[HN Gopher] A Brief History of the First Planetarium
___________________________________________________________________
A Brief History of the First Planetarium
Author : Brajeshwar
Score : 31 points
Date : 2024-05-09 14:56 UTC (8 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (spectrum.ieee.org)
(TXT) w3m dump (spectrum.ieee.org)
| smooc wrote:
| I'm pretty sure that the mechanical planetarium of Eize Eizinga
| from 1781 predates this "World's First". Maybe because it is
| projected?
|
| It's worth your visit btw.
|
| https://www.eisinga-planetarium.nl/en/history/
| sopchi wrote:
| One reproduces the sky as seen from Earth (planets, stars,
| galaxies, etc), while the other is a model of the solar system.
| The Zeiss device will let you see the sky as it is at different
| dates, from different places on Earth, will let you see the sky
| as if the Sun was not shining during daytime (so you can see
| the other objects). It is unfair to discount it as just a new
| way of presenting what that other machine was showing. They are
| in fact very different in what they can do.
| treve wrote:
| First thing I thought too! But I guess it's a different
| definition of planetarium.
|
| Wikipedia has even older mentions of planetarium, but does cite
| the one in Franeker as the oldest still working:
| https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planetarium
| _Microft wrote:
| This seems to be a model of the solar system which is more
| commonly known as ,,orrery".
|
| https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orrery
| Delphiza wrote:
| The last time that I went to a planetarium it was far too
| digital. As a child I would love going to the planetarium that
| was part of a university and it inspired my interest in astronomy
| at a (too) early age. Those original analogue projectors with all
| the movements and lenses of various sizes were amazing! Maybe we
| have it too easy with imax projections and lost something along
| the way that made a planetarium experience so believable and
| magical.
| IncreasePosts wrote:
| A little related, but I recently used a friends digital
| telescope (you look into an eyepiece, but you're looking at an
| LED screen of the captured image, not light directly from the
| lenses). And, for whatever reason, it felt far less magical
| than actually letting the photons from Jupiter hit my eye(yes,
| I know they are absorbed and retransmitted at various points,
| but you know what I mean).
| dylan604 wrote:
| This is pretty much how I feel about electronic view finders
| on modern digital cameras. I love my xSLR type cameras where
| I'm seeing the photons directly from the lens and not some
| digital version of them. I was not even aware of the
| telescope system that you mentioned actually being a thing,
| and I'm holding back my involuntarily gag reflex that kicked
| in just from the description.
| coisasdavida wrote:
| The last time I went to one was in fact in Jena and it was a
| modern Zeiss projector. It was an awesome experience for a
| Brazilian who always used Zeiss stuff in photography, on top of
| being in Jena and seeing the Optical Museum and the Schott Glass
| Museum.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2024-05-09 23:01 UTC)