[HN Gopher] Oxygen discovery defies knowledge of the deep ocean
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Oxygen discovery defies knowledge of the deep ocean
        
       Author : cmsefton
       Score  : 108 points
       Date   : 2024-07-22 16:48 UTC (6 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.bbc.co.uk)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.bbc.co.uk)
        
       | mentalpiracy wrote:
       | drop a few of these into your nearest water-world, wait a few
       | years, et voila: your very own sea monkeys.
        
       | adim86 wrote:
       | I think its crazy that we find a discovery like this in our eco-
       | system that we barely understand and the first thing people want
       | to do is mine them for profit. Like the race to profit with the
       | disregard for consequences is mind-blowing
        
         | whalesalad wrote:
         | yep, these guys are hell bent on mining everything from the
         | seafloor because they think its "free" and inconsequential
         | https://metals.co/nodules/
        
         | hammock wrote:
         | These metallic nodules on the bottom of the ocean - and the
         | habitat they create that is teeming with life - are already
         | slated for strip-mining actually. Finding out they are a source
         | of oxygen may save them (or see them destroyed in a different
         | way)
         | 
         | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33988999
        
           | yellow_postit wrote:
           | Last Week Tonight had a deep sea mining operation episode.
           | 
           | https://www.hbo.com/last-week-tonight-with-john-
           | oliver/seaso...
        
             | pstuart wrote:
             | John Oliver (and crew) is a national treasure.
        
         | LargoLasskhyfv wrote:
         | 'First thing' ? AFAIK the idea existed looong before this
         | recent discovery.
         | 
         | Even if only as a cover story for the
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glomar_Explorer at first.
        
         | datavirtue wrote:
         | I picture these getting strip mined, causing a domino effect
         | that results in Ocean death.
        
         | unshavedyak wrote:
         | Is it surprising/crazy though? I feel like our entire
         | capitalist mindset is to pillage everything you can stomach and
         | to push your own boundaries because if you don't - someone else
         | will and beat you with their profits.
         | 
         | It always feels like a morality race to the bottom. Clearly i'm
         | a pessimist here, but it's obvious in my pessimistic mindset.
         | Do you have a more positive outlook perhaps?
        
           | bamboozled wrote:
           | Yup, we just pretend it's not disgusting and keep
           | participating / allow it to continue.
        
           | shrimp_emoji wrote:
           | It's not just capitalism. The Soviet Union drained the Aral
           | Sea in hopes of irrigating cotton farms and overfished whales
           | whose carcasses went to waste to mindlessly meet quotas.
           | 
           | At least capitalism is good at extracting value from the
           | pillaging, unlike the alternatives.
           | 
           | But, in the end, pillaging is inevitable. Thermodynamically,
           | "there's stuff already there, and all we have to do is get
           | it" is the simple sugar of industry. You'll never find easier
           | Calories. It's too sweet to resist. That's how you end up in
           | oxymoronic schemes like "biomass" (cutting down forests) in
           | the pursuit of renewable energy.
        
             | littlestymaar wrote:
             | > At least capitalism is good at extracting value from the
             | pillaging, unlike the alternatives.
             | 
             | Well that's kind of the problem, it's really efficient at
             | it and this efficiency is the root of the crisis we're in.
        
           | nilamo wrote:
           | Is it a capitalistic mindset? There have been many
           | civilizations throughout history which pillaged everything
           | they could, and I'm not sure very many were driven by
           | capitalism.
           | 
           | I'm thinking about the ancient Egyptians, Vikings, Huns, etc.
        
             | littlestymaar wrote:
             | Marx got you covered in _Das Capital_ , this topic is being
             | addressed explicitly. Long story short, you're right it's
             | not specific to capitalism, capitalism is just the latest
             | and most formally structured system to enable this
             | fundamental human sin.
             | 
             | What's interesting is that societies are not bounded by
             | destructive instincts: over time we've progressed a lot in
             | limiting violence between humans. We will never reach a
             | state with absolutely zero violence, but northern Europe or
             | Canada shows that you can definitely reach levels that are
             | incredibly low by human standards.
             | 
             | Now we need to do the same will pillaging and exploitation
             | (of both nature and other humans).
        
               | frumper wrote:
               | It feels premature to say regions of the world have
               | limited violence between humans. People are still alive
               | from a time when there was some major European violence.
        
