[HN Gopher] Google Maps is ruining us
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Google Maps is ruining us
        
       Author : HAARP
       Score  : 22 points
       Date   : 2024-07-23 07:42 UTC (15 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (therectangle.substack.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (therectangle.substack.com)
        
       | bitdeep wrote:
       | Yep, don't trust Maps or Waze, you can get shot in Brazil if you
       | use it blindly.
       | 
       | Always force it to suggest main routes, even if suggest a route
       | with less traffic.
        
         | TheBengaluruGuy wrote:
         | How can it get you shot?
        
           | rokkamokka wrote:
           | Criminals setting up ambushes on less traveled roads
        
           | theolivenbaum wrote:
           | Going up the wrong road and ending up inside a favela
           | https://www.france24.com/en/20170807-british-tourist-shot-
           | af...
        
             | akolbe wrote:
             | Mm. Google Maps will sometimes confidently suggest roads
             | which without that recommendation would have seemed quite
             | unsuitable. So people put their instincts aside and think
             | Google must know better ... only to regret it later.
             | 
             | It would be helpful if Google could add a few qualifiers
             | like "Note that this is a very steep and mostly single-lane
             | unpaved road" or "This road leads through an unsafe
             | neighbourhood", followed by "An alternative route would be
             | ..."
             | 
             | Maybe in a few years' time.
        
       | rurp wrote:
       | Google Maps works pretty well in cities but is terribly
       | unreliable outside of those areas. I have had it route me down
       | all sorts of terrible or nonexistent dirt roads when there were
       | much better options available. There are many stories of drivers
       | blindly following directions, getting stuck, and needing a rescue
       | or worse.
        
       | dustincoates wrote:
       | So, yeah, Google Maps sent the author down the wrong way, but how
       | are paper maps going to be any better? The paper maps aren't
       | going to know that those roads are closed, either.
       | 
       | What does the author propose as an alternative? He's in Sicily,
       | so he can't rely on his own built-up knowledge. Maybe he's
       | suggesting asking locals, but nothing's stopping him from doing
       | that, and it's not so easy.
       | 
       | So yeah, online maps have downsides, but what concretely is the
       | proposal?
        
         | saulpw wrote:
         | The road wasn't closed. Google Maps was wrong.
         | 
         | And with a paper map, you would have the intuition that it
         | might be stale, so you ask a local. Whereas Google Maps is
         | marketed as the latest and greatest and most up-to-date, so you
         | wind up trusting it, even over your own senses sometimes!
         | 
         | The trust is the mistake, but it's hard not to fall into that
         | trap when it works reasonably well most of the time. But it's a
         | fragile system--when it fails, you're truly SOL. Whereas paper
         | and people are anti-fragile--they're less trustworthy but
         | because of that, they're also more resilient. Who hasn't gotten
         | directions from a stranger and wondered if they were a troll or
         | an imbecile? And then either gotten a second opinion or
         | proceeded with caution?
        
           | yetihehe wrote:
           | Sometimes it's about shunning responsibility:
           | 
           | I followed a map and made an error, I'm responsible, someone
           | will be mad at me.
           | 
           | I followed google maps, they are responsible for providing
           | bad directions, so it's not my error, you should be mad at
           | google, not me.
        
           | dustincoates wrote:
           | > We followed the navigation apps, and after 30 minutes of
           | driving, they dropped us off at a closed road. We turned
           | around, drove another 20 minutes or so, and encountered
           | another shuttered lane.
           | 
           | I'm talking about these closed roads.
        
       | jszymborski wrote:
       | I was that dumb foreigner in Japan that got lost in a forest on
       | an island off the Shimanami Kaido (I think it was Setoda IIRC).
       | 
       | I had to get to a bus stop near a highway in a very rural area,
       | and Google Maps led me through a (albeit gorgeous) winding path
       | through farms and forests, until the underbrush started taking
       | over the road. With the last bus time quickly approaching, and
       | having to get to the next island over as that's where my next
       | hotel was, I was starting to get desperate, rushing through vines
       | and fallen tree limbs.
       | 
       | The path ended with a gate, looking nothing like what Google was
       | telling me the path should.
       | 
       | Eventually I back tracked, and arrived just in time for my bus. I
       | had leaves in my hair and my legs were all scratched, which left
       | this gaijin looking even more like like a sore thumb in this
       | rural island.
       | 
       | All this to say, I was dumb and frankly a bit ill prepared for
       | this particular leg of the trip. In very weak, tepid defence,
       | organizing these smaller details in rural areas of countries
       | whose language you don't speak can be at times challenging.
        
       | johnny22 wrote:
       | I don't like how it is "because we trusted screens"
       | 
       | A physical map that was marked the same way and touted as being
       | up to date would have caused the exact same problem.
       | 
       | At some point things are not going to work and you're going to
       | have rely on human judgement. It sounds like trust was built up
       | enough over time that such reliance was second nature.
        
