[HN Gopher] Conical Slicing: A different angle of 3D printing
___________________________________________________________________
Conical Slicing: A different angle of 3D printing
Author : fanf2
Score : 44 points
Date : 2024-05-06 10:42 UTC (1 days ago)
(HTM) web link (www.cnckitchen.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (www.cnckitchen.com)
| hcrean wrote:
| This is actually kind of an awesome idea, printing overhang has
| been a issue with printer adoption, and greatly limits some of
| the parts you can fabricate. I hope this becomes mainstream in
| the major slicers soon.
| newaccount74 wrote:
| In my experience printing overhangs is rarely an issue.
|
| The big issue that I have is that the orientation of the layers
| determines the strength of the part. Any vertical tension pulls
| the layers apart, so sometimes I wish I could somehow print a
| part in two orientations to make it stronger...
| progman32 wrote:
| Or even alternate to create a weave.
| WillAdams wrote:
| Or just do 100% infill and bake in salt and re-melt to get
| a solid part?
|
| https://hackaday.com/2020/09/23/reforming-3d-prints-with-
| sal...
| impossiblefork wrote:
| I've felt that it's strange that these kinds of things aren't
| more standard, but I'm guessing it's harder to tune the machines
| for this?
|
| The core idea is basically the same as that of the Nubian vault,
| so the core idea is very ancient. One can do this with snow too,
| to build somewhat surprising structures without having to use
| supports.
| AbrahamParangi wrote:
| Back in the day I implemented this, the trick is that the
| firmware motion planner is generally by default not designed to
| handle smooth curves in 3D, only in 2D. We could have adjusted to
| fix that but the other issue was it makes the printing/slicing
| process even more unpredictable, which therefore makes it harder
| to use as an engineering tool.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2024-05-07 23:00 UTC)