[HN Gopher] Maglev titanium heart inside the chest of a live pat...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Maglev titanium heart inside the chest of a live patient
        
       Author : thunderbong
       Score  : 126 points
       Date   : 2024-07-26 17:51 UTC (2 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (newatlas.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (newatlas.com)
        
       | Jyaif wrote:
       | > the titanium heart is only meant to keep a patient alive while
       | they wait for a heart transplant, which has always been the goal
       | of fully mechanical heart development at this stage of the game.
       | 
       | Why are we not aiming higher?
        
         | nightfly wrote:
         | Because we can barely get a temporary one working now. I'm sure
         | they'd love to be able to make a permanent one, it's just not
         | in the cards yet.
        
         | WJW wrote:
         | Same reason as why we're not developing starships to go to the
         | other side of the Milky way at the moment: We don't know how to
         | and the leap from "what we can do right now" (ie we struggle to
         | get people to the moon permanently) and "other side of the
         | galaxy" is simply too big.
        
         | didgeoridoo wrote:
         | This article does a good job of outlining the challenges faced:
         | https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20230217-the-61-year-long...
         | 
         | From the outside, it looks like a race between figuring out the
         | biocompatibility and power issues for total artificial hearts
         | vs. figuring out the immunological issues for xenografts (pig
         | hearts, mostly).
         | 
         | If I had to put money on it, I'd bet that the xenografts win.
         | It doesn't seem like we've made huge strides toward solving the
         | power and durability requirements of total artificial hearts,
         | while immunology advances are happening rapidly. Exciting
         | times, nonetheless.
        
           | iancmceachern wrote:
           | Totally, I've been following that space closely as well.
           | 
           | Amazing times indeed, we are seeing xenografts and artificial
           | organs in use.
        
           | TaylorAlexander wrote:
           | Would be nice if a pig didn't have to die to save a human
           | though. This is not something everyone cares about but some
           | people (like me) do care. Hopefully some day we can advance
           | the technology enough with artificial solutions.
        
             | didgeoridoo wrote:
             | This is honestly a pretty niche concern. Even most
             | religions that strictly forbid eating pork make an
             | exception if a human's life is at stake.
             | 
             | Your best bet would probably be in advocating for the pigs
             | to be engineered to prevent cortical development, ensuring
             | they don't become anything beyond twitching, unconscious
             | organ bags. In many ways I think people would find this
             | more disturbing, though.
        
               | gregoryl wrote:
               | Something like 6% to 10% of the population is vegan, a
               | bit more than niche!
        
               | HPsquared wrote:
               | That sounds high. Are we talking about India here?
        
               | JumpCrisscross wrote:
               | > _That sounds high. Are we talking about India here?_
               | 
               | It sounds high even for India. About 40% of Indians are
               | vegetarian, a third if we exclude those who eat eggs [1].
               | The part of the country where vegetarianism is most
               | rampant, the North, is also the highest dairy-consuming
               | part of the country [2].
               | 
               | In any case, while medical veganism is something to think
               | about, it's not worth prioritising until after we have
               | reliable artificial organs.
               | 
               | [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vegetarianism_by_countr
               | y#India
               | 
               | [2] https://theprint.in/pageturner/excerpt/there-is-a-
               | scientific...
        
               | bluescrn wrote:
               | It kind of feels like activists have been trying to erase
               | the concept of vegetarianism/pescatarianism in recent
               | years while pushing full-on veganism.
               | 
               | That's probably not a good move if we want to achieve a
               | pragmatic reduction in meat consumption to help reduce
               | related CO2 emissions. A smaller step is a much easier
               | sell.
        
               | TaylorAlexander wrote:
               | My sincerest hope is that eating animals becomes less
               | popular over the next hundred years such that killing
               | them for medical needs becomes less acceptable.
        
             | toomuchtodo wrote:
             | Growing a human heart from scratch sounds like the ultimate
             | bioengineering X prize.
             | 
             | https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/news/2023/mini-hearts-dish-big-
             | win...
             | 
             | https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-25329-5
             | 
             | https://news.stanford.edu/stories/2022/03/building-heart-
             | one...
        
             | fuzzfactor wrote:
             | >Would be nice if a pig didn't have to die
             | 
             | Something a bacon lover never said ever . . .
        
               | TaylorAlexander wrote:
               | tbh I bet plenty of bacon lovers feel bad that a sweet
               | intelligent animal dies to make their meal, and if a
               | perfect copy of bacon could be made without it I bet a
               | good number of them would be happy to switch to it.
        
