[HN Gopher] Hogertrafikomlaggningen
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Hogertrafikomlaggningen
        
       Author : destructuredObj
       Score  : 155 points
       Date   : 2024-06-09 08:38 UTC (14 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (en.wikipedia.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (en.wikipedia.org)
        
       | mg wrote:
       | Maybe the world should standardize on:                   Driving
       | on the right         Speaking English         The metric system
       | The 2024-06-09 date format         The Celsius scale         The
       | 24-hour clock
        
         | SahAssar wrote:
         | > Speaking English
         | 
         | If you mean teaching english as a second language, I can agree.
         | If you mean switching over to it as the primary language I hard
         | disagree.
        
           | checkyoursudo wrote:
           | I am fluent in one language and speak three others passably,
           | and have order-a-beer/ask-for-a-toilet/get-directions ability
           | in a few others. It does not matter to me which language I
           | use to communicate. Why should it? The one I am fluent in is
           | not the language of any of my ancestors if I go back just a
           | couple of generations. So what?
           | 
           | My children are natively fluent in two languages. Neither of
           | their languages is a second language.
           | 
           | Which language should I tell them is their primary language?
        
             | Novosell wrote:
             | Are you trying to make a point or..? It's a bit unclear.
             | People can have multiple languages they're native in, that
             | doesn't mean we should try to replace every language with
             | English.
        
               | checkyoursudo wrote:
               | > that doesn't mean we should try to replace every
               | language with English
               | 
               | Where did I say that everyone should speak only English?
               | I do not care what language people speak.
               | 
               | > Are you trying to make a point or..?
               | 
               | Why are you being unkind? Or hostile, or whatever this
               | is?
               | 
               | I was asking a question. I understand that people think
               | they will lose something if they speak a different
               | language. My native language is not the same as any of my
               | ancestors from just a few generations ago, and I want to
               | know what difference it makes?
        
               | Novosell wrote:
               | Language and culture go hand in hand. I don't understand
               | how you've learnt 1 fluently and 3 passably and are
               | deemingly completely missing this aspect to it. So to
               | standardize language is to attempt to standardize culture
               | which I would imagine we don't wanna do, right?
               | 
               | And it doesn't matter what your ancestors spoke, of
               | course. But it does matter what those around you speak,
               | now. Neither the person you originally responded to or me
               | have mentioned ancestors.
        
               | tsimionescu wrote:
               | Speaking a different language than your great great great
               | grandfather ("a few generations ago") is not always very
               | impactful, though even this means you can no longer read
               | letters or poetry or novels that they may have written or
               | just loved. You can no longer understand laws that they
               | might have obeyed, understand speeches that influenced
               | them, and so many other things that keep a culture going
               | beyond generations.
               | 
               | However, that pales in comparison to what the transition
               | means, not speaking the same language as your
               | grandparents. You get a huge gulf of distance from
               | relatives who, for the majority of humanity, are some of
               | their most beloved and close relationships.
        
             | SahAssar wrote:
             | Usually people have one primary language which is usually
             | the one predominantly used in the home they grew up in (or
             | maybe the one used for their primary education).
             | 
             | If you have multiple, that's fine, but your disregarding
             | the reality for 90%+ of people if you don't think most
             | people have a language that is their "primary".
             | 
             | > It does not matter to me which language I use to
             | communicate. Why should it?
             | 
             | For most people language is tied to their culture and
             | history. I'm just saying that we should not mandate that
             | people use a certain language as their "primary". It would
             | be nice if we had a global way to passably communicate
             | though.
        
               | checkyoursudo wrote:
               | Yeah, I get what you are saying. I would never want to
               | mandate any language. I think it is dumb when countries
               | have official languages as opposed to e.g. operating
               | languages.
               | 
               | I just think that people are more worried about the
               | homogenization of language than they need to be. In fact,
               | with how quickly culture is homogenizing around the
               | world, I think that it is even possible that language
               | differences outlast cultural differences over the medium
               | term. Teenagers in a lot of the world I have been to in
               | the past years dress/behave/express themselves ... not
               | very differently.
               | 
               | Everywhere I go in the world, old shit is different, but
               | modern shit is depressingly the same, or really similar
               | anyway.
        
               | SahAssar wrote:
               | > Everywhere I go in the world, old shit is different,
               | but modern shit is depressingly the same, or really
               | similar anyway.
               | 
               | That seems like a very reductive take. Of course trends
               | and culture is more global since we now communicate
               | globally, but there are definitely regional cultures and
               | values and those are expressed many different ways.
               | 
               | If I travel from my small european city to a city in the
               | american midwest or a city in nigeria that are going to
               | be massive differences regardless if the teens are doing
               | the same tiktok dance or whatever metric of
               | homogenization you pick. But in all of those places I
               | almost everyone I will meet can speak english.
        
               | andoando wrote:
               | I imagine having offical languages dictates that all the
               | state functions have to operate in said official
               | languages. If you have a government office for example,
               | your website, pamphlets, administered tests etc for
               | example have to be printed in the official language.
               | Would be a mess if that was not enforced
        
               | bjoli wrote:
               | I think something changed culturally as well. When my
               | parents grew up any moderately educated person was
               | expected to speak different several different languages.
               | 
               | Very few in my generation speak three languages, even in
               | my rather international field. Yet my older colleagues
               | speak french, German and Spanish like it is nothing. And
               | my international colleagues often speak 4+ languages.
               | 
               | I am fine with English being a de facto Lingua Franca,
               | but I can't help feeling something has been lost.
        
               | type0 wrote:
               | Speaking and using professionally is not the same. One of
               | my friends speaks 6-7 languages, but can't use most of
               | those for work, it's better to know 2 sufficiently well
               | than imagining yourself being a polyglot.
        
