[HN Gopher] Carpenter's AirTags help uncover 'massive' case of s...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Carpenter's AirTags help uncover 'massive' case of stolen tools in
       Maryland
        
       Author : williamsmj
       Score  : 123 points
       Date   : 2024-05-31 14:12 UTC (8 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.washingtonpost.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.washingtonpost.com)
        
       | bookofjoe wrote:
       | https://archive.ph/ec54N
        
       | bhouston wrote:
       | A good Hollywood caper story would end with this being ultimately
       | engineered by the tool vendors themselves in order to stimulate
       | more demand for their goods.
        
         | ProllyInfamous wrote:
         | This is _exactly_ what I was thinking, because a real theft
         | ring wouldn 't be sitting on so much unsold inventory... what
         | if it ends up being the dealer reps attempting higher
         | commissions?
         | 
         | ----
         | 
         | As a retired tradesman (IBEW), discovering your tools have been
         | stolen is "up there" in gut-wrenching professional experiences.
         | My good luck meant most items stolen from me were probably just
         | "walk aways" [leant out, never returned]. Last time my work
         | truck was burglarized, they only stole personal effects
         | (leaving behind thousands in rechargeables).
        
         | brookst wrote:
         | That would be a good Hollywood ending. Sadly the world has
         | become so credulous that people probably believe nutty
         | conspiracy theories like that today.
         | 
         | When two seconds of thought would make anyone realize that the
         | conspiracy story is insane: professionals working at a company
         | literally paying for criminal acts targeting their own
         | customers, in support of a sales increase they could never get
         | credit for, and which would bankrupt the company overnight if
         | it ever came to light.
         | 
         | But critical thinking seems nearly extinct, and the thrill of
         | having _figured it all out_ seems irresistible.
        
           | brailsafe wrote:
           | Compared to some stuff that actually seems to happen, the
           | only leap of imagination I see here is that it would bankrupt
           | the company overnight, or that it would matter to the people
           | involved.
           | 
           | Not to say that it's even remotely _likely_ , but all you
           | need is for someone with a vested interest to find a cost
           | effective way to boost sales. Depending on how desperate
           | people and the broader economy are, and how little people
           | care about risk, it's not exactly that farfetched that people
           | will go to insane measures. People will try and pull off
           | ridiculous schemes/crines for relatively small amounts of
           | cash or even social media points and shoulder huge amounts of
           | risk, and then turn around and buy nonsense with it, that's
           | just America.
           | 
           | The person stealing doesn't need to know who hired them,
           | nobody else at the company needs to know did the hiring,
           | shareholders are happy.
        
             | Aloisius wrote:
             | _> The person stealing doesn 't need to know who hired
             | them_
             | 
             | I think you're _vastly_ underestimating how difficult it is
             | to anonymously recruit and pay thousands of thieves from
             | all over the country to target one particular brand _and_
             | ensure they actually do the job.
             | 
             |  _Maybe_ one could offer some sort of buy-back program to
             | maybe induce this behavior, but that would be quite
             | expensive.
        
           | axus wrote:
           | It's really amazing when it actually happens though:
           | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ENl3eh1o-SM
           | 
           | https://asia.nikkei.com/Opinion/Japan-s-Bigmotor-scandal-
           | is-...
        
       | intrasight wrote:
       | Wow! That is a lot of tools.
        
       | cmclaughlin wrote:
       | The article states...
       | 
       | Though none of the prolific thieves has been arrested yet, Der
       | said, "we are investigating several suspects for their roles in
       | this massive theft scheme and expect charges soon."
       | 
       | I wonder who owns and/or rents that warehouse...
        
       | k2enemy wrote:
       | That is a huge inventory. How do stolen tools get fenced? Sent
       | abroad? Craigslist and FB marketplace? I've bought some used
       | tools from online classifieds, but it always seems to be a
       | homeowner or business owner selling one or two things.
        
         | INTPenis wrote:
         | I have no idea but I remember the Sopranos episode where
         | Christopher's father in law owns a hardware store and sells
         | fenced goods out of it.
         | 
         | It's not hard, but the owner can get done for it of course.
        