               | fuzzfactor wrote:
               | This does seem like a more "palatable" alternative and
               | there should be excellent opportunity for the lab-grown
               | pork to have a place on the table. Would seem less cruel
               | to a lot of people I would think.
        
               | brnt wrote:
               | This bacon lover has seen how pigs are treated in
               | industrial facilities and has lost all appetite. I rarely
               | buy it, from a local place whose pigs are slaughtered not
               | by low wage people in a dark slaughterhouse that must
               | meet quotas and have very disturbing ideas of fun.
        
               | fuzzfactor wrote:
               | I do know what you mean.
               | 
               | I was raised as a pork lover but did stop as a teenager
               | on my own a couple years before I quit beef. I think that
               | did have a positive effect on my young health in the
               | interim, but eventually everything was replaced by more
               | comprehensive plant-based alternatives.
               | 
               | Still love the smell of bacon though.
        
         | tomcam wrote:
         | > Why are we not aiming higher?
         | 
         | We've been aiming higher explicitly for at 70+ years
         | (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_heart). I've been
         | following it for 50. Artificial hearts were 5 years away since
         | at least 1972 or so when I first learned about this field. The
         | problems (mechanical, surgical, electrical, biological) are
         | endless and it's an astoundingly hostile environment for
         | machinery. We have enough problems getting pacemakers to work
         | without severe problems.
        
         | Leynos wrote:
         | The Abiocor device always fascinated me.
         | 
         | It was developed with long-term implantation in mind. You can
         | read about it here:
         | https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/medicine-and-dentistry/...
         | 
         | The use of inductive power transfer meant that no transdermal
         | cabling was needed.
         | 
         | Sadly, it sounds like for various reasons the dream was not
         | achievable at the time.
        
           | iancmceachern wrote:
           | I know people who worked on that, I've held one in my hand.
           | 
           | It was not designed with long term implantation in mind.
           | 
           | It was designed to get funding and keep the company alive.
           | The device itself was very crude, not statenof the art at the
           | time, and much of it was hand dip-molded with basic
           | materials. It was a hand made research device that in all
           | reality would have never been expected to be reliable and
           | long lasting.
           | 
           | The Bivacor, Heartmate III, these things are in a different
           | class.
        
         | iancmceachern wrote:
         | The human heart is magical. They've been aiming higher since
         | the 60s and this device is also aiming higher, but this is the
         | stepping stone to that.
        
         | enthulhusiastic wrote:
         | Because our bodies are already peak technology.
         | 
         | I think the 6-million-dollar man thing is a weird goal.
         | 
         | Better to regrow, implant, perhaps supplement.
         | 
         | Full-on replacement isn't just a "when" but a "why" and a "how
         | do you expect to do better than evolution".
         | 
         | Titanium is cool! That doesn't make it better than muscle.
         | 
         | Go for a run if you want a better heart
        
           | perihelions wrote:
           | - _" how do you expect to do better than evolution"_
           | 
           | Because our goal is aligned with our actual problem (survival
           | of individual human beings), as opposed to the merely
           | partially-aligned goal of "statistical survival up to
           | reproduction age"? Natural evolution is an unaligned AI, in a
           | sense: powerful, but not helpful.
           | 
           | Eventually humanity will defeat this problem, and we won't
           | even need computational parity with natural evolution to do
           | that. Most of that computation is wasted.
        
           | Dylan16807 wrote:
           | It's really easy to come up with a better plan than evolution
           | for lots of things.
           | 
           | If our bodies were peak, we wouldn't need to use hundred(s)
           | of hours of exercise per year to force muscular and
           | cardiovascular improvements, it would just happen. Muscles
           | wouldn't shrink away in an aggressive attempt to conserve
           | calories, especially not regardless of BMI.
        
             | bamboozled wrote:
             | _If our bodies were peak, we wouldn 't need to use
             | hundred(s) of hours of exercise per year to force muscular
             | and cardiovascular improvements, it would just happen._
             | 
             | Then what would be the point of living if you had nothing
             | to do but wait for updates? How boring.
             | 
             | Even a self-improving machine is spending time, not
             | exercising but "designing a better version of itself".
             | Which is an "exercise".
             | 
             | I hate to say this but I think your comment misunderstands
             | the beauty of life and the challenge behind the struggle to
             | improve. It is a blessed journey.
             | 
             | I personally think being fallable and not having full
             | control of my destiny, while scary, is a feature and not a
             | bug. It seems to make existence exciting.
        
