[HN Gopher] Plane, open-source Jira alternative, got to 100K+ Do...
___________________________________________________________________
Plane, open-source Jira alternative, got to 100K+ Docker and 44K+
K8s deploys
Author : viharkurama
Score : 38 points
Date : 2024-05-15 21:35 UTC (1 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (plane.so)
(TXT) w3m dump (plane.so)
| viharkurama wrote:
| Hi HN,
|
| Vihar here, one of the maintainers at Plane
| (https://github.com/makeplane/plane).
|
| Last time, we shared how we reached 15K stars on GitHub in less
| than a year, pushing Plane to the top spot in #project-
| management. The post received great feedback from the HN
| community, and we noticed comments about lapses in self-hosting.
|
| We took on the challenge, rethought the entire Docker setup, made
| it single-click, and provided a maintenance script.
|
| Now, we share our journey to over 100K+ Docker pulls and 44K+ K8
| deploys in this blog. Please let us know what we could improve.
|
| Hope you enjoy the article. Feedback welcome!
|
| Thanks,
| jauntywundrkind wrote:
| Couple of >100 comment >100 vote submissions for Plane in the
| last year, if anyone's interested in looking at previous
| comments,
|
| https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36824450
| https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36129594
| https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38624873
|
| Very happy to see this project thriving.
| viharkurama wrote:
| Thanks for sharing.
| solardev wrote:
| Anyone have thoughts about the usability of this vs Linear,
| especially when it comes to simplicity and UI performance?
| viharkurama wrote:
| Linear is an opinionated tool for product teams. At Plane, we
| strive to develop a versatile tool that accommodates teams of
| all sizes and types.
|
| For example, Linear begins with the creation of a team, whereas
| we initiate with the creation of a project, subsequently
| integrating teams as needed. Currently, Plane is being utilized
| by a spectrum of users, ranging from small indie game
| developers to large enterprises. In Linear, the starting point
| always revolves around forming a team.
| mushufasa wrote:
| very cool!
|
| we use GitHub issues/projects and we're pretty happy with it.
| Github invested a lot to revamp projects over the past 3 years
| and it shows. would love to hear from anyone who's tried both how
| these compare.
| viharkurama wrote:
| GitHub imposes numerous limitations on custom fields, issue
| automation, dashboards, workflow rules, and more. Being open-
| source, Plane offers significant advantages to our customers by
| providing opportunities for learning and by striving to develop
| a tool that caters to the diverse needs of individuals and
| teams, facilitating progress.
|
| Just as an example, while GitHub projects is great, tools like
| Plane (with bi-directional sync)/ZenHub still are trying to do
| a better job.
| jesse_faden wrote:
| It's confusing to me that the pricing says it's per user if you
| self host the pro tier?
| viharkurama wrote:
| We also offer a one-time perpetual license for growing teams
| (Plane One: https://plane.so/one), while the Pro and other
| plans (which come with AI) are designed for large companies; we
| follow the same pricing model as GitLab.
|
| Additionally, there's always a free community edition
| available, which doesn't restrict the number of users.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2024-05-15 23:00 UTC)