[HN Gopher] How to prolong lithium based batteries
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       How to prolong lithium based batteries
        
       Author : VHRanger
       Score  : 101 points
       Date   : 2024-06-21 16:55 UTC (6 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (batteryuniversity.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (batteryuniversity.com)
        
       | girishso wrote:
       | 1. It's ok to keep laptop plugged in, even at 100% battery
       | 
       | 2. Keep temperature as low as possible, maintain airflow
       | 
       | 3. Avoid fast chargers
        
         | ianschmitz wrote:
         | I wish more devices offered a way to enable a "slow charge"
         | mode.
         | 
         | When I'm plugging my laptop into my dock to work for the next 8
         | hours it doesn't need fast charging.
         | 
         | When I'm plugging my phone in before bed to charge for the next
         | 8 hours it doesn't need fast charging.
        
           | zuppy wrote:
           | i have 2 chargers near my bed, one has 3 amps, the other one
           | has 1. i use one on another depending on how fast i need it
           | charged. not the best solution, but it works.
        
           | mtlmtlmtlmtl wrote:
           | At least on Android it's possible to disable fast charging.
           | It's in the battery settings on my phone.
        
           | zimpenfish wrote:
           | > When I'm plugging my phone in before bed to charge for the
           | next 8 hours it doesn't need fast charging.
           | 
           | iPhones do this with "Optimised Battery Charging" turned on
           | (which I believe is the default setting) - "allow iPhone to
           | wait to finish charging past 80% until the time you need to
           | use it" (which it learns over time.)
        
             | delecti wrote:
             | Android has something similar. A notification pops up when
             | I plug in at night, letting me know that it's charging
             | slowly because I usually leave it plugged in overnight, and
             | that I can disable it (once or permanently) to switch to
             | fast charging.
        
           | dsp_person wrote:
           | On my laptop I have a script to set
           | /sys/class/power_supply/BAT0/charge_control_end_threshold
           | 
           | I could imagine automating this to set the threshold to the
           | current battery level, and incrementing the threshold by 1%
           | every N minutes to control charge speed.
           | 
           | Right now I try to keep it at 50% max charge like this while
           | plugged in at home.
        
           | kube-system wrote:
           | As others have mentioned, many phones do this in software,
           | but I find the easiest solution is simply to use a charger
           | incapable of fast charging.
        
         | gruez wrote:
         | >1. It's ok to keep laptop plugged in, even at 100% battery
         | 
         | It might be "ok" to keep it plugged in at 100%, but if your
         | laptop has a "battery conservation" mode that limits the charge
         | to 80% (or similar), that's even better.
        
           | crazygringo wrote:
           | If you're on a Mac, you can install the free version of
           | AlDente:
           | 
           | https://github.com/AppHouseKitchen/AlDente-Charge-Limiter
           | 
           | I keep my MBA at 60% since it basically never goes for more
           | than a couple hours within being plugged in.
        
             | oidar wrote:
             | Also batfi - https://github.com/rurza/BatFi
        
               | crazygringo wrote:
               | Oh wow, looks like that's brand-new (from March?) as
               | opposed to AlDente which is about 4.5 years old at this
               | point, at least according to GitHub releases.
               | 
               | It looks really really sharp, the UX is definitely much
               | more visually appealing than AlDente. I might have to
               | check it out.
        
             | ein0p wrote:
             | I think (though I might be wrong) charging of Apple
             | hardware detects usage patterns and it would already not
             | charge the battery to 100% if you're frequently plugged in.
        
               | crazygringo wrote:
               | Kind of, it's described here [1].
               | 
               | But that only applies if you have a "charging routine",
               | e.g. you always charge overnight and use it on battery
               | all day long starting at 9:15 am:
               | 
               | "When the feature is enabled, your Mac will delay
               | charging past 80% in certain situations. Your Mac learns
               | your charging routine and aims to ensure that your Mac is
               | fully charged when unplugged."
               | 
               | But in my experience, the feature doesn't do anything if
               | your Mac is just usually plugged in. It simply stays at
               | 100% because there's no routine for it to learn for when
               | you tend to unplug it.
               | 
               | [1] https://support.apple.com/en-us/102338
        
               | ein0p wrote:
               | Useful info, thanks. There's really no reason for my MBP
               | to be charged 100% - I rarely unplug it
        
         | user_7832 wrote:
         | > 3. Avoid fast chargers
         | 
         | Isn't this primarily due to heat produced? Aka cool fast
         | charging is better than warm slow charging.
         | 
         | I seem to remember a tweet I think by Mishaal Rahman (or
         | another android journalist) on this.
        
