[HN Gopher] The First Hedge Fund
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The First Hedge Fund
        
       Author : nsoonhui
       Score  : 114 points
       Date   : 2024-06-25 00:23 UTC (22 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (commoncog.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (commoncog.com)
        
       | mjfl wrote:
       | > It was started in 1949 by a middle-aged journalist with a
       | masters in sociology and little-to-no investing experience.
       | 
       | Cue eyeroll. This triggered a rant in me. We really shouldn't be
       | giving so much money to these people. But the problem is that we
       | individually don't have much control over the matter because the
       | majority of their clients are large pension funds, endowments,
       | sovreign wealth funds, and government managers of social
       | security, which themselves are managed by... managers who have an
       | incentive to hand off the risk of being fired for poor
       | performance to someone else. Very few clients are actually high
       | net worth individuals who trust the skill of the hedge fund
       | manager.
       | 
       | And indeed, most of them have no skill whatsoever. Hedge funds
       | are, for a large part, part of a parasite economy, where large
       | sums of money are diverted from astronomical sums of money
       | without many people noticing.
        
         | chollida1 wrote:
         | > . Very few clients are actually high net worth individuals
         | who trust the skill of the hedge fund manager.
         | 
         | I'd check your assumptions. The vast majority of hedge fund
         | clients are high net worth individuals, with very few pension
         | clients for the typical hedge fund. You might be right about
         | the skill assertion but no one is being taken advantage of.
         | 
         | Hege fund clients are almost all high net worth individuals who
         | are very capable of making their own financial decisions. Even
         | pensions that do allocate to hedge funds are such a small
         | portion of the pension holdings. PE is probably a larger
         | portion than hedge funds.
         | 
         | Think about it for a second. There are a very few finite number
         | of pension funds and a relatively huge number of high networth
         | clients.
         | 
         | I don't know which fund you work for to get your insight but
         | you are incorrect in yoru assumptions:)
        
           | mjfl wrote:
           | > Hege fund clients are almost all high net worth individuals
           | who are very capable of making their own financial decisions
           | 
           | This is just blatantly false. The majority of clients are
           | large institutions. FYI I used to work for one.
        
             | chollida1 wrote:
             | > The majority of clients are large institutions.
             | 
             | Well atleast we got you to move the goal posts from pension
             | funds to large institutions but again think about the
             | average hedge fund.
             | 
             | The average hedge fund is 3 people and about $25M in money.
             | What kind of institutional money do you think they'll
             | raise? That's right, about zero and their capital will be
             | their own and friends/ family and one or two anchor
             | clients.
             | 
             | Again with thousands of hedge funds and very few pension
             | funds how could the majority of clients be pensions?
             | 
             | Your assertion doesn't seem to pass a quick sanity test:)
        
               | throwup238 wrote:
               | They didn't move the goalposts. They said (originally):
               | 
               |  _> the majority of their clients are large pension
               | funds, endowments, sovreign wealth funds, and government
               | managers_
               | 
               | You said:
               | 
               |  _> The vast majority of hedge fund clients are high net
               | worth individuals_
               | 
               | "large pension funds, endowments, sovreign wealth funds,
               | and government managers" are not high net worth
               | individuals, by definition. You're just talking past each
               | other (or you stopped reading after the first item of the
               | list).
        
               | tingletech wrote:
               | I'm pretty sure my pension has holdings in around 100
               | hedge funds -- but it has more allocated to private
               | equity and real estate. The endowment has more in hedge
               | funds than the pension iiuc, but in basically the same
               | funds. The investment office also announced last year
               | that it is going to divest from hedge funds and re-
               | allocate that to private credit. The chief investment
               | officer said the hedge funds didn't proved any hedge in
               | 2000, 2008, or 2020.
        
               | em500 wrote:
               | > Again with thousands of hedge funds and very few
               | pension funds how could the majority of clients be
               | pensions?
               | 
               | The US alone already has around 5000 defined benefits
               | pension funds. (The smaller ones probably invest via
               | fund-of-funds, rather than directly as a LP.)
        
           | smabie wrote:
           | this isn't even remotely true
        
           | Terr_ wrote:
           | > I'd check your assumptions. The vast majority of hedge fund
           | clients are high net worth individuals
           | 
           | [Citation Needed], especially if we're already at the point
           | where people are being told to check their assumptions.
           | 
           | One possible charitable explanation is that OP is talking
           | about majority _by assets_ , whereas you're talking about
           | majority _by identity_.
        
