[HN Gopher] The dual nature of Japanese Knotweed
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The dual nature of Japanese Knotweed
        
       Author : dnetesn
       Score  : 34 points
       Date   : 2024-06-05 11:59 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (worldsensorium.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (worldsensorium.com)
        
       | blackeyeblitzar wrote:
       | This thing is incredibly invasive and is all over the Northwest
       | and other parts of America near waterways. It spreads underground
       | like bamboo. It's super expensive to get rid of, because it you
       | have to fight it for many years consistently for it to die out.
       | And even then you may just be unlucky enough for it to spread
       | into the area again from some adjacent area or from fragments in
       | the water.
        
       | janice1999 wrote:
       | It's stupidly irresponsible to encourage people to forage
       | Japanese Knotweed in countries where it is a major threat to
       | existing ecosystems. Even small fragments on shoes or in water
       | can cause outbreaks. That's why dealing with contaminated soil is
       | extremely expensive.
       | 
       | https://emmaplusthree.com/home/japanese-knotweed-understandi...
        
       | pclmulqdq wrote:
       | I had almost half an acre of this crap on my property, and still
       | have about a quarter of an acre after thoroughly removing one big
       | patch. There is nothing good about Japanese knotweed in the US,
       | and everyone who forages it is part of the problem. It evolved on
       | the sides of volcanoes, so if you cut anything off of it (or burn
       | it), it triggers a chemical signal that encourages virulent
       | growth from the attached rhizome. By cutting down small amounts
       | of it, you are actually propagating it. That is the furthest
       | thing from "environmental stewardship."
        
         | hosh wrote:
         | There are many plants that have survival adaptations like that.
         | 
         | The question is: what are the other animals that would normally
         | eat it and keep it in check?
        
           | fredley wrote:
           | Lava flows?
        
             | hosh wrote:
             | According to this article:
             | 
             | > This BBC article from 2010 points out that Japanese
             | knotweed isn't really a problem in its native country -
             | while common, the plant "doesn't rage out of control like
             | it does in the UK, thanks to natural predators that keep it
             | in check".
             | 
             | > In Japan, knotweed has many natural predators in the form
             | of nearly 200 insect species and a variety of fungi.
             | Certain psyllids (plant lice) have proven to have an
             | appetite for Japanese knotweed sap - the organisers of the
             | Chelsea Flower Show have looked at using psyllids to keep
             | Japanese knotweed at bay, and one species (Aphalara
             | itadori) has even been released into the wild in an effort
             | to combat the UK's knotweed problem.
             | 
             | https://www.taylor-weed-control.co.uk/news/post/what-eats-
             | ja...
        
               | zukzuk wrote:
               | Same with Dog Strangling Vine in Europe vs North America.
               | 
               | I volunteer every week helping with ecosystem stewardship
               | here in Southern Ontario, and DSV is absolutely out of
               | control in parks and forests. It spreads like wildfire
               | and wraps itself around anything and everything, choking
               | out most other plants and creating mass monoculture.
               | 
               | Meanwhile, in France, where I just spent a week hiking,
               | you see the occasional vine here and there, minding its
               | own business, acting like a well-behaved member of the
               | forest community.
        
           | pclmulqdq wrote:
           | Japanese bacteria, fungi, and lava. It's nearly defenseless
           | against the microorganisms in its ecosystem because it spent
           | all its evolution points on growing on the sides of
           | mountains.
        
             | hosh wrote:
             | There are probably some kind of microorganism and insects
             | native to the US that would like to eat them.
        
       | hosh wrote:
       | I find it interesting that many permaculturists would include
       | "invasive" species in their designs. (What makes something
       | invasive has more to do with few, if any, ecological links to
       | other species within the area). Anything from horseradish,
       | asparagus, to autumn olives, sea buckthorne, jujube.
       | 
       | There's a particular case of the Tree of Heaven, an aggressive
       | tree species that can live on land polluted by copper tailings.
       | They get everywhere, grow back more prolific if you tried pulling
       | them, and do not have a pleasant odor. The mayor of Jerome, AZ
       | seeded them to help stop erosion in Jerome. And it worked.
       | 
       | Even running bamboo can be managed -- the key is to consistently
       | harvest the edible sprouts.
       | 
       | This demonstrates the power of regeneration in living systems, be
       | they ecologies or individual plants. It's aligning this
       | regenerative power with the interests of human civilization that
       | can restore wastelands, reverse desertification, while yielding
       | something useful for humans.
        
         | throwup238 wrote:
         | _> The mayor of Jerome, AZ seeded them to help stop erosion in
         | Jerome_
         | 
         | Kudzu, cheatgrass, knotweed, tree of heaven, saltcedar, crown
         | vetch, english ivy, giant reeds, iceplant... the list goes on
         | and on. It's absolutely ridiculous how many invasive plants
         | have been spread intentionally to control erosion. I found out
         | later in life that most of the iconic plants I associate with
         | the places I grew up are invasive.
        
           | hosh wrote:
           | But, if they develop relationships with other species within
           | that ecology, then those form networks that allows
           | participation in the local ecology. They would no longer be
           | invasive.
        