           | papercrane wrote:
           | That seems like the mostly likely way, at least for the new
           | items stolen from retail. Trying to sell on craiglist/FB
           | marketplace doesn't seem like it would scale. An unscrupulous
           | hardware store owner could mix the stolen goods in with their
           | stock to pad their margins. The tools could also be used as
           | stock for 3rd party seller on Amazon.
        
             | dylan604 wrote:
             | The Amazon marketplace seller is what I thought would be
             | the most used route. Selling overseas would require
             | hardware changes with the plugs I would think which would
             | probably not be something they're willing to do. Unless
             | it's common to use adapters or have people make that mode
             | themselves as part of the "but it was cheap"???
             | 
             | Amazon marketplace is one of the best fences of all time.
        
               | MisterTea wrote:
               | > Selling overseas would require hardware changes with
               | the plugs
               | 
               | Canada, Mexico, Guatemala, Costa Rica, Colombia,
               | Venezuela, and a few other Central/South American
               | countries can plug these tools right into the wall.
        
               | dylan604 wrote:
               | For whatever reasons, my mind equates overseas with
               | Europe and even Eastern Europe more specifically when it
               | comes to trading in illicit wares. In my mind, any where
               | in the Americas just isn't overseas.
               | 
               | But you are absolutely right in that a lot of stolen
               | items do end up in that part of the world.
        
               | closewith wrote:
               | None of those countries are overseas from the US.
               | 
               | Maybe there's a case to be made for Venuzeuela and
               | Colombia because of the Darien Gap, but that's pushing
               | it.
        
             | ornornor wrote:
             | Amazon comingled inventory would be the perfect vehicle for
             | the perfect crime. They can't even tell who shipped what,
             | it's basically like a cryptocurrency tumbler but for real
             | world goods!
        
               | NegativeLatency wrote:
               | In fact it already is, lots of stuff is stolen and sold
               | this way.
        
           | bredren wrote:
           | I just read (by audiobook) two great fiction works by Colson
           | Whitehead that include some of these ideas, Crook Manifesto
           | then is prequel Harlem Shuffle.
           | 
           | Great stuff.
        
         | roflchoppa wrote:
         | Probably a mix of online and FB. Our local flea market has
         | stuff tables of tools like this. Some tools are sold for like
         | half the price.
         | 
         | Maybe there is some organization to it, one wear house,
         | multiple people selling.
        
         | kube-system wrote:
         | Every flea market I have ever been to in my life always has
         | some guy with a huge amount of lightly used and heavily
         | assorted high-dollar power tools.
         | 
         | Before Home Depot started putting tools in cages, I used to see
         | a lot of craigslist/marketplace/etc postings for brand new and
         | unopened tools, posted at amazing prices.
        
           | jeffbee wrote:
           | Yeah, and then people act like the flea market is some
           | precious cornerstone of the local culture. In my city there
           | is a flea market that has dozens of freshly stolen bikes
           | every week. There's a fund where people buy back the bikes
           | and reunite them with their owners. Unfortunately, there's no
           | fund supporting violence against these bike thieves.
        
             | consumer451 wrote:
             | Violence for property crime is a bit 18th century, no?
             | 
             | I've been robbed, and wanted to inflict violence in the
             | heat of the moment, but cooler heads... prison would be
             | fine, and you know, civilized.
        
               | throwup238 wrote:
               | Prison in the US is hardly civilized.
        
         | MisterTea wrote:
         | A former coworker came to the USA from Chile with a degree in
         | Molecular Biology but couldn't find work in that field because
         | of his language barrier. Instead he got a shitty job and build
         | a small export company that sold used appliances and other
         | goods from the USA to Chile. A big chunk were things like air
         | conditioners, refrigerators, and washing machines. Even though
         | Chile is a 50Hz 220V country 60Hz stuff will run off a
         | transformer though sub-optimally which for most people is
         | better than nothing. BUT he also found a more lucrative path by
         | selling gun parts (mostly ammo parts like shell casings) hidden
         | within said appliances. So there is an international market for
         | this kind of stuff.
        
