[HN Gopher] 200 people charged in $2.7B health care fraud crackdown
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       200 people charged in $2.7B health care fraud crackdown
        
       Author : apsec112
       Score  : 155 points
       Date   : 2024-06-27 21:09 UTC (1 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (apnews.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (apnews.com)
        
       | cs702 wrote:
       | $2.7B in made-up claims, divided by 200 accused individuals,
       | gives us an average of $13.5M per alleged criminal.
       | 
       | That's not peanuts!
        
         | kurthr wrote:
         | "In the Arizona case, prosecutors have accused two owners of
         | wound care companies of accepting more than $330 million in
         | kickbacks as part of a scheme to fraudulently bill Medicare for
         | amniotic wound grafts, which are dressings to help heal
         | wounds."
         | 
         | Total fraud in that case was $900 million, for a only 500
         | patients, or almost $2M per patient.
        
           | Spooky23 wrote:
           | Wound care is bullshit when it's not fraud. My dad was
           | getting billed $12,000 weekly for treatment of bedsores due
           | to neglect when he was inpatient. The procedure took under 15
           | minutes.
           | 
           | Compromised patient, injured due to basic incompetence, A
           | Medicare probably paid a million dollars or more to treat it.
        
             | proee wrote:
             | That is insane. Did his insurance cover this? What happens
             | if you refuse to pay such outlandish fees? I'm sorry he had
             | to deal with this.
        
               | llamaimperative wrote:
               | GP says Medicare paid for it, so the US taxpayer.
        
               | Aurornis wrote:
               | > Did his insurance cover this? What happens if you
               | refuse to pay such outlandish fees?
               | 
               | The billed numbers are almost completely made up. The
               | insurance company (Medicare in this case) will only
               | reimburse up to a set amount.
               | 
               | The reimbursement is calculated as min(billed_amount,
               | allowed_amount). If the facility accidentally bills less
               | than the allowed_amount, they get less than they could
               | have. So to make sure they get 100% of the possible
               | payout, they bill extremely high numbers to insurance.
               | 
               | It's a dumb system, but it's something you have to keep
               | in mind whenever someone talks about how much things cost
               | in the US system. With expensive procedures, products, or
               | drugs, virtually nobody ever pays the big number. It's
               | just a placeholder to make sure insurance payouts are not
               | left on the table.
        
               | bliteben wrote:
               | I don't understand how it isn't fraud. I looked at an
               | ambulance bill for my mom the other day:
               | 
               | $1798 total
               | 
               | -$388 Medicare paid
               | 
               | -$1324 Service adjustment
               | 
               | $86 Amount you owe.
               | 
               | I don't think dumb is sufficient to explain this. It's
               | pretty easy for me to see how someone leaps from this de
               | facto legal system to outright fraud, because the line
               | between them is pretty thin.
        
               | Spooky23 wrote:
               | That was from the Medicare statement. I think the wound
               | care courts as a surgery.
        
           | guynamedloren wrote:
           | > Total fraud in that case was $900 million, for a only 500
           | patients, or almost $2M per patient.
           | 
           | That seems so outside the bounds of reality that I'm
           | questioning if it's what happened here. I can't imagine how
           | that would pass any kind of sniff test by Medicare.
           | 
           | Quote from the article: "In less than two years, more than
           | $900 million in bogus claims were submitted to Medicare for
           | grafts that were used on fewer than 500 patients, prosecutors
           | said."
           | 
           | The alternative interpretation of this is that the grafts
           | were _applied_ to 500 patients, but potentially many many
           | more were billed for grafts that they didn't need (and didn't
           | receive). Maybe more feasible?
        
         | onlyrealcuzzo wrote:
         | No - but $2.7B in fraud over $4.5T total healthcare spending
         | per year is peanuts.
         | 
         | This appears to happen over ~5 years or more - so that's $2.7B
         | vs $22.5T or about 0.012% of total spending.
         | 
         | The reason healthcare is broken in the US is not because of
         | fraud.
         | 
         | It's due to the design.
         | 
         | By the way, fraud is inevitable.
         | 
         | We _might_ be able to save about ~1% per year on healthcare if
         | fraud was reduced to more reasonable levels. That 's not going
         | to move the needle at all.
        