           | qwertox wrote:
           | > as a second language
           | 
           | It should go beyond that, a second official language, so that
           | all signs, documents and government interactions should be
           | just as valid in both languages.
        
             | SahAssar wrote:
             | I think that if it were to become a official second
             | language that would be a natural second step, if nothing
             | else just for efficiency in regions that currently have
             | multiple languages.
        
         | cupofjoakim wrote:
         | I can agree on all of the points except "Speaking English". The
         | way things are going it's going to be either that or mandarin
         | regardless, but there's so much culture in language that IMO
         | it'd be a shame to hurry it up.
        
           | mg wrote:
           | I don't know enough about Mandarin to have an opinion on it.
           | 
           | The language has more characters than what fits on a
           | keyboard, right? I wonder how typing on a keyboard feels. I
           | guess only people who have experience in writing Mandarin
           | _and_ English can compare the feeling.
        
             | toxik wrote:
             | Writing Mandarin with pinyin is way easier, you just type
             | the first letter of each sound in a sentence. "I like to
             | eat ice cream" is Wo Xi Huan Chi Bing Qi Lin , written
             | entirely by the letter sequence wxhcbql.
        
           | mmmrk wrote:
           | English is more likely than Mandarin, because lots of people
           | (including the mainland Chinese working in sectors that
           | interface with the outside world) can speak some English, but
           | very few people outside China speak any Mandarin.
           | 
           | Nassim Taleb wrote about this in
           | https://medium.com/incerto/the-most-intolerant-wins-the-
           | dict....
        
         | triyambakam wrote:
         | No daylight savings time
         | 
         | ...would be one that I would add.
        
           | usr1106 wrote:
           | Maybe all should use Beijing time, Moscow time, or UTC?
           | 
           | Seriously, I think the planet has bigger problems than
           | discussing about DST.
        
           | elaus wrote:
           | Found the German.
           | 
           | On a serious note: compared to the other inconsistencies,
           | this seems like a very minor one. If we wanted to standardize
           | time, we should agree on ONE timezone across the world. But
           | of course that seems almost impossible: Having to convince 8
           | billion people on a change that has little benefit in their
           | everyday life.
        
             | noduerme wrote:
             | How would one timezone work? The sun sets at 8:00 in one
             | place and sets at 20:00 on the other side of the world?
             | 
             | In terms of working or traveling between time zones, it
             | seem like it would be _much_ harder to remember the fact
             | that, for instance, people in New York stop work when the
             | clock says 17:00 and people in LA work until 20:00, than to
             | remember that they are three time zones apart.
        
               | usrusr wrote:
               | IIRC the more serious proposals for a global time scheme
               | deliberately abandon the old 24:60:60 so that daylight
               | expectations, locally as they would be, would have to be
               | re-learned anyways. Up to that point that doesn't sound
               | that bad to me. But where i don't see any chance is
               | durations, how many seconds/minutes/hours. I suspect that
               | a change to duration units would be even harder to adapt
               | to than metrification of lengths.
        
             | teddyh wrote:
             | _So You Want To Abolish Time Zones_
             | <https://qntm.org/abolish>
        
               | WithinReason wrote:
               | This is linked every time and every time it's debunked.
               | It's silly.
        
             | wolletd wrote:
             | I propose infinite timezones, you simply calculate the true
             | noon from your latitude. Smartphones can do that for us.
             | The time at your workplace would be some minutes off the
             | time at your home. And when your phone is off, you are
             | screwed.
             | 
             | It's like in the old days before railroads when every town
             | had it's own time, but even worse.
        
         | purple-leafy wrote:
         | > Driving on the right
         | 
         | No thanks
         | 
         | > 2024-06-09 date format
         | 
         | That doesnt infer what you want. Are you saying you want YYYY-
         | MM-DD or YYYY-DD-MM
        
           | geysersam wrote:
           | They want YYYY-MM-DD
        
           | codetrotter wrote:
           | Look at what date it is today, and then try to guess which
           | one of these format is the one they are referring to.
           | 
           | Also: one of these is an ISO standard format. The other one
           | is a format that no one would use. (DD/MM YYYY is in use, but
           | no one would write YYYY-DD-MM.)
        
             | purple-leafy wrote:
             | Don't Americans do:
             | 
             | MM-DD-YYYY?
             | 
             | So it would stand to reason that an American commenter may
             | be meaning
             | 
             | YYYY-DD-MM
             | 
             | And guessing based on todays date, tell that to commenters
             | who check this post in 6 months
        
               | adastra22 wrote:
               | Americans do mm/dd/yyyy, but never mm-dd-yyyy
        
           | xjay wrote:
           | Underscore as a separator, YYYY_MM_DD:
           | 1970_01_01       2024_06_09       2024_12_31
           | 16383_12_31
           | 
           | Treated as base-10 number literal in some programming
           | languages.
           | 
           | 5 bits for DD [0, 31] + 4 bits for MM [0, 15] + 14 or more
           | bits for year [0, 16_383] = 23 bits.
        
           | yokoprime wrote:
           | Nobody ever should write YYYY-DD-MM, its the worst of both
           | worlds with the structure being both in a non-logical order
           | AND not conforming to how dates are pronounced.
        
             | Symbiote wrote:
             | Just in case it isn't clear, the usual European date format
             | (DD-MM-YYYY though the separators vary) reflects the usual
             | pronunciation -- even in Britain and Ireland, where today
             | is the ninth of June.
        
           | jogjayr wrote:
           | > YYYY-DD-MM
           | 
           | Some people just want to watch the world burn
        
           | kulhur wrote:
           | Just use uppercase numbers for the month and lowercase for
           | the day. That way you will always know which is more
           | significant without any prior knowledge of how the order of
           | the digits in decimal numbers work.
        
