[HN Gopher] Former Twitter Employees $500M Severance Suit Dismissed
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Former Twitter Employees $500M Severance Suit Dismissed
        
       Author : Jimmc414
       Score  : 25 points
       Date   : 2024-07-11 19:13 UTC (3 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.wsj.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.wsj.com)
        
       | tardy_one wrote:
       | I don't really get his behavior on this one.. $500m is a lot to
       | save, but this is someone who has lost billions more on various
       | other things..
       | 
       | In some particular markets it may be helpful to only attract
       | workers who aren't very confident, but in the longer term I think
       | it would hurt possibilities to have a lot of the work force take
       | a piss on your job offers. I.e. never the best in a niche, only
       | whoever will entertain an offer connected to Musk.
        
         | martinbaun wrote:
         | I don't know the specifics of this, but the judge ruled in his
         | favor and thus the severance package didn't include this. Elon
         | musk literally have a whole team of lawyers just to deal with
         | all the times he gets sued for various thing - like every one
         | celebrity or rich person. If he paid everytime, he would have
         | went bankrupt many times.
        
           | falcor84 wrote:
           | > If he paid everytime, he would have went bankrupt many
           | times.
           | 
           | If he just paid proper severance every time (rather than
           | paying out after being sued), I think he'd still be
           | absolutely ok.
        
           | tardy_one wrote:
           | Deciding it is not a matter of federal law is not a ruling in
           | his favor for violating norms, verbal and written contracts..
           | If he can't afford the norms of compensation and leasing then
           | that is a reason to never do business with him.
        
             | lazide wrote:
             | Market dynamics have been trending in the direction of
             | leasing companies getting more desperate, not less.
        
               | tardy_one wrote:
               | >> but in the longer term I think it would hurt
               | possibilities
               | 
               | Doesn't matter in this weeks market, but he can't even
               | convince people he's capable of remaining a passive
               | investor, so ten years from now no top spots, no top
               | people because the way norms are enforced is by black
               | balling people like him whenever it is tolerably
               | inconvenient.
        
               | lazide wrote:
               | If you can afford to blackball billionaires without going
               | insolvent, then more power to you.
        
               | tardy_one wrote:
               | If you think ypu are going to make it rich signing
               | contracts only the other side can enforce then how would
               | you remain solvent? There's a lot more other business in
               | the world.
        
       | htrp wrote:
       | From the article
       | 
       | >The judge in California's northern district said this week that
       | the lawsuit by two ex-Twitter employees incorrectly claimed the
       | company's severance plan was governed by a federal law dictating
       | minimum payment thresholds.
       | 
       | From the legal docs
       | 
       | >Plaintiff Courtney McMillian was an employee at Twitter as the
       | Head of People Experience leading Compensation, Benefits, and
       | other global functions.
       | 
       | --------------------------
       | 
       | Seems strange that the person who headed up benefits would get
       | this one wrong.
        
       | ChrisArchitect wrote:
       | Some other coverage: https://techcrunch.com/2024/07/10/elon-musk-
       | does-not-owe-ex-...
       | 
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40935439
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-07-11 23:02 UTC)