           | vkou wrote:
           | The design of the system makes normal billing practice
           | indistinguishable from fraud. I will go as far as to say that
           | charging $200 for a Tylenol, bundled with a million other
           | different line items in a treatment _is_ fraud.
        
           | Aloisius wrote:
           | It's not like this is the only fraud we've found in years.
           | It's not even the first billion dollar fraud incident case
           | this year.
           | 
           | The FBI estimates fraud accounts for upwards of 10% of
           | healthcare expenditures.
        
         | sidewndr46 wrote:
         | if they were smart they paid taxes on the fraudulent gains. So
         | they netted US $5 million or more each
        
       | autoexec wrote:
       | This is the sort of action we need more of to help combat
       | corruption and restore some basic faith in the medical industry,
       | but it's only a start. The convictions that follow have to come
       | with severe enough consequences to more than offset the the
       | millions they got while hurting patients and stealing from
       | taxpayers. If the people involved get away with a slap on the
       | wrist or fines that are only a fraction of what they made in
       | profit it will only encourage others to do the same thing. Any
       | doctors accepting kickbacks should, at the very least, lose their
       | license and be prevented from practicing medicine again.
        
         | marcod wrote:
         | The other good news of the day was that the Sackler family lost
         | much of their future prosecution immunity
         | 
         | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40813369
        
         | rdtsc wrote:
         | I suspect this is just a the tip of the iceberg. These clowns
         | are just the dumb ones who got caught. I mean they bought books
         | on "how to disappear" and "how to avoid criminal prosecution".
         | I guess the smart ones get away with it regularly. It's sad
         | really.
         | 
         | > The convictions that follow have to come with severe enough
         | consequences to more than offset the the millions they got
         | while hurting patients and stealing from taxpayers.
         | 
         | I wish they land in prison for many years and then have to pay
         | back what they stole and for all the court fees as well.
        
         | dheera wrote:
         | Related: https://hospitalogy.com/articles/2024-06-18/done-adhd-
         | telehe...
        
       | bozhark wrote:
       | Jail for the execs.
       | 
       | Loss of license for the nurses and doctors.
       | 
       | People died but the money matters more?
        
         | RecycledEle wrote:
         | If people died that would not have died, is this murder?
        
       | rdtsc wrote:
       | > Authorities allege Gehrke and King, who got married this year,
       | knew charges were coming and had been preparing to flee. At their
       | home, authorities found a book titled "How To Disappear: Erase
       | Your Digital Footprint, Leave False Trails, and Vanish Without a
       | Trace," according to court papers. In one of their bags packed
       | for their flight, there was a book titled "Criminal Law Handbook:
       | Know Your Rights, Survive The System,"
       | 
       | I guess "step 15" from the book was "marry your criminal
       | associates, so you're not forced to testify against each other":
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spousal_privilege?
       | 
       | Step 1 should be "don't buy any incriminating books related to
       | your planned disappearance" followed by the next chapter, "step
       | 2: too late, already".
        
         | marcod wrote:
         | Would you expect that kind of book to make any difference for
         | final sentencing?
        
           | rdtsc wrote:
           | I can see it making a difference when presented to jury, if
           | it's admitted as evidence. It may not be main evidence but
           | combined altogether with other things they did, it might tilt
           | the balance into the "sentence them closer the maximum term
           | limit" vs the "lower end".
        
           | armada651 wrote:
           | No, but it will make a difference in determining whether
           | they're a flight risk by the judge. Given the evidence these
           | two will probably await trail in jail rather than at home. Or
           | at the very least they just bought themselves a nice new
           | ankle bracelet.
        
             | sandworm101 wrote:
             | The books evidence a desire to flee but equally evidence an
             | ineptitude, the lack of an ability to flee. Buying a ticket
             | for an international flight is akin to making an
             | appointment with the FBI for you to be arrested. The FBI
             | only dreams that every fugitive first pass through
             | inspection/x-ray before being arrested in an airport
             | terminal ringed with security. No need to worry about a
             | fight, weapons or a dangerous police chase. The perps have
             | already been frisked by the FAA. If these people ever run,
             | they won't get far.
        