               | Dylan16807 wrote:
               | > nothing to do
               | 
               | > Which is an "exercise".
               | 
               | You're arguing against a strawman. I'm not complaining
               | about working for self-improvement, I'm complaining about
               | how muscles shrink away so rapidly when not in use. Look
               | at what happens when people are bedridden for a few
               | weeks, that is not good design!
               | 
               | And I'm not saying people should automatically look like
               | body builders, I'm saying the baseline should be a
               | healthy level.
        
               | elcritch wrote:
               | I'm pro genetic modifications for these sort of (slight)
               | changes. We live in entirely different environments and
               | our baselines to be healthy makes sense to me. Of course
               | the next step always seems to be "make superhuman
               | soldiers" or "designer babies".
        
         | bawolff wrote:
         | You first must crawl before you can run.
        
         | fuzzfactor wrote:
         | Listen to what Dr. Cohn says in the clip:
         | 
         | https://abc13.com/post/artificial-heart-procedure-performed-...
         | 
         | >Why are we not aiming higher?
         | 
         | The final trajectory is not fully known but it looks like they
         | have been preparing for a moon shot from the beginning anyway.
         | 
         | You've got to get there from here.
         | 
         | The higher the integrity, the more you under-promise and over-
         | deliver :)
         | 
         | not my downvote btw, corrective upvote to compensate
        
         | _qua wrote:
         | That white hose you see coming off the back of it is the drive
         | line which passes out the chest and connects to an external
         | battery. It's not a normal life with one of these in place, a
         | heart transplant would be vastly preferable.
        
           | billfruit wrote:
           | Is it not possible to avoid the cable passing through the
           | chest, by using induction to pass currents between circuits
           | inside and outside the body?
        
       | nickburns wrote:
       | dupe:
       | 
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41086952
        
         | dang wrote:
         | Looks like that one was posted later* so we'll merge that
         | thread hither. Thanks!
         | 
         | * (you can tell from the item IDs)
        
           | nickburns wrote:
           | ah. was confused by the timestamping on my end (i.e. 41080654
           | shows just '2 hours ago' and 41086952 shows '7 hours ago').
           | must be some other inner-workings. but thanks for pointing
           | out IDs to me for future reference.
        
             | dang wrote:
             | That's an artifact of HN's re-upping system. The system is
             | described at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26998308
             | and links back from there. About the timestamps, there are
             | past explanations here: https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=a
             | ll&page=0&prefix=true&que.... I hope that will make sense!
        
       | ajb wrote:
       | Wonder how the join the arteries to it. Any pressure seems likely
       | to kill biological tissue, and while it might grow on, presumably
       | that would take a while. Maybe some kind of glue?
        
         | iancmceachern wrote:
         | They have what they call sewing cuffs attached to short
         | arterial and venous grafts which you can get already for
         | surgical repair of blood vessels. The sewing cuffs are
         | essentially little cuffs made from polyester velour and
         | silicone and then the surgeon sews through the flanges on the
         | cuffs to anastomose to the blood vessels.
         | 
         | Here is a paper that talks about it for LVADs, which are
         | similar but different
         | 
         | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10047-022-01350-3
        
         | floam wrote:
         | The BiVACOR titanium artificial heart is sutured to the
         | arteries, not glued. Surgeons use biocompatible synthetic graft
         | materials (like Dacron or ePTFE) to connect the arteries to the
         | device.
        
           | iancmceachern wrote:
           | Sometimes they use bioglue to cover up mistakes in their
           | sewing, they're not supposed to, and you certainly can't do
           | things like put bioglue all around the circumference, but my
           | understanding is that it's used for touch up here and there.
        
             | floam wrote:
             | That's interesting, thank you for the gentle correction and
             | illuminating that caveat. I just shouldn't make assertions
             | about topics I have no background with when I know I just
             | read about this on Google Scholar right before commenting.
             | I'm basically confidently faking it like ChatGPT.
             | 
             | "ah they stitch it to this neat synthetic graft stuff
             | therefore glue couldn't/wouldn't be used": wrong.
        
               | alecst wrote:
               | Wow. I really appreciate the humility and candor shown by
               | you in response to being corrected. I'm genuinely
               | impressed.
        
       | perihelions wrote:
       | - _"...active control system... "_
       | 
       | https://spectrum.ieee.org/this-maglev-heart-could-keep-cardi...
       | 
       | That's some high-stakes software programming!
       | 
       | Passively-stable magnetic levitation is possible with diamagnetic
       | materials (notably including superconductors), but those probably
       | don't meet the requirements of this project.
       | 
       | - _" This positional control system works as follows: Tiny
       | contactless sensors send out magnetic fields that interact with
       | the rotor, determining its exact location many times per second.
       | If the rotor is moving in one direction or another, the control
       | system puts electrical energy into electromagnetic coils within
       | several actuators, causing them to cancel out that movement."_
        
         | elromulous wrote:
         | Yes, but not as high-stakes as an autopilot in a commercial
         | aircraft!
        