         | constantcrying wrote:
         | >Speaking English
         | 
         | Having worked in an international organization where most
         | people communicated in English and most people were ESL, going
         | back to a company where my native language was the norm was a
         | _huge_ benefit in clarity of communications.
         | 
         | Languages certainly form how we think, a universal language
         | undoubtedly leads to worse communication and worse ideas.
        
           | falcor84 wrote:
           | My understanding was that the parent recommends standardizing
           | the native language throughout the world, rather than
           | enforcing ESL.
        
             | constantcrying wrote:
             | Sure, but how would I teach my children English as a first
             | language, when my English is only ESL. And even if I could,
             | I would never do that, as a diversity in languages directly
             | leads to a diversity in thought.
        
               | graemep wrote:
               | I agree about diversity in languages being a good thing.
               | I also see minor languages gradually dying out.
               | 
               | First languages do change with time so it does happen,
               | and it can be induced to happen. My grandparents all
               | spoke English as a first language, but if you go back a
               | few more generations only one of my great (or possibly
               | great great) grandparents ancestors would have done.
        
               | falcor84 wrote:
               | Diversity in thought is great, but I don't think that
               | distinct native languages are a prerequisite for that.
               | Throughout history, the societies that were able to
               | achieve the greatest accomplishments, according to most
               | any measure, are those with the most people using the
               | same language.
        
           | encom wrote:
           | >clarity of communications
           | 
           | I (native dane) work in robotics. Our company has a
           | disproportionate amount of non-danes employed, who also are
           | not native english speakers. I've been reading and writing
           | english since I was very young, but having almost never
           | spoken it makes face-to-face communication challenging. And
           | not only that, but I encounter colleagues conversing in
           | Hindi, Russian, Hungarian, Polish, Greek etc. Any of those
           | conversations is one I'm locked out of, and unable to
           | contribute to. It's really a Tower Of Babel type of situation
           | here. Effective communication is a frustrating chore,
           | especially since we're talking about highly technical
           | subjects. Upper management thinks our diversity is a
           | strength, but I'm just not seeing it from where I'm sitting.
           | 
           | In my next job, this is a situation I will seek to avoid.
        
             | m_eiman wrote:
             | > I encounter colleagues conversing in Hindi, Russian,
             | Hungarian, Polish, Greek etc. Any of those conversations is
             | one I'm locked out of, and unable to contribute to.
             | 
             | This is really rude of them, and it's something management
             | should work very hard to fix. Because as you say, in
             | addition to being rude it's terribly inefficient for the
             | company. If they employ people from all over the world,
             | they should probably mandate English as the only allowed
             | language in just about any situation.
             | 
             | If you have speakers of different languages in a
             | conversation or group, it's just common sense to use a
             | language everyone can understand and use.
             | 
             | Yes, it's easier for Danes to speak Danish when four out of
             | five in the group understand it, but standing around there
             | being the fifth person who can't understand a word of
             | what's being said is not a nice experience.
        
             | constantcrying wrote:
             | >And not only that, but I encounter colleagues conversing
             | in Hindi, Russian, Hungarian, Polish, Greek etc. Any of
             | those conversations is one I'm locked out of, and unable to
             | contribute to.
             | 
             | I had that happen on occasion, every time it felt pretty
             | exclusionary and somewhat rude, so I tried to always speak
             | in english if that was the only common language among
             | people tangentially involved in a conversation.
             | 
             | But even that is certainly not ideal, it has been pretty
             | clear to me that, even though I have absolutely no problem
             | speaking and understanding English, talking to a native
             | speaker in my native language leads to much quicker and
             | clearer communication.
        
         | wood_spirit wrote:
         | Great list! Let's add Euros and universal health care too!
        
           | bjoli wrote:
           | The euro was great for Germany. Others weren't that happy.
        
             | netsharc wrote:
             | Your comment is grey because people are downvoting you. But
             | you're right, and it makes me think HN has more ignoramus
             | than curious hackers...
             | 
             | It's economics:
             | https://seekingalpha.com/article/564881-how-germany-
             | benefite...
             | 
             | https://archive.nytimes.com/krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/
             | 0...
        
         | morjom wrote:
         | Did it happen yesterday?
         | 
         | Did it happen last month?
         | 
         | Did it happen last year?
         | 
         | I feel like that's the order I ask questions if wonder when
         | something happened.
        
         | beardyw wrote:
         | > Driving on the right
         | 
         | More people in India drive on the left than North America and
         | Europe put together.
        
           | jiehong wrote:
           | China drives on the right ;)
        
             | beardyw wrote:
             | I know more drive on the right than left. I was just
             | pointing out that it is not as ubiquitous as many believe.
        
         | lokimedes wrote:
         | That would end all communication between frontend and backend
         | developers.
        
         | bsza wrote:
         | > Speaking English
         | 
         | That's the opposite of what we should do. If a plant
         | monoculture is susceptible to diseases, then a language
         | monoculture is susceptible to mind-viruses. What would the
         | world look like now if every country spoke German in 1933?
        
           | tsimionescu wrote:
           | Mostly the same as today, if that was the only difference?
           | 
           | Same language is a result of cultural similarity much more so
           | than a cause for it. If there is no political or cultural
           | pressure to speak the same language, they relatively quickly
           | diverge.
        
             | bsza wrote:
             | What I was implying is, language barriers are a firewall
             | against charismatic, manipulative psychopaths trying to
             | brainwash you into doing unspeakable things.
             | 
             | They do so by turning "he has a point" into "who is this
             | funny little moustache guy and why does he sound so angry?"
        