             | throwup238 wrote:
             | That doesn't help all the plants they displace or drive
             | extinct altogether. That's why they're called invasive, not
             | because they're incapable of forming new ecological
             | relationships.
        
               | hosh wrote:
               | The displacement is only a bad thing if there are no
               | interactions between the native ecology and the new one.
               | 
               | If there are interactions, then the ecologies start
               | merging and adapting. The native species can still thrive
               | because there is participation among both old and new.
        
               | throwup238 wrote:
               | So even by your standard of weapons grade copium, it's
               | always bad. Invasive species outcompete native ones by
               | definition so they _can 't_ thrive.
               | 
               | Seriously, go look at the iceplant covering California's
               | coasts [1]. Or the himalayan blackberry all over the
               | pacific north west [2]. Or the kudzu vine all over the
               | south east US [3]. They smother native competitors and
               | eliminate them everywhere they go, turning once diverse
               | ecosystems into monocultures.
               | 
               | The ecosystems don't adapt, they get wiped clean of any
               | native plants whose niche overlaps even slightly with the
               | invader. If the native species could adapt, the
               | introduced species wouldn't be called "invasive" but
               | "naturalized"
               | 
               | [1] https://www.fiscaliniranchpreserve.org/images/Photo%2
               | 01%20NP...
               | 
               | [2] https://extension.oregonstate.edu/sites/default/files
               | /styles...
               | 
               | [3] https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/4c/K
               | udzu_on...
        
               | hosh wrote:
               | I can't reply directly to that.
               | 
               | You have to introduce species that bridges the gap and
               | creates those links.
               | 
               | To give an example with kadzu:
               | 
               | https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/true-story-
               | kud...
               | 
               | Tldr: kadzu turns out not to be as invasive as people
               | thought, and the kadzu bug has been eating its way
               | through them.
        
       | exDM69 wrote:
       | Previous owner of my property planted this damn plant here in two
       | separate patches.
       | 
       | I'm on year four trying to get rid of it and it's still showing
       | signs of vitality. If I let my guard down, it's gonna be back
       | with a vengeance in a year or two.
       | 
       | I dug out about 600 kg of roots from about 6 square meter area
       | and have culled every shoot every day from the patch almost every
       | day for four years.
       | 
       | The other patch was first treated with herbicide and then covered
       | it with a light blocking tarp made for this purpose. It's still
       | going after 4 years in the dark.
       | 
       | Please do not pick it up or mess with it. It is a terrible plant
       | and destroys everything around it.
        
         | rimunroe wrote:
         | I believe cutting every day is counter-productive because it
         | causes it to spread. I'm in Massachusetts. The strategy we're
         | using is cutting once in early summer. Then we let it grow
         | (completely undisturbed) until right after it flowers in early
         | fall. At that point we cut and inject concentrated glyphosate
         | into the stumps. The idea is to inject the herbicide right as
         | the plant is drawing stuff back into its root system for the
         | winter.
        
           | bjacokes wrote:
           | I've read about this strategy and am giving it a shot this
           | year.
           | 
           | If I understand it correctly, the reasoning is that until the
           | late summer, the underground root system is putting its
           | energy towards growing the stalks and leaves, so you _want_
           | it to grow as much as possible. If you trim daily, you'll
           | never let it get into the rapid growth stage where it's
           | really depleting its energy reserves. In other words if you
           | trimmed daily or monthly til the end of time, eventually
           | you'd kill the plant, but it might ironically die more
           | quickly if you trimmed monthly.
           | 
           | It's a bummer knowing that it'll be hard to fully eradicate
           | it given how widespread it is in the area (I'm also in
           | Massachusetts), but I guess there aren't really any permanent
           | victories in life when you think about it.
        
         | foobarian wrote:
         | Wonder if this plant would be helpful for greening up deserts
         | or converting co2 to biomass. Apparently it doesn't even need
         | light!
        
       | fatnoah wrote:
       | It is a very tenacious plant. I had exactly one stalk grow to 3
       | feet in a mulched area of my yard. I didn't think too much about
       | it because I didn't know what it was and hadn't heard of it.
       | While testing a trial of a plant identification application, I
       | successfully identified it.
       | 
       | As someone loathe to use chemicals, I thought perhaps that the
       | tenacity of the plant was overhyped, so I simply pulled the stalk
       | out of the ground. Over the next several months, I'd notice 3-4
       | new stalks popping up each week over a roughly 15 foot radius
       | area. That continued through the next spring when I finally
       | decided enough was enough and got the glysophate.
       | 
       | From June through winter (I'm in the northeast US), I'd let a
       | plant grow for a week or two and then spray it with the
       | glysophate and leave the plant in place. I did this for the
       | entirety of the following year as well. Now, in year 3, I finally
       | have no more shoots popping up, and can't begin to imagine what
       | managing a true infestation looks like.
        
         | krunck wrote:
         | I had a situation similar to yours. I was able to eliminate the
         | single plant by chopping it out every time it popped up. No
         | glyphosate needed.
        
