[HN Gopher] Is Target selling its excess inventory on eBay and P...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Is Target selling its excess inventory on eBay and Poshmark?
        
       Author : pavel_lishin
       Score  : 46 points
       Date   : 2024-05-30 21:12 UTC (1 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.modernretail.co)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.modernretail.co)
        
       | daveguy wrote:
       | > A Target spokesperson confirmed to Modern Retail that the
       | company that runs the Bullseye Deals account does buy salvage
       | merchandise from Target and sells it.
        
         | antiterra wrote:
         | You can buy Target return/overstock pallets at auction, and a
         | deals account likely just resells that. Target doesn't have to
         | deal with it on an item level at that point.
        
           | dawnerd wrote:
           | Target does have some really restrictive rules on those
           | pallets however that Bullseye deals doesn't seem to follow so
           | they have either some form of an agreement in place where
           | they don't have to or they're just a spinoff totally-not-
           | target corp.
        
             | pavel_lishin wrote:
             | What are those rules?
        
         | rootusrootus wrote:
         | Heck, calling it "Bullseye Deals" is a big giveaway by itself.
        
       | datadrivenangel wrote:
       | Per Betteridge's law, no.
        
         | umeshunni wrote:
         | A rare exception here:
         | 
         | > A Target spokesperson confirmed to Modern Retail that the
         | company that runs the Bullseye Deals account does buy salvage
         | merchandise from Target and sells it.
         | 
         | > Target doesn't control this Bullseye Deals inventory, but it
         | is aware that its reverse logistics partner is doing this.
        
           | antiterra wrote:
           | So, it's still no. They sell to a third-party company and
           | forget about it.
        
             | LeifCarrotson wrote:
             | What's the difference between selling exclusively to a
             | third party (against whom they don't enforce their
             | trademark) who buys exclusively from them, and actually
             | answering the headline with "yes"?
             | 
             | I understand there's a legal distinction, but there's so
             | little practical difference that you'd be hard pressed to
             | explain the distinction to a layperson.
             | 
             | Unless maybe you got hurt by a defective item and tried to
             | sue Target for damages. I assume this scheme is intended to
             | insulate Target from that possibility, their lawyers would
             | argue that you'd have to sue Bullseye Deals, LLC which has
             | negligible assets, not their multi-billion-dollar
             | corporation..
        
               | cqqxo4zV46cp wrote:
               | I could explain that to a layperson in one sentence. I
               | think you're giving yourself a little too much credit for
               | understanding this. How are _you_ not a layperson here?
               | Techie transferable expertise fallacy.
        
           | quickthrowman wrote:
           | How is this an exception? It's an independent company buying
           | merchandise from Target. Target has no ownership stake.
        
         | adolph wrote:
         | I hadn't thought out the reasoning behind Betteridge before,
         | the highlighted portion below rounds out the law's method of
         | action.
         | 
         | "Betteridge's law of headlines is an adage that states: 'Any
         | headline that ends in a question mark can be answered by the
         | word no.' It is named after Ian Betteridge, a British
         | technology journalist . . . . It is based on the assumption
         | that _if the publishers were confident that the answer was yes,
         | they would have presented it as an assertion; by presenting it
         | as a question, they are not accountable_ for whether it is
         | correct or not. "
         | 
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridge's_law_of_headlines
        
       | mgaunard wrote:
       | No, but people who buy from Target do.
        
       | nightfly wrote:
       | Goodwill too
        
       | crazygringo wrote:
       | Tons of big-box and department stores do this. It's not just
       | Target.
       | 
       | Where do you think all those "open box" items on eBay come from,
       | from sellers with 50,000 reviews? When a single seller has 18
       | Logitech mice of the exact same model, and won't show you photos
       | of the one you'll receive, but guarantee that it's functional and
       | has no major cosmetic damage?
       | 
       | They buy pallets of returned and excess merchandise for cheap, go
       | to all the work of making listings and setting prices and
       | shipping it all, and (hopefully) turn a profit at the end of the
       | day.
       | 
       | There are a lot of product categories -- including things like
       | computer peripherals and accessories, or department store suits
       | -- that are known to be extremely overpriced when bought at
       | retail. While on eBay they can go from reasonably priced to
       | downright cheap.
        
       | dawnerd wrote:
       | I've suspected this too. Technically not target but just a
       | spinoff company they can use for tax reasons, of course.
        
       | jimt1234 wrote:
       | After my little sister had her first child and realized how
       | expensive baby stuff is, she started a lucrative side-hustle and
       | ran with it for years. Basically, she bought baby stuff from a
       | warehouse that got their inventory from returns at large
       | retailers like Target and Walmart. She focused almost entirely on
       | baby strollers, but also backyard swing sets for kids, and got it
       | all for pennies-on-the-dollar. She became friendly with the
       | customer service repos at the stroller manufacturers and could
       | usually get replacement parts for free (it's a warranty
       | replacement if the service rep says it is). She knew all the
       | stroller model numbers and their associated various part numbers.
       | She got really good at repairing the strollers in her garage, and
       | then flipping them on Craigslist. Her garage looked like a baby
       | stroller showroom. She made decent money doing it, but the best
       | part is her "customers" (other new mothers, most of them poor)
       | were always so happy and appreciative because of the deal they
       | were getting. Everyone was happy.
       | 
       | The real secret sauce to her side-hustle was the relationship she
       | had with the lady who managed the warehouse where she bought the
       | baby stuff. The warehouses usually have auctions on large lots or
       | pallets of stuff; you bid on whatever's on the pallet, you've got
       | no choice. The lady used to let my sister come to the warehouse
       | periodically (usually just before a big auction) and cherrypick
       | what she wanted, which was always the baby strollers and swing
       | sets. The side-hustle wouldn't have worked without that. (My
       | sister (and her husband) used to flip houses, too, and I think
       | she sold the warehouse lady a house.)
        
         | phyzome wrote:
         | << you bid on whatever's on the pallet, you've got no choice.
         | The lady used to let my sister come to the warehouse
         | periodically (usually just before a big auction) and cherrypick
         | what she wanted, >>
         | 
         | Ah yes, the free market.
        
           | s1artibartfast wrote:
           | Why do you say that? Command economies arent exactly known
           | for being free from personal dealing either
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-05-30 23:00 UTC)