[HN Gopher] Bruce Bastian, WordPerfect co-creator, has died
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Bruce Bastian, WordPerfect co-creator, has died
        
       Author : razin
       Score  : 150 points
       Date   : 2024-07-02 17:11 UTC (5 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.heraldextra.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.heraldextra.com)
        
       | tgma wrote:
       | The WordPerfect story as told by an early executive, Pete
       | Peterson:
       | 
       | http://www.wordplace.com/ap/almostperfect.pdf
        
         | songeater wrote:
         | This one and Sid Meier's "Memoir!" are two of my favourite
         | software dev stories. Both are quick easy reads / and from the
         | same era... code-nostalgia and hard- business mixed together.
        
           | peterfirefly wrote:
           | "The Autodesk File Bits of History, Words of Experience":
           | 
           | https://www.fourmilab.ch/autofile/e5/
        
             | teddyh wrote:
             | The Network Revolution - confessions of a computer
             | scientist (1982)
             | <https://books.google.com/books?id=6f8VqnZaPQwC>
        
         | Scoundreller wrote:
         | The things that were possible in 1980, when you could work
         | mornings in a grocery store making FOUR dollars an hour,
         | covering your house payment (with a large garden!) because your
         | drapery business is failing.
        
           | Phiwise_ wrote:
           | Partially because where WP set up shop, the Utah Valley in
           | the 1980s, was mostly still a rural county with a barely-
           | semi-urban exclave at the middle. Living in the center of
           | Provo let you pretend to be surrounded by actual development
           | while you worked or got your Psych degree, but WordPerfect
           | was building itself on top of apple orchards and alfalfa
           | fields once they went a few miles outside in any direction.
           | The land was much, much cheaper, and the old steelworkers'
           | not-even-ramblers much smaller, than even the neighboring
           | Salt Lake Valley a few tens of miles to the north, which by
           | now had a mostly-developed mix despite being more than a
           | little larger, let alone any of the actually urban metro
           | areas high tech businesses usually tend to spring up in.
           | 
           | Nowadays, though, the place is pretty much built out, and the
           | land prices have spiked accordingly since most of the nearby
           | areas are BLM land. Don't expect a next WordPerfect any time
           | soon.
        
           | kcplate wrote:
           | I was around back in the mid '80s and don't recall my $4/hour
           | PT job being able to be stretched that far. Especially when
           | mortgage rates in the early '80s were bouncing around 10-12%.
        
         | cmrdporcupine wrote:
         | vi/vim users everywhere gonna love this one:
         | 
         |  _" He also eliminated the different typing modes which plagued
         | the early word processors. With other products, if you were
         | typing new text at the end of a document, you had to be in a
         | Create mode. If you typed in the middle, you had to be in an
         | Edit mode. In an Edit mode, your typing would erase existing
         | text, so to insert text, you had to change to an Insert mode.
         | Alan allowed the user to type anywhere in the document without
         | a mode change"_
        
           | CoastalCoder wrote:
           | I use neovim, but I actually really _prefer_ the Wordstar-
           | like editing model (same /similar to Word Perfect's?).
           | 
           | You'd think that would push me towards emacs, but I just get
           | the sense that neovim has a more active community.
        
             | cmrdporcupine wrote:
             | Emacs is probably more active than ever.
             | 
             | But it's a whole thing. Ends up being a whole all-
             | encompassing world view. It's my preferred editor, and I
             | love and have memorized the default key bindings and window
             | management years ago... but I also ... have a love hate
             | thing with it. Something always needs tweaking and it takes
             | so long to start.
        
           | TeMPOraL wrote:
           | If it worked at s-expression level rather than character
           | level, it would make total sense! Editing and inserting are
           | different phases.
           | 
           | And of course it's trendy writers' advice today to do not mix
           | writing with editing. Create vs. Edit mode embodied that
           | before it was popular.
        
         | eigenvalue wrote:
         | This was a great story, I really enjoyed reading about it.
        
