[HN Gopher] Bolivia's little-known African tribal kingdom (2021)
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Bolivia's little-known African tribal kingdom (2021)
        
       Author : stareatgoats
       Score  : 95 points
       Date   : 2024-06-16 08:08 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.bbc.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.bbc.com)
        
       | jajko wrote:
       | Potosi is well worth the visit, if anybody had ever doubts how
       | brutal slavery could be, look no more. Slaves lasted 6 weeks
       | before dying horribly in some of the jobs they had, mostly in ore
       | processing parts. Or if you want to see why its really not a good
       | idea to be pregnant in >4000m altitude, look at their local
       | church.
       | 
       | Mines themselves are surprisingly still open and locals work
       | there, even if they know very well within 15-20 years most of
       | them will develop aggressive lung cancer. IIRC its from fine
       | silica dust that is all over those mines in form of thick dust
       | (and sometimes even raw crystals form on the walls). The hill in
       | which the mines are is pure emmental, around 5000 entries IIRC
       | from various directions and ages.
       | 
       | Visited them with my wife/fiancee few years ago, local woman
       | whose husband died from what I described above guided us quite
       | deep inside. Never saw actual red sticks of dynamite with the
       | burning string till that day. We offered very strong alcohol and
       | coca leaves to Pachamama, had some leaves with 'activator'
       | ourselves (and then went blabbing for half an hour due to mouth
       | and tongue anesthesia). Those silica in the air are not benign,
       | so there are warnings everywhere (and good modern masks should
       | definitely help, we didn't have those unfortunately this was well
       | before covid).
       | 
       | A powerful experience, as backpacking around whole Bolivia is, to
       | us its the most interesting country in South America to visit for
       | intense adventure and lifelong memories. Yungas death road on a
       | rented bike is another very memorable experience, from snowed
       | plains and glaciers 4700m high into jungle in few hours.
        
         | rendall wrote:
         | I do not know much about Bolivia. The little I know comes from
         | this series by the travel vlogger _Bald and Bankrupt_ :
         | https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLqWdYjn21PdFLL0gOBMRf3Hmy...
         | 
         | The impression this series gives is that Bolivia can be
         | somewhat dangerous.
         | 
         | For instance, from his Wikipedia article, the _... video about
         | a trip to Patamanta in Bolivia was reported by_ Gizmodo Espanol
         | _as "more scary than entering Chernobyl". In the video, he
         | informed a local woman that he was a tourist, prompting her to
         | warn him that "they burn people" in the area. Two men later
         | approached Rich, inspected his passport, and gave him 30
         | minutes to explore and leave the area._
         | 
         | And that video actually is terrifying.
         | 
         | But, given that you backpacked around Bolivia with your fiance,
         | your experience must have been different? Was _Bald_ unfair to
         | Bolivia? Is it relatively safe?
        
           | lukan wrote:
           | "Is it relatively safe?"
           | 
           | I have not been to Bolivia myself, but this question is
           | always relative.
           | 
           | It depends what you count as save and where do you want to
           | go, but also on your experience.
           | 
           | "for intense adventure and lifelong memories. Yungas death
           | road on a rented bike is another very memorable experience"
           | 
           | Parent seems to have a higher risk tolerance.
           | 
           | Also it matters a lot, if you can speak spanish and can act
           | like a local. But if you look and act like a helpless gringo
           | tourist, then you will likely get robbed or worse on the
           | first day.
           | 
           | But I know people who hitchhiked there without serious
           | trouble as white gringos. So the answer is probably, it
           | depends.
        