         | wnevets wrote:
         | > That is a huge inventory. How do stolen tools get fenced?
         | 
         | Sold in bulk to someone overseas is my theory, way too much
         | effort and risk selling this stuff piecemeal online or locally.
         | You can see something similar happening with stolen cars in the
         | US. [1]
         | 
         | [1] https://abc7ny.com/stolen-cars-tri-state-port-of-newark-
         | west...
        
         | gwbas1c wrote:
         | Makes me wonder if they were having trouble selling? It seems
         | "poor business" to let stolen items sit for up to a decade.
        
         | duxup wrote:
         | From the article they note that some of the things they found
         | were VERY old, sounds strange but maybe they hadn't gotten to
         | that part / were not able to move that much stuff:
         | 
         | >Some were stolen as long ago as 2014
         | 
         | Weird situation near me, some local folks where stealing
         | construction stuff were found not far from me and ... they
         | found everything stolen over the course of a few years. If a
         | generator and some tools were taken, there they were, all of
         | them together. It appeared they straight up had no plan /
         | active effort to sell everything.
        
       | educasean wrote:
       | It required the victim to take matters into his own hands and
       | invest inyo buying multiple AirTags in order to sort out the
       | burglary. I wonder how many of these burglary cases just sat
       | there gathering dust and for how long.
        
         | duxup wrote:
         | I mean let's say tools vanish from a job site. That's not a
         | heavily evidence laden situation. Not like there will be muddy
         | tracks to the warehouse.
        
       | rdtsc wrote:
       | > He called police, who got a search warrant
       | 
       | Kind of sad, that I was surprised they did that. It's definitely
       | a local thing. I'd expect the police to shrug, and say it's too
       | bad, just file a report to use for insurance.
       | 
       | I remember people saying "so what if you have tags, police won't
       | do anything and you shouldn't be confronting thieves anyway".
       | 
       | Apple, on the other hand, is also explicit about tags not to be
       | used as an anti-theft device. The word "theft" doesn't appear
       | even once on https://www.apple.com/airtag. It would be
       | interesting if they still released a puff piece as a response:
       | "Oh look, a carpenter `found` his tools in the next state, in a
       | warehouse along with other tools. We don't know how they ended up
       | there, but isn't that great?"
        
         | tamimio wrote:
         | My guess is the carpenter knows someone that knows someone in
         | the police department that they actually did something, but in
         | a normal situation, definitely they won't bother.
        
           | FireBeyond wrote:
           | Yeah, I pointed the police to someone who was selling fifty
           | plus obviously stolen MacBooks and iPhones, including mine
           | (all described as "locked", "no charger, no accessories",
           | etc., etc.) and the could not possibly care less.
           | 
           | "He probably was not the one who stole them."
           | 
           | "Isn't it still a crime to sell stolen goods?"
           | 
           | "Shrug."
        
             | ToucanLoucan wrote:
             | The roots of police departments are the paid security
             | forces of business owners, and their values as
             | organizations reflect this. Business owners worked with
             | local governments to create police departments to socialize
             | some of the cost of securing their private property; their
             | rented homes, their warehouses, their stores. And they
             | reflect this to this day.
             | 
             | Individual property crime doesn't mean shit. A criminal can
             | sell _your_ Macbook if they like, but if they steal from
             | Apple itself? Oh man there will be hell to pay.
        
               | nickff wrote:
               | Where did you get this idea about the origins of police?
               | It doesn't agree with the history on Wikipedia, or my
               | understanding of their origin (having more to do with
               | rulers maintaining order). Corporations, and what you
               | call 'businesses' are a very modern concept, long
               | predated by rulers, courts, and police.
               | 
               | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Police
        
               | mingus88 wrote:
               | OP's description of police sounds very similar to the
               | history of the Pinkerton organization in the U.S.
               | 
               | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pinkerton_(detective_agen
               | cy)
               | 
               | Fast forward to today and it's very common for private
               | security to be composed of ex-cops and former military,
               | creating a very fluid dynamic of all policing as a
               | paramilitary organization in support of capitalism.
        
