[HN Gopher] Windows 11 is now enabling OneDrive folder backup wi...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Windows 11 is now enabling OneDrive folder backup without asking
       permission
        
       Author : josephcsible
       Score  : 175 points
       Date   : 2024-06-24 21:30 UTC (1 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.neowin.net)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.neowin.net)
        
       | whalesalad wrote:
       | Seems like every 48-72 hours now Microsoft announces yet another
       | extremely compelling reason to abandon their platform for Linux.
        
         | noodleman wrote:
         | They've been at it for years. I'd genuinely be surprised if
         | this cracked the top 10 worst things Microsoft have done to
         | Windows users.
         | 
         | I think there would need to be a concerted effort at a grass-
         | roots level, say from r/buildapc, to get new PC gamers onto an
         | alternative for there to be a considerable shift away from
         | Windows.
        
           | Syonyk wrote:
           | > _...to get new PC gamers onto an alternative for there to
           | be a considerable shift away from Windows._
           | 
           | Have you tried Steam on Linux? It works amazingly well,
           | either with native Linux support in games or through Proton
           | support (their Windows emulation layer). Quite a few people I
           | know have gone that route and are shocked at just how well it
           | works in practice.
        
             | Zardoz84 wrote:
             | It simply works. It's amazing what does now Wine/Proton
        
               | whalesalad wrote:
               | I was pretty blown away by how simple and straightforward
               | the experience was for me recently on Debian 12.
               | 
               | * Go to app store (flatpak) and install Steam
               | 
               | * Launch and login to Steam
               | 
               | * Install Helldivers 2
               | 
               | * Launch the game. Done! Everything "just works"
        
               | dpkirchner wrote:
               | Even games with EAC and Battleye ("anti cheats") work
               | well. That was pretty surprising.
        
               | jsheard wrote:
               | YMMV there depending on the specific game, both of those
               | anti-cheats _can_ work on Linux but the developer of the
               | game has to opt-in to allow it since their Linux
               | implementations are much easier to bypass than their
               | Windows ones. There 's games like Rust which use EAC but
               | have refused to enable its Linux support for that reason.
        
             | animalsgiraffes wrote:
             | Proton has been huge for Linux gaming, especially since the
             | Steam Deck launched. Apple's Game Port Toolkit is also
             | quite promising on Mac side. Unix based OSs are seeing
             | something of a vg renaissance.
        
             | janice1999 wrote:
             | I recently purchased a Steam Deck and I've been blown away
             | by how games just work. I used to use Wine a lot for
             | applications in the early 2010s and it was always hit and
             | miss (and Codeweaver for Office support). Proton is
             | amazing.
        
               | bee_rider wrote:
               | I think the discussion is tainted actually by technical
               | people who used Wine in the bad old days, haha. I fought
               | Wine a decade ago and it was pretty bad. If anyone had
               | asked, I'd probably give the "dual boot, may as well keep
               | Windows around as a glorified console" spiel.
               | 
               | A non-technical friend got a steam deck, when I asked
               | what OS he'd used I got a response along the lines of
               | "oh, I guess it must be Linux." It the thought about what
               | OS hadn't even occurred.
               | 
               | The future is cool.
        
               | mananaysiempre wrote:
               | > I used to use Wine a lot for applications in the early
               | 2010s and it was always hit and miss
               | 
               | IME Wine is still hit and miss for applications in
               | general, even old ones. Games are just a particularly
               | good fit here--they rarely care how well your COM
               | marshalling or shell namespace or transactional NTFS or
               | weird SQL-like inside Windows Installer is implemented.
               | Not to imply that getting games to work is a simple task,
               | just that the API surface is much less spread out, and
               | any emulation improvements for a single game are more
               | likely to improve support for a wider range of other
               | games.
        
             | talldayo wrote:
             | The Nvidia experience on the beta channel is shockingly
             | good now, too. The big sore spot for gaming on Linux was
             | trying to convince Nvidia users the experience was worth
             | their time. Using 555-series drivers on GNOME Wayland right
             | now is pretty much flawless.
        
             | noodleman wrote:
             | I'm all in on Linux at this point - it's been usable for a
             | long time.
             | 
             | My comments not really about whether it works, as we know
             | it does, it's about how we go about getting the word out
             | there.
        
               | hparadiz wrote:
               | I just switched to Wayland with KDE Plasma 6.1 from KDE
               | 5.x on X11.
               | 
               | VR works now. Screensharing and everything you expect
               | with other operating systems works perfectly as well.
        
             | metalspoon wrote:
             | Mandatory Google [your games] + proton first
        
         | dan-robertson wrote:
         | Which do you think is the bigger risk to ordinary users?
         | 
         | - someone hacks into Microsoft and accesses their files from
         | onedrive (for passwords/blackmail-info I guess?)
         | 
         | - Microsoft looks at their files in onedrive and does something
         | bad (not sure what)
         | 
         | - someone hacks into their computer and accesses their files.
         | Or someone does so by causing the user to download something
         | bad
         | 
         | - the user's ssd fails or is corrupted because they have
         | consumer grade hardware that is not treated particularly well,
         | taking all their documents with it.
         | 
         | - the user accidentally deletes some important document (or eg
         | drag-and-drops the contents of their document somewhere else
         | and autosaves the now blank document, or they lose it some
         | other way)
         | 
         | I think the benefits outweigh the risks for a lot of users for
         | this change. I don't know how onedrive works but one could
         | imagine it working in a reasonably secure way by encrypting
         | data at rest (secure keys on device would be nice but bad UX;
         | key-derivation function probably better). IMO the real problem
         | with the feature is typical big-company lack of coordination
         | (the amount of free storage isn't enough for how much people
         | typically need, even right away) and lack of incentives to fix
         | it (the increase in paying customers is probably worth a lot
         | more to whoever caused this change than the increase in annoyed
         | users due to drive-full warnings) and the idea that that people
         | might pay Microsoft for more storage (that you can't easily pay
         | for remote reliable automatic backup storage when you set the
         | OS up does not feel like a particularly big advantage of free
         | software to me).
         | 
         | I think there are things not to like about this but it doesn't
         | seem to me to be the obviously terrible thing your comment
         | suggests. Certainly it seems less bad than lots of other recent
         | windows changes.
        
           | smolder wrote:
           | There's no justification here for turning the feature on for
           | users who have already explicitly _chosen_ not to use it, or
           | for not presenting them with the choice.
        
