[HN Gopher] The Bleak Genius of Michel Foucault
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The Bleak Genius of Michel Foucault
        
       Author : Caiero
       Score  : 35 points
       Date   : 2024-06-27 17:36 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.compactmag.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.compactmag.com)
        
       | janice1999 wrote:
       | > In practical terms, Foucault's and his followers' assault
       | against sexual normalization has helped bring about institutions
       | that disavow normativity at every turn.
       | 
       | I assume this is an oblique defense of Foucault's lifelong and
       | vocal campaign to remove the age of consent so adults could have
       | sex with children. Foucault was also recently accused of having
       | purchased boys for sex by his friend Guy Sorman.
       | 
       | https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2021/4/16/reckoning-with-...
        
         | dralley wrote:
         | Aside from this, the pretension is literally dripping from that
         | sentence, my god.
         | 
         | It's difficult to value the "genius" of people (and frankly
         | entire fields) who seem to apply most of their cleverness
         | towards being inscrutable for no good reason.
        
           | prewett wrote:
           | I think the purpose of the inscrutability serves is to "idea
           | launder" obvious falsehoods into something believable, much
           | like the convoluted path one takes to convert stolen money
           | into believably-legal money.
        
             | blacksmith_tb wrote:
             | Well to be fair there are two arguments, one is that you
             | can't use normal commonplace phrasing to describe something
             | that's at odds with the 'normal'; the other is that in a
             | publish-or-perish academic world each new generation of
             | thinkers invents a new jargon to differentiate themselves
             | from their predecessors (and keep their jobs). Not that
             | both couldn't be simultaneously true, but I think it's a
             | little too cheeky to say they're making it up for no reason
             | at all.
        
             | bitwize wrote:
             | "Idea laundering". You've neatly summarized what I believe
             | Curtis Yarvin to have been doing, both with his political
             | writing and his computational silliness like Urbit.
        
         | hackandthink wrote:
         | The article about Foucault's pedophilia is worth reading. I'm
         | not really surprised. When I read the piece on Pierre Riviere
         | decades ago, it creeped me out.
         | 
         | https://markkukoivusalo.org/thinkers/foucault/cp/pierre-rivi...
        
         | pasabagi wrote:
         | Apparently bullshit, though: https://www.lexpress.fr/idees-et-
         | debats/michel-foucault-et-l...
         | 
         | Guy Sorman wasn't Foucault's friend, and later said (about his
         | statement) that he never actually saw anything he described,
         | but just a 'convergence of disturbing clues'. You have to bear
         | in mind that accusing gay people of pedophilia is pretty
         | standard fare for homophobes up and to this day.
        
           | complaintdept wrote:
           | IIRC Focault still signed a petition to legalize sex with
           | children. Not sure why, but it wasn't an entirely unpopular
           | opinion among (often) leftist intellectuals in Europe at the
           | time.
        
             | pasabagi wrote:
             | I mean, it seems a bit unclear _what_ his political
             | positions actually were, but it does seem they were just
             | opinions. As philosophers go, that 's pretty small beer:
             | Thales used to roast people alive in a brass container,
             | Marcus Aurelius was responsible for numerous genocides, and
             | Heidegger was a card-carrying Nazi.
        
               | rcMgD2BwE72F wrote:
               | >Thales used to roast people alive in a brass container
               | 
               | Source?
        
               | teractiveodular wrote:
               | That would be Phalaris of brazen bull fame, not Thales.
               | 
               | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phalaris
        
             | MrBuddyCasino wrote:
             | Foucault, Jean-Paul Sartre, Simone de Beauvoir and Jacques
             | Derrida signed a petition to decriminalise pedophilia [0].
             | The age of consent at that time in France was 15.
             | 
             | "In a sense, all the rest of my life I've been trying to do
             | intellectual things that would attract beautiful boys."
             | 
             | [0] https://x.com/AuronMacintyre/status/1806019580315463689
        
           | Amezarak wrote:
           | That article says they were probably teenagers, not young
           | children.
           | 
           | > After interviewing residents of Sidi Bou Said who had known
           | the philosopher, his report concluded: "Michel Foucault was
           | not a paedophile, but he was seduced by the young Ephebes."
           | 
           | Not exactly _vindicating_ , but not the same level of horror,
           | I suppose. It's not exactly a crazy idea given Foucault's own
           | words quoted elsewhere in this thread.
        
         | slibhb wrote:
         | The author is a social conservative. He's by no means defending
         | Foucault's "assault against sexual normalization".
         | 
         | My sense is that, by "recognizing Foucault's bleak genius," the
         | subtext is "we need God because otherwise there's nothing but
         | depravity".
        
       | slowhadoken wrote:
       | Noam Chomsky called Foucault a morally bankrupt phony. I think
       | Chomsky was being kind.
        
         | idontknowtech wrote:
         | Foucault is the primary intellectual force behind the
         | contemporary social science trend of seeing everything through
         | a power relationships lens. His influence cannot be overstated,
         | at least in the American academy. It's bizarre.
        
           | slowhadoken wrote:
           | I've read Foucault. I'm familiar with western and continental
           | philosophy. I studied psychology, sociology, and political
           | science too. Foucault's influence, as well as French
           | existentialism and post-structuralism in general, are to
           | blame for the current state of social science. Boiling
           | everything down to a cultural power struggle is a pyramid
           | scheme, a cult that infiltrated American academia. It's
           | certainly not a moral philosophy and Foucault's life reflects
           | that.
        
         | vinteruggla wrote:
         | Why? Any context or reference?
        
           | dcre wrote:
           | You can watch Foucault and Chomsky debate!
           | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3wfNl2L0Gf8
        
           | slowhadoken wrote:
           | Foucault was a degenerate. He espoused a belief in moral
           | relativism to conceal the fact that he was a monster. In
           | reality he was at best a pedophile and at worst a culture
           | destroying sociopath.
           | https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=i63_kAw3WmE
        
         | slowhadoken wrote:
         | What's funny is people down voted this comment even though it's
         | true. What does that say about the voting system on this site?
         | lol
        
         | viccis wrote:
         | Was that before or after Foucault cooked him in the debate?
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-06-28 23:01 UTC)