               | marginalia_nu wrote:
               | I'd argue lacking a shared global language is more likely
               | to isolate a population and ensure they can only hear the
               | local mustache man's narrative.
        
               | bsza wrote:
               | But having one gives a platform for those narratives to
               | spread and potentially become dominant.
               | 
               | To be clear, I'm not saying freedom of press between
               | countries should be eliminated (quite the contrary!),
               | only that diversity of languages should be preserved. In
               | my opinion, this does two things:
               | 
               | 1. Allows more diverse ideas to come into being, as
               | language directly affects on one's way of thinking.
               | 
               | 2. Slows the spread of dangerous ideas, due to some of
               | their appeal (or the charisma of their advocates) being
               | lost in translation.
        
               | echoangle wrote:
               | You think germany would have taken over europe by
               | convincing them if the citizens of the other countries
               | spoke german?
        
               | bsza wrote:
               | They had Europe's most accomplished public speaker and
               | its best propagandist at their disposal, both of whom had
               | a better understanding, or at least a more insidious
               | approach, to crowd psychology than perhaps anyone at the
               | time.
        
           | marginalia_nu wrote:
           | That was already sort of the case though, at least among the
           | intellectuals.
           | 
           | Up until WWII, a huge part of the scientific discourse was
           | held in German. The language's relevance had waned a bit by
           | 1933, but it was still a widely spoken and understood
           | language in Europe, much more so than today.
        
         | d-lisp wrote:
         | Maybe, maybe the world should standardize on:
         | Driving on the left         Speaking creole         The metric
         | system         The 09/06/2024 date format         The Kelvin
         | scale         The french decimal time system         The
         | AuthaGraph projection
        
         | asddubs wrote:
         | 230v 50Hz
        
         | carlosjobim wrote:
         | > Speaking English
         | 
         | Let's standardize that to the Newspeak version of English for
         | clarity and to make hackers happy.
        
         | emchammer wrote:
         | Sorry, why would you write 2024? I thought it's the year 5784.
        
         | euroderf wrote:
         | > Speaking English
         | 
         | Not worth discussing until some serious improvements to the
         | spelling system. Currently learning it requires learning two
         | obnoxiously independent systems, the written and the spoken.
        
         | KSteffensen wrote:
         | Aligning the EPAL pallet and the 30' container is another great
         | candidate that is just not going to happen.
        
           | Ekaros wrote:
           | Which one should be changed? The pallet or the container?
        
             | KSteffensen wrote:
             | Whichever is cheaper. My gut feeling says pallet, but I
             | have no idea.
        
       | matsemann wrote:
       | One surprising (after we got a ticket..) thing about parking laws
       | in Sweden is that you're also only allowed to park on the right
       | side of the road / with the car in the direction of the traffic.
       | This has the benefit of that when you're leaving the street
       | parking, you are sitting close to the lane and can look behind
       | you for coming cars and only cross one lane. Compared to parking
       | on the "wrong" side, where you're sitting on the opposite side of
       | the lane in your car, having your view of the opposing lane
       | blocked by the parked car in front of you.
       | 
       | As a cyclist I wish we had the same rule where I live. Far too
       | often a car parked on the street will not see me when they try to
       | exit their spot, as it's only when half the front of the car is
       | in the cycle lane they actually can see past the other car.
        
         | n_plus_1_acc wrote:
         | This is the case in most of Europe. Another reason is that cars
         | are required to have red reflectors at the back, but no
         | reflectors at the front.
        
         | gerikson wrote:
         | As a Swede it amazes me that some countries allow parking "in
         | the wrong direction". I've never even thought about it, and I
         | don't know if it's a written rule (I'm sure it is, just it;s
         | been a long time since I got my license).
        
           | edb_123 wrote:
           | You don't have to go further than Norway to be allowed to
           | park on both sides of the street (unless indicated otherwise
           | by signs) as well as park in both directions.
           | 
           | I believe many Norwegians have received parking tickets when
           | visiting Sweden because if this difference. I wasn't aware of
           | this myself until recently.
        
           | gfna wrote:
           | In finland this has been allowed since a few years ago. It is
           | quite useful on narrow sidestreets in residential areas where
           | it helps hunting for parking spaces. The biggest problem
           | seems to be that now many misinterpret the law that one must
           | leave 5 meters empty space before pedestrian crossings as
           | being measured from the front of the car, ie not applying
           | when parking on the "wrong" side
        
             | Ekaros wrote:
             | Also it seems less understood or followed rule is that it
             | is also technically 5 meters from any crossing lane. And
             | then sometimes whole intersection is very nebulous. As
             | pedestrian crossing can be faraway from intersection and
             | still be part of intersection...
             | 
             | Sometimes things just get weird.
        
           | Tade0 wrote:
           | Over here in Poland it's allowed in areas of "low traffic" -
           | a term not defined anywhere in the law.
           | 
           | I did it the other day and it felt illegal.
        
             | type0 wrote:
             | It feels much more illegal in Italy
        
           | gmac wrote:
           | As a Brit it amazes me that this is even a concept. I've
           | certainly never heard of it. We park whichever way is
           | convenient.
        
             | scarytom wrote:
             | If you read the British highway code, you will find that we
             | have this rule too.
        
         | noduerme wrote:
         | Where do you live?! You couldn't park facing the wrong way in
         | any big city in America, either. Maybe on small residential
         | streets it's not always enforced.
        
           | matsemann wrote:
           | Norway. It might be more common than I anticipate, just weird
           | that we've been parking in Sweden for decades not knowing
           | this and never having received a ticket. I guess it has
           | helped that it until a few years ago was quite hard to
           | enforce tickets on foreign cars, so maybe they just skipped
           | us and thus we never learned our lesson.
        