         | elzbardico wrote:
         | I knew an old guy who worked at Wordperfect, he absolutely
         | hated Pete Peterson with passion. From what he told me, Pete
         | would be exactly the kind of guy that would insist on an Return
         | to Office police just because if you are not suffering, you're
         | not giving us back all we pay you.
        
       | toomuchtodo wrote:
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bruce_Bastian
       | 
       | Related (from Wikipedia references):
       | 
       | https://www.deseret.com/utah/2024/06/17/word-perfect-co-foun...
       | 
       | https://www.fox13now.com/news/local-news/bruce-bastian-co-fo...
       | 
       | https://www.hrc.org/press-releases/human-rights-campaign-mou...
        
         | canucker2016 wrote:
         | The legacy.com link lists cause of death as pulmonary fibrosis.
         | 
         | https://www.legacy.com/news/celebrity-deaths/bruce-bastian-1...
        
       | dang wrote:
       | I changed the url from https://www.wsj.com/tech/bruce-bastian-
       | wordperfect-lgbtq-act... because that one doesn't appear to have
       | any paywall workaround.
       | 
       | It does appear to be a better article though, so if someone finds
       | a link that people can actually read, we can swap it back.
        
         | filmgirlcw wrote:
         | Here is a free link https://www.wsj.com/tech/bruce-bastian-
         | wordperfect-lgbtq-act..., although I'm not sure how many clicks
         | it will support, but here it is anyway.
        
         | dredmorbius wrote:
         | Black Bar?
         | 
         | (Emailed as well.)
        
       | ssl-3 wrote:
       | So long, and thanks for _Reveal Codes_.
        
         | MegaDeKay wrote:
         | ALT F3, my dear incredibly powerful friend. There wasn't a jam
         | you couldn't get out of once the magic codes behind the curtain
         | were revealed.
        
         | kstrauser wrote:
         | For those who weren't there at the time:
         | 
         | Imagine that all web editors emitted a proprietary document
         | format that wasn't documented anywhere except in the editor
         | that wrote a file and the viewer that interpreted it. You lived
         | with this because that's just the way it was done. It was
         | common to get a web page into such a state that 2/3 of the page
         | was red, one column was RTL for some reason, and everything was
         | in italics except for the 1 word you wanted to be that way.
         | 
         | You were used to this. It wasn't great, but that's life.
         | 
         | And then someone released a web editor with a "reveal HTML"
         | setting that suddenly showed you that `<font color="red">` tag
         | that messed everything up and allowed you to delete it.
         | 
         | That's what _Reveal Codes_ did for us. It was a revelation.
        
           | ssl-3 wrote:
           | Yep. It's just like a right-click "View Page Source" function
           | in a browser, except: A person can use it to perform
           | modifications.
           | 
           | Everything in WordPerfect was just markup, and it was
           | _editable_ markup at that.
        
         | zzo38computer wrote:
         | The "Reveal Codes" is a good idea. WYSIWYG without Reveal Codes
         | is no good.
        
       | tibbydudeza wrote:
       | The goto office package during MSDOS time period - First WordStar
       | then Multimate and then WordPerfect.
       | 
       | Famous for supporting every printer manufactured on planet Earth
       | - 3 disks of printer drivers.
       | 
       | Afaik it was written in assembler hence the tough time when they
       | needed to move to more modern OS/2 with Presentation Manager and
       | then later Windows 3.
        
         | banish-m4 wrote:
         | You could download zillions more from their BBS, especially
         | when new printers came out. That list was seemingly endless.
         | 
         | Also, when they supported video cards for print preview,
         | similarly they had extensive support.
        
       | criddell wrote:
       | WordPerfect is still being sold. Lawyers used to love it, but I
       | think they've mostly moved on to Word now. So who's still buying
       | new licenses for WP in 2024?
        
         | hnlmorg wrote:
         | Some authors still used it too
        
         | ChrisArchitect wrote:
         | Related:
         | 
         |  _I still use WordPerfect 6.2 for DOS_
         | 
         | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24413394
        
         | jccalhoun wrote:
         | They haven't released a new version since 2021 so I am guessing
         | hardly anyone is still buying WordPerfect. I'm guessing that
         | like Winzip (which they also own) it is just going on fumes now
         | while the company that owns it is focusing on other products.
        