         | lelandfe wrote:
         | Fun story, I grew up on an incredibly steep street which dead
         | ends - it gets too steep - and then continues again at the top
         | of the hill.
         | 
         | Well, one edition of some Thomas Guide had this street
         | connecting.
         | 
         | Every 5 or so years, some poor, poor, truck driver would get
         | stuck on the hill, and need to carefully reverse down this tiny
         | street and its ridiculous hill. One year, a giant semi hauling
         | glass windows got stuck at the top of the dead end. He was
         | unable to reverse, and so we had to call every neighbor to move
         | their cars off of the hill to give the driver room to turn
         | around. Took most of the day.
        
         | lainga wrote:
         | I have some inkling that _not_ having the urge to lock in to a
         | single input (as TFA puts it) is not universal. One of the most
         | common reasons (IIRC) for failing the RN 's submarine command
         | course (the "perisher") is excessive reliance on a single
         | instrument -- these are officers with 5-10 years of experience
         | by the time they enter the course, and the cream of the crop to
         | have even qualified -- and with enough stress, even they lose
         | the ability to do "sensor fusion".
         | 
         | Anecdotally, I don't know anyone who's constantly doubting the
         | map and cross-checking it against signs the way I do when
         | driving or walking. Then again, my first thought in basically
         | any situation is what the worst case could be! so...
        
       | divnat2023 wrote:
       | Frequency of use of road, or else some kind of road review is
       | relevant for rural roads.
        
         | netsharc wrote:
         | It'd be interesting to see if the road is mostly used by
         | farmers but other locals avoid it, and Google theoritically has
         | all that info, assuming they have Android phones: a farmer
         | lives near the fields and spend a lot of their daytime on the
         | fields, a local lives in the village.
        
       | jurassicfoxy wrote:
       | > We drove down an increasingly narrow and desolate road. The
       | tarmac disappeared, replaced by lose stones. It got steeper. The
       | track turned into potholed grass and dirt. Huge rocks reared out
       | of the earth.
       | 
       | ...
       | 
       | > And it was all Google Maps' fault.
       | 
       | I mean, it was 100 % your fault, but you can blame a stupid phone
       | if it makes you feel better about having zero common sense, and
       | being a poor driver.
        
       | jjulius wrote:
       | tl;dr - nothing is perfect.
        
       | gizajob wrote:
       | This seems more like a problem with Italians than a problem with
       | Google maps :\
        
       | snakeyjake wrote:
       | >And it was all Google Maps' fault.
       | 
       | No, it was your fault.
       | 
       | Paper maps can be, and almost certainly all are, wrong. It is
       | normal to blame a paper map if you sail off the edge of the Earth
       | where the map says there ought to be more sea?
       | 
       | Even if you run into an island where there should be no island,
       | or drive into a space that should be fit for cars but is not,
       | your hands are on the wheel and your feet are on the pedals.
       | 
       | >Consider this: have you ever been in a situation where you've
       | seen a beautiful landscape or watched something funny happening
       | and your first thought is, "how can I take a picture of this for
       | Instagram?"
       | 
       | No.
       | 
       | Something is wrong with this person's brain.
        
         | Symbiote wrote:
         | You need to read the next paragraph of the article.
        
           | snakeyjake wrote:
           | "lol j/k it's really because I made the mistake of trusting
           | the computer" is deflective nonsense.
        
         | jmalicki wrote:
         | > It is normal to blame a paper map if you sail off the edge of
         | the Earth where the map says there ought to be more sea?
         | 
         | That's what the US Navy does (in part) when a $3 billion
         | submarine hits an underwater mountain.
         | 
         | https://www.cnn.com/2021/11/01/politics/navy-submarine-under...
        
           | snakeyjake wrote:
           | That event is perfectly illustrative of my point.
           | 
           | You can't even see out of a submarine but still the
           | commander, executive officer, and chief of the boat of that
           | submarine were fired because no matter what technology or
           | capabilities exist it is the responsibility of the person in
           | control of the machine to control the machine.
        
           | joseda-hg wrote:
           | To be fair, US military anything is about as far as you can
           | be from normalcy
        
       | timonoko wrote:
       | "Russian Topo Maps"-app is the best if you want to survive in
       | wilderness of Japan and Norway. The material from 1960's before
       | people moved to big cities on both those places. You can find
       | overgrown pathways and railroads which will help your near-death
       | trek to the nearest Seven-Eleven.
        
       | welcome_dragon wrote:
       | So ... Computers try to kill you in a lake?
        
       | wsve wrote:
       | Isn't this literally a gag in The Office...? Which would
       | unfortunately make this author Michael Scott in this situation...
        
       | silisili wrote:
       | One thing I'm finding myself not liking about Google Maps is its
       | routing algorithm. It defaults to something I'm not positive on,
       | perhaps shortest possible route or time? But in doing so often
       | has me taking 5 or 10 turns through neighborhoods and poorly lit
       | streets that don't seem designed for through traffic.
       | 
       | When I look at the map, I usually see a way easier way to go,
       | that's usually about the same or maybe a minute or so longer. I
       | wish it defaulted to that. I'd much rather have an easy, two turn
       | 15 minute drive than a zig zag through neighborhood 14 minute
       | drive.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-07-23 23:15 UTC)