             | dan-robertson wrote:
             | I mean, the person who caused windows to behave this way
             | surely had some justification, even if it was self-serving.
             | I think a choice would be better but I also think that
             | being on is a reasonable default for users.
             | 
             | I don't understand the point about users explicitly opting
             | out (and that being switched?). I would chalk such a thing
             | down to the kind of big company systematic nefariousness
             | you get (no one needs to say 'make it ignore the opt out',
             | they just implement a default wrong and don't
             | notice/fix/investigate the bug because KPIs increase)
        
               | pseudalopex wrote:
               | They had a motive. Not justification.
        
           | the_snooze wrote:
           | What you say is true. And what you say completely misses the
           | point.
           | 
           | The problem isn't that cloud sync/backup is (or isn't)
           | useful. It's that Microsoft isn't respecting users' agency to
           | adopt it or not. If the product is indeed useful on its
           | merits, then there's no need to turn it on by default or
           | continually nag users who say "no thanks." And it's not like
           | Microsoft doesn't have a history of underhanded moves to
           | capture users into its ecosystem; see what happens when you
           | search for Chrome or Firefox in Edge
           | https://www.theverge.com/23935029/microsoft-edge-forced-
           | wind...
        
           | A4ET8a8uTh0 wrote:
           | << Microsoft looks at their files in onedrive and does
           | something bad (not sure what)
           | 
           | Some of us use documents that should not just end up 'in the
           | cloud' for various reasons including legal, regulatory or
           | just 'I don't want Redmont to have copies of my kids
           | pictures'. It does not even have to be that they do something
           | bad to it. It is merely that the act of taking it without
           | user permission is a major violation of trust.
        
             | dan-robertson wrote:
             | I definitely see why businesses might be hesitant about
             | such a feature (obviously they could also read whatever
             | onedrive-related contract they have with Microsoft and make
             | an informed decision). I mostly think users don't really
             | think of this is some stark distinction, though perhaps
             | they should. I still think the real risk of expensive (in
             | the general sense) data loss is worse for users than the
             | cost of this kind of 'major violation of trust'.
        
           | metalspoon wrote:
           | I put my genital images in my Windows so that if they leak it
           | I can get compensation and become a millionaire.
        
       | LinuxBender wrote:
       | _As a reminder, you can always just uninstall OneDrive and call
       | it a day._
       | 
       | Is this really true? Does it never get reinstalled or enabled by
       | a cumulative update?
        
         | ziddoap wrote:
         | On my gaming rig that I've had for quite a few years now, it
         | has never been re-enabled and I've never been nagged about it.
        
           | LinuxBender wrote:
           | Cool, thank-you. I put some of the OneDrive domains in my DNS
           | overrides to see if they get tickled just in case.
           | # I am probably missing some. Hope they are not hard coded.
           | cat /etc/unbound/override/onedrive.conf          local-zone:
           | "storage.live.com" always_nxdomain         local-zone:
           | "onedrive.com" always_nxdomain         local-zone: "1drv.com"
           | always_nxdomain         local-zone: "skyapi.live.net"
           | always_nxdomain         local-zone: "onedrive.live.com"
           | always_nxdomain         local-zone: "docs.live.net"
           | always_nxdomain         local-zone: "odwebp.svc.ms"
           | always_nxdomain
        
           | Tempest1981 wrote:
           | Win11 or Win10?
        
             | ziddoap wrote:
             | 10
        
             | jabroni_salad wrote:
             | I updated to w11 about a month ago and my onedrive
             | preferences (logged out and not in use) has been respected
             | so far.
        
       | goosedragons wrote:
       | Is this even new? Pretty sure I dealt with exactly this setting
       | up a Windows 11 install last year. Had to do it multiple times
       | too due to a flakey SSD I ended up returning.
        
       | wtallis wrote:
       | Microsoft makes it a pain, but you _can_ still jump through some
       | CLI hoops to use only a local user account to log in to Windows,
       | rather than the cloud-conmected Microsoft account they try to
       | funnel you into. Not logging into a Microsoft account prevents
       | OneDrive from doing anything other than spamming you with
       | notifications about how great it would be if you logged in and
       | started using it. And you can still uninstall OneDrive after
       | every major OS update that brings it back.
        
         | hhh wrote:
         | You can still use it offline without an account just fine with
         | Pro SKUs and up.
        
           | ranger_danger wrote:
           | that shouldn't be necessary though
        
           | ziddoap wrote:
           | You can use offline accounts with Home as well.
        
           | _carbyau_ wrote:
           | Installed Windows 11 Pro, had to do some CLI dickery to get
           | the option for local only account.
        
             | hhh wrote:
             | here are the steps I just used a few minutes ago to use a
             | local account. You can do it without leaving the OOBE, but
             | you shouldn't have to go through so many steps to do it.
             | 
             | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40781798
        
             | justsomehnguy wrote:
             | ITT: people complain about 'CLI dickery' in Windows but
             | arguing for Linux.
             | 
             | *shrug_emoji*
        
           | cjk2 wrote:
           | Not by saying "no" you can't. You have to fuck around with
           | shift+F10 and oobe stuff. This was tested on 23H2 yesterday.
        
             | hhh wrote:
             | Yes, you can. I just now downloaded a win11 23H2 iso and
             | installed w11 pro without going outside of the OOBE. Sure,
             | you shouldn't have to click 'domain join instead' etc, but
             | you can absolutely do it without doing anything outside of
             | the OOBE.
             | 
             | Here are the exact steps I used:
             | https://pastebin.com/nDnLBYg2
        
               | aidenn0 wrote:
               | Does the "domain join" work even if you don't have an AD
               | server setup to join to?
        
           | wtallis wrote:
           | I've definitely seen laptops from multiple OEMs with Pro
           | edition pre-installed that still don't offer the local
           | account route without first going through the CLI to bypass.
           | I think the only other route remaining is to just not have
           | any NIC that the installer can recognize.
        
         | Waterluvian wrote:
         | Inaccessible to 99% of users, but an escape hatch for the 1%
         | who might make a useful fuss. Evil genius.
        
         | Zardoz84 wrote:
         | Or just use a Linux distro and avoid all M$ shit
        
           | Sayrus wrote:
           | Unfortunately the world runs on Word and Excel and unless you
           | want the even worse Office 365 experience, you often do need
           | some M$.
        
