[HN Gopher] Jacek Karpinski, the computer genius the communists ...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Jacek Karpinski, the computer genius the communists couldn't stand
       (2017)
        
       Author : janisz
       Score  : 134 points
       Date   : 2024-07-25 18:50 UTC (4 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (culture.pl)
 (TXT) w3m dump (culture.pl)
        
       | darby_nine wrote:
       | You can see a modern version of this with all the bleating about
       | needing to regulate AI for "safety" reasons. Times and ideologies
       | might change but the shitbags running our society do not.
        
         | RIMR wrote:
         | Man you really should have read the article to understand that
         | the main competitor to the K-202 had ties to the Communist
         | government and was able to get production shut down.
         | 
         | There was also some concern over the number of western parts
         | inside of the K-202, so a modern equivalent would be closer to
         | the U.S. banning of Huawei hardware in U.S. cell networks,
         | where the hardware is cheaper and superior, but we ban it
         | because we want to protect our own domestic hardware suppliers,
         | and avoid letting too many Chinese-made parts into our
         | country's critical digital infrastructure.
        
           | darby_nine wrote:
           | > Man you really should have read the article to understand
           | that the main competitor to the K-202 had ties to the
           | Communist government and was able to get production shut
           | down.
           | 
           | What do you think regulatory capture is? The exact same
           | behavior, and we have it all over our society. The parallels
           | to OpenAI are obvious. And if you look... sure enough, the
           | board has multiple people connected directly to the bowels of
           | federal government.
           | 
           | Granted, I don't think OpenAI is 1/10000th as interesting as
           | microcomputers were, but it's still nauseating to see people
           | take aforementioned bleating seriously.
        
             | robertlagrant wrote:
             | > What do you think regulatory capture is?
             | 
             | Not this.
        
       | M95D wrote:
       | The TLDR version is this:
       | 
       | > Karpinski's computer could be so small and resilient because it
       | used Western components. Even though they were vital to the
       | functioning of the K-202, [...] they were elements imported from
       | beyond the Iron Curtain and used in the sensitive field of
       | information processing.
        
         | atrus wrote:
         | Lets not gloss over this:
         | 
         | >The manufacturer of Odra, the Elwro company, was, however,
         | better connected with the regime than Karpinski. Instead of
         | improving its product to catch up with the competition Elwro
         | began to subvert Karpinski's position in any way they could,
         | not shying away from slander.
        
         | skirge wrote:
         | Government of Edward Gierek had no problem with buying foreign
         | licenses for products which required western components so it
         | was not a problem.
        
         | axus wrote:
         | Apple built iPhones in China, but the country of manufacture is
         | almost irrelevant to that accomplishment.
        
       | HayBale wrote:
       | Not that I want to be Debbie downer but as always in case of
       | Polish (which I am also are) overexaggerated and having that
       | strange believe that if not the communists Poland would be a
       | global superpower.
       | 
       | Its enough to go the wiki (both about the computer and the
       | inventor) to see that the situation was not that clear. The
       | performance was greatly overstated, it depended on the import of
       | the component from the west etc.
       | 
       | Moreover the guy was cooperating with the Polish version of the
       | FBI so it's not like it was a story of lonely genius vs the
       | governament....
        
         | legitster wrote:
         | > strange believe that if not the communists Poland would be a
         | global superpower
         | 
         | I think it's fair to consider Poland the birthplace of the
         | modern computer:
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bomba_(cryptography)
         | 
         | Maybe not a global superpower, but it is _very_ easy to me to
         | imagine a Poland not destroyed by Nazi then communist rule
         | being an innovation center of the world.
        
           | BalinKing wrote:
           | According to that link, The Martians were Hungarian :-P
        
             | legitster wrote:
             | Oops. Updated to be less wrong.
        
