[HN Gopher] Feral pigeons and the London Pigeon String Foot and ...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Feral pigeons and the London Pigeon String Foot and Rescue group
        
       Author : nickwritesit
       Score  : 44 points
       Date   : 2024-06-22 10:54 UTC (2 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.bbc.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.bbc.com)
        
       | junto wrote:
       | I always had a negative view of pigeons as being "flying rats",
       | but someone pointed this out to me that humans domesticated them,
       | revered them, bred them, used them to deliver messages and then
       | the telegram and telephone came along. These new communication
       | tools made them superfluous to our needs so we abandoned them.
       | 
       | Put in that context it's rather sad.
        
         | timthorn wrote:
         | Gordon Corera wrote a good book covering their use in WWII:
         | https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/37933332-secret-pigeon-s...
        
         | ljf wrote:
         | My (mildly interesting) pigeon story:
         | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39689815
         | 
         | I think they are amazing, and as you say they were once
         | integral to our lives, now just a pest.
        
           | Loughla wrote:
           | That's a fun story.
           | 
           | We raised roller pigeons after a pair showed up at our farm.
           | They obviously escaped from somewhere, as they were red and
           | tame. Until we knew what they were, we assumed there was
           | something wrong with them, as they couldn't fly without doing
           | loops and flips. That's what they're bred to do.
           | 
           | And they're delicious, as a side note. . .
        
             | ljf wrote:
             | I'm I'm eating pigeon (which we used to a lot as a child) -
             | I was always told that Wood Pigeon was the tastiest - but I
             | can't say I could tell the difference.
        
         | gerdesj wrote:
         | An ecosystem (world) has all sorts of niches. Pigeons (Rock
         | Doves) are simply living and evolving according to
         | circumstances they encounter. Some pigeons have been given
         | medals during wartime (1). All organisms do what they do,
         | because that is what they do. You do too, but you get to be
         | retrospective about it on internet forums. Pigeons don't ...
         | yet.
         | 
         | "Flying rats". OK so what is wrong with rats? They often
         | perform a initial clean up role and live blameless lives, if we
         | want to think of them in a positive way - they don't care. Rats
         | and many other "pests" tend to get "out of control" thanks to
         | mostly human interventions: dumping waste inappropriately and
         | the like.
         | 
         | (1) https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-tayside-
         | central-17138...
        
         | fire_lake wrote:
         | It is.
         | 
         | I wonder what a humane method of population control looks like?
         | 
         | Pigeon feeding can lead to rats so it seems reasonable to ban
         | that.
        
           | jonathrg wrote:
           | Feeding birds will only lead to rats if you give them the
           | wrong food or too much. Otherwise they will eat it all up and
           | there will be nothing left for the rats.
        
       | richardw wrote:
       | My wife and a few friends were into helping feral cats. I did a
       | few stints. Built a shelter, helped bake cookies for sale to
       | generate funds etc.
       | 
       | I remember doing predator-prey models at uni. The issue is that
       | the population will just grow until it's at some kind of
       | capacity. Cats are easier to capture and spay, but an issue there
       | is that for every cat that lives longer, many thousands of native
       | animals are going to die. But the cat is cuter and visible, so we
       | help it.
       | 
       | For eg pigeons, what limits the population? You can't capture and
       | neuter every bird, so population restriction is environmental. If
       | you add food, rather than 1000 birds you now have 1100 birds,
       | etc. Ideally we're being kind to a balanced population of birds
       | that play some part in the local ecosystem, rather than one that
       | we created and out-competes other birds because we give it a
       | hand.
       | 
       | Not an expert. Experts, what's the best outcome here?
       | 
       | Edit: emigrated to Sydney. Took 3 moggies with us at great
       | expense but they're now inside cats so we don't annihilate the
       | local wildlife and irritate all the neighbours (who are
       | rightfully very protective of their native animals). Cats are
       | happy. A friend's mom looked after about 17 feral kittens. Now 17
       | grown cats that eat a lot of food made of presumably gentle cows.
       | This is not well-thought out. But kittens are cute and have
       | utterly hacked humans.
        
         | ajb wrote:
         | [Edit: I had misread the above comment, which is not saying
         | 'per year']
         | 
         | While cats do indeed kill wildlife, I suspect that "thousands
         | of animals per year" is a big exaggeration even for ferals. It
         | might be true if their sole diet was wildlife, but in most
         | cases the diet will include a lot of contributions from humans
         | (from people who like cats, scavenging in bins, and
         | occasionally, theft). And of course almost all of the wildlife
         | they do take will be mice, which is the original reason we live
         | with cats. Even today, if a cat near you is taking thousands of
         | mice per year, few people would prefer to live with thousands
         | of mice.
         | 
         | Pet cats, of course, don't take anything like this number. I've
         | seen figures of <5 per year, and that's consistent with my own
         | cats.
        
           | richardw wrote:
           | If you're going to quote, make it an accurate quote :) I
           | didn't say per year. And the amounts of animals killed by pet
           | cats are very much not accepted as 5. Maybe you're presented
           | with 5.
           | 
           | "Cats have played a leading role in most of Australia's 34
           | mammal extinctions since 1788, and are a big reason
           | populations of at least 123 other threatened native species
           | are dropping.
           | 
           | But pet cats are wreaking havoc too. Our new analysis
           | compiles the results of 66 different studies on pet cats to
           | gauge the impact of Australia's pet cat population on
           | Australia's wildlife.
           | 
           | On average, each roaming pet cat kills 186 reptiles, birds
           | and mammals per year, most of them native to Australia"
           | 
           | https://www.nespthreatenedspecies.edu.au/news-and-
           | media/late...
           | 
           | "scientific evidence does not support the popular use of cats
           | to control urban rat populations, and ecologists oppose their
           | use for this purpose because of the disproportionate harm
           | they do to native wildlife"
           | 
           | "Surveys of cat owners find they often view the depredation
           | of wildlife as a normal thing that cats do, and rarely feel
           | an individual obligation to prevent it.[55] They may
           | experience some level of cognitive dissonance toward the
           | subject, because when surveyed they're more likely than the
           | general public to believe that cat predation isn't harmful to
           | wildlife"
           | 
           | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cat_predation_on_wildlife
        