             | jajko wrote:
             | I have more than a year of cumulative backpacking
             | experience all around the world when its just you, guide
             | book ie Lonely planet and a loose plan for maybe next 2-4
             | days, mostly India but also other places. I don't know if
             | that makes me one with 'higher risk tolerance', definitely
             | higher than 0 to actually experience anything interesting.
             | But I do some more intense sports like climbing or
             | paragliding where some risk is unavoidable and you do your
             | best to minimize your exposure to it, and this mindset then
             | permeates rest of your persona.
             | 
             | As for Bolivia, what parent described sounds like some
             | extreme case of 'I walk randomly into favela with gold
             | chain around the neck and rolex watches and shit happened'
             | kind of foolish beginner behavior. Backpacking gives you
             | some instincts what not to do. Did I feel safe in Bolivia
             | in those few places we've done? Absolutely. Is the whole
             | country completely safe in any situation? Most probably
             | not, or it wasn't in 2018, no idea about current affairs.
             | Btw neither me nor my fiancee/wife speak spanish, you can
             | get by with 20 words if you have to.
             | 
             | I've gone to Iran in cca 2015 (Mont Damavand, a bit of
             | culture), an amazing experience and one of my best.
             | Wouldn't go there currently, not because common people got
             | bad (no, they were amazing and everybody spoke english
             | well) but politics made it unsafe.
        
               | lukan wrote:
               | "I don't know if that makes me one with 'higher risk
               | tolerance'"
               | 
               | Compared to an average human, I would say yes.
               | 
               | And yes, speaking the local language is not a must, I
               | also got by in poor and potential dangerous places by
               | communicating with hand and feat. Eye contact.
               | 
               | The way one treats the people matters. Do they perceive
               | you as a arrogant, bored rich westener who has come to
               | visit the poor people zoo? That might end bad. But
               | showing genuine interest yields different results.
        
             | alemanek wrote:
             | Death road on a mountain bike isn't all that dangerous. It
             | got its name because it used to be the only route to and
             | from Brasil. So you would get 2 way traffic of like box
             | trucks on a smallish dirt road with a sheer cliff drop off
             | on one side and a mountain on the other. Lots of them went
             | off the cliff.
             | 
             | Now you can book a tour and they provide nice bikes and
             | follow the group in a minivan. There is still some cars and
             | such but it is mostly locals or tour groups. They built a
             | modern highway so that route isn't used for trucks anymore.
             | 
             | It is super beautiful and not really dangerous unless you
             | want it to be. Totally worth it.
        
               | user070223 wrote:
               | It only takes one mistake to fall off, it could be
               | mechanical failure, hole in the ground after rain,
               | someone in front of you stopping / looking back which
               | cause them to drift (that what happened to me had to
               | break hard and fell) I saw a video from helmet go pro of
               | some girl hanging on shrubs on her life Nevertheless 40
               | km downhill with beautiful scenery would do it again :)
        
               | DiggyJohnson wrote:
               | One mistake won't cause you to fall of unless you put
               | yourself in a position where one mistake would lead to
               | this: aka riding right next to the edge.
        
               | notahacker wrote:
               | there are a few places where riding relatively close to
               | the edge is inevitable, although you can probably bring
               | yourself to slow down and concentrate for those moments.
               | Still the cycle tour operators (who operate with
               | considerably better than average equipment and
               | professionalism) have non-zero death tolls, so it's not
               | just drunk drivers trying to pass each other.
               | 
               | Still, I reckon Death Road is probably a fair bit safer
               | than the mines in Potosi, or Potosi/Sucre taxi ride at
               | the speed the locals like to drive at, Andes night buses
               | in the less reliable bus companies or deciding to visit a
               | mountaintype viewpoint by wandering through one of the
               | local districts with a camera (Bolivia definitely didn't
               | feel like the worst part of Latin America for that
               | though...). Roads being blocked by angry protestors is a
               | characteristically Bolivian thing too, although they're
               | not at all interested in tourists so unless you're
               | determined to pass the only real danger is to your
               | schedule.
               | 
               | now the time I actually _did_ ride a bike off a cliff was
               | a nice smooth road in Ecuador (I went a little too close
               | to a drain which wasn 't particularly close to the edge,
               | went over the handlebars, landed inelegantly on the road
               | and was a little surprised to find no bike behind me...
               | had fun retrieving it from the tree it was caught in a
               | couple of feet below the edge)
        
           | ponector wrote:
           | Entering Chernobyl is not scary unless you go digging in a
           | few highly radioactive places like ruzzian soldiers did in
           | 2022.
           | 
           | Prior that, you could go to Chernobyl with a tour and it was
           | absolutely safe. Much safer than walking around random US
           | city, actually.
        
