[HN Gopher] iDOS 3 App Review appeal rejected despite UTM PC Emu...
___________________________________________________________________
iDOS 3 App Review appeal rejected despite UTM PC Emulator Approval
Author : tech234a
Score : 15 points
Date : 2024-07-17 20:29 UTC (2 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (litchie.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (litchie.com)
| p0w3n3d wrote:
| We're living in times where big companies create (unlawful) law
| systems (theoretically based on law _somewhere_) and force others
| to obey (you must agree to our terms), without giving possibility
| to appeal nor have their rights proven under the real court
| (because it would be for example too expensive, or because that
| "you have accepted our terms").
|
| This was funny unless people jobs and lives started to rely on
| those big companies, and their _de facto_ monopoly (if your store
| vanishes from Google Maps your store will surely vanish in real
| life eventually)
| throwaway3306a wrote:
| How exactly is it unlawful? What law exactly says you have a
| right for appeal, or any rights to the company services at all?
|
| I don't want to say there isn't room for improvement. But I am
| not aware of any current law that would mean any of this is
| unlawful. I'd like to be proven wrong.
| a2128 wrote:
| EU's DMA recognizes the existence of gatekeepers and is
| supposed to make this kind of behavior unlawful and require
| allowing 3rd party app stores as an alternative
| blackeyeblitzar wrote:
| We have to recognize that companies above a certain amount of
| revenue or profit or users are as powerful as the government.
| Let's not waste time debating their practices - their size is
| itself a problem. Once above some threshold they really should
| be governed like a public utility.
| ryandrake wrote:
| They're only requiring their customers/developers/partners to
| play by their rules, and so far, we still have the ability to
| choose not to be customers.
|
| Nobody's yet put a gun to my head and forced me to agree to a
| company's terms of service.
| tech234a wrote:
| I had to add ?updated to the URL because a previous version of
| the article was discussed last month [1]. The comments widget on
| that site appears to vary depending on the exact URL even if the
| content is the same, so if you want to view the comments and
| replies placed on the article itself, use the original link:
| https://litchie.com/2024/04/new-hope
|
| [1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40782541
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2024-07-17 23:08 UTC)