           | HayBale wrote:
           | Prewar Poland was a military dictatorship(mild but was) in
           | the permanent state of crisis, on a brink of a civil war with
           | all of its minorities. And it is a wild take to blame
           | communists for the nazi atrocities.
           | 
           | But communist solved most of the problems that prewar Poland
           | would have problem of solving. Yeah Polish tech was amazing
           | especially if you consider the resources
        
           | linearrust wrote:
           | > I think it's fair to consider Poland the birthplace of the
           | modern computer:
           | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bomba_(cryptography)
           | 
           | "The first machine was built by the Poles and was a hand
           | operated multiple enigma machine."
           | 
           | There were polish contributors to the general idea of
           | computation. But computation is not the same thing as modern
           | computer. No serious person can view the bomba as a 'modern
           | computer'. It took the discovery of the transistor to give
           | birth to the modern computer.
           | 
           | > but it is very easy to me to imagine a Poland not destroyed
           | by Nazi then communist rule being an innovation center of the
           | world.
           | 
           | Poland doesn't that the population, resources, etc for that.
           | Whatever great innovators poland would have possibly had in
           | your alternate universe would have been siphoned off by
           | germany, russia, britain, france, US, etc. There is a reason
           | why so many renowned poles pre-ww2 made their contributions
           | outside of poland.
        
         | piombisallow wrote:
         | Communism certainly didn't help.
        
         | pinewurst wrote:
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K-202
        
         | mzs wrote:
         | Think more CIA than FBI. He reported back to SB what he learned
         | about foreign technology, and that was in the '60s before the
         | events around the K-202.
        
         | elzbardico wrote:
         | Yes. I love my Polish friends, but some of them have this
         | strange mania of exageration and rewriting history as if Poland
         | would be glorious empire if not from the subhuman
         | soviets(russians actually), or because the envy of the evil
         | germans.
        
       | sieszpak wrote:
       | Many Poles have distinguished themselves in various fields of
       | science and life. I recognize Madame Curie, Copernicus, Ulam,
       | Pope John Paul II, Chopin, Polanski, and perhaps Wozniak. I had a
       | Polish professor at Mellon University who talked a bit about it,
       | and there was a lot.
        
         | jsrcout wrote:
         | I don't know the names, but I recall there was a large Polish
         | contribution to Allied codebreaking in WWII.
        
           | surfingdino wrote:
           | Rejewski, Zygalski, Rozycki
           | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marian_Rejewski
        
           | jjtheblunt wrote:
           | marian rejewski
        
           | TacticalCoder wrote:
           | Polish mathematician had the Polish "bomba" in... 1938 (which
           | is actually right before WWII):
           | 
           | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bomba_(cryptography)
        
         | TMWNN wrote:
         | Don't forget the breakthrough nature of the first Polish
         | submarine <http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-s1t9CkrpGsM/TrINhUSZ5SI/AA
         | AAAAAABt...>.
        
           | Ancapistani wrote:
           | This actually really bothers me.
           | 
           | The Poles have a long history of being a leading European
           | nation in many areas. These "jokes" arose in the wake of
           | Polish immigration to the US and the conquering of Poland by
           | Nazi Germany and then the Soviets.
        
             | TMWNN wrote:
             | I am well aware of Polish genius in things like their early
             | work on Enigma (as mentioned elsewhere). In the US (I don't
             | know about other countries), 100% of Polish jokes are told
             | without any inclination, on the part of the teller or the
             | recipient, of actually believing that Poles are
             | intellectually backward.
             | 
             | I have no idea how/why Poles became the subject matter of
             | such jokes, but doubt that the history you outlined was the
             | cause; after all, there are no such Czech jokes or Romanian
             | jokes. I suspect that just as the jokes themselves are
             | memes, at some point in the past Poles mysteriously ended
             | up as the putative subject in some random fashion, akin to
             | the arbitrariness of the ethnic group in this famous
             | _Austin Powers_ scene
             | <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zgp-0UxeBK0>, then spread
             | as a meme.
             | 
             | PS - Steve Wozniak (also mentioned elsewhere) ran a Dial-a-
             | Joke line featuring Polish jokes in the early 1970s.
        
           | troll1000 wrote:
           | I don't get this one...
        
         | surfingdino wrote:
         | Others include Marek Holynski
         | https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marek_Ho%C5%82y%C5%84ski (co-
         | inventor of OpenGL, told by the visiting Russian commie
         | inspector to focus his 3d research on "serious" things like CNC
         | machining), Stefan Kudelski
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stefan_Kudelski (Nagra audio and
         | video recorders), Staniskaw Ulam
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanis%C5%82aw_Ulam (Manhattan
         | Project, Monte Carlo methods), Casimir Pulaski
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casimir_Pulaski, Tadeusz
         | Kosciuszko
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tadeusz_Ko%C5%9Bciuszko and many
         | more...
        
