[HN Gopher] The semiotics of barbed wire fence
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The semiotics of barbed wire fence
        
       Author : ano-ther
       Score  : 48 points
       Date   : 2024-06-23 22:21 UTC (3 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu)
 (TXT) w3m dump (languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu)
        
       | ortusdux wrote:
       | Very interesting! Makes me think of the barbed wire telephone
       | networks -
       | 
       | https://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/barbed-wire-telephone-...
        
         | throwway120385 wrote:
         | Yeah -- if you knew whose fence you were connected to then you
         | could identify the line and to whom you would be ringing when
         | you connected your phone to it.
        
       | keiferski wrote:
       | I don't think Deleuze and Guattari actually talk about it
       | directly, but barbed wire seems like a perfect example of a
       | technology that turns smooth space into striated space. Basically
       | smooth spaces are vast and open, like the sea or the great
       | plains, whereas striated spaces are ones organized, put under a
       | grid, etc.
       | 
       | https://www.christianhubert.com/writing/smoothstriated
        
         | ortusdux wrote:
         | This is a big deal with fish passage restoration. Rectangular
         | farmland led to dykes that straitened out streams and rivers.
         | Straight waterways flow faster and wash away sediment. This
         | makes it harder for fish to swim upstream while leaving fewer
         | places to rest and spawn. There is a fair amount of restoration
         | work going on in the PNW to try and undo this, and the results
         | I've seen have been promising.
        
       | kens wrote:
       | The article shows an interesting collection of different types of
       | barbed wire with a name on each one. The article claims that
       | different types of barbed wire allowed ranchers to tell at a
       | glance if the land and animals belonged to them. Unfortunately,
       | that theory is completely made up and wrong. The names on the
       | barbed wire are the _manufacturers_ not the ranchers. Different
       | manufacturers produced different styles of wires due to patents
       | and functionality reasons.
       | 
       | For instance, the first wire in the article is labeled "Kelly
       | loose barb". That corresponds to the Michael Kelly patent [1].
       | The next name is Scutt, describing the improved barbed wire
       | invented by H. B. Scutt [2].
       | 
       | [1] https://patents.google.com/patent/US283614A [2]
       | https://patents.google.com/patent/US195239A
        
         | Animats wrote:
         | Yes. The history of barbed wire is well known, and this article
         | misses it.
         | 
         | For cattle operations, barbed wire is somewhat obsolete,
         | anyway. There's a wire mesh called "King Ranch fencing".[1] No
         | barbs, but strong enough to contain cattle. With fewer scrape
         | marks, the leather is more valuable. No risk of animals caught
         | in barbed wire. Less sagging wire. "We don't fix fence, we
         | build fence" - King Ranch slogan.
         | 
         | [1] https://redbrandstore.com/products/king-ranch-field-
         | fence-66...
        
           | doodlebugging wrote:
           | Wow!
           | 
           | I have two 330' rolls of a similar Red Brand field fence I
           | bought about 20 years ago, 660' total of it like the roll in
           | the listing. I paid $75 for each 330' roll.
           | 
           | I think mine is the Monarch Field Fence roll with the
           | graduated spacing beginning with 3" at the bottom. The same
           | rolls sell for more than $300 each today according to that
           | site.
           | 
           | Time to build a cheap fence with my old wire.
        
         | masfuerte wrote:
         | I understood that the labels were brand names, but I thought
         | the article was saying that the ranchers deliberately used
         | different brands of barb wire because it made it easy to
         | distinguish their holdings. I don't know if they did.
        
           | bluGill wrote:
           | Ranchers go to the local store and buy whatever barb wire is
           | in stock. Whatever the owner of the store buys is what they
           | get. There may be more than one store, the store may order
           | from different manufactures, and the store may have more than
           | one type in stock (with different marketing trying to
           | convince you one is better than the other) - but in the end
           | it is all what the store has in stock. I'm going to count the
           | local Sears catalog (and others) as a local store for this
           | discussion.
           | 
           | The important key is farmers don't consult with others to be
           | intentionally different. (farmers will consult with each
           | other but that is only to see what works for someone else to
           | copy it - if a farmer has barbed wire that doesn't work they
           | will replace it and tell the neighbors). They all have the
           | same set of choices to work with.
           | 
           | Farmers also have no reason to care if their fence is
           | different. They know where their land is (and often are
           | leasing land that someone else built the fence). Barbed wire
           | isn't something that a dishonest farmer would steel - it gets
           | harder to work with after it has been put up once so a fresh
           | roll is better.
        
