[HN Gopher] The history of 'OK' (2023)
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The history of 'OK' (2023)
        
       Author : goles
       Score  : 35 points
       Date   : 2024-05-09 20:07 UTC (2 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (people.howstuffworks.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (people.howstuffworks.com)
        
       | CTDOCodebases wrote:
       | I always find it odd when people track down the invention of
       | something to one source when multiple people were using the same
       | phrase around the same time.
       | 
       | Sure it's popularisation may have been fueled by a particular
       | person or group but did they really invent it? Or did they refit
       | an existing abbreviation to fit their purpose? Or was it just
       | invented in parallel?
       | 
       | One explanation I have heard about "OK" is that it was an
       | abbreviation invented by Greek migrant dock workers in the USA.
       | Apparently they used to write the abbreviation "OK" on boxes that
       | contained what they were supposed to contain. "ola kala" is a
       | Greek phrase that basically means "everything good".
        
         | syndicatedjelly wrote:
         | Ok
        
       | dang wrote:
       | Related:
       | 
       |  _How 'OK' took over the world (2011)_ -
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14533098 - June 2017 (99
       | comments)
       | 
       | I think there have been other threads as well?
        
       | pfdietz wrote:
       | Perhaps the way to look at this was that "ok" came not from the
       | events that created it, but from the niche it filled. There must
       | have been a need for the term or it would not have thrived and
       | spread.
        
       | hahahacorn wrote:
       | A deep knowledge of etymology, if nothing else, is useful for
       | answering a 5 year old's infamous chain of "why?"s
       | 
       | Disregarding potential inaccuracies, I love stories like these.
       | Not particularly sure why, but I'm sure someone has a post
       | somewhere about why we're so obsessed with the history of _our_
       | mundane.
        
       | jonplackett wrote:
       | Is it me or does the final paragraph totally contradict itself?
       | 
       | > It's not that it was needed to 'fill a gap' in any language.
       | Before 1839, English speakers had 'yes,' 'good,' 'fine,'
       | 'excellent,' 'satisfactory' and 'all right.' What OK provided
       | that the others did not was neutrality, a way to affirm or to
       | express agreement without having to offer an opinion.
       | 
       | That, as is then explained - response without judgement, is a
       | really big and useful gap to fill.
        
       | jamiek88 wrote:
       | It's unknown where OK and okay came from. Each article has
       | different just so bullshit stories but stories they remain.
        
       | causality0 wrote:
       | I've found it's often impossible to get keyboards like Swiftkey
       | to stop autocorrecting "ok" to "OK". It's so irritating because
       | while grammatically correct, it makes me look like a boomer in
       | text conversations.
        
         | ClassyJacket wrote:
         | I've noticed this too but I just use the word 'okay' anyway. I
         | mean, I'm not saying 'ock', I'm saying 'oh kay', so why
         | shouldn't the spelling reflect that?
        
           | gerdesj wrote:
           | Or are tending towards m'kay!
        
           | doctor_eval wrote:
           | My ghoti would like a word.
        
         | pushedx wrote:
         | the first thing I do on any device is disable all forms of
         | autocorrect
        
         | bigstrat2003 wrote:
         | What? Nobody cares if you say "ok" or "OK", dude.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-05-09 23:00 UTC)