[HN Gopher] Skip and Arc'teryx built a futuristic exoskeleton
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Skip and Arc'teryx built a futuristic exoskeleton
        
       Author : coderintherye
       Score  : 97 points
       Date   : 2024-07-26 16:44 UTC (6 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.fastcompany.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.fastcompany.com)
        
       | whywhywhywhy wrote:
       | https://archive.is/iKGjx
        
       | 0xcafefood wrote:
       | This is actually really cool. A device that will help take strain
       | off people's legs while recovering from an injury, or let people
       | stay active longer in life or longer throughout the day could
       | have a huge impact on society, if they can bring it to market at
       | a price affordable enough for many people to have one.
        
         | jeltz wrote:
         | Both for good and bad. For a leg to heal properly you need to
         | put the right amount of strain on it. Not too little and not
         | too much.
        
           | datameta wrote:
           | Likewise joints that are repairing need to be utilized just
           | enough so that blood and lymph circulation can bring
           | nutrients and repair materials while carrying away by-
           | products of repair thereby not letting it concentrate through
           | sedentariness.
        
           | ghostpepper wrote:
           | Maybe the robot-joint could be used as rehab to automatically
           | put progressively more weight on the leg as it heals
        
             | orbital-decay wrote:
             | This makes me think about a e-bike with a control
             | system/transmission that helps you maintain constant output
             | power for a workout, applying resistance or assistance as
             | needed.
        
       | TestingWithEdd wrote:
       | $4500 now, so we could see alternatives on the market by 2030
       | around the $500 mark (fingers crossed)
        
         | twalla wrote:
         | If you frame this in the context of existing outdoor recreation
         | equipment like skis and mountain bikes and then factor in
         | something like FSA/HSA eligibility this is more attainable than
         | I was initially expecting.
        
           | charlie0 wrote:
           | What does HSA/FSA have to do with mountain bikes? Are they
           | eligible?
        
             | mikestew wrote:
             | Generally speaking, exercise equipment is not eligible.
             | However, one can get a "letter of necessity" from a doctor.
             | I have no idea how hard that would be.
             | 
             | But I believe GP's point was that _if_ such a thing became
             | eligible for HSA purchase, it would make it much more
             | attainable.
        
         | sitkack wrote:
         | Depending on how much fitment it requires, would be great for a
         | rental. This isn't something that folks that need it for hiking
         | would be using all the time.
        
       | twalla wrote:
       | Not sure why this in particular does it for me but the thought
       | that in my old age I'll be able to continue enjoying the outdoors
       | with an Arc'Teryx branded exoskeleton that they might sell next
       | to the hiking poles at REI really gives off some "holy crap I'm
       | living in the future" energy.
        
         | milleramp wrote:
         | Just rode demo e-mtn bike, it was amazing. Not ready to make
         | the switch just yet, but for people whose choice is doing
         | nothing or using these assistants it's great.
        
           | stronglikedan wrote:
           | When you're ready to make the switch, I recommend converting
           | your own with a Bafang mid-drive to avoid vendor lock-in. A
           | lot of LBS's won't even touch pre-builts, and if you work on
           | your own bike you can work on a conversion just as easily.
        
       | RandallBrown wrote:
       | I wonder what the battery life is like.
       | 
       | Things like this will be awesome to get people out hiking more,
       | but it could also get people into some trouble if it dies and
       | they're too far away to make it out on their own.
        
       | bwanab wrote:
       | I'm in my 70s with two knees that have experienced the ravages of
       | too much tennis and running. This looks like a godsend if it
       | works!
        
         | apwell23 wrote:
         | curious have you tried compression pants with wires in them
         | like stoko.
        
           | bwanab wrote:
           | No, but looks interesting. Thanks for the pointer.
        
       | ray__ wrote:
       | Looking forward to walking to the corner store in my Arc'teryx x
       | Kith exoskeleton. Jokes aside, this is really cool. I hope I
       | won't need one for a while, and look forward to the engineering
       | improvements when I do need one.
        
       | mhb wrote:
       | No video?
        
         | islaydog wrote:
         | there's a video on their instragram and linkedin posts, but
         | weird to not link the article
         | https://www.instagram.com/reel/C93Nec8MTH0/?igsh=MzRlODBiNWF...
         | https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7222666...
        
       | user568439 wrote:
       | A bit offtopic but does anyone know of an exoskeleton that offers
       | full body support? My wife has Long Covid and she can walk 1 km
       | at a very slow pace but further than that she must use a
       | wheelchair.
       | 
       | I would love to find an exoskeleton for her but it has to be
       | comfortable and able to support her back and neck since she can't
       | cope with her own body standing for very long. I would be willing
       | to spend a significant amount if it makes her life better.
        