       | vessenes wrote:
       | This was interesting but I don't know if semiotics is a large
       | part of the essay. I was _hoping_ to get a deconstruction of
       | barbed wire fence as a security measure in different parts of the
       | world. My experience living in South Africa for a while was that
       | to an American eye, barbed wire on top of a wall codes as  "this
       | neighborhood is unsafe". To a South African it codes as "this
       | home is protected and safe" -- very different reactions. There
       | were a few houses in my neighborhood in Cape Town that refused
       | barbed wire, and I always respected them immensely and thought of
       | them as sort of hold-overs from a less violent period in the
       | country's history.
        
         | crazygringo wrote:
         | Yeah, to me the headline is just completely wrong and
         | misleading.
         | 
         | None of this has anything to do with semiotics. I was expecting
         | the exact same thing as you -- semiotics would be about _what
         | does seeing barbed wire in specific spaces /contexts mean to
         | different groups of people_?
         | 
         | What are its associations with prisons, compounds,
         | neighborhoods, safety, security, the state, private security,
         | militarization, crime, farming, cattle, trespassing, the
         | American West, freedom to roam, and so forth? When you see
         | barbed wire, does it make you feel safe or nervous or scared?
         | How does that change if it's in a residential neighborhood vs.
         | around a military base?
         | 
         | Your experience in South Africa is a perfect example -- thanks
         | for sharing.
        
         | matharmin wrote:
         | In my experience around Cape Town, it's both: High security (or
         | more commonly electric fencing in affluent neighbourhoods) on a
         | single house means the house is safe (or the owners are
         | paranoid). High security on every house in the neighborhood
         | means high crime rate in the neighborhood.
         | 
         | It also don't think crime stats went up much over the last
         | decades in general (may be different in specific
         | neighborhoods), but there is definitely more fear of safety
         | that leads to more security.
        
           | vessenes wrote:
           | I agree that the perception, (and implied acknowledgment) of
           | violence is a very interesting factor -- and I would not be
           | surprised if the very act of building a lot of visible
           | security features near a building overall increases the rate
           | of some sorts of crime.
           | 
           | That said, you're a little out of date on SA - violent crime
           | across the country was relatively stable for a decade or two,
           | but since 2021, violent crimes across SA have spiked, and now
           | even Cape Town is in the 20 most dangerous towns in the
           | world, and in the top 10 murder / capita towns in the world.
        
         | dylan604 wrote:
         | > to an American eye, barbed wire on top of a wall codes as
         | "this neighborhood is unsafe". To a South African it codes as
         | "this home is protected and safe" -- very different reactions
         | 
         | If the neighborhood is safe, the barbed wire would be
         | unnecessary to make the home protected and safe. Not really
         | sure why the distinction is necessary. In your South African's
         | take, what happens when you leave the protected and safe
         | property. To me that means you are stepping into an unsafe
         | neighborhood.
        
           | vessenes wrote:
           | You've definitely never lived in SA with that comment.
           | Everywhere in the world security is just a feeling, but SA
           | explores just how far feelings can be from reality quite
           | often.
        
         | mmaunder wrote:
         | I think you're reading a bit too much into this. Reasons for
         | barbed or not vary. (or broken bottles laid in concrete on top
         | of a wall, which is something else you'll see in SA) I don't
         | think houses necessarily refuse barbed wire. They just have
         | other security controls.
        
         | richardw wrote:
         | In SA, barbed wire is a good start. You've left off electric
         | fence, cameras, manned boom gates and security company. And
         | security WhatsApp groups. What am I missing? Some have guns or
         | double layers of the above. Many live in security complexes
         | inside the fenced off areas. Oh yes, burglar bars. And security
         | alarm linked to the security company.
         | 
         | The above doesn't always work. You need to ensure the gates
         | can't be crowbarred off. Happened to us a few times. The amount
         | of IQ allocated to breaking in is amazing. Serious innovation
         | on the criminal side. Think of your smartest friends very keen
         | to get into your house and working together for years on how to
         | do it.
        
           | 0_____0 wrote:
           | What.... What happened to SA? Is there a unique set of
           | circumstances that gave rise to this particular kind of
           | violent lawlessness?
        
             | causi wrote:
             | Quite a few contributing factors:
             | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iiny1GrfhYM
        
             | richardw wrote:
             | Top recipe: you force some people to have a very shit life,
             | selection based on race. Some lawlessness is naturally bred
             | and in some cases encouraged. You then take away the rules
             | that made it shit but you leave the economic, societal and
             | mental damage of a polarised society. You start uplifting
             | people but you mainly focus on a small group and do little
             | to help most people. You allow education to go south
             | because teachers are unionised and you want their votes.
             | You demonstrate corruption at the highest levels and then
             | dismantle the parts of the law meant to fight it. You let
             | the economy grow too slowly because you're so focused on
             | cutting pieces of the pie for yourself that you forget to
             | grow it. You let public health and policing go to waste, so
             | only wealthy have access to good healthcare, education,
             | security. You break the electricity generation capacity
             | through corruption. Poverty never really gets fixed because
             | a kid in a rural village has a massive hill to climb to be
             | economically active. You also add other broken countries
             | nearby so you end up with a lot of job seekers. Add some
             | resentment of those people.
             | 
             | The kids who make it through all that to e.g. get a job in
             | a bank are absolute heroes.
        