             | ajb wrote:
             | My apologies, I misread your comment.
             | 
             | I think it's safe to say that the number of animals killed
             | by pet cats is disputed. It will also be quite different in
             | different places; my figures come from my area. The
             | situation is also very different in Australia, where cats
             | are a recent introduction, and the native population is
             | naive to them, versus countries where this is not the case.
             | I certainly don't defend letting cats outside in Australia
             | or New Zealand.
             | 
             | In other places it's more a question about equilibrium. All
             | wild animals die, either from predation, starvation, or
             | disease; predation may not be the worse death. Nor is
             | predation necessarily a sign of disequilibrium (IE, cats
             | causing a falling wildlife population) - at equilibrium
             | it's still possible for 100% of deaths to be by predation,
             | as the older animals get slower and are predated. The exact
             | effect of pet cats is therefore quite involved, and
             | counting the number of kills won't tell you the whole
             | picture even if you could get that figure.
        
               | richardw wrote:
               | No problem. And you're right it's never simple.
               | 
               | If cats weren't there, native animals would be doing the
               | predation. We enable cats to out-compete other animals.
               | Islands make it easier to measure the impact but
               | obviously this plays out similarly in all places. We like
               | cats, help them where we can, have devoted much of our
               | internet bandwidth to them, and there's no way that is a
               | positive for other animals in the ecosystem. The level of
               | impact is debatable but it's not anywhere near positive.
               | 
               | I lived in South Africa. Tons of cats in cities and very
               | few species of birds. Go to a reserve with "proper"
               | wildlife and there are tons of bird species and no cats.
               | They're utterly out-competed when the playing field is
               | level.
               | 
               | Going back to the article, if we feed pigeons they'll
               | increase in number until we get a new equilibrium. So our
               | current state isn't an act of god, and by doing more of
               | the same we'll just exacerbate the problem. Humane
               | management is surely a better idea, like the fake eggs
               | approach described by another commenter.
               | (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40771093)
        
         | ktothe wrote:
         | > For eg pigeons, what limits the population?
         | 
         | Not an expert myself but here in Germany people build pigeon
         | shelters and swap out the eggs with fake eggs.
        
       | fartfeatures wrote:
       | I'm guessing these guys have never had Pigeon-Induced Severe
       | Sleep Exhaustion Disorder. I ended up chronically PISSED due to
       | some loud ass pigeons nesting outside my window. 4 hours sleep a
       | night over a period of months sucks.
        
         | lostlogin wrote:
         | If you've ever seen a pigeon nest, it's actually hilarious.
         | 
         | It'll be a couple of sticks just plonked on a ledge. They can
         | be very proud of their nests and after the 9 seconds of effort
         | put into the job, who's to blame them?
        
         | card_zero wrote:
         | Simply go with the flow, wake up at dawn, and go to sleep when
         | the sun sets, like the pigeons are telling you to. You'll be
         | leading a more natural life, and you'll avoid the risk of being
         | eaten by a fox due to hopping around on the ground after dark.
        
           | fartfeatures wrote:
           | Ha. That does seem to be the only logical solution.
        
       | Ozzie_osman wrote:
       | There are parts of the world where pigeons are bred for food in
       | the same way chicken might be, and in fact, it can be considered
       | a delicacy.
       | 
       | When I was a kid (in Cairo) my father let me keep a small pigeon
       | coop on the roof. We'd buy a few, then you have to keep them
       | locked in the coop for a couple weeks so that they "home" there.
       | After that, they'd be allowed to leave and fly wherever they'd
       | like, and they'd always come back to the coop to nest at night.
       | You'd feed them once a day or so by throwing some grain on the
       | floor outside the coop, and they'd learn to associate a cue (like
       | waving a flag) with feeding time and fly back to eat.
       | 
       | That said, I could never bring myself to eat them (not because of
       | disgust, but just because at that point they felt like pets).
        
         | card_zero wrote:
         | I observed a group of urban pigeons and their nesting habits
         | for a couple of years (you gotta have a hobby), and I started
         | getting upset by threats to their success, like when jealous
         | humans put up netting, or when a buzzard shows up, or when a
         | chick gets sick and dies ... until it occurred to me that I was
         | more invested in their lives than they were. They care deeply
         | about the competitive _process_ of making chicks, defending
         | nest sites, getting the best twigs and food, and about the eggs
         | ... but once they hatch, if a chick vanishes (they usually only
         | have two at a time), the parents ' reaction is "Yay! Time to
         | make more! Let's remodel the nest and get busy!". They're at it
         | again within half an hour, with no sign of distress. I guess
         | that's life as a prey animal.
         | 
         | There are quaint old picturesque dovecotes in a lot of historic
         | places ... those were for harvesting the squabs, to turn into
         | pies. On reflection I think this was a reasonable arrangement
         | for keeping things in balance (a modest proposal, even).
        
       | RealityVoid wrote:
       | I find them interesting but wound up disliking them greatly
       | because they make a mess. When you make them mistake of not
       | having the heart to ruin their nest and have to shovel buckets
       | full of poop at the end, and them getting poop on your terrace
       | daily, you kind of get sick of them.
       | 
       | I would not mind them as much if they did not shit everywhere.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-06-24 23:00 UTC)