               | boomboomsubban wrote:
               | From your link
               | 
               | >The first example of a statutory police force in the
               | world was probably the High Constables of Edinburgh,
               | formed in 1611 to police the streets of Edinburgh, then
               | part of the Kingdom of Scotland. The constables, of whom
               | half were merchants and half were craftsmen, were charged
               | with enforcing 16 regulations relating to curfews,
               | weapons, and theft.
               | 
               | That sounds a lot like businesses working with government
               | to secure their property.
        
               | nickff wrote:
               | Those 'statutory police' were predated by others by
               | thousands of years, and it seems more like the king
               | enlisted business owners to enforce the king's laws in
               | the city than 'paid security forces of business owners'.
        
               | nick238 wrote:
               | Maybe in Europe that's the case. In the US, law
               | enforcement has its roots in slave patrols.
               | 
               | https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2020/07/20/the-
               | invention-...
        
               | ljf wrote:
               | I went to read a bit more about this - as this was
               | something I was only vaguely aware of:
               | https://theconversation.com/the-racist-roots-of-american-
               | pol...
               | 
               | It seems there were police in the States before the Slave
               | Patrols though.
        
               | ToucanLoucan wrote:
               | What do you think Slave Patrols were...? Security to
               | enforce private property. Slaves were property. Runaway
               | slaves might be property that stole itself, effectively,
               | but it's the same thing.
               | 
               | And also, the slave patrol link has much stronger ties in
               | the southern states where slavery was more prominent.
               | That's not to say it didn't happen in the north, of
               | course it did, but it happened more in the south, the
               | south's economy was near dependent upon both the slave
               | trade and the massive amounts of free-at-point-of-use
               | human labor that supplemented their agricultural
               | industries. That's why the civil war happened and don't
               | start with me about how it wasn't about slavery, the
               | confederate constitution lays out in black and white
               | (beige?) that it was absolutely, definitely about
               | slavery. The south's economy would've utterly collapsed
               | with total abolition.
        
               | jjmarr wrote:
               | A common good like security should be socialized because
               | the alternative is multiple independent groups enforcing
               | property rights, and when they start to conflict, you get
               | a civil war won by the person who spent the most on
               | security.
               | 
               | The idea that police are inherently corrupt because they
               | developed from paid security forces ignores that the very
               | process of development is what enshrined the rule of law
               | over power.
        
               | ToucanLoucan wrote:
               | I don't disagree that security should be a socialized
               | good, it's a good idea. That doesn't change the fact that
               | police in the United States and elsewhere were formed in
               | the basis of law not to protect _people_ but to protect
               | _property._
               | 
               | Even today courts have ruled that police are under no
               | obligation to protect civilians from direct, inevitable
               | harm. They are not there to protect you, they are there
               | to protect "the peace" which can be fucking anything.
        
               | nicoburns wrote:
               | > police in the United States and elsewhere were formed
               | in the basis of law not to protect people but to protect
               | property.
               | 
               | Be as that may (and as shitty as that is), this thread is
               | about police forces utterly failing to protect property
               | (or even attempt to).
        
               | ToucanLoucan wrote:
               | Well right, my point is the damaged party is in the wrong
               | class. That's why it's not being resolved.
        
               | FireBeyond wrote:
               | > Even today courts have ruled that police are under no
               | obligation to protect civilians
               | 
               | Yeah, LAPD's "protect and serve" was dreamed up by the
               | City's marketing arm in the 1950s.
               | 
               | And those rulings have come because PDs have stood up and
               | said "We have no obligation to prevent crime or protect
               | people" and the courts have said, "Yup, you're right."
        
               | defen wrote:
               | > A criminal can sell your Macbook if they like, but if
               | they steal from Apple itself? Oh man there will be hell
               | to pay.
               | 
               | Where do you get the idea that there will be "hell to
               | pay" if you steal from Apple itself? People regularly run
               | out of Apple stores with tens of thousands of dollars
               | worth of merchandise and never get caught.
        
