[HN Gopher] Italy's $12.7B Bridge to Sicily [video]
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Italy's $12.7B Bridge to Sicily [video]
        
       Author : simonebrunozzi
       Score  : 47 points
       Date   : 2024-05-19 15:45 UTC (7 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.youtube.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.youtube.com)
        
       | antirez wrote:
       | I'm Sicilian, and I would call this a well put video. If you go
       | in Messina you will see that the city is oddly oriented with the
       | _back_ of the buildings and squares and everything facing the
       | sea, like if the city is actively aware that the sea is
       | dangerous. This shape was given by the reconstruction after the
       | tsunami.
       | 
       | Btw: taking the boat from Messina to Villa San Giovanni is quite
       | a nice experience. There is a tradition to eat arancini while
       | crossing. Most Sicilians are not actually hoping so much to see
       | this bridge to be completed, especially since in Catania and
       | Palermo there are very high traffic airports with plenty of cheap
       | options to go to Rome or Milan (Catania airport is the 3rd by
       | number of flights in Italy). If the fast trains available in the
       | North would be available here, it would be different perhaps.
       | 
       | About the social factors, if the bridge would start from Catania,
       | where I live, I could be a bit more positive about the ability to
       | complete it. Catania has kinda of a different mentality compared
       | to the rest of Sicily (I guess I can tell this without biases
       | since I'm from the center of Sicily and lived in multiple places
       | for years). For instance Catania is the only place under Naples
       | to have a subway. Apple and Ikea are in Catania, and so forth, in
       | general you can make things work here, and even if this is a
       | national project, local factors may play a role. Messina is not
       | similarly well positioned.
        
         | znpy wrote:
         | > since in Catania and Palermo there are very high traffic
         | airports with plenty of cheap options to go to Rome or Milan
         | 
         | What you fail to mention is that very often such "cheap"
         | flights and paid in part by the state with public money. If
         | that bridge you'd have other options
        
           | antirez wrote:
           | Actually the exact reverse is true: the flights are in
           | general overpriced during vacation seasons because emigrates
           | are desperate to return home and stay with their families a
           | few days. So airways companies exploit this fact. They are
           | cheap in certain periods (not for government helps that are
           | minimal and only recently reintroduced: an unfair price with
           | a 25% of discount remains an unfair price), terribly costly
           | in other periods (500 euros for 2000km flight is common),
           | because the government is not protecting enough people living
           | here or living in Milan/Rome but originally from Sicily. They
           | should have access to decent ticket prices. At the same time
           | you can go from Milano Malpensa to Lisbona with 30 euros or
           | alike...
        
         | simonebrunozzi wrote:
         | > Catania airport is the 3rd by number of flights in Italy
         | 
         | 5th, not 3rd [0], after Rome, Milan, Bergamo, Naples, and
         | before Venice - passengers, not number of flights.
         | 
         | [0]:
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_the_busiest_airports_i...
        
           | antirez wrote:
           | Catania and Naples have the same number of flights if you
           | check recent stats (last stats released:
           | https://assaeroporti.com/statistiche/). Sometimes Catania is
           | ahead, sometimes Naples. So indeed not 3rd but 4th, with
           | Catania and Naples having the same traffic.
        
             | ottavio wrote:
             | On yearly basis, in 2023 it was #6
             | 
             | See page 83 of
             | 
             | https://drive.google.com/file/d/1JHNwYFeNqfE2K6u08vk2-_ujhr
             | Y...
        
         | throw0101d wrote:
         | > _Most Sicilians are not actually hoping so much to see this
         | bridge to be completed, especially since in Catania and Palermo
         | there are very high traffic airports with plenty of cheap
         | options to go to Rome or Milan (Catania airport is the 3rd by
         | number of flights in Italy). If the fast trains available in
         | the North would be available here, it would be different
         | perhaps._
         | 
         | Would a rail connection help with shipping goods? Would a road
         | connection help with transport trucks?
        
           | antirez wrote:
           | Well, this is a very fucked-up situation. When I was a child,
           | during 80s, most of the Sicily / North Italy goods shipping
           | was by train / boat, and we had good railways. Then a
           | decision was made to favor trucks: I don't know why. So in
           | general, yes, shipping goods via train was a lot better and
           | less costly AFAIK. But politics play a role, as the trains
           | where suppressed in Sicily with some agenda. In general
           | companies shipping stuff from/to North with trucks are not in
           | the cleanest hands. Note that trains can pass from Messina
           | without huge issues as it was already made for decades. The
           | train gets disassembled and put on the boat and assembled
           | back on the other side, this happens many times every day. It
           | is how it works right now. But in general, I believe that
           | trains is what could give more sense to this project.
        