       | LeoPanthera wrote:
       | F10, F7
        
       | hbarka wrote:
       | Brings back so many memories. WordPerfect, Quattro Pro, Novell,
       | and Wang Computers. So long, Mr Bastian, and thank you
        
         | banish-m4 wrote:
         | And Lotus 1-2-3, SuperCalc, dBase, and R:Base.
         | 
         | I met one of the Lotus cofounders on a group bicycling vacation
         | tour in Europe. While legally blind at the time, he had a
         | strategy for participating without crashing into anyone else.
        
       | banish-m4 wrote:
       | How else would I have shrunk 12 pages of high-school physics
       | notes to fit on the allowed 3x5" (76x127mm) index card with 0.1
       | pt font printed in raster mode at 600 dpi on an HP LaserJet 4? WP
       | 5.2 for DOS. IIRC, Word for Windows at the time was inflexible in
       | granularity of TrueType font sizes.
        
       | pjmorris wrote:
       | Late 80's: WP's 'Reveal Codes' helped me whip up some code that
       | imported our application's screen definitions so I could use them
       | directly in a specification document, impressing our customer. WP
       | was an elegant weapon in a more civilized age.
        
       | Jare wrote:
       | Back in the late 80's I was feeling the kind of the world editing
       | documents WYSIWYG with some Desktop Publishing package on my
       | Atari ST, while my friends toiled away in the stone age of PC
       | text mode with WordPerfect and that incredibly weird and
       | primitive thing (to me): reveal codes.
       | 
       | By the time I moved to PCs I could use Windows 3.x and MS Word,
       | so I lived through college in the late 80s and early 90s without
       | ever using WP. But I still learned to understand the meaning,
       | reason and power of reveal codes.
        
         | TheAmazingRace wrote:
         | Funny you should mention the Atari ST. I heard WordPerfect did
         | make it to the platform, but only for a short time. I wonder if
         | it was any good?
        
       | tombert wrote:
       | This makes me sadder than I thought it would.
       | 
       | My first computer [1] didn't have Microsoft Word on it, but it
       | had WordPerfect installed with the OEM Windows. I've always had
       | really horrid handwriting so I preferred to type out all my
       | homework since I was twelve or so, so I had to use whatever I
       | could to do so, and WordPerfect was there.
       | 
       | I grew to actually really like it, and I used it for about two
       | years until my hard drive crashed, I had to reinstall Windows,
       | and then I installed StarOffice (which Google was giving away for
       | free from Google Pack or something like that).
       | 
       | Still, I liked WordPerfect, and looking at the history it seems
       | like it was actually quite significant; a part of me feels like
       | it should have been the de facto word processor instead of Word.
       | 
       | [1] Not counting the hand me down Commodore 64 I got as a pretty
       | young kid.
        
         | jillesvangurp wrote:
         | I somehow memorized most of the function key combos for
         | wordperfect when in high school. And it wasn't like I was doing
         | loads of reports for school. I guess it was a combination of
         | there not being much else to do with the PC I had than playing
         | the few (copied) games I had and fiddling with my copy of
         | Wordperfect 5.1 (my neighbor who taught using it, supplied it).
         | In any case, bored as I was, I explored a lot of the feature
         | set and wrapped my head around features I would never use. Like
         | creating mailings. I don't think I've ever actually had to
         | create one. But it was there so I dove into it. For the post-
         | internet generation, this is how you would create snail mail
         | spam campaign in the early nineties. Merge a list of addressees
         | with a letter with the right codes and then print personalized
         | letters.
         | 
         | I also had a hand me down commodore 64 before that. My uncle
         | donated this when he got his first PC. I taught myself basic on
         | that. And with a few peeks and pokes managed a simple game
         | even. Alas, I had no disk drive and never thought to actually
         | save my creations anywhere. Like on the tape drive I did have.
         | The commodore 64 was great though. And my uncle bundled some
         | introductory computer science stuff with it (a primer on bits
         | and bytes) that along with the excellent C64 manual went a long
         | way to got me into programming. My local library was useless. I
         | had no access to information. There was no internet (at least
         | not accessible to me; I had not even heard of it). But that C64
         | manual got me curious and I had nothing better to do. I did not
         | realize it at the time but that bit of commodore 64
         | documentation and computer science intro is what changed my
         | life.
         | 
         | The PC I got after that was relatively boring because it did
         | not include anything useful in terms of documentation. Starved
         | of information, I dove into Wordperfect.
        