             | behnamoh wrote:
             | While I love Word for academic writing, I've found Apple's
             | Keynote and Google Sheets superior alternatives to
             | PowerPoint and Excel.
        
             | bee_rider wrote:
             | For now. The kids (incoming college students over the last
             | couple years) like Google's office suite better as far as
             | I've seen.
             | 
             | Anyway, real documents are written in LaTeX.
             | 
             | Windows lives in this in-between space where it isn't as
             | easy Google/Apple stuff, but it isn't as good as Linux.
             | That gap is always closing.
        
               | passwordoops wrote:
               | "real documents are written in LaTeX"
               | 
               | Tell me you've never had a job in the real world without
               | telling me you've never had a job in the real world
        
             | ziddoap wrote:
             | And QuickBooks Enterprise, and CAD, and Windows-only CRM
             | systems, and Windows-only internal financial programs in
             | banks/credit unions, and Windows-only programs in
             | government environments...
             | 
             | It's a lot more than just Office that requires Windows.
        
         | Dalewyn wrote:
         | Additionally for those with Windows 11 Pro or higher, you can
         | straight up block OneDrive and other cloud functions with Group
         | Policy.
        
         | esalman wrote:
         | I was trying to install security updates into a ~8 years old
         | laptop the other day. It's been updated to Windows 10 before.
         | The updates were OTA, but after it completed there was no way
         | to log into the local account without logging into a Microsoft
         | account first (while it being connected to Wi-Fi).
        
         | aceazzameen wrote:
         | I'm working on a personal Win 11 Pro machine right now using a
         | local account. I never made an online one. Also I wonder if I
         | uninstalled OneDrive over a year ago, because I don't see
         | OneDrive in File Explorer or Task Manager. I've had this laptop
         | for over a year, so OneDrive has never returned in all the
         | updates since.
        
         | behnamoh wrote:
         | Most those changes will get reverted after the next Windows
         | update...
        
         | bee_rider wrote:
         | Hacks that require going to into a CLI are just not accessible
         | to non-technical people. Switch to something user friendly like
         | Linux.
         | 
         | At least Gnome only gets screwed up once every decade or so.
        
           | doublerabbit wrote:
           | > Switch to something user friendly like Linux.
           | 
           | The same applies; are just not accessible to non-technical
           | people.
        
         | fencepost wrote:
         | Or if ordering a new PC you can get one with Windows 11 Pro for
         | a few $$ more, choose the option to domain join (during initial
         | setup) to create a local account, and create user accounts with
         | no Microsoft account.
         | 
         | Makes it easier to do minor little things like drive encryption
         | as well.
        
       | mirkodrummer wrote:
       | To me Microsoft, Apple, Google, Facebook they all seem by a
       | degree or another totally out of control. They seem to be so
       | careless of any short-long term consequence that I wonder if
       | there is any accountability at all or if it's just a shitshow of
       | who does perform better and get bonuses
        
         | blackeyeblitzar wrote:
         | They're all monopolies. We just need to formally redefine the
         | terminology around anti trust to punish the anti competitive
         | nature of all these tech giants
        
       | scrlk wrote:
       | I've never found any compelling reason to set up Windows 11 (or
       | 10) with an online account. Things like this just reinforce my
       | decision to stick with a local account.
        
         | dyauspitr wrote:
         | It forced me this last time I set up windows 11
        
           | scrlk wrote:
           | Hit Shift + F10 at the Windows 11 setup screen to open a
           | command prompt, then enter `oobe\bypassnro`. After this, skip
           | connecting to a network and this will allow you to create a
           | local account.
           | 
           | It's extremely obnoxious that they've made it this difficult.
        
             | ranger_danger wrote:
             | didn't work for me on 24H2 /shrug
        
               | tripflag wrote:
               | it worked for me on win11pro 24h2 just a few days ago;
               | maybe you had a lan cable connected?
        
           | ziddoap wrote:
           | There are several bypasses.
           | 
           | Don't connect to the internet -> Shift + F10 to bring up CLI
           | -> OOBE\bypassnro
           | 
           | The out-of-box experience will restart, and you will have a
           | button to set up with a local account.
           | 
           | You can also (or at least _could_ , it's been a bit since
           | I've tried this method) use a banned e-mail account when it
           | asks for your Microsoft account.
        
             | LinuxBender wrote:
             | Additionally burning the ISO to Thumb drive with Rufus [1]
             | gives an option to disable Microsoft Accounts and hardware
             | validation upon installation.
             | 
             | [1] - https://rufus.ie/en/
        
         | squidbeak wrote:
         | The only one I ever found was that it made new installations of
         | Windows free with a digital licence associated with your
         | account. I don't know if this is still true of Windows 11.
        
       | rochak wrote:
       | I pity the soul forced to use Windows
        
         | IshKebab wrote:
         | Windows 10 is very solid. I'm going to assume it will get
         | updates for about as long as Windows XP did... I'll re-evaluate
         | when they actually EoL it. Who knows, maybe that will be the
         | year of the Linux desktop! (Spoilers: no.)
        
           | apantel wrote:
           | Agree re: Windows 10 (Pro). Though even with all the crap
           | I've turned off, I can't help but wonder what Microsoft is
           | taking from my machine without my knowledge.
        
           | skeeter2020 wrote:
           | Next October (2025) is the end of the road, because my
           | desktop can't be upgraded to Win11 and they tell me that
           | about once a month.
        
             | branon wrote:
             | October 2025 is EOL for 22H2, but 1809 LTSC is supported
             | until 2029.
        
       | 0cf8612b2e1e wrote:
       | If Microsoft is determined to make money from One Drive, could
       | they please improve the product? My work laptop routinely pegs a
       | core doing who knows what. When there is something to backup, the
       | throughout is beyond atrocious.
       | 
       | Microsoft has all of the apis available to monitor changes on its
       | own file system. Why does their solution seemingly run naive file
       | comparisons to detect changes? What is it doing burning all of
       | that computation time? Why does it struggle with tracking 100k
       | files? A bubble sort written in Ruby should be able to handle
       | 100k anything in seconds.
        
         | kentm wrote:
         | Indeed. After being brow beat into using it MS rewarded me by
         | syncing my personal PCs desktop shortcuts to the family PC
         | resulting in a screen full of broken shortcuts. Good jorb MS.
        
         | 42lux wrote:
         | Interestingly, OneDrive is likely the only Microsoft QT app.
         | It's amusing that the applications they aim to integrate most
         | into their system are no longer native. Last month, they
         | crippled Windows Co-Pilot by replacing the native app with an
         | EdgeWebView, which has significantly less system integration.
        