           | imajoredinecon wrote:
           | I learned to drive in Seattle, where it's 100% allowed, and
           | then moved east and almost got ticketed my first day in my
           | new city.
        
             | pimlottc wrote:
             | Seattle is noteworthy for being going against the norm in
             | this case. As a midwesterner, it definitely surprised me to
             | see so many "contra-parked" cars the first time I visited
             | Seattle. It was one of those things that was just so deeply
             | ingrained that it never occurred to me to park against
             | traffic like that.
        
         | gwbas1c wrote:
         | Assuming you're in the US: It's usually the rule here (state
         | laws vary) but rarely enforced.
        
         | scarytom wrote:
         | This is in the UK highway code too
        
       | usr1106 wrote:
       | When I was trainee in Stockholm in the 1980s most (if not all)
       | escalators in the metro still run such that you had to take the
       | left one.
        
         | Jamie9912 wrote:
         | Train tracks in Sweden are still left-hand traffic
        
           | usr1106 wrote:
           | Like in France (excl. Alsace and Lyon metro). But which track
           | trains use has extremely limited effects on the general
           | public.
        
             | piva00 wrote:
             | It's barely noticeable except when I come back from abroad
             | and expect train doors to open on the wrong side, it
             | happens maybe a couple of times until I get used to it
             | again.
        
               | usr1106 wrote:
               | For trains the door side is hardly ever standard, even if
               | the train always uses a certain track out of 2
               | directional ones. Some stations have center platforms,
               | others have side platforms. Maybe there is some network
               | in the world with only one type, but in most cases they
               | come in a mix.
        
         | noduerme wrote:
         | Still on escalators everywhere, if you're standing, you stand
         | on the right. If you're passing, you pass on the left.
        
           | usr1106 wrote:
           | Everywhere as everywhere in Sweden?
           | 
           | I'd guess in London it's the opposite (has been a while,
           | cannot remember).
        
             | dom96 wrote:
             | In London on the tube escalators you stand on the right and
             | pass on the left.
        
             | chronogram wrote:
             | The escalators in London had signs with "please stand
             | right" the times I've been there.
        
           | yencabulator wrote:
           | In Tokyo it's common to stand on the left and pass on the
           | right.
           | 
           | https://www.getaroundjapan.jp/archives/4730
        
             | lynguist wrote:
             | And opposite in Western Japan!
        
           | echoangle wrote:
           | That's not related to left-hand traffic though, right? You
           | also overtake other cars on the left when driving in right-
           | hand traffic.
        
       | rjsw wrote:
       | I was in Sweden then, was only 2yo though so don't remember it,
       | my parents felt the change went smoothly.
        
         | chronogram wrote:
         | A trucker at the time said the transition was instant: people
         | just did it, it was that easy.
        
       | kabouseng wrote:
       | There is a joke, that in order to facilitate such a change, it
       | should be done in more manageable steps. So on day 1, only the
       | motorcycles switch over to the other side of driving, on day 2
       | the motor vehicles, and on day 3 the trucks and busses switches
       | over...
        
         | Archelaos wrote:
         | My version of the joke:
         | 
         | "Have you heared: Britain wants to switch to right-hand
         | traffic?"
         | 
         | ...
         | 
         | "Yes, but they want to do it step by step."
         | 
         | ???
         | 
         | "They want to start with lorries first."
        
       | user20180120 wrote:
       | Making everyone speak English should not happen!
       | 
       | We need to understand that the language you are able to think in
       | - limits your thinking.
       | 
       | Some languages have things you cannot translate into English.
       | 
       | These non translateable concepts do not exist in the Western
       | world view point.
        
         | nkozyra wrote:
         | I'm curious about examples. I know many languages do not have
         | word::word translations, but a concept that cannot be
         | translated -- even if it needs a full sentence, is a very
         | different thing.
        
           | Falkvinge wrote:
           | It's like how the Inuit have 35 words for "snow", or the
           | Swedish have 51 words for "tax evasion". Some cultures have a
           | need for nuances that necessarily gets reflected into the
           | local language, nuances which will be lost when bluntly
           | translating into the one category-level word in English.
        
             | Nzen wrote:
             | The Inuit example is a common misconstrual [0]. The
             | ancestor language has three root words that they might
             | modify with a suffix in the way we might use a phrase 'snow
             | on the ground'.
             | 
             | [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eskimo_words_for_snow
        
           | neontomo wrote:
           | There are words/concepts that require you to have lived in
           | that culture for some amount of time to understand the
           | cultural baggage connected to the word, and how the word
           | actually describes a part of the culture. As a Swede, one
           | such word for me is `lagom`, which is often translated as
           | `just right`, but this is a cop-out that doesn't do it
           | justice.
           | 
           | To understand it you must know, on a deeper level why a Swede
           | values things being lagom, and this is surprisingly hard to
           | put into words because it involves history, language, value
           | systems, social patterns and even concepts like gratitude
           | towards simple things. This word encapsulates a really big
           | aspect of Swedish culture, making it impossible to translate
           | accurately.
        
         | acheron wrote:
         | Sapir-Whorf is nonsense.
        
           | mistermann wrote:
           | It is a shame you are unable to appreciate the irony of this
           | comment.
        
       | Arnt wrote:
       | I cannot resist... I have to tell... when they did it, they had
       | non-stop media coverage, as much as could possibly be done.
       | 
       | An hour or two after traffic switched, TV broadcast from
       | Svinesund, the biggest of the road crossings to Norway, and a
       | major route for road haulage, and a reporter said something like
       | "here we have the driver of a Norwegian 18-wheeler, <name>. Well,
       | <name>, what do think of the big reform?" Norwegian, looking a
       | little dense and speaking slowly: "Uh, what reform?" There was
       | big signage everywhere. The reporter tried dropping a hint, the
       | Norwegian truck driver refused to have noticed any change in the
       | driving rules. Camera showed the very big 18-wheeler. The
       | reporter dropped increasingly clearer hints and looked
       | discomfited, the Norwegian still said "no, what reform, is
       | anything new?" and eventually they cut the interview and switched
       | back to the studio.
        
