[HN Gopher] The Myth of Panic (2021)
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The Myth of Panic (2021)
        
       Author : apsec112
       Score  : 16 points
       Date   : 2024-05-18 01:59 UTC (21 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.palladiummag.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.palladiummag.com)
        
       | nuancebydefault wrote:
       | Interesting that Fritz already debunked the myth of panic during
       | WWII, while rather recently, during the last pandemic,
       | governments delayed correctly informing of the crowd, due to that
       | myth.
       | 
       | So myths will be myths?
        
       | IcyWindows wrote:
       | I can believe it. Despite scientists and politicians saying the
       | climate situation is dire, there is no panic.
        
         | lupire wrote:
         | Dire is not immediate.
        
         | lisper wrote:
         | Wait until we have our first planet-wide crop failure.
        
         | scottLobster wrote:
         | I panicked for a few months, as a naive college student in my
         | early 20s, then I realized there was no stopping it and decided
         | to position my family as best as possible to live through it.
         | 
         | But if you have nothing better to do than panic, then by all
         | means do so. At some point I might be able to market you a
         | product based on that panic, which will be a few more dollars
         | toward building my family's ark.
        
       | hash872 wrote:
       | He leaves out examples that contradict his thesis, like the 1977
       | New York blackout which lead to widespread arson and looting. (1)
       | Plus similar widespread rioting in Montreal in the 60s when the
       | police went on strike. (2) Wiki also suggested a page for 'list
       | of incidents of civil unrest in the US', which appear to number
       | in the hundreds. (3) My guess would be that whether your city
       | 'panics' or not just depends on a bunch of different
       | circumstances, and that there's no one conveniently pat answer.
       | 
       | I used to follow Tanner on Twitter and he seems like a nice guy,
       | but he's definitely part of this new generation of self-appointed
       | 'intellectuals' that got famous on social media, have no actual
       | subject-matter expertise in any 1 field, and just handwave stuff.
       | He is the director of what's apparently a 1 man think thank, and
       | he supposedly 'focuses on contemporary security issues in the
       | Asia-Pacific and the military history of East and Southeast Asia'
       | despite having no graduate degrees or military/intelligence
       | record that I'm aware of. (Also has nothing to do with this
       | piece). Again, nice guy who I'm sure means well, but basically a
       | self-appointed Twitter 'expert'. Call me old-fashioned but I'd
       | like to see my experts have some actual qualifications in
       | something
       | 
       | 1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_City_blackout_of_1977
       | 2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murray-Hill_riot 3.
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_incidents_of_civil_unr...
        
         | lupire wrote:
         | Your Montreal example is off base. That riot was a planned
         | attack as part of a year long civil war in Quebec, not a night
         | of panic caused by a sudden emergency.
         | 
         | Civil unrest is not the same as panic.
        
         | amadeuspagel wrote:
         | The New York City blackout and the Murray Hill riot are
         | examples of criminals taking advantage of a situation where the
         | police were on strike or unable to respond, not of a panic. I'm
         | not going to go through the entire list of incidents of civil
         | unrest in the United States, but the first entry is described
         | as an anti-government protest, not a panic either.
         | 
         | Who do you expect to appoint intellectuals?
        
         | lisper wrote:
         | Another example: the hoarding of toilet paper after the
         | pandemic lockdowns. Granted, this was panic writ very small,
         | but it was panic nonetheless. Suddenly everyone was hoarding TP
         | because everyone thought there wouldn't be any available, thus
         | turning the TP shortage into a self-fulfilling prophecy.
        
           | NoMoreNicksLeft wrote:
           | Not sure what counts as hoarding. I've always bought it in
           | bulk and prefer to have at least a 6 months supply, even 12
           | months seems reasonable. It does not spoil, I can buy when
           | it's on sale, and it's relatively compact and stacks well
           | without wasting storage space.
           | 
           | Though, I suppose there were people who were buying it when
           | they did not expect to use it personally. Fuck those people.
        
             | lisper wrote:
             | When the store shelves are empty for months despite the
             | fact that nothing has actually changed in terms of
             | underlying supply or demand, that's hoarding.
        
       | WalterBright wrote:
       | The bombings of London during WW1 and WW2, and the Allied
       | bombings, were attempts to cause panic among the civilians and
       | thus the countries to collapse. It never happened.
       | 
       | Although the V1 attacks did not cause panic and caused little
       | damage, they were cheap to make and fire, and caused the British
       | to divert enormous resources to stop them - resources that were
       | not brought to bear on Germany.
       | 
       | On the other hand, while the V2 attacks also did little damage
       | and caused no panic, they were terrifically expensive for the
       | Germans to make, and was a huge diversion of their resources.
       | Since there was no defense against them, they did not divert
       | Allied resources away from attacking Germany.
        
       | WalterBright wrote:
       | Isn't it amusing that censorship is there to protect the morals
       | of civilians, yet the censors are not corrupted by viewing it?
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-05-18 23:01 UTC)