           | kccqzy wrote:
           | Yes that's absolutely the case. So it just depends on how
           | good the cooling system is. For a phone, it has no active
           | cooling system. For an electric vehicle, almost all
           | manufacturers (except Nissan Leaf) have adopted active
           | cooling and you can expect them to do a good job activating
           | adequate cooling for the battery.
        
             | ssl-3 wrote:
             | In absolute terms, cooler isn't always better.
             | 
             | For example, Tesla has a pre- _heat_ function for their
             | cars ' batteries that can be used prior to charging.
             | 
             | https://www.tesla.com/ownersmanual/model3/en_us/GUID-F90720
             | 0...
        
               | kccqzy wrote:
               | That affects charging speed, not battery longevity.
        
               | VygmraMGVl wrote:
               | It can affect battery longevity. If you charge lithium
               | ion at cold enough temperatures, you get lithium plating
               | which rapidly degrades capacity and can lead to internal
               | shorts and fires.
        
           | VygmraMGVl wrote:
           | It's due to heat produced, gas generated from overvolting the
           | battery, and stress gradients from different levels of charge
           | across the battery.
        
         | sopchi wrote:
         | I disagree with your point #2 as it is written. You want to
         | keep you battery close to the temperature at which it is rated.
         | Cycling below that also harms batteries and shortens their
         | life. If you really want to geek out about that, I can
         | recommend for example a talk [1] that was given last week (you
         | can jump to slide 15). The presentation has nice electron
         | microscopy images of the cracking this type of abuse causes in
         | batteries.
         | 
         | [1] https://academy.covalentmetrology.com/wp-
         | content/uploads/Bat...
        
       | Filligree wrote:
       | I wish I could find this information for LFP batteries. There's a
       | lot out there, but it's all mixed with advice for LiPo; I can't
       | find anything I trust to tell me the optimal voltages for maximum
       | lifetime.
        
         | user_7832 wrote:
         | Is it possible to reach out to the manufacturer, or the place
         | you;re buying your batteries from?
        
         | speedgoose wrote:
         | I was told that LFP is difficult because the battery management
         | system (BMS) cannot reliably guess the state of charge using
         | the voltage. The voltage is a mess on LFP.
         | 
         | Even though a lower voltage prolongs the battery, you have to
         | charge to 100% regularly to help the BMS. Thankfully the LFP
         | chemistry doesn't seem to mind high state of charge as much.
         | 
         | As a popular source, Tesla recommends to daily charge the LFP
         | batteries to 100%.
        
           | andruby wrote:
           | > The voltage is a mess on LFP
           | 
           | That's a weird statement. The voltage curve for LFP [0] is
           | just a lot flatter. That's nice for your electronics, but
           | makes it hard to estimate state of charge based on the
           | voltage alone. So the BMS needs to keep track of total energy
           | used to calculate state-of-charge.
           | 
           | [0] https://www.jackery.com/blogs/knowledge/ultimate-guide-
           | to-li...
        
             | Filligree wrote:
             | Excellent link, thank you!
        
             | speedgoose wrote:
             | True, it's very flat. And If you add some major temperature
             | changes over many days and a descent amount of non full
             | charging cycles, it's more challenging. Maybe I wasn't told
             | it was a mess, but it's how I remembered it.
        
           | fy20 wrote:
           | The 100% charge thing is also for balancing, as most BMSs are
           | pretty dumb and only use passive balancing.
           | 
           | When an individual cell reaches a set voltage, a resistor is
           | turned on which bleeds the excess power preventing that cell
           | from overcharging. When the pack reaches 100% theoretically
           | every cell should then be at the same voltage.
        
             | Filligree wrote:
             | If that's the case, then if you don't regularly charge to
             | 100% you can end up depleting any cell that's out of
             | balance. Good to know.
        
         | serpix wrote:
         | Lfp voltages are all over the place and even after charging to
         | 90% the voltage drops back down. They might not care much at
         | all being charged to high percentages. There is no reliable way
         | to know the SoC other than coulomb counting and regular 100%
         | top balancing.
        