           | foobarian wrote:
           | At some point even highly invasive plants like JK have to
           | respect laws of thermodynamics. You get it eventually!
           | 
           | On that note, the dried knotweed stalks are fun to burn
           | because their bamboo-like segments are divided by a membrane
           | that seals them shut, so they pop quite satisfyingly. Our
           | kids were sad that they ran out of it at some point after a
           | while harvesting the stalks behind our yard.
        
         | zikduruqe wrote:
         | If it pops up again, eat it.
         | 
         | https://www.eattheweeds.com/japanese-knotweed-dreadable-edib...
        
       | Modified3019 wrote:
       | When you get to the point where you realize a herbicide might be
       | nice, but aren't set up for spraying or dealing with potential
       | drift (droplet size is important, a mist means chemical is
       | floating away to touch something you don't want), look into stem
       | injectors which is a common method to limit risk. Keep in mind
       | timing will be important though.
       | 
       | As always, take the PPE notice on the label seriously (sit down
       | and read the entire damn thing), and always wear chemical
       | resistant gloves and a splash guard for the face.
        
       | err4nt wrote:
       | It just occurred to me - we only call these 'invasive' not
       | because they invade nature, but because they invade the spaces we
       | as humans have carved into nature. If our presence wasn't there,
       | perhaps the natural ecosystem wouldn't have space or room for
       | some of these species to enter, but because of human activity, a
       | space is carved out for these other species to grow in, and
       | that's what causes us the stress.
       | 
       | Isn't it weird how we're so acutely aware of the effect of the
       | species that invade our space, but so ignorant so often of our
       | effect on the same spaces when we invade them?
       | 
       | I think I learned something valuable today chewing on this
       | article.
        
         | resizeitplz wrote:
         | Invasive species aren't 'invasive' for invading _human_ space.
         | They 're invasive for invading _other species_ space.
        
         | enlyth wrote:
         | The term "invasive species" never made sense to me. It just
         | means something can evolutionary outcompete other things,
         | because it is better at utilizing that environment.
         | 
         | Basically putting a label on things we don't like.
        
           | cmyr wrote:
           | This is definitely true, but there is a useful distinction
           | between the usual evolutionary competition between species in
           | an ecosystem and the very sharp situation of an ecologically
           | novel species being introduced into that ecosystem and out-
           | competing the incumbents, and 'invasive species' is the best
           | term we currently have for this second case.
        
           | ppseafield wrote:
           | We don't like it because it can cause widespread damage to
           | the ecosystem, not just to us. Life didn't evolve in a
           | vacuum, and the balance of natural ecosystems can be fragile.
           | 
           | > [Feral pigs] are invasive and cause millions of dollars in
           | agricultural damage each year, rooting and trampling through
           | a wide variety of crops. They prey on everything from
           | rodents, to deer, to endangered loggerhead sea turtles,
           | threatening to reduce the diversity of native species. They
           | disrupt habitats. They damage archaeological sites. They are
           | capable of transmitting diseases to domestic animals and
           | humans.
           | 
           | https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/feral-pigs-are-
           | inv...
           | 
           | > Interestingly, in their native range in Europe and Asia,
           | pigs do not cause as much ecological damage. In fact, some
           | studies indicate that they may modify habitat in important
           | ways for species that have evolved with them, such as frogs
           | and salamanders.
           | 
           | https://theconversation.com/feral-pigs-harm-wildlife-and-
           | bio...
        
           | raffraffraff wrote:
           | My wife read about an endangered butterfly called the Small
           | Blue. The female feeds exclusively on a plant called kidney
           | vetch. Isn't that crazy? One fucking plant! This isn't a
           | plant that you can buy in a garden center.
           | 
           | That's the magic about ecosystems. They develop over aeons,
           | and have intricate interdependencies. Many species are
           | extremely picky about how they mate, where they lay their
           | eggs, what they eat when they're larva, what they eat as
           | adults etc. If you wipe out a single plant, you could wipe
           | out an insect that exclusively feeds on it, which could wipe
           | out some other thing that feeds exclusively on that insect.
           | If an invasive species that threatens a single native
           | species, this isn't just "something we don't like", it can
           | cause a chain reaction of extinctions.
        
         | jasonpeacock wrote:
         | There are many natural ecosystems being wiped out by invasive
         | species that do not have human presence.
         | 
         | https://education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/invasive-s...
         | 
         | But humans are almost always the reason for the introduction of
         | invasive species either by accident or purpose.
        
       | fmajid wrote:
       | Here in the UK, it's considered incredibly bad news because it
       | destroys the foundations of houses, and is well-nigh impossible
       | to eradicate.
        
         | throw46365 wrote:
         | This is why when you see a house on rightmove that has heavy
         | plastic tarpaulin over a considerable patch of the garden, you
         | ask questions... Bit of an issue in some of the areas I've been
         | looking.
         | 
         | It is possible to kill it -- it's possibly easier to kill than
         | Horsetail/Mare's Tail, which spreads even faster at root level
         | and is very difficult to remove, but thankfully does not damage
         | buildings.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-06-06 23:02 UTC)