       | cjk2 wrote:
       | Why the hell aren't the EU and the FTC suing the shit out of them
       | for bundling, telemetry, lock in, gouging, shitty defaults?
        
         | AlexandrB wrote:
         | Great question.
        
         | robotnikman wrote:
         | I've been wondering this too. The stuff Microsoft has been
         | pulling for the last decade is just ripe for them to go after,
         | yet all you hear is crickets.
        
         | deanCommie wrote:
         | I think the 90's Antitrust battle was long and painful for
         | everyone, and the hope was that the lessons from the fallout of
         | it from it would carry forward in OS design.
         | 
         | But the staff has turned over and nobody remembers it anymore,
         | so here we go again. (see also: The rise of Fascism worldwide
         | as WW2 veterans die off)
         | 
         | That said, a Web Browser was/is a disproportionately
         | significant application for the OS, where preferential defaults
         | and bundling raise anti-trust concerns. Not so with a cloud
         | backup option. TBH, Apple has been/remains equally annoying
         | with iCloud integration/upsells on both OSX and iOS. And nobody
         | cares.
        
           | cjk2 wrote:
           | Microsoft bundle edge still and it can't be removed, even in
           | windows 11 LTSC. Constant nagging if you don't accept
           | O365/OneDrive unless you eviscerate the machine thoroughly or
           | use a cracked LTSC build.
           | 
           | As for Apple, no. Literally I get asked once about stuff and
           | then never again.
        
         | Syonyk wrote:
         | "It looks like you're considering investigating Microsoft! I've
         | loaded 500 free crystals into Candy Forgecraft Extreme and
         | launched it for you! Just play one level..."
         | 
         | I have no idea why the EU isn't going after Microsoft with a
         | heavy club for all the crap they're pulling lately.
        
           | cjk2 wrote:
           | _> I have no idea why the EU isn 't going after Microsoft
           | with a heavy club for all the crap they're pulling lately._
           | 
           | Did someone get a O365 license reduction or a nice dinner
           | out. MS rep used to take me out to dinner in the 90s to get
           | us to use NT+Visual Basic. Free dinner with asshats - worth
           | it. We used Solaris in the end and Sun only gave us hats.
        
           | 42lux wrote:
           | The last time, they built a new office and convinced an
           | entire state to abandon their custom Linux setup and switch
           | back to Office 365. Looking at you Bavaria...
        
         | spacebanana7 wrote:
         | Sadly I think the enthusiasm with which the market embraced
         | this behaviour in mobile, console and IoT makes it legally
         | difficult for Microsoft to be punished.
         | 
         | How can you penalise Microsoft for pushing OneDrive by default
         | but not penalise Apple for iCloud? Should multiple backup
         | providers be suggested at startup for economic fairness? Or
         | should backups be disabled by default (potentially annoying
         | consumers of mobile devices)?
         | 
         | Not saying it's impossible for a skilled regulator to build a
         | PC specific theory of harm but it's hard. Potentially might
         | need entirely new legislation.
        
           | djxfade wrote:
           | iCloud Drive, and actually the entire iCloud ecosystem is
           | opt-in
        
             | amelius wrote:
             | Yes, but the question is how they implemented it. Are there
             | dark patterns, is it all-or-nothing, etc.?
             | 
             | Also, with iCloud being at the heart of Apple's ecosystem,
             | a simple bug may very well cause accidental sharing of
             | sensitive data. Even if that never happens, it does not
             | make me sleep better.
        
             | kentm wrote:
             | It also doesn't nag if you decide not to use it.
        
               | blackeyeblitzar wrote:
               | It does - there's a message with a red dot badging in
               | your settings that you can't dismiss. Clicking it takes
               | you to a nag message to log into iCloud. Still, nowhere
               | near the blatantly insecure and anticompetitive dark
               | patterns that Microsoft uses
        
           | nicoburns wrote:
           | IMO While Apple are pushing iCloud harder than they really
           | should be allowed to, but it's nowhere near as bad as what
           | Microsoft are doing. With Apple there's a simple opt-out in
           | the setup wizard, and if you opt-out you stay opted-out (and
           | are only prompted to opt-in once a year with the major OS
           | update).
        
           | temac wrote:
           | It seems completely illegal for MS to do that on EU
           | computers, esp. with Schrems (but probably even completely
           | illegal with just GDPR)
        
         | ffhhj wrote:
         | How will goverments surveil their citizens without these
         | companies?
        
       | ranger_danger wrote:
       | Jokes on them, I only use local accounts
        
         | davidkellis wrote:
         | You to today (I do too). May not tomorrow:
         | https://www.tomshardware.com/software/windows/microsoft-acco...
        
       | Syonyk wrote:
       | I'm not the target market for Windows, haven't been for a while.
       | 
       | But I _genuinely_ cannot figure out what Microsoft 's vision for
       | Windows 11 is. Or if they even have one beyond "idk, shove crap
       | in, meet OKR, get promotion... maybe?"
       | 
       | For a while, it seemed like they were focused on making sure that
       | they could link as much of your activity on your computer to
       | _you, as a person_ - witness the ever-increasing challenge of an
       | offline-only account, which means the value of knowing the email
       | address of the signed in user is substantial. And then they
       | embedded ad delivery as a first class participant in the platform
       | - the sort of crap that used to be common from people who
       | installed Bonzai Dancer Cursor Free or such is now literally part
       | of the OS.
       | 
       | ... and then it 's just gone weird. AI with Copilot, Recall, etc.
       | There doesn't appear to be a coherent vision of what it is,
       | beyond a place to shovel crap, deliver unwanted applications
       | (that they get paid to shove at people, presumably), and install
       | _lots_ of updates.
       | 
       | Linux has problems, but there are no shortage of distros that
       | just run apps, without delivering all your behavioral surplus up
       | for collection, and that's what (IMO) an OS should be. Windows
       | 11, from the outside, doesn't look like it's serving me. Except
       | in the sense that it's focused on "serving me to Microsoft for
       | further subversion of my will."
       | 
       | ... and apparently Windows will now _orange_ screen? Last time
       | someone offered to let me touch a Windows machine, it orange
       | screened in protest before I could even touch anything. At least
       | the feeling is mutual.
        
