terms? Find out and learn a fascinating part of Google's
             | history.
        
               | cj wrote:
               | Spoiler alert: Google agreed to give yahoo $300m worth of
               | Google IPO shares.
        
         | sureIy wrote:
         | This was the most consequential purchase, it's the one product
         | Google will never sunset because it _is_ Google.
        
       | dang wrote:
       | Discussed at the time (of the article):
       | 
       |  _The origin story of Google Analytics_ -
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12986649 - Nov 2016 (53
       | comments)
        
       | iJohnDoe wrote:
       | I think a lot of people forget some of the other Google origin
       | stories.
       | 
       | Android was a company Google acquired.
        
       | sebastiennight wrote:
       | Urchin analytics (which, IIRC, were provided to us by our host
       | OVH for free at the time) is what taught me what I would still
       | call Rule #1 of being a webmaster:
       | 
       | > Tracking your analytics makes traffic grow. Refreshing your
       | analytics makes traffic stall.
        
         | stingraycharles wrote:
         | Could you elaborate on that? The meaning of "makes traffic
         | stall" is lost on me, unless you simply mean "don't obsess over
         | it, just look at long-term trends".
        
           | sebastiennight wrote:
           | Because humans like to see lines go up to the right, there's
           | a weird Gaussian curve where
           | 
           | - never checking your analytics means you're probably going
           | to stagnate forever,
           | 
           | - checking them at a fixed frequency means you're going to
           | look at what's worked and work hard to keep it going, so
           | traffic grows,
           | 
           | - checking them at every time of the hour (I was at my worst
           | when I switched from Urchin to Xiti client-side analytics in
           | '06) means you're switching back to a passive almost-
           | superstitious wait for the number to move, which is both
           | frustrating and extremely ineffective.
           | 
           | I've been there and done all 3, and as CEO of a startup[0] I
           | find it's my job to do my best to stay in the middle :)
           | 
           | [0] https://onetake.ai
        
       | randomgiy3142 wrote:
       | So have a good idea, be lucky and smart, and most importantly
       | come from really rich families because floating 2.8million
       | through two (!!?) crashes on an obvious now technology but log
       | processing in the early 2000s is like describing how to win
       | powerball.
        
         | AlbertCory wrote:
         | what's the obvious new technology right now, and why aren't you
         | doing it?
        
       | sskates wrote:
       | Wow- a lot of similarity to what's important with analytics
       | today! Depth of analytics and speed of queries were their key
       | competitive differentiators. Those are still ones we hammer at
       | Amplitude. Also individual visitor history drill-down (we call it
       | user timelines) is one of the most used features in Amplitude
       | today.
       | 
       | I have a huge amount of respect for the Urchin team. They had to
       | figure out everything for the first time on their own with
       | nothing to go off of while going after a much smaller and earlier
       | market.
        
       | AlbertCory wrote:
       | Personal story: in 2006 in Google Enterprise, we had many, many
       | meetings with the GA team, the goal being a private, inside-the-
       | firewall box that would run GA, using our Google Search Appliance
       | hardware.
       | 
       | This never came to anything.
        
         | k__ wrote:
         | In 2006, I worked for a company that built exactly that: A web
         | analytics engine that ran behind the firewall. It would rely on
         | a reverse proxy and not on cookies or pixels, so it couldn't be
         | blocked.
         | 
         | They even had some of the biggest sites in Europe as customers.
         | 
         | However, the company never turned a profit and after going
         | through the hands of a few investors, they closed shop.
        
           | AlbertCory wrote:
           | Yeah, "inside the firewall" declined as a marketing pitch
           | pretty quickly.
        
             | dylan604 wrote:
             | Security over convenience is also something that declined
             | pretty quickly as well followed quickly by the concept of
             | privacy in exchange for convenience.
             | 
             | With what we know about how/why/where the use of those
             | analytics are used back then, would we make the same
             | decisions if it was a choice today?
        
       | jeffnappi wrote:
       | We were Urchin users prior to the acquisition and were also
       | Google AdWords customers...
       | 
       | I remember being shocked at the idea of putting Google's
       | JavaScript in our secure e-commerce site. We wanted to pay as
       | little as possible for traffic and were mining the long tail of
       | keywords. We certainly did not want AdWords to know what our
       | economics were.
       | 
       | Ultimately AdWords evolved into a very efficient system that
       | groups similar keywords and takes as much margin as the
       | advertisers can handle. The golden days of a level playing field
       | in ppc advertising were over and Google won the game :)
        
       | morning-coffee wrote:
       | Hmm. So this is the ancestor of stuff I block with my pihole now?
        
       | tgtweak wrote:
       | The fact ga4 doesn't even do what urchin did back when Google
       | bought it tells you everything you need to know about how great
       | this software (and company) truly was.
        
         | kristianp wrote:
         | It doesn't necessarily show that Urchin was great, it is an
         | example of the dumbing down of software that happens these
         | days.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-08-10 23:01 UTC)