             | ivanhoe wrote:
             | Yeah, that one confused me too. Visiting Chernobyl was
             | mostly a walk in a park, as no other people around and
             | forrest slowly taking over everything. Honestly, it felt
             | way safer than big cities in Ukraine to me - hell, even
             | safer than big cities in my own country :)
        
           | laszlojamf wrote:
           | Like with a lot of countries in South America, there are
           | certainly places you shouldn't just wander about in. VRAEM in
           | Peru is another example. But there is a lot of tourism in
           | Bolivia. Most places are perfectly safe. Lonely Planet can be
           | a good place to start if you're unsure.
        
           | ivanhoe wrote:
           | It's definitely not "relatively safe" in what I as a European
           | would consider a safe place - although I was told it got a
           | lot better in the last decade. If you look like a rich
           | tourist than you need to be careful, like pretty much
           | anywhere in S. America. However if you present yourself as a
           | nomad hippie looser with nothing worth the trouble of messing
           | with you, you can go around and probably you'll have no big
           | problems, but still requires a bit of common sense in
           | interaction with people. And speaking at least some Spanish.
           | It's not that people are not friendly, they're just poor, and
           | the line between being friendly and hustling you is very
           | thin.
        
           | rendall wrote:
           | Downvote, really? Why? Explain.
        
           | sillystuff wrote:
           | Bolivia was a high point in my trekking around S. America. I
           | felt perfectly safe, and had no negative experiences.
           | Beautiful kind people. In La Paz, I asked directions from a
           | random passerby to their electronics market (I wanted to
           | replace a pair of lost headphones), and the man cautioned me
           | that some sellers might try to take advantage of me. He asked
           | me what I was after, and told me what he would expect to pay.
           | But, I had no issues, the price offered, by the first seller
           | I approached, for a pair of Sony ear buds was less than $4--
           | the headphones only differed in color from the pair I had
           | lost-- I had paid $16 at Target in the US for them.
           | 
           | I was alone, and, when in urban areas, mostly stayed in the
           | hotels in the spaces above street-level businesses that are
           | not geared toward foreign tourists (Spanish required). Except
           | for La Paz, it was less than $10/night and usually between a
           | few dollars to $5. Food was inexpensive and excellent too.
           | 
           | There were amazing historical sites. And, really interesting
           | "hmmmmmm" contemporary things to encounter, if paying
           | attention-- e.g., there was a tribe near Rurrenabaque that
           | spoke Quechua?! (A language you would expect to encounter in
           | central Peru, not there).
           | 
           | The Bolivian high desert is so high that the low hills are
           | topped in ice (14000ft/4000m at the valley floor) and in the
           | low-lands are tropical jungles and pampas. While trekking in
           | the jungle, I saw Tapirs, sloth, jaguar scat/tracks, caiman
           | (alligator/crocodile type animal), spider monkeys, howler
           | monkeys, so many birds... It was amazing!
           | 
           | You will need some level of proficiency in Spanish, unless
           | sticking to tourist places, but even then Spanish will be
           | helpful though not required.
           | 
           | Highly recommend.
           | 
           | (for those unaccustomed to seeing men with guns, you will
           | encounter men with rifles e.g., outside banks, in large
           | cities like La Paz-- so, yes crime exists, but I didn't ever
           | feel that sketch feeling where you decide it is time to leave
           | a place, or not enter it, in the first place-- Bolivia felt
           | very safe to me)
        
             | mkl wrote:
             | > there was a tribe near Rurrenabaque that spoke Quechua?!
             | (A language you would expect to encounter in central Peru,
             | not there).
             | 
             | Quechuan languages are quite widespread, including over
             | large areas of Bolivia:
             | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quechuan_languages
        
           | richardlblair wrote:
           | Everywhere has their bad parts. I arrived in La Paz in rough
           | shape, as I hadn't slept on the red eye on the way in. I
           | could have easily been taken advantage of. Instead the taxi
           | driver took me right where I was going, helped me unload and
           | communicate with the front desk of the building where my
           | airbnb was.
           | 
           | The people are really friendly, generous, and happy.
           | 
           | I can't wait to go back
        