               | cwmma wrote:
               | There is an amount of theft that apple is OK with because
               | preventing it would hurt sales and occasional theift of
               | product they can easily brick is certainly under that
               | limit, plus there is likelyreporting biases, as it's
               | likely you've seen videos of it happening but when there
               | are arrests or recoverys you havn't seen those reports.
        
               | google234123 wrote:
               | This is a regressive and defeatist attitude. We actually
               | don't have to tolerate this in a society- those engaging
               | in it should be punished and forcibly removed if they
               | aren't able to change.
        
               | ToucanLoucan wrote:
               | Evidence has shown that punitive penalties for crime do
               | not affect crime rates.
        
         | doctoboggan wrote:
         | I am also surprised they got a warrant based on AirTag data,
         | especially with stories like this:
         | 
         | https://www.cnn.com/2024/03/08/us/denver-police-raid-wrong-h...
         | 
         | I suspect there has to be more evidence than just the AirTag,
         | but it is possible that the police used that tip to kick off an
         | investigation that ultimately led to the warrant and search. Or
         | they already started building a case. Based off the estimated
         | 15,000 stolen tools, this theft ring was in the millions of
         | dollars and was quite possibly already on their radar.
        
           | duxup wrote:
           | Warrant doesn't mean they had to go all storm trooper in that
           | situation either, that would lower the risks.
           | 
           | I suspect just one more data point would be pretty easy to
           | manage, peek in a window, or even have the dude drive around
           | the facility and see if the location was consistently
           | reporting.
        
         | tantalor wrote:
         | I guess tracing the stolen property to a huge storage facility
         | vs house makes a big difference to the district attorney.
         | 
         | Big time vs. small beans
        
         | GeekyBear wrote:
         | I think it's dependent on the local government.
         | 
         | There are cities that have gotten proactive and fought against
         | high car theft rates by handing out free Bluetooth trackers to
         | the public and having people hide them in their car.
        
         | bagels wrote:
         | It's more sad that your expectations would be met in most
         | places.
        
         | nytesky wrote:
         | Maybe they don't advertise AirTags as antitheft, but this Apple
         | Ad had the owners sleuthing after laptop thieves via Apple
         | device tracking
         | 
         | https://youtu.be/asKvPLmjxXY?si=bkHzT42gSzhjDWqE
        
         | nashashmi wrote:
         | Also not to be used for tracking someone you are stalking.
        
         | dmitrygr wrote:
         | "OK, I have a gun and I'll go get my stuff myself" is not
         | illegal to say and 100% gets police to show up. Source: tried
         | it more than once
        
           | rdtsc wrote:
           | Not bad strategy. Though I can see, depending on their
           | disposition them turning against you. "Oh, you have gun?
           | Better not reach for it! Is it registered, where is it?".
           | They could turn into assholes real fast if they feel like
           | you're trying to force them to do something.
        
           | m463 wrote:
           | some of that depends on the state/jurisdiction you're in.
           | 
           | I think in texas you can defend your self/loved ones/property
           | with a gun.
           | 
           | In california, you can take a gun to the target range (in
           | your trunk, unloaded). Not sure what else you can use a gun
           | for except maybe get in trouble.
        
             | fragmede wrote:
             | California's not happy about guns existing, but if you're
             | being attacked in your home, there are some limited carve
             | outs.
        
           | vundercind wrote:
           | The single case of theft I personally know about ever being
           | acted on by the police, was when a business owner spotted the
           | van that'd been present at burglaries of his business and
           | several others (several of them had footage of the van, the
           | thieves, and legible shots of the license plate--cops didn't
           | care), called the police to report it, and, when they _still_
           | acted reluctant to do anything, said "you better come down
           | here or I'll confront them myself".
           | 
           | I assume what got them to show up was that they didn't want
           | the bad press if the dude got shot.
        