             | thinkindie wrote:
             | Back then most of the trucks were made by IVECO, hence
             | FIAT. This is the same reason highways are quite developed
             | across Italy, while Milan is the only place with proper
             | infrastructure in place for commuters. It's the same reason
             | Turin had to wait until early 2000s (before the Olympics)
             | to get an underground rail.
             | 
             | The biggest issue with Sicily infrastructure is that most
             | of the rail lines are single tracks, plus southern of
             | Salerno you don't have high speed trains. Therefore the
             | bridge itself cannot make much of an impact without fixing
             | the infrastructure at both sides of the (hypothetical)
             | bridge.
        
         | RaoulP wrote:
         | Sicily is really stunning. You make me want to return there
         | now...
         | 
         | But I'm curious (if you don't mind) - as an accomplished
         | programmer/entrepreneur, do you ever feel torn between wanting
         | to live in your idyllic home of Sicily, vs. a hub like Silicon
         | Valley? Do you feel limited in terms of what you can do, and
         | does that matter to you?
         | 
         | I ask because Sicily seems close to your heart, while I think
         | it's also safe to assume that you would have lots of
         | opportunity elsewhere. I imagine staying was a very conscious
         | decision?
         | 
         | There are lots of wonderful but "small" corners of the world
         | where people might face the same dilemma.
        
           | jtwaleson wrote:
           | Off-topic, but I would one day like to start a tech hub there
           | called "Sicilian Valley". An ideal place for techies from
           | northern Europe to spend the winter. Rent an office with your
           | team for a week or two and have a great time.
        
           | antirez wrote:
           | Yeah this is a non trivial thing. Sicily is economically
           | depressed, but what is interesting is that it is generally
           | not culturally depressed, I mean we had geniuses like
           | Majorana because the university of math in Catania was good
           | _once_ , and there are a lot of "thinkers" so you are not
           | like alone in some island but with 5 million of people, part
           | of which do the most desperate things and are intellectually
           | very active. At the same time, the weather is good, the food
           | is good, the life does not cost too much, there is a lot of
           | history and nature. And... for people doing programming,
           | there is the Internet, like this site. About connections with
           | the IT system: in part I believe that in isolation you can
           | accomplish more work, even if it is true that the group, the
           | network, sometimes create a "chain effect", but I'm a very
           | solitary programmer, so this setup worked for me. At the same
           | time I don't "value" to remain where you were born: I respect
           | a lot people that are tired form staying here and want to go
           | away. What I miss the most is that the helathcare system in
           | North Italy is at the same time free and among the best
           | systems in the world. Here is decent, but not at the same
           | level, so for serious stuff there are people going to Milan
           | or Turin or Florence to get some procedure, and that's not
           | cool. But, air quality is stellare compared to North, and
           | this also is a part in the health story. Compromises...
        
           | rice7th wrote:
           | To be fair, Catania has more fabs than any other city in
           | Italy (2 with another fab in construction), also being home
           | to the largest stmicroelectronics establishment in Italy, so
           | I guess it kinda is Italy's silicon valley
        
         | rice7th wrote:
         | Yea, coming from Trapani I can surely say that Catania doesn't
         | even feel like Sicily. It is much more advanced than even
         | Palermo, and no other city can really compete.
         | 
         | That's the real problem of Sicily; it's not about the bridge
         | itself, but rather the whole ecomomic situation and living
         | standard that lags behind the rest of Italy. I don't remember
         | if the rest of Sicily is affected, but in Trapani we don't even
         | get fresh water every day! Instead each house has canisters and
         | pumps that fill every 3 days or so. Another example might be
         | the almost complete lack of actual industries and a much more
         | agricultural-based economy, to the point that almost all
         | sicilians also own a farm or a piece of farmland (or at least I
         | think so, again, I haven't visited much outside of Trapani).
         | There are *lots* of things to improve, but I still think that
         | Sicily has one of the highest economic potentials of the 20
         | regions, because it has lots of natural resources, people and
         | space, and Catania is definitely an example of that potential
         | turned into reality.
         | 
         | Also Palermo _does_ have a subway, so Catania isn 't the only
         | city with such privilege.
        
       | Luker88 wrote:
       | As an Italian, it's a wonderful project technically, but you will
       | be hard pressed to find people in northern Italy that believe in
       | it (can't speak for mid/lower). The tech challenges give it
       | little credibility, but the mifias problems are really what makes
       | it a non-starter for basically everyone here.
       | 
       | The video shows one politician a couple of times, but he's one of
       | the most unreliable ones (and Italians one in general are not
       | that reliable).
       | 
       | It's a political tool, many speculate it's just another big
       | project that will never be completed, since it's a common
       | historical pattern with heavy right-wing governments like the
       | current one.
       | 
       | Even though a lot of money has already been spent, it remains
       | especially difficult to detach this project from its political
       | side so don't hold breath, or hope.
        
