[HN Gopher] The non-Riemannian nature of perceptual color space ...
___________________________________________________________________
The non-Riemannian nature of perceptual color space (2022)
Author : cpach
Score : 23 points
Date : 2024-07-31 08:45 UTC (2 days ago)
(HTM) web link (www.pnas.org)
(TXT) w3m dump (www.pnas.org)
| bbor wrote:
| The paper in PDF:
| https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.2119753119?downloa...
| there's a lot of math symbols but IMO the usage is pretty
| straightforward for anyone familiar with linear algebra and
| proofs. Ramsay (30) suggests that the principle
| of diminishing returns or its opposite may have been spuriously
| identified by otherresearchers (daringly including his PhD
| advisor, Helm) because of experimental procedures (successive
| intervals, paired compar-isons) ill suited to the task. Indeed,
| open-ended and criterion-dependent tasks give less accurate
| measures of similarity because of individual factors and the
| difficulty of the task... Instead, we use a more reliable
| two-alternative forced choice (2AFC) task, where the participant
| simply answers the following question: "Which is more different?"
| Specifically, we use a triad arrangement of stimuli with the
| reference in the middle and one test on either side. Each of 320
| triads covering the neutral axis was judged by at least 250
| different participants in a crowdsourced study on Amazon
| Mechanical Turk (MTurk) (52).*
|
| The core of it seems strong, IMO. I would have liked a bit more
| cognitive science / philosophy to distinguish between an ideal
| color space and whatever imperfect model is created by individual
| human's neural software, and skipping Goethe and Schopenhauer in
| the intro was downright criminal, but that's more on me than
| them.
|
| Color has long been a convenient "entry point" into the study of
| human unconscious and subconscious data transformations, most
| notably through Wittgenstein's musings about red squares. I look
| forward to this technique being extended to other spaces, even
| ones as abstract as "moral space" or "valence space"!
| piannucci wrote:
| I love the drama of how the abstract is written, but TBH I don't
| think this is a surprise. I believe it's well-known among color
| theorists that large perceptual distances are inconsistent with
| sums of small differences. So maybe the most generous thing to
| say here is, good on them for bringing awareness of this subtlety
| to a broader audience.
| jimsimmons wrote:
| Is it non Riemann or non Eucliden
| OvbiousError wrote:
| Both
| Sniffnoy wrote:
| While this phrases things in terms of Riemannian geometry, it
| seems to me like this is really about more fundamental metric
| properties, but I find its terminology a bit unclear. Would it be
| correct to summarize this as saying is that color space is not a
| length space / geodesic space? (See e.g.
| https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intrinsic_metric )
|
| (Yes "length space" (or "path space") and "geodesic space" are
| not exactly the same thing, but "length space but not geodesic
| space" doesn't exactly seem like a very likely possibility.)
| ucarion wrote:
| > Consequently, we need to adapt how we model color differences,
| as the current standard, DE, recognized by the International
| Commission for Weights and Measures, does not account for
| diminishing returns in color difference perception.
|
| This isn't to reduce the notability of the article, but isn't
| BIPM's interest in any color-perception stuff basically limited
| to making lightbulbs roughly equally bright? (i.e.
| https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luminous_efficiency_function) I
| guess I don't see how even nonlinearity in perceptual space
| matters for that purpose.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2024-08-02 23:00 UTC)