         | 8xeh wrote:
         | LFPs are indestructible and last forever.
         | 
         | For general advice, they like it cooler[1] than other kinds of
         | lithium batteries. Try to keep them between 15-25degC. Other
         | than that, charge LFP batteries to whatever percentage you want
         | whenever you want.
         | 
         | They are simply better than every other kind of lithium
         | chemistry. Their practical downside is lower cell voltage (3.2
         | vs 3.8), and slightly lower energy density. I've spent the last
         | 7 years building LFP-powered lawnmower-sized robots, and in
         | practice, the lower voltage and doesn't matter. And, unlike
         | other chemistries, they don't catch fire when you stab them.
         | 
         | For other kinds of lithium batteries, to maximize lifetime,
         | keep them between 40-60%, avoid big charge swings (10-90%), and
         | keep them warm (above 25degC).
         | 
         | [1]: At 35degC, tests show they lose about 5% more capacity
         | after 2,000 cycles compared with 25degC. But even that isn't
         | really a problem, because they don't get to 20% capacity loss
         | until 4,000 cycles. See:
         | https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1149/1945-7111/abae37,
         | fig 3.
        
           | Filligree wrote:
           | A practical concern is that the batteries in question will be
           | powering our cottage, which is entirely off-grid.
           | 
           | It's also unused for half the year, and for much of that half
           | the solar input is effectively zero; for part it's literally
           | zero. Not enough to even run the Victron gear, never mind a
           | heater. Spring temperatures often drop below -5C.
           | 
           | So we'll winterise it by shutting everything off, BMS
           | included to the degree it'll let us, and the question is what
           | SoC they sold be at for that to work.
        
       | speedgoose wrote:
       | I'm not a battery expert but some coworkers from the battery lab
       | at work are, and they say that charging more often is better than
       | doing big cycles. On most chemistries.
       | 
       | In more concrete terms, it's better to keep the state of charge
       | between for example 60 to 30% compared to for example 80% to 15%.
       | Big cycles like 100% to 5% are the most damaging over time.
        
         | izzydata wrote:
         | Do you know if it is true that a battery reporting 100% is
         | really only 80% and 0% is really about 20%? I heard that
         | somewhere, but have had trouble confirming it. At least for
         | something like a common smartphone.
        
           | SubiculumCode wrote:
           | Probably depends on the device,but I bet that marketing
           | incentives suggest most won't. I mean do you buy the device
           | that says10 hours battery live or 8 hours battery life?
        
             | plonk wrote:
             | "The battery is messed up after 2 years" is a complaint
             | I've seen and it was pretty damaging to my buying
             | intentions. Just one data point
        
           | radomir_cernoch wrote:
           | I think it's hard to define "the true 100%". It's always a
           | matter of finding a tradeoff between capacity and lifespan -
           | by defining a voltage range.
        
             | aidenn0 wrote:
             | True 100% seems easy for LiPo; it's the point at which it
             | spontaneously catches fire.
        
               | layer8 wrote:
               | "Spontaneously" seems to imply that it's not actually a
               | deterministic point.
        
           | speedgoose wrote:
           | It depends on the BMS. Some have big buffers, some don't. One
           | simple clue is how fast it charges relative to the state of
           | charge. If the battery takes a while to go from 95 to 100%,
           | it more likely goes to a full state of charge. If the battery
           | charges very fast to 100%, it probably has some buffer.
           | 
           | In my experience, vacuum cleaners and smartphones are
           | designed to destroy the battery as fast as possible, while
           | most car manufacturers will have a big buffer and lie about
           | the true 100%. With some notable exceptions though, like
           | Tesla that allows to charge to 100% with some scary warnings
           | or Nissan that designed some early Leafs battery pack without
           | longevity in mind.
        
         | 1970-01-01 wrote:
         | This % all depends on how the battery management system (BMS)
         | was designed to manage the state of charge (SOC). Some BMS may
         | set 100% SOC to 80% capacity to prolong the cell and pack
         | lifetime. Additionally, 0% SOC may be set as high as 20%
         | capacity.
        
           | tooltalk wrote:
           | >> Additionally, 0% SOC may be set as high as 20% capacity.
           | <<
           | 
           | I think that was the case for GM Bolt years ago, but
           | batteries cost a lot of $$ and you won't see more than 5%
           | reserved for buffer these days -- or 95% usuable capacity.
           | 
           | Tesla also had software lock limiting access to extra battery
           | capacity on the Model S -- 70KWh instead of 75KW, or about
           | (7%?). No point in carrying around extra weight that costs
           | $3,000 to unlock, but it probably helped prolong battery
           | life.
        
