[HN Gopher] Telegram Stars: Pay for Digital Goods and More
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Telegram Stars: Pay for Digital Goods and More
        
       Author : p1anecrazy
       Score  : 34 points
       Date   : 2024-06-06 17:09 UTC (5 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (telegram.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (telegram.org)
        
       | datadrivenangel wrote:
       | It appears that the stars are worth $0.05 each, so this will
       | either be great for microtransactions, and/or lead to some insane
       | money laundering issues.
        
       | neilv wrote:
       | Seems manipulative design to me.
       | 
       | Yellow stars are already used heavily in apps for ratings,
       | favoriting, marking as important. And previously as stickers of
       | approval on your childhood homework.
       | 
       | In the example animation of purchases, note all the exciting
       | confetti and sunburst reward-like animations... for spending
       | money.
       | 
       | Not only are they introducing a level of indirection over money
       | (you're not spending real money, but some fun imaginary thing),
       | but they're also appropriating and misusing a popular favorable
       | symbol.
       | 
       | Just show what these things cost in familiar real money (or at
       | least make it a stylized gold coin already), stop preying upon
       | children, and stop manipulating adults.
        
         | reaperducer wrote:
         | Imagine a society where the big tech companies encouraged
         | people to save money, act civilly, and be polite to one
         | another.
         | 
         | "You didn't spend real money on pretend things today. Here's
         | some confetti!"
        
       | CynicusRex wrote:
       | Each iteration I dislike Telegram a bit more. It used to be the
       | sleek "flagship killer" among chat software, but now it's slowly
       | becoming bloatware. Their positive stance on pyramid schemes was
       | were it all went downhill.
        
       | JZL003 wrote:
       | Are there other messaging apps which are equally bot friendly.
       | Telegram bots are just so nice and scriptable, I don't use it for
       | anything else, just a personal bot (so maybe all this bloat and
       | sketchiness doesn't matter) but I'd be happier to use another
       | scriptable platform
       | 
       | Even being able to have bot custom keyboards/buttons is pretty
       | great
        
         | preezer wrote:
         | Sadly no. I tried Signal, but it's incredibly complicated. I
         | would move to signal if they made their API more easy.
        
         | Karrot_Kream wrote:
         | I use Telegram a lot, but Matrix is even more friendly to
         | scripting. If you're just using the bots for yourself, you can
         | setup a non-federated Dendrite instance and just write bots for
         | it.
        
         | ravetcofx wrote:
         | What do you use bots for if you don't mind me asking? I've
         | never found a use case for messaging app bots for personal or
         | hobby use
        
           | omani wrote:
           | home automation for example.
        
         | hagbard_c wrote:
         | Run your own XMPP server - prosody or ejabberd - and you have
         | all the freedom in the world to use it for whatever purpose you
         | want whether that be remote control, 'bots' or anything else.
         | If you're a resident of the EU you'll also escape the 'chat
         | control' [1] (mass surveillance) law which is a boon. Prosody
         | runs happily on a SBC like a RasPi 2 or higher - even a RasPi 1
         | would work - and takes next to no maintenance to keep it up and
         | running.
         | 
         | [1] https://mullvad.net/en/chatcontrol
        
       | ilrwbwrkhv wrote:
       | Fantastic features. Telegram is the modern day Winamp. Amazing
       | software with a cohesion in it's features unlike the buggy,
       | broken, hideous Google Suite for example.
        
       | GabeIsko wrote:
       | Trying to stand up an alt currency backed by Russian oligarchs
       | with deep ties to Russian intelligence services? I smell a
       | federal ban if this catches on.
        
         | kmeisthax wrote:
         | Naah, the feds need Telegram to exist so people don't
         | accidentally use something good like Signal.
        
       | fullspectrumdev wrote:
       | I wonder how fast this will be adopted by the automated bot-shops
       | on telegram where you can buy illicit substances with a few taps?
        
         | nurumaik wrote:
         | Should've stayed with "grams" as base currency instead of
         | renaming it to toncoin
        
       | ChilledTonic wrote:
       | This is pretty clever design to me. If Apple & Google don't try
       | to change their policies to skirt around it, it seems like a good
       | way to build so-called super apps on their respective platforms.
       | 
       | Building a Telegram bot is incredibly easy, and a lot of digital
       | services are more then capable of being handled in that format.
       | Being able to easily charge for that built into the actual
       | software library? Win-win to me.
        
       | colesantiago wrote:
       | Killer app for criminals, money laundering and for illicit
       | payments.
        
         | nurumaik wrote:
         | Tornado, Tonnel (tornado on ton) and Monero already exist. You
         | can already easily launder any amount of money with that
         | services
        
           | reaperducer wrote:
           | "Don't be against this thing that's bad because all these
           | other things are also bad. That makes it good!"
        
         | null0pointer wrote:
         | You must be thinking of the US dollar.
        
       | RicoElectrico wrote:
       | So Telegram wants to become a "Russian" super app, akin to WeChat
       | and LINE.
        
       | saos wrote:
       | Telegram UI/UX surely surpasses that of WhatsApp? That's what
       | I've noticed since joining the telegram. It simply lacks in E2EE
       | by default
        
       | cunidev wrote:
       | Has Telegram made any active effort on the encryption/privacy
       | side in the last years?
       | 
       | With no E2EE except in unpractical, single-device "secret chats",
       | it falls behind the majority of chat platforms (aside from Meta-
       | owned ones, at least), and feels like a Western WeChat more than
       | a place I would like my data to be owned by. Which is a shame
       | because its UX is consistently great.
        
       | wesamco wrote:
       | > Soon, developers will be able to withdraw the stars earned by
       | their bots in Toncoins via Fragment.
       | 
       | So it's backed by Telegram's own cryptocurrency, or at least soon
       | gonna be. reading this killed the little excitement I had.
        
       | farukozderim wrote:
       | I see that lots of people mention it's missing E2E, but that's
       | also the convenient part of it. You have all your chat history in
       | the cloud, can open it at any new device including huge sizes of
       | video and images.
       | 
       | Signal is good for E2E but not comparable in terms of
       | convenience.
        
         | para_parolu wrote:
         | I don't understand why people say telegram is missing e2e.
         | There is a convenient way to create e2e chat when you need them
         | (which is "rare" for me).
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-06-06 23:01 UTC)