               | mulmen wrote:
               | [delayed]
        
         | cs702 wrote:
         | _> The owners of the wound care companies, Alexandra Gehrke and
         | Jeffrey King, were arrested this month at the Phoenix airport
         | as they were boarding a flight to London_
         | 
         | The whole sequence of events reads like something straight out
         | of a Vince Gilligan show, like _Breaking Bad_ or _Better Call
         | Saul_.[a]
         | 
         | The only significant difference is that Gilligan's shows take
         | place in New Mexico instead of Arizona.
         | 
         | --
         | 
         | [a] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vince_Gilligan
        
         | snibsnib wrote:
         | I have read 'How to disappear', i don't think it would be very
         | useful here. It's written by two private detectives to help
         | people evade stalkers or family violence. It specifically
         | recommends against breaking the law. In any case it would be a
         | bit out of date by now.
        
           | pyuser583 wrote:
           | So if you're ever arrested for anything, that fact can be
           | used to argue against bail. For the rest of your life.
        
         | pridkett wrote:
         | Spousal privilege may not apply when both members of the couple
         | are accused of committing the crime.
        
           | defen wrote:
           | I can't help but think of this classic Arrested Development
           | scene https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=idqG3thKtpU
        
             | metadat wrote:
             | That's too perfect.
        
           | strangattractor wrote:
           | Guess SBF marrying Changpeng Zhao wouldn't have helped any;)
        
         | mahogany wrote:
         | "They can't arrest a husband and wife for the same crime!"
        
         | AceJohnny2 wrote:
         | This is bleak, but it reminds me how police found, in the home
         | of convicted murderer and former Linux FS contributor Hans
         | Reiser, a book about how to get away with murder.
        
       | treeFall wrote:
       | Here's the scammer's wedding registry from earlier this year.
       | They look happy https://www.theknot.com/us/jeff-king-and-lexie-
       | gehrke-feb-20...
        
         | voganmother42 wrote:
         | the schedule not being chronological is baffling to me, is that
         | a common thing?
        
           | data_ders wrote:
           | agreed! more baffling than their fraud!
        
         | data_ders wrote:
         | lol when you click "our story" [1] it says:
         | 
         | > Our Story coming soon!
         | 
         | also under "Travel":
         | 
         | > Travel coming soon!
         | 
         | haha no kidding!
         | 
         | [1]: https://www.theknot.com/us/jeff-king-and-lexie-gehrke-
         | feb-20...
        
         | marcod wrote:
         | Dolce&Gabbana Casa Leopard Silk & Wool Throw $3,245.00 -
         | Purchased
        
         | montag wrote:
         | Louis Vuitton Medallion Blanket $1510.00 - Purchased
         | 
         | Really can't make this stuff up
        
           | janalsncm wrote:
           | Maybe I'm cheap but $335 for an extra small pet leash seems a
           | bit steep.
        
             | squigz wrote:
             | You're probably just not disgustingly rich.
        
           | cs702 wrote:
           | Don't forget about the six beach towels for $4650:
           | 
           | https://www.theknot.com/us/jeff-king-and-lexie-gehrke-
           | feb-20...
        
         | lxm wrote:
         | Baccarat Lucky Butterfly $250.00 Purchased
         | 
         | Maybe not as lucky as advertised?
        
         | b3lvedere wrote:
         | Wedding Party coming soon!
         | 
         | I bet $15 on 'nope'
        
         | SCUSKU wrote:
         | Checks out that they were in Phoenix/Scottsdale... When I
         | visited last year it felt very much like LA 2.0. Lots of
         | plastic surgery, people flaunting wealth, and generally
         | materialistic and shallow culture. Not representative of the
         | entire area of course, but I was surprised by how much of that
         | there was.
        
           | com2kid wrote:
           | Agree on all accounts, but I'd also like to add: Surprisingly
           | good Italian food. Not the standard "high class" American
           | stuff slathered in cheese either. Just really good wholesome
           | delicious high quality dishes I as not expecting that from
           | Scottsdale.
           | 
           | But yeah, otherwise kind of an odd place.
        
       | hdivider wrote:
       | I wonder: would this level of fraud occur if the US had universal
       | healthcare, or its effective equivalent?
       | 
       | Asking out of genuine intellectual curiosity, not with political
       | or other overtones (even with the highly political character of
       | the news today).
        