           | seanhunter wrote:
           | > The vast majority of hedge fund clients are high net worth
           | individuals, with very few pension clients for the typical
           | hedge fund.
           | 
           | This is definitely not the case if you are talking in terms
           | of the % of AUM. For all the hedge funds that I know about
           | the vast majority of their AUM comes from institutional
           | clients like pension funds.
           | 
           | For big hedge funds even by number of investors the majority
           | is probably institutions because they don't encourage
           | individual clients and instead target their marketing at
           | institutions so they can raise more AUM.
           | 
           | Source: worked in the securities division of a major wall st
           | firm for 8 years and had a lot of hedge fund clients, then
           | worked for a hedge fund startup. Have close friends who have
           | launched 2 hedge funds and have seen the whole process for
           | them including cap intro etc. Worked at a software company
           | where one of my clients was one of the largest hedge funds in
           | the world so spent a bunch of time embedded onsite at that
           | fund.
        
           | Galanwe wrote:
           | > The vast majority of hedge fund clients are high net worth
           | individuals, with very few pension clients for the typical
           | hedge fund.
           | 
           | That is very, very wrong. HNW have to small tickets to be
           | interesting for most hedge funds, where the minimum ticket
           | size is around $10M. The KYC is also much more complicated
           | for invividuals, risk profiles are generally not aligned, and
           | overall most individuals are not sophisticated enough to be a
           | good fit as client. I say that after close to 20 years in the
           | HF industry, and 2 partners positions...
           | 
           | I would estimate the ratio to be 95/5 for
           | institutional/individual.
           | 
           | > Think about it for a second. There are a very few finite
           | number of pension funds and a relatively huge number of high
           | networth clients.
           | 
           | There is actually a a really large pool of pension funds,
           | funds of funds, and overall institutional investors out
           | there. Basically most schools have endowments funds, every
           | groupment of companies will have a fund for their employees,
           | there's all the insurance companies, the state / countries
           | pension funds, all the various banks and wealth managers,
           | etc.
           | 
           | > Hege fund clients are almost all high net worth individuals
           | who are very capable of making their own financial decisions
           | 
           | Definitely not. Most HF have specific risk profiles and/or
           | characteristics, that are not suited for individuals. Most
           | HNW go to CTAs instead which are much easier to understand
           | and advertise.
        
         | SilverBirch wrote:
         | I'd like to know what you're proposing as an alternative. There
         | are savings, we want to take those savings and give them to
         | businesses to invest and grow and then share in the profits.
         | This is good for the investor and for the business and as a
         | result for the economy in general. It's literally a positive
         | sum game - there may be inequality in society, but in general
         | _everyone_ is getting richer over time.
         | 
         | Someone has to figure out the mechanics of taking that money
         | and investing it. Who would you propose does that? And what do
         | you think is a fair share for that job? If you think the Hedge
         | funds fees are too high? Fine, take your money out of whatever
         | hedge fund and stick it in SPY or pick stocks yourself, but
         | there's good reasons you wouldn't want to do that.
        
           | mjfl wrote:
           | I think the average person should, in fact, do what my former
           | manager at the hedge fund advised me to do with my own money,
           | just put it in a low cost index fund that tracks the S&P.
        
       | qigtyofhp wrote:
       | The story was interesting but the title is misleading. This
       | wasn't the first hedge fund. Benjamin Graham started his first
       | fund in the 1920s which would be what we call a hedge fund today.
       | Graham's fund might not be the first hedge fund but it came
       | before Jones'.
        
         | seanhunter wrote:
         | That is exactly what I was going to post.
        
         | matco11 wrote:
         | Jones' is normally referred to as the first hedge fund because
         | he used/invented shorting.
         | 
         | Before him, if you wanted to make a negative bet on a stock you
         | could really only do it with spread betting.
        
           | kasey_junk wrote:
           | That's not true. Shorting equities goes back to the East
           | Indies Company and is often blamed for crises going back at
           | least to the late 1700s.
           | 
           | Jacob Little was a giant Wall Street shorter in the 1830s.
        
             | hristov wrote:
             | The answer is that aw jones was the first to use the long
             | short hedging strategy. That is why his fund is called a
             | hedge fund and is considered the first of its kind. Others
             | have used shorting before but he was the first to use the
             | strategy of specifically entering a short position to
             | protect a different long position. Well, he was the first
             | one to officially theorize it and market it, at least. That
             | is why when carol loomis described his fund, she coined the
             | word hedge fund.
        
