[HN Gopher] Ozempic keeps wowing: trial data show benefits for k...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Ozempic keeps wowing: trial data show benefits for kidney disease
        
       Author : pseudolus
       Score  : 38 points
       Date   : 2024-05-24 15:36 UTC (7 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.nature.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.nature.com)
        
       | neverokay wrote:
       | Ozempic? Or just eating less?
        
         | Rinzler89 wrote:
         | Eating less and exercising is tyranny and commie propaganda.
         | What is this, North Korea? People should be free to eat as much
         | as they want. If they want to balloon to 400lbs, it's their god
         | given right.
         | 
         | /s See the latest South Park episode
        
           | artninja1988 wrote:
           | Doesn't ozempic just make you feel full more easily and help
           | you eat less?
        
             | mensetmanusman wrote:
             | 'Just' is doing a lot here.
        
         | eganist wrote:
         | Probably the latter, but "just eating less" is next to
         | impossible for a non-trivial minority of people much the way
         | "just stopping heroin" would be for someone battling addiction.
         | 
         | An aid to help clear the noise in the brain seems to be
         | unsurprisingly useful, then, in achieving these outcomes.
        
           | chatmasta wrote:
           | Sure, but Ozempic is not the only drug that suppresses
           | appetite. So if the underlying benefits are from "just eating
           | less," then the study should also examine the effects of
           | other pharmaceutical interventions that suppress appetite.
        
             | eganist wrote:
             | Funding tends to be a constraint with larger studies, and
             | it's best to keep studies focused anyway -- less
             | confounding variables.
             | 
             | Here, I'll pontificate a bit. For instance, study 1 finds
             | that Ozempic is associated with a reduced risk of X. Study
             | 2 is now funded to see if the association can be
             | experimentally reproduced to establish a causative
             | relationship. Competing institution gets Study 3 funded to
             | test competing drug Mounjaro, reaches same conclusion.
             | Study 4 by another institution finds same conclusion with a
             | drug that acts in an entirely different manner, Buproprion.
             | Study 5 by yet another institution finds similar results
             | with amphetamines. Study 6 is funded on the premise that
             | there's an underlying mechanism that needs to be explored,
             | gets funding to study caloric restriction, gets similar
             | results. Meanwhile, study 2 finds a causative relationship
             | between Ozempic and X, concluding experimentally that
             | Ozempic achieves X by inducing calorie restriction, which
             | concurs with study 6.
             | 
             | I'm oversimplifying. But you see where I'm going with this.
             | Much easier to both control and fund the smaller studies
             | than a giant one, and you develop more knowledge in the
             | process.
             | 
             | ---
             | 
             | Also, I'm not an academic, so I could be wildly off base.
             | Would appreciate a gut check by someone who actually does
             | this for a living.
        
       | ilikeitdark wrote:
       | I'm starting to think somebody has a bunch of truckloads of this
       | stuff they gotta unload.
        
         | KptMarchewa wrote:
         | Yes, Novo Nordisk. Largest EU company.
        
           | Am4TIfIsER0ppos wrote:
           | Last I heard they couldn't make it fast enough to meet demand
           | from fatties causing at least one government to ask doctors
           | to only prescribe it to diabetics.
        
         | im3w1l wrote:
         | There is a global shortage.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-05-24 23:02 UTC)