       | UniverseHacker wrote:
       | Some tools I use to actually follow this advice on various
       | devices: I use Chargie devices (chargie.org - no affiliation) to
       | control maximum charge level, and set thermal limits on
       | smartphones and other small devices that can't limit charge
       | internally with software. I also use a Peltier cooled phone
       | holder and charger in the car (about $50 on Amazon), so it keeps
       | the phone cool when charging and processing hard during
       | navigation, and in direct sunlight. On Macbooks I use the free Al
       | Dente app which lets me manage charge level. When I owned an
       | e-Golf EV, I was able to set charge limits through the VW Car-Net
       | app.
        
         | ssl-3 wrote:
         | I just clip my phone cradle to an AC vent on the dash. I've
         | been doing this since [checks calendar] 2014, when I retired
         | the last phone I ever had that had a specialized window mount
         | accessory available.
         | 
         | It cools when it is hot, and sometimes it warms when it is
         | cold. Both things can be useful functions.
         | 
         | (Even on old junk I've had without functioning aircon, turning
         | the selector to "Vent," the temperature to "Cold," and the fan
         | to some speed other than "Off" works to circulate air around
         | the phone.)
        
           | UniverseHacker wrote:
           | That works on some cars, but I prefer having the phone up
           | high so I can keep my eyes on the road, and I drive a
           | convertible with the top usually down, so like to leave the
           | HVAC off.
        
           | ortusdux wrote:
           | I remember the first time I upgraded android phones and
           | logging in triggered 100+ apps to start downloading. The
           | phone got to hot to old, so I put it in the freezer. As a
           | bonus the metal blocked enough of the wifi signal to meter
           | the downloads. Not the best initial user experience!
        
             | ssl-3 wrote:
             | Yeah, the Motorola Droid 4 was that way for me sometimes
             | long after I began using it.
             | 
             | It wasn't clear what the combination of triggers was, but
             | sometimes the Play Store would wake up and start updating
             | everything that could be updated -- and do all of these
             | updates _in parallel_.
             | 
             | Once or twice, it did this when I got in the car, plugged
             | my phone in, and started driving -- sucking down what was
             | (at the time) an enormous amount of [thankfully unmetered]
             | cellular bandwidth and using enough power that the battery
             | either would not charge, or would slowly discharge.
             | 
             | It'd get a pretty toasty.
        
         | locofocos wrote:
         | TIL there's a name for this! (Chargie)
         | 
         | I have an old Mac multiport adapter (USB C / USB A / VGA) that
         | I use only to limit the current going into my smartphone, for
         | the sake of battery health. It effectively downgrades any fast
         | charger to a slow charger. This looks nicer, thanks for
         | sharing.
        
         | sitkack wrote:
         | https://chargie.org/
        
         | clumsysmurf wrote:
         | The Chargie looks nice but ~6 of them for your devices gets
         | pretty expensive.
         | 
         | I'm looking for some device like a 6-port Chargie... Or a
         | 6-port charger like this Anker:
         | https://www.anker.com/products/a2123?variant=37436925477014
         | that would allow you to control the charge status of each port
         | via Zigbee / Wifi. Something like A/C smart plug functionality
         | but for each USB port.
         | 
         | Anyone see that?
        
           | UniverseHacker wrote:
           | Do you really need one for every device you own? Having it
           | just for my phone is mostly fine. It is possible to configure
           | a chargie to limit charge level based on current draw on non-
           | phone devices, but complex, and usually not worth it in my
           | opinion, I only use it for my iPhone.
        
       | SubiculumCode wrote:
       | The article mentioned heat. I park my ev in the sun in CA.
       | Definitely hotter than 86 degrees. Does the car protect the
       | battery somehow with cooling, or do I need to find shade asap.
        
         | 1970-01-01 wrote:
         | Varies by EV. The 1st generation Nissan Leaf was famous for
         | overcooking its own battery pack because it didn't have the
         | capability.
        
           | the-alchemist wrote:
           | Also worth pointing out that the original Nissan Leaf is now
           | at least 13 years old, a lifetime ago in lithium battery
           | tech, and intentionally used very cheap cells to keep the
           | cost down.
        
         | Rygian wrote:
         | My car will run the AC on the battery whenever it needs to,
         | even if I'm away.
        