         | apwell23 wrote:
         | Not quite what you are looking for but I use stoko for skiing
         | 
         | https://stoko.com/
        
       | 082349872349872 wrote:
       | dual-use: allows your able-bodied infantry to carry even more (at
       | least if part of that weight is comprised of sufficient
       | batteries?)
        
         | jandrese wrote:
         | This seems like more of an edge case to me. You still have to
         | hold the weight with your arms (even if assisted) and balance
         | your center of mass. There is only a narrow range between where
         | an able person doesn't really need the help and where the
         | pallet jack/fork lift is a better solution. This is especially
         | true when you consider what happens if you drop the item in
         | question. There are certainly cases where a solution like this
         | is perfect, but I think they'll be rather niche.
        
         | maxglute wrote:
         | Then you'd want a hip/back structures to help alleviate load
         | which also helps with lugging around more batteries.
        
       | apwell23 wrote:
       | > I have zero doubt that mini exoskeletons like MO/GO will soon
       | be an essential part of our lives
       | 
       | high praise for something with no video :/
        
       | NN88 wrote:
       | Military.
        
       | A_D_E_P_T wrote:
       | Interesting that Arc'Teryx is owned by Chinese conglomerate Anta
       | Sports, yet chooses to partner with an American firm on this.
       | It's interesting because China is way ahead in this particular
       | field, and already dominates in civilian exoskeleton production.
       | 
       | This sort of Chinese product is starting to find its way to the
       | West: https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/hypershell/one-
       | horsepow...
       | 
       | ...But there are a dozen firms in China that make similar
       | products that are already commercially available, e.g.:
       | https://www.kenqingkeji.com/product_details/14.html
       | 
       | At a glance, the style of exoskeleton favored by Chinese firms is
       | a hip exoskeleton which assists in raising/swinging the leg,
       | whereas the MO/GO is a knee exoskeleton which assists with
       | straightening the leg and putting one's foot forward. From a
       | metabolic cost perspective, the Chinese style is markedly
       | superior in most scenarios save for climbing. Presumably the
       | MO/GO is mountaineering oriented, whereas most of the hip
       | exoskeletons are mobility oriented.
        
         | RandallBrown wrote:
         | I'm guessing Skip approached them.
         | 
         | I also imagine that the Anta Sports ownership is far enough
         | removed from day to day operations at Arc'teryx that they
         | wouldn't even know this kind of thing was happening.
        
         | islaydog wrote:
         | Maybe also for people specifically with knee pain? my parents
         | complain about stairs the most, so a hip devices wouldn't be as
         | good for them?
        
         | maxglute wrote:
         | > mountaineering oriented
         | 
         | One would think hip designs be integrated to lighten backpack
         | load.
         | 
         | From article:
         | 
         | >We heard a lot from people who felt self-conscious, who didn't
         | want a brace or walking stick but loved hiking poles and things
         | that looked like [outdoor] gear
         | 
         | Rule of cool. It does look very cool though.
        
       | generalizations wrote:
       | > They cause the pants to balloon out when you look at them,
       | almost like a crinoline dress on your legs. (Seeing photos of
       | myself wearing MO/GO later, I'm actually surprised how subtle it
       | looks on my body, because the sensation of wearing the bracers is
       | comfortable, but by no means subtle.)
       | 
       | Notice there are zero front-facing images of what the exoskeleton
       | looks like. This is very, very cool but I wonder if they'll need
       | to refine the aesthetics further before they see widespread
       | usage, even within their target market.
        
       | folli wrote:
       | Maybe it's my age, but I'll out myself as luddite.
       | 
       | Please don't. I'm already seeing how e-bikes brought multitudes
       | of people to places that were 10 years ago empty and peaceful as
       | they used to require effort to reach. Now e-legs will be bring
       | people were e-bikes couldn't reach yet...
        
         | nullstyle wrote:
         | I have nothing but disdain for opinions like the above.
         | Assistive technology is a boon, and anyone who gets out into
         | the open and public spaces by way of these gadgets will
         | benefit. If you want your solitude, get further out or buy some
         | space for yourself; public lands shouldn't be for the able-
         | bodied alone.
        
         | pedalpete wrote:
         | Being from Whistler, this was a contentious point of view.
         | However, the outdoors are to be enjoyed by everyone.
         | 
         | The danger is that assisted bikes (and possibly legs) can get
         | people far enough out in the wilderness, that a dead battery
         | can lead them into significant trouble.
         | 
         | Sure, this can happen without the assistance, but it's more
         | difficult to get out of your depths.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-07-26 23:13 UTC)