         | PointyDog wrote:
         | I lived in Howard County for a year. With the combination of
         | county income tax and affluent property taxes, every service
         | was exceptionally well funded.
         | 
         | Having lived in Mountain View & Sunnyvale, CA as well for a
         | decade my experience was Howard County itself had quicker and
         | better services than those cities.
         | 
         | It doesn't surprise me at all that their police department is
         | competent and helpful.
        
           | 1024core wrote:
           | You will find similar pockets of responsive police in areas
           | like Piedmont (in Oakland), Atherton, Hillsborough, etc.
        
           | hangonhn wrote:
           | My buddy got his bike stolen in Mountain View. Not only did
           | the police find his bike they also arrested the thief.
           | 
           | Another buddy was woken up one night by a drunken stranger
           | pounding on his door. He called the MVPD and within 5 minutes
           | 3 squad cars showed up.
           | 
           | I used to live in Dallas. One night an entire floor of cars
           | parked in my apartment garage was broken into. I called the
           | police and reported it. Then I asked when they're coming and
           | if I should stick around to wait for them. They told me
           | they're not coming. The next night, the thieves returned and
           | broke into all the cars on the next garage level.
           | 
           | Funding really matters. Mountain View is one of the handful
           | of cities in the country with a triple-A municipal bond
           | rating.
        
             | AceJohnny2 wrote:
             | > _Mountain View is one of the handful of cities in the
             | country with a triple-A municipal bond rating._
             | 
             | Having Google headquartered there probably helped their
             | finances.
        
         | burningChrome wrote:
         | >> Kind of sad, that I was surprised they did that. It's
         | definitely a local thing. I'd expect the police to shrug, and
         | say it's too bad, just file a report to use for insurance.
         | 
         | Two years ago, WhistlinDiesel youtuber used trail camera's and
         | his air tags to bust his neighbors stealing from him. It took a
         | few calls, but he got it done. He was smart and used the cops
         | as mediators and didn't just go over and start yelling at the
         | dude to get his stuff back.
         | 
         | https://youtu.be/rnFOWvAAapU?si=lqkQBFijR3U2UdSJ
        
         | diogenescynic wrote:
         | In California, they definitely wouldn't do anything.
        
       | dylan604 wrote:
       | The logistics of this is kind of interesting to me. Even if each
       | of the victims reported them to the police, the value of the
       | items from each theft wouldn't add up to much in the grand scheme
       | of things. Construction equipment might raise more of an eyebrow,
       | but the hand tools would even be noticed. Unless...someone was
       | collecting all of those reports and analyzing them bigData style,
       | o wait, we're talking about the police here.
       | 
       | Of course it was a civilian victim tired of the cops being unable
       | to do anything. I say unable vs unwilling even though I'd also
       | suggest unwilling, but I digress. It's the kind of theft ring
       | that would just not motivate anyone to look at anything. I
       | wouldn't be surprised to see that this has been going on for a
       | really long time. It's kind of genius
        
         | chucksta wrote:
         | > Even if each of the victims reported them to the police, the
         | value of the items from each theft wouldn't add up to much in
         | the grand scheme of things.
         | 
         | I don't think you know how expensive commercial power tools and
         | accessories are.. They cited 15k items with a range of 3-5
         | million. At 3 million that's $200 an item. Hardly peanuts.
         | 
         | The article also says the tools likely came from a variety of
         | sources
        