         | NiteOwl066 wrote:
         | Yeah you could add many more major names like Banach or my
         | favourite (and imo most underappreciated) Jan Czochralski.
        
           | mrcode007 wrote:
           | Don't forget a father of a modern oil refinery:
           | 
           | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignacy_%C5%81ukasiewicz
        
         | msikora wrote:
         | What about Wojciech Zaremba of OpenAI? MAybe not at the level
         | of the above yet, but crucial person in one of the hottest
         | companies in the world.
        
           | msikora wrote:
           | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wojciech_Zaremba
        
           | fear91 wrote:
           | Jakub Pachocki from OpenAI is polish too.
        
       | novia wrote:
       | I wish he had chosen to go with the Americans who recognized his
       | genius. Having loyalty to his home country set him back. He could
       | have returned to Poland after the fall of communism, potentially
       | with millions of dollars to invest locally.
        
       | abc_lisper wrote:
       | He really loved his country, even if the government basically
       | destroyed his career.
        
         | tester457 wrote:
         | If he stayed in America he could've been so wealthy and famous.
         | His skills must have decayed when he was on the countryside
         | too.
        
       | tivert wrote:
       | > Thus in 1970, the Microcomputers Plant was established. Located
       | in Warsaw, it employed Polish workers but used British components
       | and financing - the required parts weren't available in Poland
       | and the communists weren't at all eager to throw money at the
       | project....
       | 
       | > Karpinski's computer could be so small and resilient because it
       | used Western components. Even though they were vital to the
       | functioning of the K-202, they might have raised suspicion among
       | the authorities of the Eastern Bloc, as they were elements
       | imported from beyond the Iron Curtain and used in the sensitive
       | field of information processing.
       | 
       | What the superior performance of his machine mainly due to the
       | Western components he was using?
       | 
       | The article makes it seem he was treated very unfairly so as to
       | favor his competitors (and maybe he was), but it seems entirely
       | legitimate to me for the Communists to have favored a more secure
       | supply chain, given the political situation at the time.
        
         | novia wrote:
         | > What the superior performance of his machine mainly due to
         | the Western components he was using?
         | 
         | No. The genius was in the design and how the components were
         | used.
         | 
         | > It seems entirely legitimate to me for the Communists to have
         | favored a more secure supply chain.
         | 
         | It mentions in the article that the bottleneck with getting
         | components that were high quality was that the local government
         | did not want to spend the money to develop their own secure
         | supply chain.
         | 
         | He demonstrated a proof of concept. If they were concerned
         | about national security, they could have made it a priority to
         | get him equivalent components.
        
         | cloudsec9 wrote:
         | If supply chain was the issue, surely they could have worked to
         | create a more local source for things; but it seems like a
         | flavour of corruption to use slower and inferior machines
         | instead of trying to leverage the best of both.
         | 
         | My feeling from the article was that he worked outside the box,
         | and THAT was simply unacceptable to the authorities, no matter
         | how good the underlying technology was.
        
           | ordu wrote:
           | _> My feeling from the article was that he worked outside the
           | box, and THAT was simply unacceptable to the authorities, no
           | matter how good the underlying technology was._
           | 
           | USSR had a planning economy, so they decided ahead what good
           | and in which quantity must be produced in a coming five
           | years. And then comes some genius and makes a computer better
           | than planned. What should they do?
           | 
           | Something alike was with Setun[1], there was no place for
           | Setun in 5-years plan.
           | 
           | Moreover I suspect that what will be included into the next
           | plan was a big politics. No low engineer could change that.
           | Centralization is evil.
           | 
           | [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Setun
        
       | karaterobot wrote:
       | > It's believed that Karpinski paved the way for today's common
       | use of paging in computer memory systems.
       | 
       | So, I didn't know anything about the K-202, so this is very
       | interesting to me.
       | 
       | However, are we sure that it influenced _anything_ , given that
       | only about 230 of them were ever made, and those were destroyed
       | at the factory? How would knowledge of his team's innovations,
       | let alone specific information, have leaked out to western
       | computer designers from within Soviet Poland? If it did, was the
       | mechanism... espionage, published research, what?
        
