[HN Gopher] STEMFIE, a 3D-printable construction set toy
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       STEMFIE, a 3D-printable construction set toy
        
       Author : _Microft
       Score  : 101 points
       Date   : 2024-07-13 12:01 UTC (10 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.stemfie.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.stemfie.org)
        
       | michaelmior wrote:
       | Very cool! I still think to date one of the coolest uses of 3D
       | printing I've seen is the Free Universal Construction Kit[0].
       | There are adapters for any pairing of LEGO, Lincoln Logs, K'NEX,
       | and several others. This is something that would likely never
       | happen commercially due to licensing issues.
       | 
       | [0] https://fffff.at/free-universal-construction-kit/
        
         | _Microft wrote:
         | I had heard of people creating adapter parts for different
         | systems but from what I remember, these attempts were by far
         | not as broad as this one. Thanks for sharing!
        
         | bitwize wrote:
         | I thought, that was an unfortunate choice of acronym. Then I
         | checked the domain: Austria, home of the village formerly known
         | as Fucking. So it tracks.
        
           | skrebbel wrote:
           | Hahaha it's for sure 100% on purpose
        
       | yjftsjthsd-h wrote:
       | 3D printing obviously wins for low barrier to entry, but I wonder
       | if it wouldn't be faster and cheaper at scale to make some of
       | those parts the "traditional" way with molds or such. Maybe worth
       | a group buy?
        
         | ThrowawayTestr wrote:
         | Injection molds start at 6 figures and you need a different
         | mold for every part.
        
           | echoangle wrote:
           | Theoretically you could have a large mold with multiple
           | different parts, kind of like plastic model kits.
        
           | amelius wrote:
           | > Injection molds start at 6 figures
           | 
           | This was the same 30 years ago. Why is this stagnant?
        
             | buildbot wrote:
             | It's not, xeometry can do it for much less! Or hubs.com
             | (now part of protolabs)
        
           | RodgerTheGreat wrote:
           | Moreover, some of the STEMFIE parts have complex internal
           | shapes and overhangs which would be extremely difficult to
           | form with injection molding. Unfortunately, the same
           | properties pose problems for hobbyist-level alternatives like
           | resin casting, too.
        
             | yjftsjthsd-h wrote:
             | I was looking at the threads/screws when I said _some_
             | parts might be worth making with traditional methods, yeah.
             | Even so, if you can make even some of the parts more
             | cheaply /quickly it seems like a possible win.
        
           | GrantMoyer wrote:
           | Apparently, for low volume production you can 3D print
           | injection molds.
           | 
           | Ex. https://all3dp.com/1/3d-printing-injection-molds-the-
           | ultimat...
        
           | WillAdams wrote:
           | Yes, if you want a stainless steel mold to very fine
           | tolerances which will hold up for very long production runs.
           | 
           | There are more affordable options these days, but whether or
           | no the newer options would be suitable for these parts or if
           | these parts would be suitable for molding (usually that
           | requires designing the part to take the requirements such as
           | "draft angle" which helps get a part out of a mold) would be
           | something which would need to be researched and accounted for
           | and so forth.
        
           | jkestner wrote:
           | 4 figures. You can get P20 molds, good for 20k cycles,
           | <$5,000 in China. And of course, you can get family molds
           | that make more than one part at a time, though most of the
           | savings is in per-part cost.
        
       | jhardy54 wrote:
       | This looks like it would solve a problem for me, thanks for
       | sharing! Candidly, I'm a bit turned off by the name, the framing
       | as a "toy", and honestly the ergonomics of the website (compared
       | to similar systems like https://gridfinity.xyz/ or
       | https://gridbeam.xyz/), but the underlying system seems like what
       | I'm looking for.
       | 
       | I've been prototyping some models with a 3D printer, and have
       | unfortunately been building my own sort of "construction set" so
       | that I can minimize my print times and only reprint the parts
       | that have changed. This means that I can mostly print flat
       | pieces, which take an hour rather than 12 hours, but trying to
       | invent a modularity system takes time (and iterations), which
       | detracts from iterating on the thing I'm actually working on.
       | 
       | For anyone having trouble navigating the website, I'd recommend
       | starting at https://www.stemfie.org/parts?view=category&id=14, or
       | maybe skimming
       | https://thangs.com/designer/Stemfie3D/sort/downloads if you just
       | want to see the most commonly used pieces.
        
         | kragen wrote:
         | yeah, this website is like endless ikea. is there a word of
         | explanation anywhere?
        
       | skrebbel wrote:
       | I don't think this is a name clash in any meaningful way but I'd
       | nevertheless like to share that in Dutch, a "stemfie" is a selfie
       | that you take from inside the voting booth and I love that we
       | have a 7 character word for that.
        
       | TOGoS wrote:
       | I like the idea of this sort of thing. Lots of different
       | predesigned parts, cool, cool.
       | 
       | But it's axe grinding time.
       | 
       | As I recall from digging into STEMFIE a while ago (because I
       | can't find this information on the site), they use some odd base
       | unit like 12.5mm, which I assume is chosen because it's
       | approximately half an inch (12.7mm), but "more metric". Which as
       | far as unit systems goes, gives you the worst of both worlds, in
       | that it will almost, but not quite, fit with your 1/2-inch based
       | construction systems (like Erector Set/Meccano beams), and the
       | metric numbers end up being not all that nice anyway (if you
       | subdivide a beam in half or thirds you up with 6.25 or 4.167mm),
       | so you may as well have picked exact compatibility with an
       | existing system, anyway.
       | 
       | I wish people were less afraid to use "half an inch" as their
       | base unit, if that's the size they want. It's as if they hear
       | 'metric is superior' in grade school and think that means that
       | real-world objects that happen to be designed around something
       | other multiples of 10 of some metric unit are yucky and they'd
       | better adjust it slightly so nobody notices, even if that means
       | throwing out compatibility with a lot of existing stuff.
       | 
       | Okay rant over.
        
         | tonyarkles wrote:
         | Lol I'm laughing about the time I designed a circuit board with
         | standard 0.1"/2.54mm headers but accidentally ordered 2.5mm
         | headers. The small 2-4 pin headers went in just fine and then
         | when I went to put the big 20 pin header in... no dice.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-07-13 23:00 UTC)