         | bee_rider wrote:
         | Probably incorrect conspiracy theory: with the success of Azure
         | and also due to basic common sense, anyone inside MS that gives
         | even the smallest shit about OS quality is a huge Linux fan.
         | But, they have this awful legacy OS dragging them down, they
         | can't get rid of it because of various contracts and general
         | shareholder expectations. They added as much Linux to it as
         | they could really get away with, and their only good program
         | (VSCode) has been ported and works perfectly fine on Linux, so
         | things are mostly looking OK.
         | 
         | The only thing left to do is to tank Windows and get rid of
         | that legacy support burden once and for all.
        
         | Dalewyn wrote:
         | >But I genuinely cannot figure out what Microsoft's vision for
         | Windows 11 is.
         | 
         | An operating system for the common man (and hopefully a
         | subscription revenue inlet).
         | 
         | We need to acknowledge that cloud backups _are a good thing for
         | most people_ , we're talking people who otherwise never take
         | backups no matter what and then cry when they inevitably lose
         | their data.
         | 
         | The only problems here are OneDrive is absolute roasted garbage
         | with how it actually executes the concept and Microsoft account
         | integration is far too fucking obnoxious.
        
           | utensil4778 wrote:
           | I run a cloud backup service. Cloud backups are good for you,
           | the user.
           | 
           | Therefore, I have the right and moral obligation to break
           | into your computer and upload all of your data to my own
           | servers without your knowledge or consent.
        
         | Sohcahtoa82 wrote:
         | > But I genuinely cannot figure out what Microsoft's vision for
         | Windows 11 is. Or if they even have one beyond "idk, shove crap
         | in, meet OKR, get promotion... maybe?"
         | 
         | 100% agreed
         | 
         | I can't figure out who MS's target audience is for Windows now.
         | They're losing marketshare to Apple in the casual home user
         | market. Heck, based on my last two jobs, even developers are
         | switching to MacBook, though I acknowledge that that's
         | confirmation bias.
         | 
         | Technical users are happily switching to Linux or Mac.
         | 
         | That leaves who else? Gamers? They're still stuck on Windows
         | depending on the games they play. Anything written in a cross-
         | platform like Unity is fine, and Proton is getting better and
         | better, and now even many anti-cheat software has a native
         | Linux client, but some major games with proprietary engines
         | still struggle under Linux. Hopefully more games start getting
         | native Steam Deck support, which ends up making them Linux
         | native.
         | 
         | But like...how many customers is MS going to burn for short-
         | term gains?
        
         | o11c wrote:
         | > figure out what Microsoft's vision for Windows 11 is
         | 
         | Never attribute to stupidity what can better be explained by
         | malice. Hanlon's razor hangs a lot of weight on that
         | "adequately".
         | 
         | We _know_ how valuable bulk data collection is, so why would
         | Microsoft ever _not_ mine it?
        
       | MR4D wrote:
       | Seems like a great place to store tons of ISO's.
        
         | the_snooze wrote:
         | Or randomly generated bits.
        
       | MR4D wrote:
       | Does anyone know if Windows 11 Pro does this too ?
        
       | elorant wrote:
       | Why is Win11 such a pain though? I don't get it. You had Win10
       | that worked just fine and they went on and fucked it up to what
       | gain? Did they manage to sell more of other products in their
       | lineup? And you do all that when Apple has its own silicon and
       | produces superb laptops that could lure a lot of people in their
       | ecosystem. I understand that Windows isn't the cash cow it used
       | to be, they've moved to greener pastures like Azure, but still
       | why mess up your main trademark product and piss off so many of
       | your users? What's the end goal here?
        
         | steve_taylor wrote:
         | Presumably, the Windows team has various targets to meet in
         | terms of ARPU and things of that nature.
        
         | okanat wrote:
         | The data they collect for the AI and the advertising
         | opportunities enable more profits and more revenue to keep
         | infinite growth happening. Even with Azure, even with Github
         | and everything else. If you're not using all the profit
         | opportunities, you are not delivering enough. The economic
         | system doesn't reward or demand stable profits or sustainable
         | growth, it demands compound growth.
        
           | Fauntleroy wrote:
           | This, exactly. Things will only continue to get more shitty
           | as long as the expectation, and often requirement, for
           | businesses with investors is to make infinite money, forever.
        
         | netsharc wrote:
         | At least the version number increment is probably necessary
         | because of the "breaking change" of requiring TPM, so they can
         | move into a locked-down ecosystem like the iPhone, which I'm
         | guessing is MS's goal within a few years.
         | 
         | But the terrible UI/UX? I guess they saw they had to entice
         | users to move by changing the look and feel, but didn't give
         | the programmers enough time, so it was mostly unfinished
         | garbage when it was released, and maybe still is the case.
         | 
         | On that note, I have Win11 and Office version whatever at work.
         | I really fucking hate new Outlook, it's a garbage web app, the
         | whole "NEW" label on the icon makes me always think "Oh I've
         | got some new emails. Oh no, it's just Microsoft being
         | fuckwits". Also, the UI for modifying email signatures is a
         | confusing maze of unfinished UI.
        
       | starik36 wrote:
       | This does not fill me with confidence that they won't pull the
       | same crap with Recall.
        
       | jjoergensen wrote:
       | How is this not a compliance risk? Automatically transferring
       | data, including personal data, to the cloud without explicit
       | consent raises GDPR concerns.
        
       | okasaki wrote:
       | I recently reinstalled Windows Home.
       | 
       | It's not possible to install a local account any more. Apparently
       | all the loopholes have been closed. It just loops you back to the
       | "oops looks like you lost internet access" page.
       | 
       | I made a new account - installer<date>@outlook.com with
       | no@thankyou.com as the backup email (which you have to give).
       | Microsoft didn't like that, so it made me go through 10 minutes
       | of captchas (captcas in the OS install - wtf)
       | 
       | Then it forced me to give it my birth date, ostensibly to check
       | if I'm of age. Could just ask "are you older than 13" but then
       | you don't get that sweet data.
       | 
       | Finally I booted into the OS, and I made a local account.
       | 
       | I spent 30 minutes going through the awful menus trying and
       | probably failing to disable all the crap that sends all my data
       | to Microsoft. Some of which can't be disabled in the Home
       | edition.
       | 
       | Then I tried to delete my "installer" account. Oops, sorry, we
       | have to "verify" who you are by sending an email to
       | no@thankyou.com. Oh, you don't have that? No worries, just give
       | us your real email address and we'll allow you to log you in
       | after 30 days.
       | 
       | Then later I check my real name gmail account and there's a
       | Microsoft email with a login code. I never gave MS this email
       | address. What the hell??
        