         | boomboomsubban wrote:
         | From the article,
         | 
         | >Thus in 1970, the Microcomputers Plant was established.
         | Located in Warsaw, it employed Polish workers but used British
         | components and financing.
         | 
         | The British were involved in every step.
        
         | mepian wrote:
         | The Wikipedia page says it was actually segmented memory rather
         | than paging as it is defined today.
        
           | mzs wrote:
           | More like both, there was a block address register (BAR) and
           | when it was 0..63 that was selecting a core memory board. So
           | that's sort of like segmentation but core could be paged out
           | from and in to tape, disc, or drum. For example the OS
           | (OPSYS) could be paged out to free up block 0 of core memory.
           | So that's paging and even neater it was basically a page per
           | program so independent programs could run concurrently,
           | paging core in and out as needed. The paging was handled by
           | controllers (disc, tape, drum) with very little involvement
           | of the CPU (executive).
           | 
           | See 3.1.1, 3.3.2, 3.4, 3.5, 5, & 5.2: http://www.zenker.pozna
           | n.pl/k-202/dokumentacja/k-202-reklama...
        
       | legitster wrote:
       | Really good story. I recommend reading the whole thing.
       | 
       | A couple things that I think add some useful context, having
       | spent some of my life in other post-soviet countries:
       | 
       | - In Communist theory (at least as Marx and Lenin saw it)
       | business competition was a destructive force and one of the
       | "inherent contradictions" of capitalism. So if another project
       | was deemed to be better, that was justification enough for
       | shutting down other enterprises.
       | 
       | - Also, during this time under soviet communism, the most common
       | measure of manufacturing was in kilograms output. Karpinski
       | working on a small run of small computers would not have looked
       | impressive to officials in the least.
       | 
       | - Importing western materials and parts was not expressly
       | forbidden (though certainly not politically popular). But Poland
       | (like a lot of Soviet countries) was undergoing a currency
       | crunch. Possession of foreign currency was illegal and importing
       | materials did not do favorable things for their "fake" exchange
       | rates. The operation was probably contingent on generating more
       | foreign dollars than they spent.
       | 
       | - Computers in general were viewed skeptically as Western
       | excesses that either wasted time or stole jobs. So making boring
       | calculating machines for accounting or scientific research could
       | be seen as acceptable - but small, cheap, Western style micro-
       | computers were another matter.
       | 
       | - The fact that Karpinski spent a lot of time in the West and
       | knew people and understood English and was not a party member
       | makes it shocking he even got to spin up the enterprise in the
       | first place. Had he not won the UNESCO award, he probably
       | wouldn't have even made it as far as he did.
       | 
       | - Getting banning from your vocation and getting a visa was
       | unfortunately a very common method of getting dissapeared. He
       | probably also lost housing privilege as well - hence moving out
       | to the country and raising pigs.
        
         | Muromec wrote:
         | To be fair, competition was very much allowed where soviet
         | government needed it -- in design bureaus and sometimes
         | architecture. There was more than one firm that designed planes
         | and helicopters for the military.
        
         | surfingdino wrote:
         | > - Importing western materials and parts was not expressly
         | forbidden (though certainly not politically popular). But
         | Poland (like a lot of Soviet countries) was undergoing a
         | currency crunch. Possession of foreign currency was illegal and
         | importing materials did not do favorable things for their
         | "fake" exchange rates. The operation was probably contingent on
         | generating more foreign dollars than they spent.
         | 
         | Poland was embargoed so it was tricky to obtain western
         | components. Poles had to pay for them in hard currency, because
         | Polish Zloty was not a convertible currency. There were two
         | exchange rates, the official one at which hard currency was
         | exchanged into zlotys and the the unofficial street rate used
         | by illegal money changers. Those rates varied wildly. Poles who
         | did earn hard currency would have currency accounts, but were
         | forbidden from withdrawing actual dollars or german marks,
         | instead they were given special tokens they could spend in the
         | so-called internal export shops selling western food, clothes,
         | household equipment, radios, TVs, and even toilet paper,
         | because that was one of the things communism struggled with
         | near its end. Those fake dollars had a lower exchange rate on
         | the street.
         | 
         | Ownership of real foreign currency was forbidden as was
         | possession of a passport. There were two types of passports,
         | one for the countries of the Soviet block and the other for the
         | whole world. You had to bring your passport to the local police
         | station for safe keeping and interrogation. Passports would not
         | be issued to all members of a household to prevent them from
         | fleeing the country.
         | 
         | Economically, Poland was getting massively squeezed by the
         | Soviet Union who ordered a lot of ships to be built in the
         | Polish shipyards, but would only pay for them in "transferrable
         | rubles", the currency which was not convertible and pretty much
         | useless.
         | https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305054272_The_Trans...
         | The exchange rate vs. local currencies was controlled by
         | Moscow. In order to deliver those ships to Russia, Poles had to
         | purchase materials and equipment outside of the Eastern Block
         | and pay for it in hard currency. Eastern European countries
         | quickly developed a barter system, but non-Eastern European
         | suppliers wanted to be paid in US dollars. Poland tried to sell
         | its agricultural and industrial output, but could not compete
         | with Western suppliers so the earning were meagre. This has led
         | to lowering of living standards beyond which people had enough
         | of communists and the party was over.
        