           | SubiculumCode wrote:
           | ill have to check: its a 2023 bolt euv
        
             | ydant wrote:
             | Bolt will cool itself, but it does so more aggressively
             | when plugged in (even if not actively charging). I always
             | leave our EVs plugged in when it's over about 80F and below
             | freezing because of that.
             | 
             | My 2021 is complaining loudly (running the cooling system)
             | about the heat-wave today.
        
         | sitkack wrote:
         | I would avoid charging at high temperatures, or rapid
         | acceleration when the pack is hot.
        
       | sitkack wrote:
       | Like making _anything_ last, don 't operate at the limits of its
       | envelope.                  * Limit max temperatures        *
       | Reduce maximum currents in and out        * For lithium
       | batteries, limit peak charge to 3.92V, do *not* charge to over
       | 4.1V or 30degC
       | 
       | I can't find the specific research study, but NASA did a study
       | that last I read was going on for over 30 years with a neglible
       | drop in capacity by only operating in the flat portion of the
       | charge/discharge curve. The result is that properly speccd
       | battery packs (probably > 1.5x most battery packs) can last
       | indefinitely. For my cordless tools, I get the largest modules I
       | can (5Ah). I have a single slim 2Ah module for fitting in tight
       | spots.
       | 
       | *edit, when using a cheap intermittent high current device, like
       | a hand vacuum, apply a duty cycle, like 30 seconds on, 10-30
       | seconds off to prevent the internal battery pack from getting too
       | hot. These kinds of consumer goods have the smallest battery pack
       | that will outlast the warranty.
       | 
       | I really wish battery charge profiles were codified in QR codes
       | on the modules themselves (besides existing on an I2C bus).
       | 
       | Short-Course on Lithium Ion Batteries
       | https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20190030819/downloads/20...
       | 
       | battery aging dataset (appears dead)
       | https://c3.ndc.nasa.gov/dashlink/resources/133/
       | 
       | https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/3-nasa_batte...
       | 
       | https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19990032333/downloads/19...
        
         | hinkley wrote:
         | In the mid 00's there was a set ACM papers about how a better
         | scheduler in the OS could substantially improve battery
         | longevity (lifetime and per charge) based on the observations
         | that most batteries do worse the faster you draw current, and
         | you're better off load leveling to keep the discharge rate
         | steady. So for instance instead of running the disk and CPU at
         | saturation, reducing CPU use when disk was saturated and vice
         | versa. The apparent speed of the system was affected less than
         | the battery life was increased.
         | 
         | About 5 years later Apple bragged about how their new laptops
         | without discrete batteries were 2x the run time of the previous
         | generation due to the batteries being 1/3 bigger, 1/3 more
         | power dense, and the operating system being 1/3 better at
         | managing battery life. I'm fairly certain the latter came from
         | someone reading those papers and taking them to heart. They had
         | an advantage for the next few years.
        
         | muzika wrote:
         | 3.92V is very conservative, that is a good voltage for long
         | term storage even. It should be safe to charge to 4.05-4.10V
         | regularly.
        
       | cubefox wrote:
       | I think all systems that allow for fast charging should, after
       | plugging in, ask: "Do a slow charge instead?" and perhaps: "Only
       | charge to 80%?". These could be two check boxes that are
       | unchecked by default. Maybe you could change the default in the
       | settings.
       | 
       | Anyway, the way this is currently solved e.g. in Android is
       | clearly suboptimal. You can only configure charging in the
       | settings, but obviously it depends on your current situation
       | whether you want to use your device immediately and need a full
       | charge.
        
         | freehorse wrote:
         | I actually have a couple of chargers that just do _exactly_
         | 5V/1A for this reason.
        
           | cubefox wrote:
           | Yeah, but a software solution would be better and actually
           | easy to implement.
        
       | hartator wrote:
       | Note that in most battery chemistries, the degradation floors at
       | around 80% whatever you do.
       | 
       | These advices are to get to that 80% slower. If you are fine with
       | having 80% in like 2 years instead of 10 years, you don't have to
       | really limit yourself.
       | 
       | A better way will be manufactures to advertised 100% as current
       | 80% and allows you to boost you to 120%.
        
         | longstation wrote:
         | Check the article, it contains a graph where the capacity is
         | reduced to 10%.
        
