[HN Gopher] With seventh person seemingly cured of HIV, signs of...
___________________________________________________________________
With seventh person seemingly cured of HIV, signs of hope for a
broader cure
Author : _tk_
Score : 9 points
Date : 2024-07-18 20:29 UTC (2 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (www.fiercebiotech.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (www.fiercebiotech.com)
| creativeSlumber wrote:
| What does "cured" mean here ? IIRC, HIV permanently modifies the
| host cells DNA. Is the DNA somehow reverted back to original in
| the cured patients?
| _tk_ wrote:
| From the article:
|
| > For almost six years they've tested his blood and other
| tissues and found no signs of the virus.
|
| Afaict, the researchers themselves don't know for sure why this
| has happened.
| jvanderbot wrote:
| From what I know (which is very little though I follow the news
| with excitement) HIV is "suppressed" by making it untestably
| low, which means (apparently) that you are also not contagious.
| IIRC, therefore _maybe_ you are a carrier, _but_ you experience
| no symptoms, will not develop AIDS, cannot be proven to be a
| carrier via testing, and are not contagious. Good enough.
|
| However, in this particular treatment, it was via bone marrow
| donation, so it literally _did_ change the DNA / body.
| pshirshov wrote:
| Bone marrow transplant. All the infected cells die, and the
| transplant produces new one, free from HIV an. carrying a
| mutation preventing them from being infected. This approach
| does not scale.
| 486sx33 wrote:
| Yeah "seemingly" and "effectively" aren't enough They are
| changing laws so if you're undetectable you don't have to
| disclose your HIV status to your partner(s) .. but you could
| transmit it if you stop taking anti virals or the HIV mutates and
| then you've infected your partners... and just because it's not
| detectable how do we know for sure you haven't transmitted it ?
|
| Seems very wrong.
| 486sx33 wrote:
| https://www.thestar.com/news/canada/supreme-court-clarifies-...
|
| And then one night your partner slips off the condom ... then
| what
| ebiester wrote:
| If your partner is on medication.. uncertainty, fear, and
| mistrust.
|
| But for as many medical trials as we've tried, you will not
| end up with HIV.
|
| If your partner is HIV+, you also are likely on prep. If not,
| you're probably looking at a course of HIV medication within
| 48 hours.
|
| So you are looking at a fair number of ways to mitigate, but
| the actual medical safety is a lower than expected risk.
|
| (The dangerous chance is if you're having sex with someone
| who doesn't know their positive status, and you don't take
| other protective measures.)
| JumpCrisscross wrote:
| > _just because it's not detectable how do we know for sure you
| haven't transmitted it_
|
| We know this unambiguously. If it's not in your body fluids you
| can't transmit it.
|
| We don't require folks produce a transcript of every VD they
| ever had to every prospective partner. If the science says not
| transmissible, that properly takes the matter out of the sphere
| of public safety and into that of personal trust. (I agree with
| you that it would seem polite for someone to disclose that.)
| tedunangst wrote:
| What are the signs of hope for a broader cure? That maybe
| heterozygous mutations work too? It's still a complete bone
| marrow transplant.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2024-07-18 23:12 UTC)