           | tombert wrote:
           | I probably would have done my homework on the C64 in the late
           | 90's, where doing something like that on the C64 would still
           | kind of be a viable thing (barely), but my dad didn't have
           | the printer for it anymore. My parents had a computer and I
           | did use it but mostly to play Descent.
           | 
           | Once I got my own computer I started doing _everything_ on
           | it, primarily because teachers genuinely could not read my
           | handwriting. This sometimes required me to retype the
           | worksheets in some capacity, but fortunately my teachers
           | never had a problem with me doing that (maybe because they
           | knew the alternative would be an unreadable mess). I learned
           | algebra and calculus via the use of MathType (which Florida
           | 's online school gave a free license and I took one class
           | virtually), and it's to a point now where I can almost never
           | find a pen when I need one because I type everything out,
           | since I haven't really practiced writing with by hand for
           | about twenty years. I genuinely get kind of uncomfortable
           | doing any kind of math with pen and paper now, since I'm so
           | used to MathType and now LaTeX.
           | 
           | I never did a depth-first analysis of the features of
           | WordPerfect, just the superficial stuff to make basic
           | documents, but I did like using it. I don't remember any of
           | the keystrokes anymore, but I did learn them when I was first
           | using it.
        
       | annoyingnoob wrote:
       | WordPerfect 5.x, running on DOS, is/was the best work processor
       | ever. WordPerfect indeed.
        
         | insane_dreamer wrote:
         | that's my experience as well
        
       | vrinsd wrote:
       | WordPerfect really was an outstanding word processor. Reveal
       | codes (like many others here have pointed out) made "debuging"
       | formatting issues relatively painless as was the "make it fit to
       | a certain layout or size" feature. In an era when you didn't
       | really have WYSIWYG they did an excellent job of enabling users
       | to more or less get nice looking output without having to go to
       | TeX.
       | 
       | I remember it took a LONG time before there was a Windows version
       | of WordPerfect which I think took a lot of their momentum away.
       | Combine that with Microsoft basically giving away Office or
       | bundling Word+Excel they succeeded in eroding market share from
       | Lotus / WordPerfect.
       | 
       | I think the Lotus Suite may have even pre-dated MSFT Office as a
       | suite (not 100% certain) and as usual functionality was often
       | superior or better implemented than MSFT's.
       | 
       | Credit should also go to WordPerfect for making a Linux version
       | in the 2000's before Linux desktop was as mature as it is today.
       | Sadly they didn't continue this effort.
       | 
       | I'm glad we have LibreOffice but it's frankly a clone of MSFT
       | Office, the UI is very cluttered and it has the same "weirdisms"
       | that Office has.
        
         | Gibbon1 wrote:
         | The thing that got me was I used to use the second to last
         | version of WordStar. Which had paragraph and page styles that
         | you could import, edit and apply to text. When it became
         | apparent that I couldn't be using Word Star to share documents
         | anymore I tried WordPerfect and it was so annoying. You just
         | want to set the paragraph style and start typing not play with
         | tags. Eventually I just used Word. But styles in word wasn't
         | nearly as obvious and straight foreword.
        