       | mepian wrote:
       | The tired cliche of comparing the subject to Bill Gates and Steve
       | Jobs (celebrities from the later microcomputer era, one of which
       | is not even a hardware guy) made me cringe, why not compare him
       | instead to Ken Olsen and Wesley Clark, the men who actually built
       | first minicomputers in the West, or to someone like Andy
       | Bechtolsheim? I guess the target audience of the article doesn't
       | know anyone but Gates and Jobs.
        
       | initramfs wrote:
       | the article mentions one other Perceptron of its kind in the
       | U.S., and that has another really interesting story (this one got
       | downplayed by Marvin Minsky but the inventor died young in an
       | accident): https://news.cornell.edu/stories/2019/09/professors-
       | perceptr...
        
       | brigadier132 wrote:
       | > After World War II, the communist regime in Poland considered
       | members of the resistance a threat to its existence, convinced
       | that people who had risked their lives to free Poland of its Nazi
       | oppressors could also act to undermine the new Soviet regime
       | 
       | Interesting fact from the article...
        
         | toast0 wrote:
         | Not particularly surprising, IMHO.
         | 
         | A group that worked against one occupier is likely to work
         | against the next as well.
        
         | TacticalCoder wrote:
         | > Interesting fact from the article...
         | 
         | That was the case in many countries. In France for example a
         | huge part of the resistance was way too sympathetic with
         | Stalin's ideas (and btw didn't join the resistance up until
         | 1941 and Hitler's operation Barbarossa, when Hitler betrayed
         | Stalin) so one of the very first thing the government did in
         | France right after WWII was to _disarm_ the resistance as much
         | as they could. Most people don 't read about that but it's well
         | documented.
         | 
         | These (back then) superpowers were paranoid and rightfully so:
         | the cold war started right after WWII and both blocks were very
         | careful not to have ennemies from within.
        
           | aaplok wrote:
           | > In France for example a huge part of the resistance was way
           | too sympathetic with Stalin's ideas (and btw didn't join the
           | resistance up until 1941 and Hitler's operation Barbarossa,
           | when Hitler betrayed Stalin)
           | 
           | It's more subtle than that. Communist resistance certainly
           | existed before 1941. Many of the veterans from the Spanish
           | civil war for example engaged quite early, without waiting
           | for Stalin's instructions. Repression against communists
           | increased overnight when Hitler invaded the USSR, which led
           | to more active resistance. But it's not like they just had
           | been sitting quietly enjoying life under Petain up to then.
           | 
           | After the war communist resistants, particularly those who
           | came back from deportation, were seen with suspicion by the
           | party's leadership, and the party ended up at the hands of
           | people who hadn't been as active in the resistance, but were
           | considered to be more loyal to Stalin. Which suited the
           | Gaullists just fine and gave them the opportunity to push the
           | narrative that only they had been the true resistants from
           | the first hour.
        
       | trwired wrote:
       | I don't have anything to add on the subject of the article, but
       | just want to mention I really like the site it's published on.
       | Alongside przekroj.org (which recently started dipping its toes
       | into publishing also in English) it is one of my favorite places
       | on the web. No clickbait, no quantity over quality, just (mostly)
       | interesting, well researched content. I wish there were more
       | places like these around the internet.
        
       | bdjsiqoocwk wrote:
       | I wonder if related to the karpinski from the Julia language.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-07-25 23:00 UTC)