         | hnarn wrote:
         | This almost sounds like a sketch since Sweden has "Norway
         | jokes" where the punchline is consistently how dumb Norwegians
         | are -- a structure that I'm sure is mirrored in Norway and
         | similarly in other countries (england/scotland, france/belgium
         | maybe?)
        
           | lb1lf wrote:
           | Oh yes.
           | 
           | In Norway we have the exact same jokes about the Swedes.
           | 
           | One quip which did the rounds in the papers prior to the
           | Swedes starting to drive on the right was that they would
           | perform the switch in several phases - first heavy traffic,
           | then cars a month later...
        
             | stareatgoats wrote:
             | > In Norway we have the exact same jokes about the Swedes
             | 
             | This is a fairly recent development. When I moved to Sweden
             | in the 1970s, it was so bad I learned Swedish at
             | accelerated rate in order to avoid the kneejerk compulsion
             | of many (if not most) Swedes to tell their favorite jokes
             | about how dumb Norwegians seemed to be. No doubt a
             | consequence of century-old rivalry and the fact that Sweden
             | during the early part of the last century was the larger,
             | richer, most industrialized and organized society in
             | comparison. And they believed much of it to be actually
             | true, in the way that derogatory humor always evokes some
             | degree of "no smoke without fire." To this day, I meet
             | swedes who are surprised at hearing that bananas are not
             | actually called "guleboj" in Norway (bended yellow) - a
             | reference to how Norwegian is not as anglicized as Swedish,
             | as there has been a pushback against this trend in Norway
             | historically. As Norway has become progressively richer
             | these jokes in Sweden about Norwgians have more or less
             | disappeared however.
             | 
             | The notion that Norwegians nowadays have the same jokes
             | about Swedes is something I hear repeated, but it saddens
             | me nonetheless because it doesn't rhyme with the spirit I
             | remember from my childhood. If true, then it means that a
             | fair number of my present (Swedish) countrymen are being
             | denigrated, perhaps because Norway can now pride themselves
             | on being the richest (real) country in the world per
             | capita, so rich that a lot of swedes migrate here to take
             | the worst paid jobs in restaurants and in hospitals. They
             | are popular as employees because they understand the
             | language and are hard working. And probably because they
             | can take denigrating jokes, maybe because well, they used
             | to do it too. But it's not all that funny, really.
        
               | BurningFrog wrote:
               | As I remember the 1970s joke wars, they were driven by
               | tabloid newspapers on both sides, and all in good fun
               | between friendly nations.
               | 
               | I learned later that many of the jokes were translated
               | American "Polish jokes".
        
               | stareatgoats wrote:
               | > all in good fun
               | 
               | Well, not everybody's idea of good fun I guess, friendly
               | nations or not.
               | 
               | But what do I know, I only visit Norway once in a blue
               | moon nowadays. I have actually yet to hear a good "swede
               | joke" at all actually; maybe they are just a myth?
        
               | bewaretheirs wrote:
               | > I have actually yet to hear a good "swede joke" at all
               | actually; maybe they are just a myth?
               | 
               | Perhaps most of the good Swede jokes moved to Minnesota?
               | 
               | (seriously, a bunch of the intra-scandinavian humor seems
               | to be of Scandahoovian-American origin. Like the "10,000
               | Swedes chased through the weeds / by one Norwegian"
               | thing.)
        
               | fl7305 wrote:
               | > As Norway has become progressively richer these jokes
               | in Sweden about Norwgians have more or less disappeared
               | however.
               | 
               | Yeah, the prevailing notion in Sweden is now that Norway
               | is so much better off that we swedes should declare war
               | on Norway.
               | 
               | After which we promptly surrender, and all our problems
               | become Norway's problems instead.
        
               | rags2riches wrote:
               | Similar jokes were made when the outlook for a Swedish
               | NATO ascension was bad. The much more cool-headed and
               | diplomatically grounded Finns were set to join NATO
               | without trouble. So the solution was obvious: Sweden
               | should join Finland instead of NATO.
               | 
               | Relevant context is that Norway was the junior partner of
               | a personal union with Sweden for most of the nineteenth
               | century and until 1905. Also Sweden and Finland was one
               | and the same realm for six centuries or so until 1809.
        
               | mistrial9 wrote:
               | also some other Scandinavians captured and sold Finns as
               | slaves until about 1100.. some things are hard to forget
               | once known widely
        
               | type0 wrote:
               | Yeah, but Lithuanians were the biggest slave traders on
               | the Baltic sea up until until Christianity was widely
               | adopted in the 15th century
        
               | jackothy wrote:
               | As a Norwegian I have bonded with Swedes on several
               | occasions over having the same jokes about each other.
               | Not that the jokes are always geniously funny or
               | anything, but that would be both an unrealistic
               | expectation and completely unnecessary. Some unserious
               | rivalry is fantastic to have among friends.
        
               | triyambakam wrote:
               | Saddens me that I'll likely never speak Swedish as well
               | as you speak English. Jag bor inte i Sverige ochsa.
        
             | mistrial9 wrote:
             | the only Norge jokes I heard (in California) were about the
             | cowardice of Swedes in battle.. nothing about being dumb..
             | that was well before the year 2000, admit
        
           | ben_w wrote:
           | I have no idea if the Scots think or joke that the English
           | are stupid, but can say that the English have a joke pattern
           | of "An Englishman, an Irishman, and a Scotsman..." and it's
           | always and only the Irish who are picked on.
        