           | hartator wrote:
           | The worst I am seeing is 78% in figure 6.
           | 
           | Obviously, I am not talking about charging your battery at
           | higher voltage than advised, but comparing 0-100% (least
           | optimal cycles) to 40-60% (most optimal cycles).
        
       | lesinski wrote:
       | Two unconventional things I do to improve my iPhone's battery
       | health (which follow this article's findings): 1) Don't use a
       | case - Otherwise, you are literally wrapping your phone in a
       | rubber insulator 24/7, increasing its overall temperature. 2)
       | Don't charge at night - Turn off your phone at night. Instead,
       | charge it during the day when you're at your desk. This reduces
       | the number of cycles over years (because your phone is
       | continually draining/recharging all night even when you aren't
       | using it)
        
         | Daniel_sk wrote:
         | iOS will not fully charge your battery during the night - it
         | will top off the battery just before you usually take it off
         | the charger in the morning (it learns your usual schedule + it
         | probably also makes sure the battery is ready based on your
         | alarm settings).
        
       | neves wrote:
       | All Galaxy phones have a configuration to limit the charge to 85%
        
         | imp0cat wrote:
         | Recent updates have changed that. The limit is now 80%. Also
         | some more options (like not staying at 100%, but bouncing
         | between 95% - 100% when plugged in to a charger overnight) were
         | added.
        
       | mnw21cam wrote:
       | I have had my phone for 4.5 years. I charge it every night to 80%
       | - I have Accubattery installed, so it pings to tell me to unplug
       | it, and it also does a fairly decent job of measuring the
       | capacity. I charge on a fast charger (10W) instead of the super-
       | fast charger (18W) because that keeps the temperature from rising
       | too much. I use the phone a fair amount, so I'm usually charging
       | from around 50%. Therefore, the battery has had ~1600 cycles of
       | around 30%, or 480 full cycles equivalent. The design capacity of
       | the battery is 4000mAh, and Accubattery tells me it currently
       | stores 3460mAh, which is 87% of the design capacity.
       | 
       | I therefore approve and recommend the above strategy for treating
       | the battery to make it last longer. I also recommend Accubattery
       | - it seems to do the job fairly well.
        
         | tooltalk wrote:
         | Accubattery pings, but doesn't actually stop charging. Some
         | Android, Samsung Galaxy for instance, now has "battery
         | protection" mode that stops charging at 80%.
        
         | pkulak wrote:
         | I just use the hell out of my phone battery and pay 50 bucks
         | every 3 years to replace it.
        
           | clearleaf wrote:
           | Me too except my first phone is the only one where I had to
           | replace the battery. My 5 year old phone still lasts the
           | whole day without going through any of this rigmarole. It's
           | mostly superstition and the parts that aren't are such a wash
           | that they aren't worth worrying about. Just look at these
           | people trying to reach an agreement on whether you should
           | stop charging at 80% or not. Your gadgets should work for you
           | not the other way around.
        
         | chasil wrote:
         | On Android, I use the "Advanced Charging Controller" module for
         | Magisk.
         | 
         | If you have some way of rooting your phone and installing
         | Magisk:
         | 
         | https://magiskmanager.com/
         | 
         | Then you can download the ACC module and set it to halt
         | charging at 80%:
         | 
         | https://github.com/VR-25/acc
         | 
         | This functionality should be native to Android and iOS.
         | Yesterday.
        
       | Havoc wrote:
       | I've been doing 80% >> 45% for a while on a 14 pro max....on a
       | best effort manual basis.
       | 
       | Appears to be working...I'm on 93% battery health today while
       | googling suggests others where hitting <90% in mid 2023 already.
       | 
       | So unscientifically it does seem to matter, though whether it is
       | worth the hassle is another question
        
         | sghiassy wrote:
         | For what it's worth, I don't pay attention to my charging
         | habits and my iPhone 14 Pro Max is at 92%
        
       | Zak wrote:
       | I've been using ACCA[0] to set limits on battery charging on
       | Android devices for years. Note that it requires root.
       | 
       | ACCA can limit charge percentage, allowing the device to operate
       | plugged in without charging beyond a certain point. It can also
       | pause charging when the temperature exceeds a threshold, limit
       | the charge rate, and several other tweaks to charging behavior.
       | By default, I use a charge limit of 60% and a charge rate of 500
       | mA, increasing those when needed.
       | 
       | [0] https://f-droid.org/packages/mattecarra.accapp/
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-06-21 23:01 UTC)