         | user070223 wrote:
         | Kris Lane[0] has excellent work on potosi
         | 
         | Potosi - "the first global city" [1] Potosi: The Silver City
         | That Changed the World by Kris Lane[2]
         | 
         | I've encountered Kris's work during the pandemic; He released a
         | book "Pandemic in Potosi: Fear, Loathing, and Public Piety in a
         | Colonial Mining Metropolis" [3] about the pandemic in 1719
         | which killed third of the city
         | 
         | Potosi as a silver hotspot had a coin mint, and of course it
         | had a fraud[4]
         | 
         | https://liberalarts.tulane.edu/history/people/faculty-staff-...
         | https://aeon.co/essays/potosi-the-mountain-of-silver-that-wa...
         | https://www.amazon.com/Potosi-Changed-California-History-Lib...
         | https://www.psupress.org/books/titles/978-0-271-09198-3.html
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Potos%C3%AD_Mint_Fraud_o...
        
       | mharig wrote:
       | There are a lot more places worth the visit in Bolivia, apart
       | from the Yungas and Potosi. Salar de Uyuni, Sucre (especially the
       | Indigenous Art and Textiles Museum), National Reserve Torotoro,
       | Pantanal (the Bolivian part is better than the Brasilian part),
       | Tarija, and a lot more.
       | 
       | Bolivia is at least as safe as the USofA. Just stay out of
       | Chapare and keep an eye on your money and passport when traveling
       | with bus (and of course in crowded places, but this is true for
       | near the whole planet).
        
         | mattbruv wrote:
         | Also, if you're interested in History and enjoy "off the beaten
         | path" type of tourism, it's 100% worth the ~8 hour ride from
         | Santa Cruz to visit La Higuera, the little pueblo where the
         | Bolivian Government captured and executed Che Guevara. The
         | schoolhouse that they executed him in is now converted into a
         | tiny little museum, and the whole town has art and statues of
         | him, it's a super interesting place.
        
           | mc32 wrote:
           | Par for the course. They may as well have one for Butch
           | Cassidy too.
        
             | nativeit wrote:
             | I'm not sure if you're suggesting Che Guavara wasn't
             | assassinated, wasn't assassinated in La Higuera, or that
             | the museum dedicated to memorializing this historical event
             | is either insincere or simply trading on Guevara's memory
             | as a cynical cash grab...so tldr; WTF are you on about?
        
               | titanomachy wrote:
               | I think they're suggesting Guevara was a criminal and
               | murderer and we shouldn't idolize or memorialize him.
               | America has strong and deeply ingrained anti-communist
               | sentiment.
               | 
               | I think that regardless of your political leaning, he is
               | an interesting piece of history.
        
               | mattbruv wrote:
               | I don't understand what he's on about either. They're
               | hardly even making any money from it. I signed the guest
               | book and there were only like one or two visitors every
               | couple of days (or week). The woman who gives tours of
               | the museum can't read or write, she's probably in her
               | 80s. Only elderly people live in the town nowadays, all
               | of the youth left. It can't be more than 30-50 people
               | living there. I don't even remember paying anything to
               | enter, and if I did, it couldn't have been more than a
               | couple of dollars.
        
             | hobs wrote:
             | https://visitidaho.org/things-to-do/museums-
             | exhibits/butch-c...
        
         | 29athrowaway wrote:
         | Seeing other countries from the reductionist lens of tourism is
         | the McDonalization of humanity. Now the human condition has
         | been reduced to a list of superficial and trivialized
         | activities on Tripadvisor.
         | 
         | Take a selfie next to a statue, eat at a restaurant, buy some
         | souvenir made in China... now you can check a country in your
         | country list and say "I have been to n+1 countries". What was
         | the cost? burning a massive amount of plane fuel to get you
         | there that is equivalent to you burning your trash for a full
         | year, something that in a planet governed by a rational species
         | would be illegal to do.
         | 
         | The article talks about something much more profound. Long
         | distance tourism is at our current technological level a
         | planet-killing industry and should be outlawed.
        
           | user070223 wrote:
           | McDonalds flopped in Bolivia :)
        
           | BXLE_1-1-BitIs1 wrote:
           | Car dependent suburban sprawl necessitating 3 hours a day
           | commutes by car 5 days a week,50 weeks a year is a much
           | heavier load on the planet than an annual plane trip .
        