           | dylan604 wrote:
           | I don't think you know anything about me to claim I don't
           | know the value of tools commercial or not. I have quite the
           | collection, come from a family of construction where my
           | grandfather was a custom cabinet maker where I grew up in his
           | woodshop. It's amazing how people just assume so wildly
           | wrong.
           | 
           | Even at $200, that doesn't even qualify as anything more than
           | a misdemeanor. The police are just not going to care if the
           | victim even bother reporting it. I've had my battery powered
           | lawn equipment stolen within the time it took me to push my
           | mower to the front of the house and then walk back to the
           | garage to grab the now stolen items. Of course I didn't
           | report it to the police. Why would I waste my time as well as
           | theirs? I even specifically qualified some equipment like
           | construction equipment would potentially raise an eyebrow
           | implying their value is more than my weekend warrior power
           | tools.
           | 
           | Talking about totally being so far off base, and missing the
           | point that you even attempt to use math to get to. However,
           | even your math totally misses the point. If you think $200
           | gets the police excited, you are grossly putting too much
           | faith in the system. It doesn't matter at all that somebody
           | else thinks $200 is hardly peanuts. It doesn't move the
           | needle at all in motivating someone doing some investigating.
           | That is the point I was making. It's the perfect crime to run
           | for a long time as even if it is reported, nobody is going to
           | do anything about it.
        
           | kube-system wrote:
           | It's all relative. The above commenter was comparing to
           | construction equipment.
           | 
           | https://www.deere.com/en/loaders/skid-steers/334-p-skid-
           | stee...
        
           | BobaFloutist wrote:
           | I don't think the police are going to be very interested in a
           | random $200 theft.
        
         | tantalor wrote:
         | > tired of the cops being unable to do anything
         | 
         | The cops literally raided the place when it was reported
        
           | dylan604 wrote:
           | Because they were specifically shown the guy's items were
           | there. They didn't find it for him. They took the data
           | provided, asked for a warrant, and then proceeded from there.
           | How is that confusing? It's not like they were expecting to
           | find what they did. I'm actually surprised they even did
           | that. There are lots of stories of people showing the police
           | their Find It showing their device at a specific location and
           | doing not a damn thing with that information.
        
       | tamimio wrote:
       | Did the carpenter alter the tags?! Afaik they beep sounds around
       | other unpaired iphones, additionally, using apps like AirGuard
       | can alarm you about such ones.
        
         | mcpherrinm wrote:
         | If they were in a storage unit, the thief may not have stuck
         | around long enough to notice. And it sounds like this happened
         | pretty soon after theft, so they wouldn't have started to beep.
        
         | bagels wrote:
         | It takes 3 minutes to remove the speaker. There are great
         | tutorials on youtube. I've only purchased airtags for use as
         | theft recovery, and if they beep it defeats the purpose.
        
           | swah wrote:
           | I also have one on a office key (useful, it vanishes every
           | few months), umbrella (useful, its left in restaurants and
           | vanishes in the car trunk), laptop bag (useless so far, I
           | never forget about it), and car (waiting for it to be robbed
           | but its old)
        
           | gnicholas wrote:
           | Don't iPhones pop up notifications if there's an AirTag that
           | doesn't belong to you following you around?
        
         | duxup wrote:
         | Did the thieves bring their phone with them to steal from
         | numerous job sites as far back as 2014?
         | 
         | That would seem like a poor choice. If the same thieves are
         | taking everything they might be "smart" enough to NOT bring a
         | personal tracking device with them.
        
       | kstrauser wrote:
       | "But AirTags aren't for finding stolen things!", someone asserts
       | every time someone mentions wanting to use AirTags for finding
       | stolen things.
        
         | TimeBearingDown wrote:
         | It's not optimal for that purpose due to the anti-stalking
         | features, but it's better than nothing.
        
         | supportengineer wrote:
         | There has to be a shady operator somewhere with no scruples,
         | who sees the market demand for this use-case.
        
           | throwanem wrote:
           | GPS trackers with SIM slots and cell radios have been
           | available for ages, and easily enough found for purchase that
           | I don't think mentioning them here adds meaningful risk.
           | AirTags distinguish on Apple's UI polish - including the care
           | for stalking mitigation - and platform integration, rather
           | than their basic functionality.
        
           | jkestner wrote:
           | Dogcow the Bounty Hunter
        
         | LeoPanthera wrote:
         | And q-tips aren't for cleaning ears, but what you gonna do.
        
           | kstrauser wrote:
           | Oh, I totally use them for the same thing. It's more that
           | whenever this comes up, some people inevitably go off on
           | tangents about how that's not what AirTags are used for, and
           | we're crazy for using them for this (incredibly obvious)
           | application.
        
