[HN Gopher] Vintage Wooden Homes on Wheels: Photos of Mobile Liv...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Vintage Wooden Homes on Wheels: Photos of Mobile Living from Early
       20th Century
        
       Author : bookofjoe
       Score  : 36 points
       Date   : 2024-06-25 14:36 UTC (8 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (rarehistoricalphotos.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (rarehistoricalphotos.com)
        
       | dylan604 wrote:
       | I love the absolute lack of concern for aerodynamics in these
       | designs. They are straight up designed for function.
        
         | opencl wrote:
         | Most of these couldn't move fast enough for aerodynamics to
         | matter much. A Ford Model TT truck had a top speed of 15mph
         | _without_ a house attached to it.
        
         | AmVess wrote:
         | Aerodynamics is one thing, complete lack of crash safety is
         | another. Aside from the RV's built on truck and van chassis,
         | these things explode into a million bits in a head on
         | collision. The vehicle's crumple zone is your face.
        
           | Retric wrote:
           | Most of those things probably had a top speed of around 10-15
           | MPH on level ground and unusually good roads for the time
           | period. You don't need much in the way of safety equipment at
           | those speeds, though hills would be more risky.
           | 
           | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_Model_TT
        
           | itishappy wrote:
           | What a 1930s Car Crash Looks Like (19s)
           | 
           | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ki9fDmBTX7w
        
             | dylan604 wrote:
             | crash? that's just how they stopped.
        
       | jimbokun wrote:
       | Shows tiny home/van life is certainly not a new concept.
        
         | dylan604 wrote:
         | Humans have been nomadic longer than they've been static. You
         | can take a nomad out of the wilderness, but you can't take the
         | nomad out of the boy or whatever. Before these, we had covered
         | wagons. Before that...
        
           | 082349872349872 wrote:
           | Before that, gypsy wagons.
           | 
           | I like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transhumance ; that way
           | you only have to move the four- and two-legged members of the
           | household, and the roof, walls, and stuff can remain in place
           | in each seasonal-appropriate stop.
        
         | bdcravens wrote:
         | You don't even have to go that far back, living in RVs is
         | nothing new. "Tiny home" is just a rebranding that removes
         | connotation of a "trailer", but it's essentially the same.
        
           | ghaff wrote:
           | "Tiny home" probably also carries the implication of trendy
           | design, more expensive materials, etc. You're not wrong but a
           | lot of tiny home designs probably optimize space usage in
           | ways that mobile home designs don't necessarily.
        
       | mhuffman wrote:
       | I think the one made out of bricks is just taking the piss! I
       | also like the ones with porches ... such a homey little
       | convenience!
        
         | lawlessone wrote:
         | has to be lino or something.
        
       | smusamashah wrote:
       | Why do they all have big wheels?
        
         | 082349872349872 wrote:
         | Roads were much poorer, so clearance* was much more important.
         | 
         | One of my great grand fathers was a surveyor, and the
         | neighbourhoods he worked on have become difficult for modern
         | cars, because the curbs can be higher than low-slung doors, and
         | driveway entrances are steep enough to bottom out.
         | 
         | * in my ski tourism area, even without reading the plates it's
         | easy to tell local vehicles apart from the tourist ones, by
         | clearance alone. Some of the farm equipment even has portal
         | axles: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portal_axle
         | 
         | (and even if they'd had good roads, I don't think they had the
         | rubber technology: "radial" tyres weren't practical until after
         | WWII)
        
           | smusamashah wrote:
           | Thanks for explaining. I had this silly idea that may be
           | small wheels is a new tech and big wheels was something that
           | just worked and everyone stuck with that back then.
           | 
           | What is it they have on these wheels if its not rubber and
           | how does bigger wheel avoid the downside of not having
           | rubber?
        
             | 082349872349872 wrote:
             | It was rubber, but natural, not synthetic.
             | 
             | (I think modern tyre shapes at 1920s rubber prices might
             | have cost a significant fraction of the car? Back then,
             | they were not only small and narrow compared with today,
             | but they were also much thinner -- which is probably why
             | Bibendum, the Michelin Man, is made of tubes)
             | 
             | The Allies miscalculated with the Maginot Line, because
             | they hadn't realised the Axis might invent and produce
             | synfuels.
             | 
             | The Axis miscalculated with cutting the UK off from its
             | rubber-producing colonies, because they hadn't realised the
             | Allies might invent and produce synthetic rubber.
             | 
             | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synthetic_fuel#History
             | 
             | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synthetic_rubber#World_War_II
             | 
             | EDIT: more on rubber; those colonies had earlier yanked the
             | market away from Brazil: https://www.k-online.com/en/Media_
             | News/News/April_2014_From_...
        
       | ch4s3 wrote:
       | Does the superb bus of Ray Conklin, president of the New York
       | Motorbus Company in 1915 have plastic windows? I guess cellophane
       | dates to 1912, but that's pretty wild to see in a photo from
       | 1915.
        
       | josefritzishere wrote:
       | Some of these look like AI.
        
         | araes wrote:
         | Had that thought too. Unfortunately, almost every history story
         | lately has started to have that suspicion filter for something
         | that was suddenly "discovered."
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-06-25 23:02 UTC)