             | 29athrowaway wrote:
             | Good thing I don't have a car.
        
             | pessimizer wrote:
             | Yes, also don't do that if you can avoid it. You can always
             | avoid tourism.
        
         | user070223 wrote:
         | Cochabamba(Chapare) indeed known for gangs and drugs, and also
         | for the water war against privatization of water
         | company(influenced James bond Quantom of solace)
         | 
         | In 2019 there were protests after alleged election fraud, Evo
         | morales the president fled out of the country
         | 
         | In La Paz was a hotspot for tourists abduction in the early
         | 2000s, there is also a known market of stolen goods
         | 
         | I had a visit from Interpol in a hostel in Sucre couple of
         | years ago
         | 
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cochabamba_Water_War
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_Bolivian_protests
        
       | teruakohatu wrote:
       | The Kingdom of Kongo had a civil war resulting two factions
       | claiming the throne and a lot of victims being enslaved and being
       | sent to South America. The monarchy was only disestablished in
       | 1914. The ancestral story mentioned in the article is quite
       | plausible.
       | 
       | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kongo_Civil_War
       | 
       | I am not sure where Uganda comes in, possibly the king has other
       | relatives from there.
        
       | alexandroqc wrote:
       | Just to add something interesting about them. Many of our
       | favorite dances and music in Bolivia have being originated and
       | developed from that zone, like Morenada or Caporales. It is a mix
       | of african and andean sounds, which I think is wonderful. And yes
       | I'm Bolivian :) Here some Saya I randomly found in YT
       | (https://youtu.be/WbI1ncuyWbk)
        
         | prmoustache wrote:
         | That's interesting, thanks for sharing!
        
         | user070223 wrote:
         | The Charango and the Siku are Iconic in my opinion
         | 
         | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8kQZHYbZkLs
         | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xnqXtz3sxjU
         | 
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charango
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siku_(instrument)
        
           | emmanueloga_ wrote:
           | You'll probably like Markama :-)
           | 
           | --
           | 
           | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UNZD5buXlmY
        
       | melenaboija wrote:
       | > the mines are notorious for claiming the lives of roughly 8
       | million enslaved indigenous South Americans and Africans over a
       | 300-year period
       | 
       | As Spaniard this is disgusting to me and I don't understand how
       | talking about this still raises anger and some weird historic
       | justifications.
       | 
       | Wether we like it or not these are the pillars of the western
       | world and why today we have privileges over most of the planet.
        
         | myrmidon wrote:
         | > Wether we like it or not these are the pillars of the western
         | world
         | 
         | Not sure I understand you correctly, but I strongly disagree
         | that colonialism was a necessary foundation for todays wealthy
         | western democracies.
         | 
         | I would consider it more another _symptom_ -- once the
         | perpetrators realized how outmatched the rest of the world was
         | in military/logistics (especially compared to their direct
         | neighbors).
         | 
         | Older cultures acted exactly the same way, compare e.g. Romans,
         | Huns, Egyptians, Persians (European colonialism just had the
         | naval logistics to make this work on a bigger scale).
        
         | blackhawkC17 wrote:
         | Industrialization is what brought prosperity to the masses.
         | 
         | Colonialism and slavery benefited the reigning elite, but the
         | average person almost didn't see any benefit.
         | 
         | Unfortunately that won't stop people from lying that slavery is
         | the foundation of wealthy western democracies.
         | 
         | Brazil had 10x more slaves than the USA [1]. They would have
         | been the richest country in Latin America per capita if slavery
         | was the foundation of rich modern democracies, but that's far
         | from the case
         | 
         | I say this as a Nigerian whose country was colonized by the
         | British.
         | 
         | 1- https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/comparative-
         | histori....
        
           | cryptonector wrote:
           | Alexis de Tocqueville noted in the 1840s that slave-holding
           | America was much poorer than non-slave-holding America, and
           | why, and it's not the climate because there were cases where
           | simply crossing a river border was crossing from wealth to
           | poverty. Slavery absolutely did not benefit the masters,
           | except in so far as it helped them _feel better about
           | themselves_.  "I'm better than you" is a human instinct that
           | continues unabated to this day -- many absolutely adore that
           | feeling as if it was a mind-altering drug hit.
        