         | davidw wrote:
         | The biggest scam in US health care is the insurance industry.
         | 
         | Most of the 'fraud' that doctors complained about where I lived
         | in Italy was old people coming in with mostly imagined
         | complaints because they're lonely and don't have anyone and a
         | doctor visit is free. Which is kind of sad, but... not the same
         | level of problematic.
        
           | Aurornis wrote:
           | > Most of the 'fraud' that doctors complained about where I
           | lived in Italy was old people coming in with mostly imagined
           | complaints because they're lonely and don't have anyone and a
           | doctor visit is free. Which is kind of sad, but... not the
           | same level of problematic.
           | 
           | I don't think that's a relevant analogy at all. In this case,
           | the _doctors_ were the ones perpetuating the fraud. Not the
           | patients, not the insurance company.
        
         | LeonB wrote:
         | There would still be some fraud, but since the prices of basic
         | medical care would be considerably lower (as demonstrated
         | everywhere else in the world) the amount of money made from
         | fraud would be considerably smaller thus creating less
         | incentives.
        
         | glzone1 wrote:
         | This level of fraud is almost non-existent when there is NO
         | insurance and NO universal healthcare.
         | 
         | Anytime the person paying is not the one receiving service, the
         | appeal of fraud goes up. When the person paying is not paying
         | with their own money the appeal goes up and a TON of incentives
         | argue against finding fraud. At least in govt, there is
         | sometimes a willful blind eye because finding fraud causes a
         | huge headache and you don't benefit or get paid more. In fact,
         | if you are taking an administrative fee to manage the program,
         | reducing expenditures can hurt your own budget.
         | 
         | I have traveled internationally where folks paid cash for
         | services. It was a bit crazy - they would basically hold you
         | hostage until you paid a bill / impound your car etc. BUT you
         | could buy many drugs OTC (no DR visit even required) and the
         | layers of things like approvals, pre-approvals, billing and
         | billing codes etc simply didn't exist.
        
         | jcjkrigii wrote:
         | This was Medicare fraud, which I imagine you'd see more of if
         | universal healthcare was implemented as single payer "Medicare
         | for all."
        
         | Aurornis wrote:
         | > I wonder: would this level of fraud occur if the US had
         | universal healthcare, or its effective equivalent?
         | 
         | The fraud was perpetuated against Medicare, which is the US-run
         | insurance plan for people 65 and older and people with
         | disabilities. Nearly 20% of the population is on Medicare.
         | 
         | Universally letting everyone on to the plan would have actually
         | allowed them to run the fraud on everyone, not just people on
         | Medicare.
        
       | readthenotes1 wrote:
       | I am shocked, _shocked_ , to find corruption is going on in here!
        
       | devmor wrote:
       | If you're interested in how often people get away with this kind
       | of scam, and how they get away with it, I strongly recommend the
       | two episodes on the subject from the popular podcast "Behind The
       | Bastards" titled "Part One: The Fake Doctors Who Gave Everyone
       | Alzheimer's" and "Behind the Bastards (2018) Part Two: The Real
       | Bastard Was Health Insurance Companies All Along"
       | 
       | These episodes detail several people who pulled off these same
       | scams, including how others tried to turn them in for it and were
       | ignored.
        
       | guynamedloren wrote:
       | Horrible, disgusting, yet not at all surprising. I don't know
       | what medical billing accountability looks like in this dizzyingly
       | complex system, but as a US citizen and patient of the US
       | healthcare system, it looks barely existent. My family has fought
       | our fair share of bogus healthcare charges. One instance: after
       | my daughter was born at a birthing center (independent of a
       | hospital), my wife experienced postpartum complications and was
       | transferred to a nearby hospital for care. As if that experience
       | wasn't stressful and traumatic enough, many months later we were
       | hit with a surprise charge from the hospital for treatment and
       | care of our newborn baby - the baby that was delivered hours
       | earlier, in a separate location, that never left my arms in the
       | hospital!
       | 
       | All that to say - it's alarmingly easy for a charge to get
       | processed in a batch of other charges, and either insurance pays
       | it without question, or the patient pays it unknowingly. During
       | our experience, we learned that this kind of thing is exceedingly
       | common. The power dynamic between patients and healthcare
       | administration severely misaligned, the information imbalance is
       | huge, and the patient is always in a compromised position.
       | 
       | The article doesn't include details on how they tracked down
       | these criminals (I'm curious to know!), but it wouldn't surprise
       | me in the least if this is just the tip of the iceberg.
        
