[HN Gopher] Freenet 2024 - a drop-in decentralized replacement f...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Freenet 2024 - a drop-in decentralized replacement for the web
       [video]
        
       Author : sanity
       Score  : 46 points
       Date   : 2024-06-14 00:22 UTC (22 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.youtube.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.youtube.com)
        
       | kstrauser wrote:
       | The last time I played with Freenet, it was glacially slow. Like,
       | it took several minutes to load a basic page. What's the user
       | experience like today?
        
       | ericrosedev wrote:
       | I'm still convinced the Internet Computer has a real chance at
       | being the replacement for AWS et al
        
       | kristopolous wrote:
       | So how does freenet prevent the spreading of slander, libel, or
       | otherwise abusive content?
       | 
       | I understand not many places have an answer for this question,
       | I'm wondering if Freenet does yet.
        
         | generalizations wrote:
         | I'd say that's the wrong priority to focus on in a project like
         | this.
        
         | llm_trw wrote:
         | Unfortunately until god comes down from heaven we have no way
         | of figuring out what is slander, libel, or otherwise abusive
         | content.
        
         | fallingsquirrel wrote:
         | Not everyone believes censorship is a feature worth
         | compromising the design of a network.
         | 
         | How does the USPS prevent libel?
         | 
         | How does the global telephone network prevent slander?
        
           | _heimdall wrote:
           | Are libel, slander, and censorship all similar concerns in
           | you opinion?
           | 
           | I see libel and slander concerns over what another person
           | says while censorship is an entity with more authority/power
           | stopping me from what I want to say. The implied power
           | imbalance alone makes censorship a much bigger concern to me,
           | though maybe I'm biased there.
        
           | kristopolous wrote:
           | I presume you've flipped the bozo bit on me and will take my
           | response in bad faith but I'll do so anyway.
           | 
           | There's a difference between something that is intentionally
           | anonymized, intentionally distributed and intentionally for
           | perpetuity. There's a number of properties to freenet that
           | makes an affordance for malice.
           | 
           | here's some recent instances, specifically with freenet:
           | 
           | https://attorneygeneral.utah.gov/utah-icac-task-force-
           | arrest... https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdtx/pr/fort-bend-man-
           | sentenced...
           | https://www.arkansasonline.com/news/2024/jan/15/benton-
           | count...
           | 
           | There's no server to seize, no way to take it offline, it's
           | there, encrypted, for perpetuity. Just scroll:
           | https://news.google.com/search?q=freenet%20arrest
           | 
           | Also when you allocate say 100GB of space for Freenet, what's
           | the assurance you aren't hosting such content?
           | 
           | You can call this the "4chan" problem. Regardless of the
           | virtues of the people who built it, there weren't enough
           | safeguards to prevent the bad actors from becoming the
           | dominant users and eventually the inmates who ran the asylum.
           | 
           | I want the channel built by and the principles held by
           | Freenet to be preserved and not polluted by propagandists,
           | fabulists, scammers, and pornographers
        
         | rini17 wrote:
         | There were unofficial lists of content keys for child porn you
         | could use to purge them from your local storage. That was the
         | most you could do.
        
       | hiq wrote:
       | From https://freenet.org/faq#faq-2:
       | 
       | > In 2019, Ian began work on a successor to the original Freenet,
       | which was internally known as "Locutus." This project, a redesign
       | from the ground up, incorporated lessons learned from the
       | original Freenet's development and operation, and adapted to
       | today's challenges. In March 2023, the original version of
       | Freenet was separated into its own project, and what was known as
       | "Locutus" was officially branded as "Freenet."
       | 
       | And https://freenet.org/faq#faq-3:
       | 
       | > Anonymity: While the previous version was designed with a focus
       | on anonymity, the current version does not offer built-in
       | anonymity but allows for a choice of anonymizing systems to be
       | layered on top.
       | 
       | So what has been known as Freenet and the new Freenet are quite
       | different apparently.
        
         | evbogue wrote:
         | Locutus as in borged Picard?
        
           | ravenstine wrote:
           | Maybe, though it could also be that locutus is a Latin word
           | that essentially means "speak". Adds another layer of meaning
           | to its use in Star Trek. :D
        
         | dccoolgai wrote:
         | It was not the first, either: See "Cleveland Freenet"
         | https://cfn.tangledhelix.com/
        
       | gman83 wrote:
       | So apparently this project isn't the old Freenet, that's been
       | renamed to "Hyphanet" - https://www.hyphanet.org. The same team
       | started a new project, originally called "Locutus" and then
       | renamed that to Freenet. A bit confusing.
       | 
       | I remember hearing about Freenet like 20 years ago, I think on
       | Kuro5hin, kind of amazing it's still going.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-06-14 23:00 UTC)