[HN Gopher] Simple equation predicts the shapes of carbon-captur...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Simple equation predicts the shapes of carbon-capturing wetlands
        
       Author : mgl
       Score  : 45 points
       Date   : 2024-06-02 12:21 UTC (10 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.quantamagazine.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.quantamagazine.org)
        
       | dukeofdoom wrote:
       | Everyone should kayak in a wetland at least once in their life.
       | It's like going to another world...can recommend.
        
         | datameta wrote:
         | I'm not sure if you're referring to peat bogs, which is a more
         | apt term for the title. I do however agree, northeastern
         | marshlands are an interesting place of biodiversity - I'd like
         | to visit the Everglades some day.
        
           | CapitalistCartr wrote:
           | The Everglades are not pleasant. Vast swarms of mosquitoes
           | decend on any people like a black cloud. They're a vast, flat
           | grassland (about 75 miles across and more N-S) full of
           | gators, snakes (including rattlers, water moccasins, cotton
           | mouths, boas, anacondas), gators, Florida panthers, gators,
           | bears, gators. And did I mention crawling with gators?
        
             | tekla wrote:
             | Who are you, Archer?
        
             | baerrie wrote:
             | I went kayaking through the everglades and despite all that
             | it was an incredible experience. Sidling up to an alligator
             | the length of the kayak was a particular highlight
        
       | zeckalpha wrote:
       | A Poisson!
        
       | jey wrote:
       | So what's the equation? Surprised they didn't share it given that
       | it's "simple". The paper seems to be paywalled without any
       | preprints online that I could find easily[1].
       | 
       | https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=41501709982626263...
        
         | edflsafoiewq wrote:
         | I really don't get who Quanta's audience is. They write all
         | these articles about, like, recent technical advances in
         | mathematical research, but for an audience that apparently
         | can't ever be forced to look at, God forbid, an equation.
        
           | magicalhippo wrote:
           | I read a lot of Scientific American when I was a young
           | teenager. Really loved science, but wouldn't have had enough
           | of a background to understand differential equations and
           | such.
           | 
           | So I've always imagined a similar target audience for Quanta.
           | People who like science but lack any strong math background.
           | Might be a plumber, might be a teenager.
        
           | graycat wrote:
           | (1) For the audience, yup, uh, _curiosity_ is a likely
           | ingredient.
           | 
           | (2) For the _purpose_ , think of the real _cause_ , James
           | Simons and his background, e.g., in
           | 
           | May 10, 2024, _Remembering the Life and Careers of Jim
           | Simons_ , By Thomas Sumner
           | 
           | at
           | 
           | https://www.simonsfoundation.org/2024/05/10/remembering-
           | the-...
           | 
           | So, yup, there is _Quanta_ , but more advanced there is the
           | Web site of that article.
           | 
           | For more, there is, as I recall, what he has done with the
           | old NYC Flatiron building. Then there are other science/math
           | promotion efforts.
           | 
           | (3) For the article mentioned in the OP, uh, just say that it
           | is "unusual" for _Quanta_.
           | 
           | One aspect to like: There's a lot of junk in society and on
           | the Internet, but _Quanta_ is not part of it.
        
         | magicalhippo wrote:
         | Well I mean Einsteins equations[1] of General Relativity are in
         | some sense "simple".
         | 
         | I imagine they mean "simple" in a similar sense, given that at
         | least one of the previous "too simple" models[2] involves
         | repeatedly solving a Laplace equation numerically to search for
         | a valid solution.
         | 
         | But yeah, certainly would be nice to include it when you got a
         | title like that.
         | 
         | [1]:
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein_field_equations#Mathe...
         | 
         | [2]: https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/114887
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-06-02 23:01 UTC)