         | em500 wrote:
         | Straight from wikipedia[1]:
         | 
         |  _During the US bull market of the 1920s, there were numerous
         | private investment vehicles available to wealthy investors. Of
         | that period, the best known today is the Graham-Newman
         | Partnership, founded by Benjamin Graham and his long-time
         | business partner Jerry Newman. This was cited by Warren Buffett
         | in a 2006 letter to the Museum of American Finance as an early
         | hedge fund, and based on other comments from Buffett, Janet
         | Tavakoli deems Graham 's investment firm the first hedge fund._
         | 
         |  _The sociologist Alfred W. Jones is credited with coining the
         | phrase "hedged fund" and is credited with creating the first
         | hedge fund structure in 1949. Jones referred to his fund as
         | being "hedged", a term then commonly used on Wall Street to
         | describe the management of investment risk due to changes in
         | the financial markets._
         | 
         | In other words, it depends on who you ask and what your exact
         | understanding is of what defines a hedge(d) fund.
         | 
         | [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hedge_fund#History
        
         | vishnugupta wrote:
         | This reminds me of a story (I don't know the authenticity of
         | it) where someone before Black-Scholes had invented the Black-
         | Scholes model but didn't publish rather they were making ton of
         | money by putting it to work.
        
           | melling wrote:
           | That would be Ed Thorp.
           | 
           | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_O._Thorp
           | 
           | He wrote a book this great book:
           | 
           | https://www.amazon.com/Man-All-Markets-Street-
           | Dealer/dp/0812...
           | 
           | He's almost 92 and still around. Here's a 2022 Tim Ferriss
           | interview:
           | 
           | https://youtu.be/gs39QFYIbBY?si=mEABrrb7yDwHR6sK
        
             | testval123 wrote:
             | It's also interesting that Thorp met a young Ken Griffin
             | and gave him some advice/materials in starting out.
             | 
             | I don't think a young Ken Griffin of today would get that
             | same access.
        
           | belter wrote:
           | Doubt it. If you go to market with Black-Scholes you will
           | lose money.
           | 
           | https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&d.
           | ..
           | 
           | "Why We Never Use the Black Scholes Equation" -
           | https://youtu.be/UoGlUZPNouM
        
             | belter wrote:
             | "Warren Buffett: Black-Scholes Formula Is Total Nonsense" -
             | https://youtu.be/H4X-4e7fPgI
        
           | dev-ns8 wrote:
           | There's also a great story that speaks more towards the
           | detriment of using Black-Scholes as an investment thesis.
           | 
           | https://www.amazon.com/When-Genius-Failed-Long-Term-
           | Manageme...
        
       | rishab1 wrote:
       | Great article!
        
       | steveBK123 wrote:
       | One part of this story that is new to me is that he sort of
       | invented an early version of the modern pod shop. Of course he
       | wasn't operating it with the same risk management discipline, but
       | still interesting.
        
       | pnetherwod wrote:
       | I've been ruuning a hedge fund for 20 years. The type of client
       | depends entirely on size. Most funds start small with friends and
       | family money. Some start bigger like ex prop traders. Before the
       | Volker rule many traders worked for banks known as prop traders
       | (proprietary). The Volker Rule stopped that but prop traders thar
       | had built up a decent track record could leave the bank and set
       | up a fund and take they clients with them. Many of these would be
       | banks clients which include HNW and family offices. Typically any
       | fund under $100m under management would not have big
       | institutional clients like pension funds. Fund of Funds (FOF)
       | used to be a big part of the business but less so today. They
       | used to reply on the fact that due diligence was hard and access
       | limited. It's not the case today. So sub $10m is mainly the
       | managers own money and friends and family. Sub $100m you may some
       | HMW and family office and possibly a FOF. Post $100m you can
       | start to attract interest of some of the more adventurous
       | institutional investors. After PS500 you're definitely in the
       | institutional category. Institutions don't want to invest in
       | small managers because they need to invest in size otherwise is
       | not worth their effort but they also don't want to be your entire
       | assets either hence the minimums. Once Institutions start coming
       | in in size then asset levels can really accelerate as the aren't
       | that many funds that are very large so they have a limited
       | choice. So what type of client to have is entirely dependant on
       | your size. In fact it's more dependant on your size than your
       | returns. In the early days to have to be a bit racy to generate
       | the interest. As soon as to get bigger to need to calm things
       | down a bit.
        