             | vessenes wrote:
             | Great question. https://www.amazon.com/History-South-
             | Africa-Fourth/dp/030018... is an excellent book that digs
             | in on this and other topics about SA if you're interested
             | in learning more about this extremely complex question and
             | country. As residents often say, it's especially a
             | heartbreak because the country has so much going for it.
        
             | underlipton wrote:
             | America, except the natives you stole the land from and the
             | black people you enslaved are one and the same, and Jim
             | Crow didn't end until after the Soviet Union
             | fell/Transformers aired, and you're on a continent that the
             | West has a pathological inclination to exploit.
             | 
             | The righteous fury of those denied the dignity of land and
             | agency burns a cultural brand into the skin of the body
             | politic, an endemic disregard for the "rules-based order"
             | that orders them to the back of the line (however it's said
             | and whoever has the megaphone). The people who benefit,
             | only willing to provide an an ounce of the pound of cure
             | necessary, mask-and-hazmat-suit-up to weather the plague
             | they wrought. It looks ridiculous because it is.
             | 
             | https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2014/5/13/oscar-
             | pistorius...
        
           | vessenes wrote:
           | For sure. Also I'm a fan of a concrete covered
           | bunker/entryway so that you can't be shot at by someone
           | inside the property when security visits you.
        
       | sdsd wrote:
       | Not related to TFA but the word "semiotics" to me is very
       | evocative of this set of academic subjects in the 70s that were
       | just kind of shelved. Right along with cybernetics or women's
       | lib. Here in Guatemala there was a used book fair and in the
       | English section they had a book for 80 cents about cybernetics,
       | which I've neglected to read, but now think I ought to read soon
       | :)
        
         | complaintdept wrote:
         | Also networks, Bucky Fullerism, Eastern philosophy, mind maps,
         | UNIX and chaos theory gaining momentum, etc. They seem somewhat
         | dated now, but in a way they've diffused through our culture so
         | extensively that they're just part of the background and nobody
         | raises an eyebrow at them anymore. The 70s had a zeal for cool
         | ideas that we just don't have anymore.
        
           | Animats wrote:
           | After the USSR went down, the Stanford bookstore had a sign:
           | "All communism 70% off".
        
             | kjellsbells wrote:
             | In the early 00s I lived in the Washington DC suburbs, and
             | saw first hand how all the old Kremlinologists and Russia
             | specialists were being pensioned off and retired. I'd
             | attend yard sales and there'd be stacks of books about
             | Russian culture, politics, literature, everything. Pashto
             | was hot, and Pushkin was not.
             | 
             | Today, they need Kremlinologists and Russian speakers all
             | over again.
             | 
             | What goes around, comes around...
        
         | 082349872349872 wrote:
         | > _or women 's lib_
         | 
         | Unlike certain jurisdictions we didn't shelve that one; we
         | actually put it into our constitution (if slightly after the
         | 70s).
        
       | chanandler_bong wrote:
       | I read an article a long time ago that drew a direct correlation
       | between the need to contain/separate livestock in the American
       | West and the battlefields of World War I.
       | 
       | Basically, as settlers moved westward, they needed to contain
       | their livestock as well as separate sheep and cows. Sheep
       | apparently eat grass down to the ground whereas cows don't, thus
       | sheep would deprive cows of food.
       | 
       | So, barbed wire was developed for this purpose and the military
       | saw the utility of it as well. Fast-forward to WWI and the vast
       | battlefields there and needing an inexpensive way to slow enemy
       | advances on foot. This led to the development of tanks to
       | overcome the barbed wire obstacles. Machine guns also became more
       | useful as a way to spray large areas when attacking troops were
       | held up by the obstacles.
        
       | banga wrote:
       | Interesting collection, but this statement gave me pause:
       | 
       | "there was nothing out here but millions of buffalo and some
       | scattered Indians"
        
       | alamortsubite wrote:
       | If the author is reading this, you really should check out the
       | barbed wire exhibits at the National Cowboy and Western Heritage
       | Museum in Oklahoma City [1] and the Kansas Barbed Wire Museum in
       | LaCrosse, KS [2]. Next-level.
       | 
       | 1: https://nationalcowboymuseum.org/explore/barbed-wire/
       | 
       | 2: https://www.rushcounty.org/BarbedWireMuseum/BWexhibits.html
        
       | underlipton wrote:
       | Barbed wire fence is a great example of technology that was
       | originally meant for capitalist ends - specifically, to allow for
       | the slicing up of a commons for private use - eventually employed
       | to literally rip apart people.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-06-26 23:01 UTC)