       | seanlane wrote:
       | On a podcast series covering some of the history of the
       | intersection of business and technology in Utah (The 4th Node),
       | the hosts had an episode with Bruce Bastian. Covers his
       | background and the history of WordPerfect, for those curious to
       | learn more and/or hear from Bruce himself:
       | 
       | https://open.spotify.com/episode/1z0AEyFvPN30WFbQc317T6
        
       | joelfried wrote:
       | I've never really seen Word as anything other than inferior,
       | having cut my teeth on WordPerfect.
       | 
       | Others have posted their favorite shortcuts (and Reveal Codes
       | truly was magical); my most used ones I haven't seen mentioned
       | were Ctrl+Shift+F1 and Alt+Shift+F1. IIRC, those were spell check
       | and thesaurus, respectively.
       | 
       | RIP Bruce, you made the world a better place for millions.
        
       | pjfin123 wrote:
       | I know lawyers (who do a lot of very particular word processing)
       | who kept using WordPerfect for decades after Microsoft Word had
       | become the norm.
        
         | CoastalCoder wrote:
         | > I know lawyers
         | 
         | Sorry, man.
         | 
         | ---
         | 
         | But does that mean you have some good lawyer jokes to share?
        
           | kstrauser wrote:
           | Why don't sharks bite lawyers?
           | 
           | Professional courtesy.
           | 
           | (I have a million of these from my lawyer friends.)
        
             | CoastalCoder wrote:
             | Please, keep `em coming!
        
               | kstrauser wrote:
               | What's the difference between a catfish and a lawyer?
               | 
               | One's a scum sucking bottom dweller and the other's a
               | fish.
               | 
               | (Stopping with this one. It's fun trading these with
               | attorney buddies but I don't want someone to take them
               | out of context as an opportunity to start lawyer
               | bashing.)
        
         | kstrauser wrote:
         | My understanding was that a lot of courtroom document standards
         | originated as "...like WordPerfect does it." For example,
         | before word processing, no one expected documents to include
         | word counts. When word processing came along, judges wanted to
         | know much much they were going to be expected to read, so they
         | started requiring the cover sheet to include the number of
         | words. And because WP came along at the right time, its
         | algorithm for counting words (do you include footnotes?
         | Headers/footers? The word "page" on "page 23"? Section titles?)
         | became the de facto way to do it, and judges being judges, some
         | were persnickety about the numbers matching exactly and would
         | throw a hissy if they didn't.
         | 
         | Here's an example of someone bumping against that:
         | https://www.wpuniverse.com/vb/forum/wordperfect/troubleshoot...
        
       | dctoedt wrote:
       | In the 1990s I loved the macro feature of WP 5.1. Macros and
       | Reveal Codes let me write a basic Emacs keyboard emulator to
       | accommodate my fingers' muscle memory.
       | 
       | When Windows got to be a thing, my law firm considered switching
       | to WP for Windows because WP 5.1 for DOS was the unquestioned
       | industry standard for lawyers. But we surveyed our clients
       | (almost all of them were big companies) and learned that _they_
       | were going over to Word for Windows. So we said,  "who gives a
       | [hoot] what other law firms are using" and switched to Word for
       | Windows. It was more than a bit of a downgrade from WP 5.1 in DOS
        
       | starik36 wrote:
       | Brings back great memories of laying out WordPerfect keyboard
       | overlays at my University Computer Lab job back in the day. And
       | helping students to Bold (F6) and Underline (F8) their documents.
       | 
       | Good times.
       | http://xahlee.info/kbd/wordperfect_shortcuts_strip.html
        
       | asimpleusecase wrote:
       | Word perfect was the best - Reveal Codes - was my ninja tool for
       | making thing format just right.
        
       | xbar wrote:
       | F7
       | 
       | Your changes have been saved, Bruce. RIP
        
       | tssva wrote:
       | WordPerfect 4.2 for DOS paired with a model F XT or AT layout
       | (function keys on the side) keyboard has a special place in my
       | heart. That combination along with a copious amount of weed got
       | me through a lot of college papers in the late 80s.
        
       | ggm wrote:
       | Reveal codes was useful. The loss of screen realestate to the
       | hint bar was sometimes annoying.
       | 
       | I preferred runoff/[t]roff and vi
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-07-02 23:00 UTC)