           | mattm wrote:
           | What are they used for?
        
       | wingspar wrote:
       | Off topic, but reminds me of the lost hunting dog whose tracking
       | collar was found in a big gator, along with a lot of other
       | collars.
       | 
       | Solved a long running 'lost hunting dog' mystery.
       | 
       | https://www.spokesman.com/stories/1995/aug/29/dogs-tracked-d...
        
         | dolmen wrote:
         | Totally on topic.
        
       | jhund wrote:
       | In the video that shows the stolen tools in the warehouse, there
       | are hardly any Ryobi tools (HomeDepot's cheap tool brand). This
       | is in stark contrast to many of the recent woodworking videos on
       | Youtube that feature craftspeople using Ryobi tools (without
       | explicitly mentioning an HD sponsorship). The thieves know a good
       | tool, and HD is trying to fool the rest of us that their Ryobi
       | tools are any good.
        
         | habosa wrote:
         | Almost nobody think Ryobi is the best, and almost everybody
         | agrees they're plenty good for a non-professional toolkit.
        
         | CornishPasty wrote:
         | FYI. Ryobi has nothing to do with Home Depot. It's owned by a
         | Hong Kong power tool manufacturer, and used to be Japanese (in
         | fact, Ryobi still exists as a tool manufacturer, just not the
         | power tool division)
         | 
         | Probably the reason they're not in any of the hauls is because
         | they have a reputation for not being very good, and are harder
         | to sell/fence...
        
         | hfe wrote:
         | What is the brand with the best reputation these days?
        
           | midtake wrote:
           | Tools are weird like text editors where people get religious
           | about some brands over others. But if your hustle is fencing
           | the most reputable and easy-to-move tools, you would probably
           | want to acquire the standard ones you see in Home Depot and
           | Lowe's, such as Dewalt, Milwaukee, Craftsman, etc.
           | Reputation-wise they're all about the same. Personally I like
           | Makita.
        
           | rocqua wrote:
           | Milwaukee seems to have a strong reputation. in Europe,
           | mafell too.
        
           | NegativeLatency wrote:
           | Pick the color you like best of the reputable manufactures.
        
             | anthomtb wrote:
             | I spent hours researching the various pro-sumer level
             | brands when upgrading my tool collection this winter. And
             | settled on Milwaukee. Because red. Ok fine, their track saw
             | played a part. But mostly red.
        
         | xyst wrote:
         | If you are a diyer that needs it for maybe 1-2 jobs a year,
         | ryobi is usually not a bad choice.
         | 
         | Personally, I stick with DeWalt because I like quality even
         | though I fall under the "diyer" category. This impact driver
         | has survived 5-6 moves, at least a handful of projects across a
         | few years, and it's still working as if I just picked it up
         | from the store. Haven't had to do any maintenance or repairs.
         | 
         | One of the cheaper harbor freight or off brand power tools I
         | picked up many years ago lasted at most 1-2 yrs with only a few
         | projects. Which is the reason I started investing in higher
         | quality (prefer dewalt, but will buy Milwaukee).
        
       | m463 wrote:
       | > Though none of the prolific thieves has been arrested yet,
       | 
       | why would they announce this without someone in custody?
        
         | elicash wrote:
         | Either they ran into a wall investigating and needed public
         | help, or to get victims back what was stolen? Or, it says they
         | expect charges soon, so maybe they waited until the
         | investigation was over.
         | 
         | Just a guess, though.
        
       | ipsum2 wrote:
       | The thieves would've gotten away with it if they had iPhones.
       | They would receive notification saying an airtag was traveling
       | with them.
        
         | bluefirebrand wrote:
         | Which has a benefit of alerting you if a stalker has planted an
         | airtag on you or your car or something
        
       | exabrial wrote:
       | Lol on hacker news i was blasted for suggesting the primary use
       | of air tags was recovering stolen goods. Ah last laugh feels good
       | once in awhile.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-05-31 23:01 UTC)