             | arrowsmith wrote:
             | In Spain they tell "Basque jokes".
             | 
             | The Basque person in the joke is always called Patxi, a
             | stereotypical Basque name (kind of like calling an Irish
             | person "Paddy").
        
           | Arnt wrote:
           | Supposed to be real. And it's not typical of the
           | Norwegian/Swede genre -- in that the direction is clear,
           | while here it might be either a dumb Norwegian driver or a
           | Swedish journalist having his leg pulled.
        
       | playingalong wrote:
       | The somewhat hidden (non financial) cost seems to have been
       | giving up on some of the existing public transport services -
       | like trams. The Wikipedia article mentions that briefly towards
       | the end.
        
         | BurningFrog wrote:
         | I don't get why. Can't you just run the trams in the opposite
         | direction?
        
           | mongol wrote:
           | It was not done throughout, but cities with trams with doors
           | on only one side posed a problem. So it is my understanding
           | that when such retrofits would have been to costly, the trams
           | were decommissioned instead.
        
         | renhanxue wrote:
         | The trams were already on the way out in the 1950's, they were
         | seen as a thing of the past that were inhibiting the
         | development of the new car-centric urban areas. Several systems
         | closed well before H-day, in the 50's and early 60's. The ones
         | that closed on or around H-day were mainly in Stockholm and in
         | Helsingborg.
         | 
         | In Stockholm, plans had been made as early as the 1940's to
         | gradually replace the tram network with the metro, and that did
         | in fact happen. Today's green and red metro lines do in fact
         | use old tram line alignments to a pretty significant extent
         | (the younger blue line was all new and mostly blasted out of
         | the bedrock deep underground). In 1957 the city council
         | formally decided that the tram networks should be gone by the
         | mid-1970's, at which time most of the infrastructure and
         | rolling stock would have been considered end-of-life. All H-day
         | did was accelerate this by a couple of years. Two suburban
         | lines were kept though and they survive to this day, but at
         | least up until the 1990's their future was kind of uncertain.
         | Things finally changed in the mid-90's, and new light rail
         | alignments started to get built again.
        
       | bloomingeek wrote:
       | In early 2001, my wife and I visited the beautiful country of New
       | Zealand. The travel books told us to be aware that traffic flows
       | opposite from the US. When we collected our rental car in
       | Invercargill, there was a sticker near the steering wheel that
       | read: "To stay alive, drive on the left!".
       | 
       | We had a good laugh and drove away from the airport. We soon
       | discovered that the raised middle finger was international. :)
        
         | nisse72 wrote:
         | You probably also saw the arrows on the road itself as a
         | reminder of the correct direction of travel. Those are always
         | near any places tourists are likely to stop, since after a
         | break it's common to forget which side to be on.
        
       | alkonaut wrote:
       | Having a non-binding referendum and moving against the 85% vote
       | takes balls. And we're forever greatful that they did. Presumably
       | people thought it would be inconvenient and voted no, while
       | politicians realized the cost of doing it later would be much
       | larger than just ripping the band aid off. At the time, the
       | number of massive motorway crossings and similar was probably
       | nearly zero. Today the cost would be unimaginable. We would have
       | caved in the 70s at the latest, and at a cost many times larger.
        
         | throwaway290 wrote:
         | If you already drove cars where drivers sit left side as
         | Wikipedia says, what exactly were those 85% thinking about?
         | Clearly not road safety?
        
           | alkonaut wrote:
           | I think a large part were just "no" to anything. Few I
           | imagine were against right hand traffic but many simply
           | resisted change. Only just half of voters voted, however.
        
             | nobodyandproud wrote:
             | NIMBYism in a nutshell.
        
               | nobodyandproud wrote:
               | Downvoted, but the down-voters have't given thought to
               | how closely coorelated this is.
        
             | throwaway290 wrote:
             | I didn't expect Swedes to be so contrarian for the sake of
             | it. Surely nobody likes to put the whole car in the
             | oncoming lane every time to check if you can even start
             | overtaking...
        
           | occz wrote:
           | Re-frame the question "I have to re-learn something" vs "I
           | can just keep on doing what I am doing today", and I think
           | you're pretty close to the answer.
        
         | boxed wrote:
         | It's funny. It took cowardice to declare the referendum, and
         | then they were forced into having even bigger balls than if
         | they had done the right thing in the first place.
        
         | air7 wrote:
         | My optimistic take on this is that the politicians of the time
         | had the actual peoples' best interests at heart and realized
         | that even though the change was unpopular, it was the right
         | thing to do and that people would eventually realize that. I'm
         | sure very few of those 83% held their opinion a few years after
         | the change.
         | 
         | Also 83% is really a lot... While seemingly obviously correct
         | now, the vast majority didn't see it that way then. I can only
         | assume that If I was there I would be against it too.
         | 
         | Nowadays with mass media and powerful almost immediate public
         | reaction to government, such "you'll thank me later" moves seem
         | less likely, and arguably, we are worse off for it.
        
           | littlestymaar wrote:
           | > Nowadays with mass media and powerful almost immediate
           | public reaction to government, such "you'll thank me later"
           | moves seem less likely, and arguably, we are worse off for
           | it.
           | 
           | The problem isn't mass media, the problem is that they did
           | use this card many times over the past decades to promote
           | neoliberal policies, and in retrospect it's clear that nobody
           | is thanking them.
           | 
           | The main lesson is that you can indeed force things on
           | people, and when you do so for good reasons you'll be thanked
           | later, but you must do it wisely and be sure that people will
           | thank you, otherwise you're just destroying public's
           | confidence in politicians (which doesn't matter to the
           | neoliberals anyway, since they don't think State is a
           | valuable institustion in the first place...)
        