             | linearrust wrote:
             | > Alexis de Tocqueville noted in the 1840s that slave-
             | holding America was much poorer than non-slave-holding
             | America
             | 
             | That's because the north, in particular new england,
             | started industrializing in the late 1700s. While the south,
             | due to a variety reasons, didn't.
             | 
             | > Slavery absolutely did not benefit the masters
             | 
             | If it didn't, the civil war wouldn't have happened. The
             | wealthy elite who owned slaves benefited immensely. Just
             | visit a plantation turned historical museum in the south.
             | Most southerners didn't own slaves.
             | 
             | > "I'm better than you" is a human instinct that continues
             | unabated to this day -- many absolutely adore that feeling
             | as if it was a mind-altering drug hit.
             | 
             | Indeed.
        
               | crazygringo wrote:
               | Yup. It's important to note that while slavery was bad
               | economically for the South _as a whole_ , it was
               | certainly good for the tiny minority of rich white elite.
               | 
               | Interestingly enough, a virulent white supremacist at the
               | time [1] pointed this out, and the South banned his book.
               | He hated black people, but at the same time made the
               | economic analysis that slavery was a tool for white elite
               | to oppress not just black people _but also poor white
               | people_. He wanted to end slavery not to benefit blacks
               | (he wanted to build a railroad to send black people to
               | South America), but to benefit poorer whites.
               | 
               | [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hinton_Rowan_Helper
        
               | cryptonector wrote:
               | I had never heard of him. Thanks for the pointer!
        
               | cryptonector wrote:
               | > That's because the north, in particular new england,
               | started industrializing in the late 1700s. While the
               | south, due to a variety reasons, didn't.
               | 
               | Among those reasons was this: that slavery made the
               | capitalists in the South lazy.
               | 
               | > > Slavery absolutely did not benefit the masters
               | 
               | > If it didn't, the civil war wouldn't have happened. The
               | wealthy elite who owned slaves benefited immensely. Just
               | visit a plantation turned historical museum in the south.
               | Most southerners didn't own slaves.
               | 
               | It's a matter of perception: the masters didn't perceive
               | that industrializing would have benefited them much more
               | than slavery ever could, nor did they perceive that
               | slavery held them back. So of course they saw abolition
               | as a threat to their status.
        
           | linearrust wrote:
           | > Industrialization is what brought prosperity to the masses.
           | 
           | Industrialization brought prosperity to the elites, just like
           | colonialism and slavery did. You act like the poor masses
           | were the biggest beneficiaries of industrialization. Most of
           | the benefits of industrializations has gone to the elites.
           | Just like colonialism and slavery.
           | 
           | > Colonialism and slavery benefited the reigning elite, but
           | the average person almost didn't see any benefit.
           | 
           | Simply false. Tens of millions of europeans crowded in the
           | smallest continent on earth were able to migrate to other
           | parts of the world and gain land ( which is one of the
           | primary sources of wealth ). And the ability to offload
           | excess population allowed european elite to invest in
           | production rather than waste resources on their excess
           | population. A win-win situation.
           | 
           | > Unfortunately that won't stop people from lying that
           | slavery is the foundation of wealthy western democracies.
           | 
           | Slavery and colonialism were the foundations of
           | industrialization. Industrializaton requires two things -
           | excess capital and excess resources. How do you think europe
           | was able to procure excess capital and resources?
           | 
           | > Brazil had 10x more slaves than the USA [1]. They would
           | have been the richest country in Latin America per capita if
           | slavery was the foundation of rich modern democracies, but
           | that's far from the case
           | 
           | And one of the most industrialized nations ( North Korea ) is
           | one of the poorest in the world. What's your point? Brazil
           | ended slavery in the 1800s and industrialized. It still isn't
           | 'one of the richest in Latin America per capita'? Obviously
           | you need something more than industrialization. Like
           | political safety and stability and competent leadership.
           | 
           | You seem to think people are saying you need slavery and
           | colonialism to industrialize. That's not the case. The point
           | is that europe industrialized due to slavery and colonialism.
           | 
           | It remarkable how many here watch silly youtube videos to get
           | their understanding of history and economics.
        
