[HN Gopher] 'Evolution happens much quicker than Darwin thought'
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       'Evolution happens much quicker than Darwin thought'
        
       Author : Brajeshwar
       Score  : 38 points
       Date   : 2024-07-22 15:59 UTC (4 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.theguardian.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.theguardian.com)
        
       | Lance_ET_Compte wrote:
       | "Punctuated equilibrium."
        
       | linearrust wrote:
       | I remember seeing this posted a few days ago. When I hover over
       | '8 hours ago', it shows '2024-07-22T15:59:19'. That's not 8 hours
       | ago. Why is a post from 4 days ago showing as a recent post? Is
       | it a title change issue?
       | 
       | Regardless. What's the point of the article. We have known for
       | decades that evolution 'can' happen much quicker than darwin
       | thought. From large animals to bacteria. Not only that we know
       | that 'lamarckian' epigentics exists.
        
         | Terr_ wrote:
         | There is a feature where sometimes old submissions are
         | resurrected and/or merged with newer ones, and it leads to
         | incorrect timestamp anchor text.
        
         | aoki wrote:
         | > What's the point of the article
         | 
         | It's an interview with Rosemary Grant, occasioned by her new
         | memoir.
        
         | rahimnathwani wrote:
         | As Terr_ said, HN has a feature that allows mods to give a post
         | a second chance to get comments and upvotes.
         | 
         | The motivation is explained here:
         | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26998308
         | 
         | If you don't know about it, it can cause some head-scratching,
         | as you wonder whether the prior post was just in your
         | imagination:)
        
       | Terr_ wrote:
       | It's interesting to look all the modern dog breeds and think:
       | "There are very few actual newly mutated genes here, we just
       | encouraged different re-mixes or even un-mixing of an enormous
       | variety that was already latent."
       | 
       | (And then, for a few dog breeds: "I'm so sorry, we have much to
       | answer for.")
        
         | 0cf8612b2e1e wrote:
         | There was a Russian experiment (still running after decades) to
         | breed domesticated foxes starting from wild animals. The
         | friendliest pups in a litter were selected for future breeding.
         | Within just a few generations, the animals were tamer and even
         | started to look like dog puppies.
         | 
         | Wikipedia
         | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domesticated_silver_fox
        
       | joe_the_user wrote:
       | The idea that evolution isn't a gradual process of improvement
       | but rather more like a dynamic system, is fairly widely accepted
       | and essentially originates with Stephan Jay Gould.
       | 
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punctuated_equilibrium
        
         | wjnc wrote:
         | These people did 40 years of fieldwork to prove the point.
         | 'Beak of the finch' by Jonathan Wiener is a very readable story
         | about their work.
        
         | skybrian wrote:
         | I'm not sure that's fair summary. It doesn't seem like they
         | ruled out gradual evolution? Perhaps I'm misremembering Gould.
         | 
         | From the Wikipedia article:
         | 
         | > Much confusion has arisen over what proponents of punctuated
         | equilibrium actually argued, what mechanisms they advocated,
         | how fast the punctuations were, what taxonomic scale their
         | theory applied to, how revolutionary their claims were intended
         | to be, and how punctuated equilibrium related to other ideas
         | like saltationism, quantum evolution, and mass extinction.
         | 
         | But it in any case, I don't think they were talking about the
         | 40-year scale. The fossil record doesn't allow paleontologists
         | to see things at so fine-grained a scale.
        
       | dwaltrip wrote:
       | Contrary to some of the comments here, I found the article quite
       | interesting. It, along with a paper it links to, describes a very
       | cool study of rapid speciation (over a few generations) observed
       | in the wild. Nice to see the guardian actually link to a paper!
        
       | fanf2 wrote:
       | Speaking as a Finch (large F) I am delighted by this study of the
       | finch (small f)
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-07-26 23:12 UTC)