         | jcranmer wrote:
         | The "advantage" of deep-sea mining is that there are no
         | neighbors to complain about the environmental effects of
         | mining, and--since it's largely proposed in international
         | waters--you get to choose whose environment regulations you
         | follow.
         | 
         | The disadvantages are more numerous: the commercial viability
         | of the extracted ore is extremely unclear; the seafloor is very
         | poorly mapped, and with poor visibility, you could easily drive
         | a seafloor rover into or over a cliff without seeing it;
         | environmental effects are largely unknown [1]; the
         | international authority meant to help guide these efforts has
         | put a moratorium on it until these questions can be answered
         | (which, given how long it's taking to answer them, has led many
         | companies interesting in deep sea mining to advocate for
         | ignoring it entirely).
         | 
         | [1] Although anyone who's had much of a thought about it would
         | probably hazard that "insanely destructive" is the most likely
         | outcome. Still an open question if deep sea mining is less or
         | more destructive than our current mining techniques.
        
         | newsbinator wrote:
         | > and the first thing people want to do is mine them for profit
         | 
         | The reason we have the technology to discover non-obvious
         | things is thanks to thousands of years of profit-seeking.
        
       | Msurrow wrote:
       | Its disgusting that every thing always have to be exploited for
       | profit. And then companies use part of that money to lobby (ie
       | effectively pay off) politicians to let them do it. And it's even
       | legal. Simply discussing.
        
       | adrian_b wrote:
       | The research paper:
       | 
       | https://www.nature.com/articles/s41561-024-01480-8
       | 
       | TLDR:
       | 
       | They have found evidence of elemental oxygen production in a
       | polymetallic nodule-covered abyssal seafloor in the Pacific
       | Ocean.
       | 
       | However, for now they have identified neither how the dioxygen is
       | produced nor which is the source of energy for this.
       | 
       | Their hypothesis for how the dioxygen is produced is that there
       | may be a redox reaction between some metals in the polymetallic
       | nodules, which might cause an electric current that could
       | electrolyze the water.
       | 
       | However this hypothesis has very little value until an energy
       | source is identified for it.
       | 
       | The voltage in a battery is not produced between metals in any
       | state, but only between an oxidized metal and a reduced metal.
       | The simplest batteries, like the AA or AAA batteries with saline
       | or alkaline electrolyte, produce voltage by the reaction between
       | reduced zinc and oxidized manganese.
       | 
       | So for a natural battery to form in those polymetallic nodules,
       | some of the metals must be in a reduced state, and for them to be
       | reduced, somewhere there should have been an energy source to
       | provide energy for their reduction.
       | 
       | That must be determined to understand what happens.
        
         | buildbot wrote:
         | Could a piezoelectric effect be large enough to cause this?
        
           | buildbot wrote:
           | Self reply as it's too late to edit, no, or only once at
           | least - you'd have to cycle the pressure to get a new charge
           | after discharge - which makes sense, you static pressure
           | generation sounds too much like free energy.
           | 
           | Although, thinking further, ocean pressure is not constant!
           | It varies with tides and other events: https://agupubs.online
           | library.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/201...
           | 
           | So no free energy issue, there could actually be some cycling
           | effect due to the energy input from the sun/moon shifting
           | tides.
        
         | notfed wrote:
         | In layman's terms: batteries don't last millions of years, so
         | wtf?
        
           | BiteCode_dev wrote:
           | But also: wow, if we could do that at scale the same way,
           | free hydrogen!
        
       | from-nibly wrote:
       | Lets not forget that the purpose of a lot of environmental
       | studies is just to seek regulatory capture. Im not saying every
       | time someone says we should take care of our environment we
       | should all assume its actually a big corporation preventing
       | competitors from finding alternatives bit it does happen.
       | 
       | I had a entomologist friend that pointed out that each little
       | body of standing water has dozens of unique species of bugs and
       | you can theoretically just say any piece of land needs to be
       | conserved because destroying it will destroy an entire species.
       | 
       | Again not saying it would be good or bad to mine this stuff. (On
       | first glance it sounds bad to reduce the oxygen we breath). Im
       | just saying caution should always be used with this kind of
       | stuff.
        
         | yellow_postit wrote:
         | There's a work of fiction "Venomous Lumpsucker" that has a near
         | future take on building a regulatory industry exactly around
         | extinction
         | 
         | I found it to be a fun read
         | 
         | https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/59593576-venomous-lumpsu...
        
       | kibwen wrote:
       | _> Several mining companies have plans to collect these nodules,
       | which marine scientists fear could disrupt the newly discovered
       | process - and damage any marine life that depends on the oxygen
       | they make._
       | 
       | If companies could find a way force you to pay for oxygen, every
       | single one of us knows in our hearts that they would.
        
         | ics wrote:
         | How much for a can of Perri-Air?
        