         | ziddoap wrote:
         | > _It 's not possible to install a local account any more.
         | Apparently all the loopholes have been closed. It just loops
         | you back to the "oops looks like you lost internet access"
         | page._
         | 
         | This simply isn't true, I did a computer with Windows 11 Home 3
         | days ago with local accounts.
         | 
         | OOBE\bypassnro still works as expected.
        
           | okasaki wrote:
           | No it doesn't.
        
             | ziddoap wrote:
             | Yes, it does. I'm not the only one in this thread, the
             | other Windows thread from today, or online that has
             | installed Windows 11 Home in the last week and successfully
             | setup local-only accounts.
             | 
             | When dozens of people say it still works and one says it
             | doesn't, chances are the one person did it incorrectly.
             | 
             | It works.
        
               | okasaki wrote:
               | Here's several people saying it doesn't work any more:
               | https://answers.microsoft.com/en-
               | us/windows/forum/all/window...
               | 
               | It tried it, it didn't work.
               | 
               | I even disabled wifi in bios.
        
               | ziddoap wrote:
               | I'm not sure what to tell you. Friday, 3 days ago, I
               | setup a brand new Windows 11 Home computer.
               | 
               | I didn't connect to Wi-Fi, I did OOBE\bypassnro, and I
               | created my local account. Nice and simple. There are
               | other people in this very thread who also had the same
               | experience as me.
               | 
               | Sorry it didn't work for you. But it still works.
        
               | okasaki wrote:
               | Maybe you used an old image? I downloaded the latest from
               | Microsoft.
        
         | consp wrote:
         | > Then it forced me to give it my birth date
         | 
         | Forgot what it was (not Ms for once) which started
         | discriminating against 124 year old people since you could not
         | enter 01/01/1900 as a birthdate. Usually it's cut at 100 (I
         | always say I'm born on 01/01/1900, there is no legal reason
         | other than the "are you an adult" question)
        
       | amanzi wrote:
       | I'm all for hating on Microsoft for their continued destruction
       | of the local Windows 11 experience, but I actually think this is
       | a good decision. Assuming you're logging in with a Microsoft
       | account, and assuming you have a OneDrive account, it's a better
       | experience to set up the folder backup feature as early as
       | possible in the set-up process. If you really don't want it, it's
       | easy to undo.
       | 
       | I still don't like being forced to log in with a Microsoft
       | account as part of the set-up. I prefer to log in locally, and
       | then incrementally turn on the cloud features. But I've voted
       | with my wallet and have moved to Linux and macOS for day-to-day
       | desktop computing. I still keep a Windows 10 VM around for when I
       | need it, but am doing all I can to avoid the "modern" Windows
       | desktop experience.
        
         | MissTake wrote:
         | > I actually think this is a good decision
         | 
         | Whatever happened to just, I dunno, _asking_ what to do?
         | 
         | > But I've voted with my wallet and have moved to Linux and
         | macOS for day-to-day desktop computing
         | 
         | As did I about 7 years ago. Still have to use Windows servers
         | at work, but I'm even supplanting many of those with Linux
         | servers as and when I can
        
         | Bilal_io wrote:
         | > Assuming you're logging in with a Microsoft account
         | 
         | The whole issue lies within this assumption. Microsoft does not
         | want you to use a local account, and they make it extremely
         | difficult to setup your Windows machine without one.
        
           | amanzi wrote:
           | Yep - I agree with that. I set up a Windows 11 machine
           | recently and was still able to create a local account. I'm
           | sure there will be ways to defeat the new requirement. I
           | haven't tried this, but even if they forced a Microsoft
           | account during set up, couldn't you just create a local admin
           | account once logged in, then log in with that account and
           | delete the first profile?
        
         | malfist wrote:
         | I think a company, without my permission, copying my personal
         | files to their server is the definition of not a good decision
        
           | amanzi wrote:
           | Note that this is only during set-up, so at that point you
           | don't have any personal files on the machine. And this is
           | only if you're logging in with a Microsoft account with a
           | valid OneDrive account. The article is light on details, but
           | I assume (hope) there's some UI to explain what's going on.
        
         | steve_taylor wrote:
         | Linux and macOS is a great combo. I recently bought a full-spec
         | UM790 Pro (Ryzen 9 with 64GB RAM), installed Ubuntu and
         | colocated it with my router. I run vscode on my low-spec Mac
         | Mini (M1 with 8GB RAM) with all the grunt work handled by the
         | Ubuntu server thanks to the Remote-SSH extension. I saved
         | several thousands of dollars by not buying a Mac with a decent
         | amount of RAM, get the great macOS user experience, and develop
         | on the platform (Linux) that I'm deploying to.
        
           | jiripospisil wrote:
           | > full-spec UM790 Pro (Ryzen 9 with 64GB RAM)
           | 
           | Fun fact: The machine actually supports up to 96GB (2x
           | CT48G56C46S5).
        
         | proactivesvcs wrote:
         | What happens when your files are considered Bad and Microsoft
         | removes them? When the OneDrive backend suffers bit rot or
         | misconfiguration? What happens when your Microsoft account is
         | compromised? When the photos of your kids in the bath are sent
         | to the police? When you have a 10GB file that's frequently
         | modified and the client then constantly scans it and uploads
         | it? When your abusive partner, relation, co-worker or boss uses
         | this to surveil you, tamper with or remove your files or even
         | plant evidence? When your business or organisation now suffers
         | from liability from not performing due data protection
         | diligence of something they were not informed nor asked consent
         | for? The list of reasons why this is terrible just goes on and
         | on.
        
         | Fabricio20 wrote:
         | Except when it doesn't ask you if you want it to do that, and
         | suddenly after investigating why my games are patching slow as
         | shit it turns out my OneDrive is full from game patches that it
         | synced from my Documents/My Games folder and my network speed
         | is being destroyed by OneDrive syncing the patches up every
         | time the launcher replaces a patch file.
         | 
         | I'm all in for automated backups, but let the user know that
         | their entire user folder is gonna get synced and give an option
         | to disable it (opt-out) on the OOBE. Make this optional and
         | explicit.
        