         | DFHippie wrote:
         | When our first child was born (a long, traumatic story in
         | itself), after the ordeal was over and we were resting in the
         | hospital, a nice fellow came by and asked whether we wanted to
         | test our baby's hearing. Sure? No mention was made of a price.
         | He put a device in the baby's ears. Hearing was fine. Then we
         | got the bill. Hundreds of dollars, maybe $500, for a moment's
         | effort and no expenditure of resources. We had almost no money
         | at the time and certainly no insurance. This was in Nashville.
         | He was an independent contractor they let wander the halls of
         | the laying in ward accosting unsuspecting new parents. He
         | bought the machine. Now he's got a steady income from this
         | grift.
         | 
         | Another event in Nashville, my wife cut her hand making dinner.
         | We walked to the emergency room. Eventually someone saw us. He
         | asked whether we wanted to try some experimental tree sap glue
         | to close the wound. Sure? It actually wasn't much of a cut and
         | it had stopped bleeding. No mention of a price. While he was
         | squeezing a droplet of liquid out of a tube the attending
         | physician looked over his shoulder. Yep, checks out. It was
         | basically a glance, less than a minute's interaction and no
         | interaction with out. The whole experience, again, when we had
         | essentially no means to pay, cost hundreds of dollars. They guy
         | who glanced over glue man's shoulder tacked on a couple hundred
         | for himself. Coming through the door and signing some papers
         | then waiting hours to be attended to cost us maybe $400.
         | 
         | I've got similar stories from Washington, DC. My son (not the
         | baby with the hearing test) had to deal with the medical system
         | in Vermont. He's dead now but we're still paying the bills. And
         | now we have insurance.
         | 
         | Regular healthcare in the US looks a hell of a lot like a scam.
         | If you have insurance, the scam is less visible, but it's the
         | same system.
        
           | Aurornis wrote:
           | > This was in Nashville. He was an independent contractor
           | they let wander the halls of the laying in ward accosting
           | unsuspecting new parents. He bought the machine. Now he's got
           | a steady income from this grift.
           | 
           | Newborn hearing screening is standard, or even mandated, in
           | most states. This wasn't just a grifter they allowed to roam
           | the halls. They were contracted with the person to administer
           | the tests. It's likely it was even required by your state
           | lawmakers:
           | 
           | Here is the page from the TN department of health that says
           | all newborns should be screened before leaving the hospital
           | or before one month of age:
           | https://www.tn.gov/health/information-for-
           | individuals/i/fact...
           | 
           | If your state is like mine, there might be a law that
           | requires this to be offered at the hospital, along with
           | several other newborn screens.
           | 
           | Newborn hearing screening isn't a scam, and the hospital may
           | not have even had a choice about offering it due to the laws.
        
         | linuxhansl wrote:
         | My son got his first official letter when we was about two
         | weeks old. It was a bill from the hospital for his birth:
         | $8,000. He was directly charged on that bill, not us parents.
         | 
         | And that was on top of the $24,000 bill that we had received
         | from hospital. So $32,000 for a no-frills (from a medical
         | viewpoint) birth and that was many years ago.
         | 
         | The health insurance paid 100% of both bills, so we ended up
         | not following up.
        
       | Sparkyte wrote:
       | If only we can be faster to detect health care fraud.
        
       | dheera wrote:
       | Related: https://hospitalogy.com/articles/2024-06-18/done-adhd-
       | telehe...
        
       | RecycledEle wrote:
       | From what I see on the news, rich white-collar criminals get
       | fined a small amount of what they stole and are sentenced to much
       | less jail time than their poorer fellows.
       | 
       | To remedy this, I suggest everyone adopt a system where anyone
       | who stole money or did other financial damage through criminal
       | means spends one day in jail for every $300 of damage they
       | caused.
       | 
       | This has several advantages: 1. The rich would no longer be above
       | the law. 2. It would deter financial crimes and vandalism. 3. It
       | would prevent "victim restitution extortion" where middle-class
       | people are extorted to either give up their life savings or go to
       | prison; They are going to jail regardless, so there is less
       | incentive to set them up to get victim restitution.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-06-27 23:00 UTC)