       | harryvederci wrote:
       | Husband of one of the researchers here.
       | 
       | These scientific cruises are a huge undertaking, and the fact
       | that the team managed to do this during Covid was an achievement
       | by itself. Shipping containers filled with obscure tech to a
       | different country that you'll then send to the bottom of the
       | ocean will surely raise eyebrows at customs. Then there was the
       | self-isolating, and working in shifts so different teams can do
       | different kinds of lander deployments (and pick them back up),
       | etc. Incredible!
       | 
       | Some of the tech that's put on these kinds of research ships is
       | pretty crazy, too. For example, they put spherical glass floats
       | on landers that go to the bottom of the ocean[0]. Weights pull
       | the lander down, and when the lander receives a signal it
       | detaches the weights[1] so the floats pull it back up. These
       | glass floats are pretty big and need to be able to resist a huge
       | amount of pressure at depths of multiple kilometers. If I recall
       | correctly, if one of these spheres breaks, due to the pressure,
       | the collapse of the water on all sides of the sphere results in
       | as much energy released as an atomic bomb.
       | 
       | As to this research: the researchers initially weren't too happy
       | to find this. First they doubted if it was correct, but it's
       | actually worse when you find out it is in fact correct but it
       | goes against everything in biology books: how the hell are you
       | going to explain this to people?
       | 
       | [0] I'm not sure if a lander like that was used in this research
       | btw, it's just an example that I found interesting.
       | 
       | [1] One time, I think on a different cruise, researchers didn't
       | have enough weights to do an extra deployment, so they got
       | weights from the gym on the ship and put them on the lander.
       | There's a whole bunch of these kinds of interesting/funny stories
       | in different fields of science, could be nice if someone were to
       | collect them somewhere.
        
         | __MatrixMan__ wrote:
         | > it's actually worse when you find out it is in fact correct
         | but it goes against everything in biology books: how the hell
         | are you going to explain this to people?
         | 
         | Maybe it's just a cultural difference between biology and
         | physics, but don't they build those huge supercolliders because
         | they're hoping to find something that they can't explain? The
         | more theory you can destroy with evidence the better... or so I
         | thought.
        
           | harryvederci wrote:
           | I understand what you mean and I agree.
           | 
           | The difference here is that they were not looking for
           | something crazy, they just wanted to measure things to enable
           | policy makers to make a well-informed decision. Then you
           | unexpectedly find something crazy, and you don't have a clear
           | answer right away.
           | 
           | Imagine being the first person to spot a black swan, and you
           | happen to be a biologist, but your research didn't have
           | anything to do with birds. That's a pretty big derail, and I
           | don't think every scientist would be happy in that scenario.
        
         | adonovan wrote:
         | Interesting! I found a picture of the glass floats here:
         | https://schmidtocean.org/cruise-log-post/anatomy-of-a-lander...
         | 
         | BTW I doubt the energy yield of an imploding sphere is anywhere
         | close to a nuclear device, but implosion is a very rapid
         | process, so its power output is indeed very high. Examples:
         | 
         | - Pistol shrimps create cavities whose collapse emits light.
         | https://arstechnica.com/science/2022/07/pistol-shrimp-sport-...
         | 
         | - A Super-Kamiokande PMT implosion triggers a chain reaction.
         | http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/Particles/kamio.h...
         | 
         | - Downed WWII aircraft dropped hollow spheres into the ocean
         | whose implosion, heard thousands of miles away, signalled their
         | position
         | https://shaunmccarthy.wordpress.com/2008/07/13/ww2-secrets-t...
         | https://acousticstoday.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Underw...
         | 
         | Also, imploding spheres have been used as a proxy for nuclear
         | detonations in calibration experiments for sound-based nuclear
         | blast detection:
         | https://inis.iaea.org/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/...
        
       | pharos92 wrote:
       | "I first saw this in 2013 - an enormous amount of oxygen being
       | produced at the seafloor in complete darkness," explains lead
       | researcher Prof Andrew Sweetman from the Scottish Association for
       | Marine Science. "I just ignored it, because I'd been taught - you
       | only get oxygen through photosynthesis."
       | 
       | What a sad indictment on modern science.
        
         | mglz wrote:
         | In research you often learn that such totally unexpected, out
         | of place things are often artifacts. Being too quick to get
         | excited about that leads to disappointment and can seriously
         | damage your reputation in the scientific community.
         | 
         | It seems terrible, but a dampener on excitement is often needed
         | for focus.
        
       | newsbinator wrote:
       | I wonder if, given enough time, these nodules would be the engine
       | of the industrialized Octopus civilization.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-07-22 23:08 UTC)