         | dagurp wrote:
         | New York should show the same courage
        
       | throwaway290 wrote:
       | > changing to driving on the right reduced accidents while
       | overtaking, as people already drove left-hand drive vehicles,
       | thereby having a better view of the road ahead
       | 
       | They already used left-hand drive vehicles but rode on the left??
       | That's just ridiculous and obvious why they switched...
        
       | agency wrote:
       | The "see also" section links to a similar changeover in Okinawa
       | which mentions that a country having more than one traffic
       | direction is in violation of the Geneva convention (on road
       | traffic)
       | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geneva_Convention_on_Road_Tr...
        
         | dreamcompiler wrote:
         | If this is a violation, the United States needs to fix its own
         | problem. Left driving is the rule in the US Virgin Islands, and
         | it's especially dangerous because (like Sweden before 1967)
         | most cars there have left-hand steering and the roads are
         | narrow.
        
           | Someone wrote:
           | I don't think the US Virgin Islands are part of the _country_
           | called the United States of America. https://en.wikipedia.org
           | /wiki/Territories_of_the_United_Stat...:
           | 
           |  _"American territories are under American sovereignty and,
           | consequently, may be treated as part of the United States
           | proper in some ways and not others (i.e., territories belong
           | to, but are not considered to be a part of, the United
           | States). Unincorporated territories in particular are not
           | considered to be integral parts of the United States, and the
           | Constitution of the United States applies only partially in
           | those territories."_
           | 
           | (This kind of stuff can be very convolutrd. There are parts
           | of France that aren't in the EU, for example.
           | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overseas_France: _"Overseas
           | France (French: France d 'outre-mer, also France
           | ultramarine)[note 3] consists of 13 French territories
           | outside Europe, mostly the remains of the French colonial
           | empire that remained a part of the French state under various
           | statuses after decolonization. Most, but not all, are part of
           | the European Union"_)
        
       | jackothy wrote:
       | I know of this one single intersection in northern Stockholm that
       | still enforces left-hand traffic:
       | https://maps.app.goo.gl/uGWr28JUQnEh9cXc6
        
         | throwaway290 wrote:
         | Doesn't need to be related to left-handed past. Just imagine
         | those lanes were the other way around, then if you and me were
         | going on Valhallavagen opposite directions and wanted to U turn
         | over there at the same time then we can easily be in the way of
         | each other.
         | 
         | When you have two multi lane one way roads going opposite ways
         | and want add a two-way connection between them then you often
         | want to put lanes the opposite of normal way. Another example
         | is all roads connecting Chiang Mai's old city outer and inner
         | circle road. The country is left-handed but those connecting
         | roads are right handed, the opposite of Stockholm intersection
        
           | jackothy wrote:
           | Makes perfect sense, thank you!
           | 
           | I haven't seen any historical maps of the road so I no longer
           | have any reason to believe it stems from that. I was just
           | going based on that (flawed) logic.
        
           | mncharity wrote:
           | > all roads connecting Chiang Mai's old city outer and inner
           | circle road.
           | 
           | Such as https://maps.app.goo.gl/uRzHBaZAY38rnjVS9 .
        
         | fragmede wrote:
         | Diverging diamond interchange
         | 
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diverging_diamond_interchange
        
       | MaximilianEmel wrote:
       | > Approximately 90 percent of Swedes drove left-hand drive
       | vehicles
       | 
       | This is probably why the adjustment was so smooth.
        
       | rkagerer wrote:
       | Interesting how changing up the side of the road drivers use
       | elevated their attention, resulting in less accidents, until the
       | activity became second nature again.
       | 
       |  _The relatively smooth changeover saw a temporary reduction in
       | the number of accidents... These initial improvements did not
       | last, however. The number of motor insurance claims returned to
       | "normal" over the next six weeks_
       | 
       | Iceland saw a similar effect on "H-dagurinn" when they made the
       | switch (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H-dagurinn):
       | 
       |  _Traffic accident rates briefly dropped as drivers
       | overcompensated for the increased risk from driving on the
       | unfamiliar side of the road, before returning to the level
       | following the trend prior to the changeover._
        
         | matsemann wrote:
         | Yes, it's a thing that makes it hard for city planners and
         | transport engineers when they test out new things. _Any_ change
         | often improves status quo in the start, so need to run it for
         | long enough to actually gather valid data.
        
           | cozzyd wrote:
           | Sounds like we should have chaotic traffic patterns to
           | improve safety.
        
             | Fuzzwah wrote:
             | When I first visited Kuala Lumpur in Indonesia I was
             | dumbfounded how there wasn't endless car accidents. The
             | taxi from the airport was one of the scariest things in my
             | life. Roads marked with 3 lanes had cars 5 abreast with
             | scooters and motorbikes still finding just enough space to
             | lane split.
             | 
             | It really seemed like chaos to me. Didn't see a single
             | bingle.
        
               | cozzyd wrote:
               | It sort of makes sense since most accidents are probably
               | due to either inattentiveness or excessive speed.
        
       | Too wrote:
       | Something interesting is that roads don't have the same
       | properties if you just drive them the other direction.
       | 
       | It's not something you will immediately notice by just looking at
       | the road, you have to think of the full picture.
       | 
       | Imagine a fork vs a merge. You have buffer zones for off-ramps.
       | Tight merges. Psychology of drivers. Reaction to signage. All
       | this alters the flow of traffic and create undesired bottlenecks.
       | 
       | In the bigger cities you can still find a few examples of such
       | originally left roads around, with less ideal flow. Usually
       | around tunnels where rework is difficult.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-06-09 23:02 UTC)