           | argiopetech wrote:
           | Perhaps, but there are a pilot and first officer to take over
           | if the autopilot goes out. You better be in the OR if your
           | titanium heart tries to kill you...
        
           | iancmceachern wrote:
           | Exactly. And systems for commercial aircraft are actually
           | designed (by law) to be dual fault tolerant. This means that
           | all safety critical systems on an airliner need to have 3
           | filly redundant, independent systems and each needs to be
           | able to function without the other two.
           | 
           | In even class III (implantable and safety critical meaning
           | the patient is harmed or killed if they fail) medical devices
           | are only required to be single fault tolerant.
        
         | haswell wrote:
         | This writeup is significantly better than the OP link. Should
         | probably be the article of record.
         | 
         | The section on constant flow vs. variable flow to simulate a
         | heartbeat got me thinking about how weird it would feel to have
         | no pulse, or what it'd be like to experience a moment of
         | excitement/adrenaline without the accompanied pounding in my
         | chest.
        
         | JumpCrisscross wrote:
         | What are the consequences of a rotor "crash"?
        
       | yumraj wrote:
       | This gives a new meaning to _heavy heart_
        
       | low_tech_punk wrote:
       | It's cool and spooky that the patient will no longer have heart
       | beat, because the rotor will deliver continuous blood flow.
        
         | JoshTriplett wrote:
         | I've read a number of reports about that. Apparently it's a
         | little unnerving at first, but the biggest problem is that they
         | have to make sure that any medical professionals or people they
         | know are aware that they don't have a heartbeat and _that 's
         | expected and does not mean they need CPR_.
         | 
         | Also, there's a long-term question of whether there are any
         | processes within the body are keyed off of the heartbeat,
         | because biological designs are often spaghetti and take full
         | advantage of any random interaction and make it load-bearing.
        
           | LelouBil wrote:
           | The workings of our bodies are just the xkcd "holding
           | spacebar makes the computer overheat" on a giant scale.
        
             | mystified5016 wrote:
             | The regulation of any individual process in the body is a
             | rube goldbergian nightmare of hormones and
             | neurotransmitters and things that _just happen_ to fire
             | under the right conditions.
             | 
             | I have absolutely no doubt that _something_ in the body
             | relies on a periodic heartbeat in some fashion, but it
             | seems so far to not be anything particularly critical.
        
               | loa_in_ wrote:
               | Probably passive lymph pumping in organs that aren't
               | muscular
        
               | TeMPOraL wrote:
               | Agreed. Hell, it wouldn't surprise me if some part of
               | human neurology used heartbeat as a clock signal
               | (particularly aspects that would benefit from speeding up
               | in same situations the heart does).
        
           | tangjurine wrote:
           | Ah, so like my codebase
        
           | oooyay wrote:
           | I have a heart abnormality that shows up as an inverted
           | T-wave on an echo cardiogram. Some physicians will
           | immediately think I'm having some sort of heart attack,
           | though I display no symptoms. It's actually that my heart
           | fills fully and empties fully in a single cycle. I'm not a
           | medical professional, so all I have are laymans explanations,
           | but what it means is that my heart beats less frequently but
           | stronger than the average heart. It was documented thoroughly
           | throughout my time in the Marines and a cardiologist
           | suggested it wasn't a defect. My heart rate remains much
           | lower than other peoples when under stress and my heart rate
           | at rest is only slightly lower than an average persons. When
           | I asked him what all that meant he suggested that I probably
           | won't die of anything heart related, but my body is otherwise
           | normal.
        
             | bluesroo wrote:
             | If you don't mind me asking, what is your blood pressure
             | with this abnormality? My gut feeling would be that it you
             | have a much larger gap between your systolic and diastolic
             | numbers than average?
        
           | hnburnsy wrote:
           | Get that tattooed on the chest.
        
         | dtgriscom wrote:
         | I wouldn't be surprised if the lack of pressure fluctuations
         | would cause harm in the long run (although this isn't meant for
         | the long run).
         | 
         | Hearts have been beating for a very, very long time, and I'm
         | sure other biological structures have taken advantage of that.
        
           | HPsquared wrote:
           | I wonder if they prescribe something like walking or jogging
           | as a substitute "repetitive movement" to get things moving.
        