       | anothername12 wrote:
       | I just use it for playing games on steam, but lately it's
       | annoying even for that. I tried steam on Linux with proton and
       | whatnot. It works okish, but there were too many issues with
       | screen flickering. The Xorg/Wayland/nvidia info out there made it
       | too confusing to deal with work arounds. A younger me would have
       | persisted though.
       | 
       | So it looks like I'm in it for another Windows-issued flogging at
       | least.
        
       | whatever1 wrote:
       | Meanwhile they have crippled the native file history and backup
       | options of the OS.
       | 
       | I was desperate until I found an excellent multiplatform open
       | source project for backups called Kopia!
       | 
       | Highly recommended, even entry level users can work with it.
        
       | TheRealPomax wrote:
       | It'd be so nice if Windows went back to offering three tiers:
       | home, which assumes you want to log in and get on with your life
       | and you don't care what the defaults are as long as things just
       | work(tm); Pro, which assumes you know what you want and doesn't
       | give you that unless you ask for it; and Enterprise, which
       | assumes you're made of money and it's literally several people's
       | jobs to manage your windows installs org-wide.
       | 
       | So we can just buy Pro and know we're getting an OS that _we_ can
       | configure instead of an OS that gets hijacked by Microsoft every
       | single windows update cycle.
        
       | slavik81 wrote:
       | Tech companies in general seem to struggle with consent. Even
       | when they bother to ask, they often refuse to take "no" for an
       | answer, only offering "maybe later."
        
         | blackeyeblitzar wrote:
         | > Tech companies in general seem to struggle with consent.
         | 
         | This is why Louis Rossman started describing these behaviors as
         | a "rapist mentality" of tech companies. It's a violation of
         | consent, an exploitation of their anti-competitive size (yes
         | just their size is inherently a problem that distorts the
         | market).
        
       | mianos wrote:
       | At least a Mac alllows you to have a local account without
       | iCloud. We are not allowed iCloud accounts on our work lappies
       | due to the risk of client data leakage. It seems to me, unless
       | the Microsoft cloud is 100% trusted you would not be able to use
       | it at many places. (We do have centrally managed computers and
       | accounts).
        
         | nofunsir wrote:
         | Microsoft cloud is[1] indeed trusted: "Office 365 GCC High"[2].
         | 
         | [1] Read: "can be" [2] https://learn.microsoft.com/en-
         | us/office365/servicedescripti...
        
         | ilamont wrote:
         | Tangential: If you use Office on your Mac, it is impossible to
         | use your own hard drive as the default save location, or remove
         | OneDrive as an option.
         | 
         | https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/msoffice/forum/all/i-wan...
         | 
         | Very, very frustrating for non-technical family members who
         | can't find files in Documents or some other local hard drive
         | location.
        
         | walterbell wrote:
         | _> We are not allowed iCloud accounts on our work lappies_
         | 
         | Is it possible to have an Apple account for apps and security
         | updates, without iCloud? On iOS, the default login panel in
         | _Settings_ will sign into both iCloud and App Store. To avoid
         | iCloud, one must use the App Store app to sign into  "Media and
         | Purchases", rather than using _Settings_.
        
       | generic92034 wrote:
       | So what kind of Windows 11 is running on my PC? System info says
       | Win 11 Pro, but I am only using a local account, was never
       | prompted for an MS account, get no ads nowhere, no nag screens
       | for upselling office/OneDrive/etc. What kind of magic did the PC
       | vendor perform for me?
        
       | ffhhj wrote:
       | Just run O&O ShutUp10++ after each update to cleanup M$ dark
       | patterns.
        
       | suby wrote:
       | This happened to me. I was wondering why my internet speeds were
       | slow when I discovered that Microsoft was in the process of
       | uploading my users directory, they had already uploaded almost
       | two gigs when I realized. They also changed the path to these
       | directories to something like C:\Users\name\OneDrive\Desktop\\.
       | Another poster in this thread claimed it's easy to reverse -- I
       | disagree, it's a pain in the ass to track down the setting, and I
       | shouldn't have to do this. When I did, it gave me an error for
       | one of the directories and refuses to revert (documents?).
       | 
       | I don't like leaving negative or hyperbolic comments on HN, but
       | this was enraging and unacceptable to me. It's hard to convey
       | without coming off as unhinged. I only ever boot into Windows
       | nowadays when I need to compile and test a Windows build of
       | software. I understand Microsoft has built up good will through
       | efforts like VS Code, but it's all undone because of things like
       | this. I avoid MS products, they cannot be trusted.
        
         | tyleo wrote:
         | This is almost my exact experience too.
        
           | sorry_outta_gas wrote:
           | It's annoying but it's a smart move, once they get you to hit
           | that low 5gb onedrive limit it's a easy path to get you on a
           | office365 sub for the extra storage.
        
         | A4ET8a8uTh0 wrote:
         | << It's hard to convey without coming off as unhinged.
         | 
         | I almost wonder if this is by design. I genuinely had people
         | look at me funny when I described relatively minor issues that
         | eventually made me jump from Windows ( in my case I think it
         | was dropping detailed descriptions from updates in Windows 7 ).
         | I kept explaining that even the issues are not the actual
         | issue. The issue is that I am unable to administer my machine
         | as I see fit. I am not anti-tech, I tell people, but the tech
         | has to work for me...
        
         | gear54rus wrote:
         | Did you login with ms account? if so, why?
         | 
         | I don't think it can upload if you aren't logged in.
        
           | lolinder wrote:
           | > if so, why?
           | 
           | Have you tried installing Windows 11 _without_ signing in to
           | a Microsoft account? It 's very difficult to do and the
           | instructions online keep having to change as Microsoft makes
           | it more and more difficult. What I'm finding now [0] involves
           | using a hotkey to open command prompt at a certain part of
           | the installation process and running a command to disable the
           | internet before you proceed.
           | 
           | [0] https://www.tomshardware.com/how-to/install-
           | windows-11-witho...
        
             | gear54rus wrote:
             | I guess mine just came pre-installed without that. But my
             | point still stands, just don't interact with the crap and
             | you're still somewhat safer.
        
               | lolinder wrote:
               | > just don't interact with the crap and you're still
               | somewhat safer
               | 
               | You're not wrong, but your initial comment made it sound
               | like it was just a matter of not stepping in a single
               | pile of dog poo. What Microsoft presents users with
               | instead is an entire sewer with a great big EXIT sign
               | pointing straight through the sewage. If you're in the
               | know you can mutter a secret incantation and a ladder
               | will drop down, allowing you to climb up onto a rickety
               | catwalk with lots of warning signs telling you that
               | you're going the wrong way. If you're brave enough to
               | ignore the warning signs then _eventually_ you 'll get to
               | the other side without touching the crap.
               | 
               | Needless to say, most people follow the path that
               | Microsoft designed for them and end up interacting with
               | at least some of the crap.
        