         | riffraff wrote:
         | I'm from central Italy and nobody believes this will be done,
         | even beyond criminal infiltrations, it's just the kind of
         | projects that get brought out every few years to distract from
         | actually important things.
         | 
         | But who knows, MOSE seemed a pipe dream too.
        
       | H8crilA wrote:
       | Fun fact: this bridge is in the works for ~2000 years; the Romans
       | were the first to want to build it.
       | 
       | Also, this is a great region, if you can ever get there in an RV
       | - you are not going to regret it!
        
         | paulryanrogers wrote:
         | Why an RV?
        
           | H8crilA wrote:
           | Doesn't have to be one :)
        
         | thom wrote:
         | It's rumoured that they _did_ build some sort of pontoon out of
         | barrels, to transport the elephants captured by Lucius
         | Caecilius Metellus after the Battle of Panormus. The story's
         | widely attributed to Strabo or Pliny the Elder but I can't find
         | the original source, whether or not we'd believe it. Tip of the
         | galea to whoever tracks it down.
        
       | ziofill wrote:
       | I'm Italian too. It's just depressing for us to see so much
       | public money percolating to organized crime (as it happens with
       | many public projects). Who knows how many more billions will
       | follow...
        
         | lnsru wrote:
         | I guess Europeans forgot how to build and learned how to
         | consume funding from public projects. I am not sure how good is
         | the source, but the sums are the same as in serious German
         | articles: https://eulerpool.com/en/news/politics/the-planned-
         | train-rou...
         | 
         | Stuttgart 21: from EUR3,5B to EUR11,5B and finish not in sight.
         | So the bridge has potential to reach EUR50B.
        
           | TacticalCoder wrote:
           | > Stuttgart 21: from EUR3,5B to EUR11,5B and finish not in
           | sight. So the bridge has potential to reach EUR50B.
           | 
           | That _is_ the purpose of the EU institutions. It 's the 2nd
           | biggest scam, after the mandatory pension schemes. Note that
           | the EU is currently jealous of the biggest ponzi of all time
           | and hence wants its own: they want to remove veto-rights of
           | member states on fiscal policies to be able to create an EU-
           | wide, mandatory, pension fund (it's literally in talks right
           | now).
           | 
           | The public sector knows how to do one thing: seize private
           | property (through taxes) to fund projects whose sole goal is
           | to steal taxpayers money. Going from $3.5bn to $11bn over
           | budget _is_ the goal. In that these projects are very
           | successful.
           | 
           | That's why we don't have the equivalent of Tesla in Europe
           | and that's why the European State Agency is nowhere compared
           | to SpaceX.
           | 
           | There's not a dollar or a EUR that's less well used that a
           | dollar or EUR that's been through public spendings.
           | 
           | Play stupid communist games (like having gigantic public
           | spendings), end, all EU-wide, with a stupid failing economy.
           | 
           | The EU shall only keep falling into irrelevancy on the world
           | scene.
        
           | snowpid wrote:
           | You guess it from two projects? There are several world
           | breaking infrastructure projects in Europe. Where are you
           | from?
        
       | chx wrote:
       | Why not a tunnel?
        
         | bell-cot wrote:
         | The Straits of Messina are ~250m deep, and Sicily has seen
         | earthquakes up to magnitude ~7.5.
         | 
         | Whatever their budget - there isn't enough unobtainium around
         | to construct tunnel wall strong enough.
        
           | chx wrote:
           | How does this compare to the Seikan tunnel constructed 40
           | years ago?
           | 
           | https://web.archive.org/web/20161018110338/http://jr.hakodat.
           | ..
           | 
           | > Minimum overburden (under seabed): 100m
           | 
           | > Maximum sea depth: 140m
           | 
           | Excuse me for being daft, is the difference going to be a
           | showstopper ? Construction and material engineering surely
           | advanced since quite a bit.
        
             | bell-cot wrote:
             | Admitting that I don't know the geology in Japan at all
             | well...
             | 
             | At the Straits of Messina, the tunnel would be crossing an
             | active rift zone ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siculo-
             | Calabrian_rift ). That rift is the source of those big
             | earthquakes - such as
             | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1908_Messina_earthquake -
             | which was _at_ the Straits, magnitude 7.1, and killed ~75k
             | people. And for extra bonus fun -
             | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mount_etna - is one of the
             | world's most active volcanoes, part of that active rift
             | zone, and less than 80km from the Straits.
             | 
             | (Vs. the geological maps I can find seem to show that the
             | Seikan tunnel does _not_ cross any sort of active fault.)
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-05-19 23:02 UTC)