         | vmsp wrote:
         | How does one get into the investment business?
        
           | beezlebroxxxxxx wrote:
           | The comment you're replying to laid it out pretty clearly if
           | you want to be a part of a hedge fund (as I interpret your
           | question.) Know friends and family with money (a lot,
           | hopefully) or, more commonly, have institutional connections.
           | Have at least some connections and experience in
           | finance/banking/investing (at a large scale, not small-fry
           | stuff). Bring the two together with _a lot_ of marketing and
           | promises.
           | 
           | If you want to _work_ in IB, then you basically need to go to
           | a feeder school or have connections. The investment business
           | is a lot of  "look, we have the smartest people in the room
           | to handle your money, trust us." They rely, like consulting,
           | on selling the prestige of their employees education and
           | social capital. You will sign on to working absurd hours,
           | with the promise of making a lot of $$$ if you can survive
           | (literally, a guy died this year at BofA).
        
             | smabie wrote:
             | Working in IB isn't related at all to actually making
             | investments / trading though.
             | 
             | If you want to trade your best bet is apply for roles at
             | prop shops and funds and avoid banks entirely
        
           | mtillman wrote:
           | Internship at a fund/CTA/market maker/wholesale bank. If
           | older, go in through an ops position. Don't spend time at a
           | retail bank.
        
             | pnetherwod wrote:
             | It depends what you want to do. Portfolio manager and quant
             | research roles are rare and highly competitive but other
             | roles in risk, ops or compliance are more common. It's an
             | insiders market for sure.
        
         | JumpCrisscross wrote:
         | > _Volker Rule stopped that_
         | 
         | We were renamed market makers and carried on for a bit.
        
       | hchak wrote:
       | I'm pretty glad that these types of articles get upvoted to the
       | top.
        
       | thedudeabides5 wrote:
       | the first hedge fund was a boat or an ox cart
        
       | instagraham wrote:
       | Interesting read, but I found this a missed opportunity to link
       | AW Jones' journalistic background to some of the journalistic
       | elements behind running a hedge fund.
       | 
       | Disclaimer - it's a thought I got from watching The Big Short,
       | which portrayed Mark Baum as a sort of investigative journalist
       | in a hedge fund manager's clothes. He takes a lead from a source,
       | investigates a thesis, talks to primary sources, and drops his
       | findings in public. More compellingly, he appears to gain
       | _access_ to meetings and people that ordinary journalists wouldn
       | 't, simply because he's seen as part of the system.
       | 
       | But unlike a regular investor, who can be tempted to call a spade
       | a forklift if it meant that it would drive up the price, Baum's
       | money comes from betting _against_ the system. His
       | "journalistic" pursuit of reality is motivated by skin in the
       | game, as opposed to institutionalised bias.
       | 
       | Of course, the motivations behind journalists and hedge funds
       | appear different, and the incentive for truth can vary too. But
       | since so much of journalism is hostage to its financial model
       | (advertising), it's arguable that there's little difference in
       | key aspects. If your goal is to make money, and the means by
       | which you make money affect your version of reality, then it's a
       | comparison between apples.
       | 
       | Since hedge funds are incentivised to protect their investments
       | against looming bear markets, they are also incentivised to see
       | past the frothing-at-the-mouth hype that accompanies bull
       | markets. Which I see as a mirror of the journalistic idea of
       | speaking truth to power.
       | 
       | I am interested in any systems that can lead to people seeking
       | out and producing high-definition versions of reality. Journalism
       | is but one system, and it has no monopoly on this pursuit. The
       | world comprises many such systems. I feel hedge funds could be
       | considered one of them.
       | 
       | That the "first" (debatable) hedge fund was started by a
       | journalist seems more than a coincidence.
        
         | empath75 wrote:
         | If you read Matt Levine's blog he talks about this quasi-
         | journalistic short selling model a lot -- here's a good example
         | -- you can follow the links to find more:
         | 
         | https://archive.ph/https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/article...
         | 
         | edit: in fact he talked about literally a hedge fund doing
         | journalism in today's entry:
         | 
         | https://archive.ph/vwCQn
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-06-25 23:02 UTC)