           | iancmceachern wrote:
           | This is a whole thing. Look up "pump head". Also check out:
           | 
           | https://ventriflo.com/
        
           | jnurmine wrote:
           | As I've understood it, not having a pulse creates all kinds
           | of problems, blood clots and whatnot. It's simply not good
           | for the blood, nor the blood flow. The body isn't made for
           | it.
           | 
           | Pulsatile flow doesn't have such issues, so a Swedish company
           | called Real Heart is making a TAH that pulses like a heart.
           | 
           | So far they've done successful tests with sheep and tons of
           | testing of various blood parameters which look way better
           | than traditional continuous-flow TAHs. Clinical trials on
           | humans should be coming up relatively soon.
           | 
           | I hope they make it, and can improve it and make it smaller
           | to fit children etc. It's pretty interesting technology.
        
             | alan-hn wrote:
             | Here is one from Carmat that is already in use in Europe
             | 
             | https://www.carmatsa.com/en/our_product/
        
             | rediguanayum wrote:
             | Here's a video where Bivacor is working on making their
             | impeller design simulate a pulse:
             | https://youtu.be/3uV8XZcIBbk?si=I9Gf6pEd9v71Q7JJ. Also has
             | nice interview with the inventor/founder Daniel Timms where
             | he talks about the motivation for doing this companany i.e.
             | when his dad got heart failure.
        
         | haswell wrote:
         | > _Such a pump has no valves, so a patient using the Bivacor
         | heart in its most basic mode would have no pulse. But we
         | recently adapted our device to give it a pulsatile outflow
         | option._
         | 
         | > _The pump can run at constant speed, producing continuous
         | blood flow at a constant pressure, and in our early experiments
         | we concentrated on testing this "pulseless" mode. But it's easy
         | to change its speed, and our later experiments proved that
         | controlled speed changes could produce a wide range of flow and
         | pressure characteristics. Running the pump first at high speed
         | (sending out more blood) and then at low speed (sending out
         | less) creates something resembling a biological heart's pulse;
         | rapidly alternating these two speeds creates something that
         | looks like a normal heartbeat._
         | 
         | > _We're now working primarily in that pulsatile mode. Within
         | cardiology, there's an open debate about whether a pulse is
         | necessary for good health..._ [0]
         | 
         | The ieee.org article has significantly more detail and is a
         | fascinating read.
         | 
         | - [0] https://spectrum.ieee.org/this-maglev-heart-could-keep-
         | cardi...
        
         | _qua wrote:
         | The lack of pulsatile flow is associated with formation of AV
         | malformations in the colon which can cause GI bleeding which is
         | a more than a little problem when you have a piece of hardware
         | in your chest which requires you take anticoagulants.
        
         | guidedlight wrote:
         | Soon after the procedure a donor organ became available, so
         | they no longer have the artificial heart.
        
       | aussieguy1234 wrote:
       | If you live long enough, everyone's heart will give out
       | eventually. With a sufficiently advanced artificial one, maybe
       | not?
        
       | JumpCrisscross wrote:
       | This video helped me understand what's going on:
       | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HAajHSmplpA
        
         | MOARDONGZPLZ wrote:
         | Really disappointed comments are turned off on this video.
        
       | donaldcuckman wrote:
       | So this is actually something I've worked on for 3ish years. Not
       | this project but a similar BiVAD. Pictured is a dual centrifugal
       | pump. The actual impeller is probably 20mm in diameter. The
       | maglev/ pump portion is most likely a slice motor topology. Which
       | is passively stable axially.
        
       | _qua wrote:
       | This is not the first cardiac support device using maglev
       | technology. Some LVAD devices and Impella pumps also use maglev.
        
       | ranger_danger wrote:
       | Zip-ties: FDA certified to keep your heart running smoothly. /s
        
         | fuzzfactor wrote:
         | And the arteries of your circulatory system well organized as
         | you bundle your ethernet wires :)
        
       | 8f2ab37a-ed6c wrote:
       | Genuinely glad we're slowly approaching Syndicate-level body
       | mods, this can't come soon enough.
        
       | bumbledraven wrote:
       | https://bivacor.com/
        
       | userbinator wrote:
       | Maybe this is the first time this technology has been used in an
       | artificial heart, but "maglev" pumps are not new --- they've been
       | around for at least a few decades. It's known as "wet rotor
       | bearingless" in existing literature, and they are found in
       | numerous white goods such as dishwashers, washing machines, HVAC
       | systems, as well as aquariums and computer water cooling. Usually
       | the drive electronics are the failure point.
       | 
       | Here's an article from 2002 about this type of pump:
       | http://www.mech.ibaraki.ac.jp/~ismb8/pocpdf/0001.pdf
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-07-28 23:08 UTC)