             | blackhawkC17 wrote:
             | > Most of the benefits of industrializations has gone to
             | the elites. Just like colonialism and slavery.
             | 
             | The average individual is much better off economically and
             | has a higher quality of life in an industrialized economy
             | than one built on slavery.
             | 
             | I'm not arguing that slavery was good, but that it was
             | orthogonal to industrialization. Virtually all countries
             | practiced slavery at some point, but most didn't
             | industrialize.
             | 
             | Industrialization began with Britain running out of
             | firewood and switching to coal as an alternative energy
             | source. Steam engines were fine tuned to pump water out of
             | coal mines, and people gradually began using steam engines
             | to power other things, kickstarting the revolution.
             | 
             | My point is that Europe would have industrialized with or
             | without slavery.
             | 
             | Thanks for picking North Korea as an example...a country
             | where 43.5% works in agriculture and only a mere 14% in
             | industry [1], compared to the much richer South Korea where
             | only 5% work in agriculture [2]. It remains obvious that
             | any economy built mainly on manual labor (slavery included)
             | will be as mediocre as North Korea's.
             | 
             | 1-https://globaledge.msu.edu/countries/north-korea/economy
             | 
             | 2- https://globaledge.msu.edu/countries/south-korea/economy
        
               | ikety wrote:
               | I understand your point, but not sure I would accuse
               | those that misinterpret these things of lying. Many
               | people are educated enough to know that the massive
               | explosion in human advancement was heavily fueled by
               | exploitation of some kind. They simply don't understand
               | exactly what those exploitations are and the resulting
               | effects they've had.
        
           | tomdell wrote:
           | Industrialization relied heavily upon raw materials generated
           | cheaply with slavery - cotton picked in the American South
           | was exported and was a necessity to fuel the
           | industrialization of textile production in England, for
           | example. There is a reason that industrializing and
           | industrialized countries that relied on slavery and other
           | exploitative economic relationships have achieved greater
           | wealth than more newly industrializing countries have.
           | America's wealth is largely supported by cheap labor and raw
           | materials in other countries, opened up for the use of
           | international corporations by state-sponsored violence - see
           | America's history of interfering in South American politics
           | or Chiquita's recent guilty verdict for sponsoring
           | paramilitary forces in Colombia.
        
             | hollerith wrote:
             | It is not true that "cotton . . . was a necessity to fuel
             | the industrialization of textile production in England".
             | 
             | England produced so much wool that it exported most of it
             | (to other European countries). Flax was also very common.
             | 
             | Factories full of steam-powered machines were going to
             | replace the existing arrangement in which most households
             | on farms and in villages manually _spun their own yarn_ and
             | _wove their own cloth_ with or without access to cheap
             | cotton.
        
         | prmoustache wrote:
         | I had a number of cringes moment in spain with my latin
         | american partner when overhearring some spanish people
         | justifying colonization with webroughtthemcivilization
         | bullshit. Also reading plain insults with similar colonization
         | justification bullshit aimed at latin american workers who
         | clean the facilities in the restrooms of a Corte Ingles in
         | Madrid center. Made me want to burn the whole place.
         | 
         | In a way colonization hasn't stopped and should still be talked
         | about and denounced.
        
       | mise_en_place wrote:
       | He is very humble for a king. Many are prone to vulgar and
       | ostentatious displays of wealth. However he has the dignity of a
       | hard worker. Many could learn from his example.
        
         | nathan_compton wrote:
         | Would prefer to simply get rid of the idea of kings entirely,
         | personally.
        
       | tdeck wrote:
       | This is fascinating. If you're interested in African communities
       | in South America, you might also like to read about San Basilio
       | de Palenque. A community of escaped slaves that managed to fight
       | off the Spanish so effectively the king gave up and granted the
       | city freedom. Many people there speak the only Spanish-based
       | creole language in South America
       | 
       | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Basilio_de_Palenque
       | 
       | https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=XkOlzCoNstM
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-06-17 23:01 UTC)