               | gleenn wrote:
               | You are definitely right but I still feel like this is
               | Stockholm syndrome, if they keep dark-patterning people
               | more and more into logging in, it doesn't really make
               | this a substantial improvement, they'll update they're
               | way into tracking you and uploading your personal files
               | somehow.
        
           | suby wrote:
           | They go out of their way to make this difficult. I tried
           | disconnecting my internet while installing, but they're
           | apparently wise to that because the option which internet
           | articles claim is there is no longer there. I think there's
           | probably a console dropdown you can bring up when installing
           | to get a local account, but I've decided against fighting the
           | OS. It's so user hostile that it's not worth it to try to
           | turn it into something I like.
        
         | IanKerr wrote:
         | I'm imagining this happening to someone on a highly metered
         | connection and blowing through gigs of their limited monthly
         | upload budget before realizing their OS has just gone rogue on
         | them. Treating everyone like they have an unlimited bandwidth
         | budget and greedily using it without permission is just awful
         | behavior.
        
         | jchw wrote:
         | > It's hard to convey without coming off as unhinged
         | 
         | Man. I have felt this way a whole lot lately.
         | 
         | I think some people see Linux users and genuinely can't fathom
         | how or why they'd want to go through all of the trouble
         | choosing to use Linux and doing real work on it. A lot of us
         | look back just as puzzled, because when I switched to a Linux
         | desktop for the first time in around 2004, it was definitely a
         | choice, but it hasn't felt like a "choice" for a very long
         | time.
        
         | davisr wrote:
         | Now you understand why Stallman was right. If you don't want to
         | get shafted, the only way is to control 100% of the software
         | running on your machine. One either does that with totally
         | free/libre software, or they don't.
         | 
         | No one can or should trust non-free software. Period.
        
         | tomrod wrote:
         | Perhaps time for me to leave VS Code. I have suitable
         | replacements for everything else MSoft. The plug-ins ecosystem
         | is helpful, but what the heck!
        
         | neither_color wrote:
         | _I don 't like leaving negative or hyperbolic comments on HN,
         | but this was enraging and unacceptable to me. It's hard to
         | convey without coming off as unhinged_
         | 
         | You're not unhinged, there's been a fundamental change in
         | internet culture and the early 2000s free internet people are
         | considered loony now. Ive been laughed out of Discord
         | groups(it's what the under 30s use these days instead of chats
         | and forums, and is itself problematic) for talking about these
         | things.
        
           | dontdoxxme wrote:
           | I think it's better to see it as not a shift in culture but
           | understand that the internet represents all culture now.
           | There are still under 30s that believe in real freedom but
           | everyone is on the internet now, rather than a set of people
           | that were more biased towards freedom (as that was partly
           | what the internet represented).
        
         | II2II wrote:
         | > I understand Microsoft has built up good will through efforts
         | like VS Code, but it's all undone because of things like this.
         | 
         | Someone in Microsoft should look into who is making these
         | decisions, why these decisions are are being made, and why they
         | are being received so negatively. Then they need to address
         | them.
         | 
         | Even though I'm not much of a fan of Microsoft products, I get
         | the impression that they have some excellent developers making
         | excellent products that end up being undermined by business
         | decisions. These are decisions that will probably end up
         | undermining the business itself. We don't live in the 1990's
         | anymore. Microsoft has plenty of competitors who are nibbling
         | away at their edges.
        
           | jtriangle wrote:
           | Oh, I mean, the "why" is pretty simple. They're going to
           | enable onedrive upload by default, wait until the sync
           | finishes, then change the EULA to allow them to scrape
           | everyone's onedrive for machine learning data that they can
           | then sell.
           | 
           | >>Welcome to hell.
        
         | chx wrote:
         | > Microsoft has built up good will through efforts like VS Code
         | 
         | That's the Trojan Horse
         | 
         | https://ghuntley.com/fracture/
        
       | lkdfjlkdfjlg wrote:
       | Stallman is always right, if only you're willing to wait long
       | enough.
        
       | givemeethekeys wrote:
       | They're going back to dark tactics. Ads galore to nudge you into
       | signing up for a Microsoft account, then an office 365 account.
       | It's annoying and I'm going to switch to Linux.
        
       | amindeed wrote:
       | Is using server editions of Windows as desktop OSs any better? I
       | mean in regards to making such changes (without explicit user's
       | consent, at least) and wasting system resources with [background
       | running] junkware, for instance.
        
       | tylerchilds wrote:
       | This is the same folder with the every three seconds screenshot
       | feature or no?
        
       | tylerchilds wrote:
       | This is the same folder as the every three second screenshot
       | feature?
        
       | Overtonwindow wrote:
       | I had to go into the registry to break Microsoft Word from
       | constantly wanting to save my documents to the cloud. It's
       | absolutely awful.
        
       | europeanNyan wrote:
       | Just this weekend, I've decided to nuke my Windows 11 drive
       | because of Recall and all the shitty practives and give a sweet
       | extra 1GB SSD to Linux Mint for storage. Didn't know Microsoft
       | would give me additional reasons to feel good for doing it.
       | 
       | I'm not missing anything. I've got the newest Nvidia drivers and
       | kernel which were all very easy to install and one search away to
       | find instructions on how to do it. Everything is rock solid. No
       | surprise dark patterns, no enabling/disabling of issues. I keep
       | Timeshift backups of the last 2 days and one for last week and
       | month. If whatever I am playing with on the system goes haywire,
       | I just restore my system with Timeshift.
       | 
       | I've also been giving up on modern gaming, too much
       | enshittification (loot boxes, engagement driven gameplay,
       | messages for modern audiences, etc.) happening lately, but
       | everything I've thrown at Proton ran great. I've been
       | rediscovering the great libraries of retro gaming consoles,
       | especially the DS and 3DS so my computer is actually a workhorse
       | now and my gaming is single player retro bliss.
        
       | evantbyrne wrote:
       | Yesterday I found out that OneDrive was silently running on
       | startup on my Windows 10 machine, only because I went to disable
       | the EA launcher. Have never used it on that machine.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-06-24 23:00 UTC)