[HN Gopher] The AI Music Era Is Here. Not Everyone Is a Fan
___________________________________________________________________
The AI Music Era Is Here. Not Everyone Is a Fan
Author : coloneltcb
Score : 7 points
Date : 2024-05-06 20:29 UTC (2 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (www.bloomberg.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (www.bloomberg.com)
| fullshark wrote:
| Is anyone a fan? Except people looking for cheap music for
| whatever media they are producing (videos / video games)?
| phoe-krk wrote:
| Online shitposters. You can make surprisingly believable music
| with pure meme lyrics - something that's not been possible
| without a lot of effort until now.
| gibbitz wrote:
| Why of all things do we choose Art to emulate with AI? Is it
| because we have such poor understanding of what makes good Art
| that it helps to sell the technology? Time and time again, those
| who know Art are insulted by this product while the average AI
| company pats themselves on the back thinking they must be doing
| something right to piss off the Art snobs. What they're missing
| is that using AI this way is just pointing out how little the
| general population understands about Art.
| barbariangrunge wrote:
| As somebody who recently did a deep dive into music licensing for
| a podcast, the simplicity of the license terms of ai companies is
| sometimes appealing, by comparison. Not always
|
| Music licenses are obscenely complex, and understanding almost
| anyone's license is a research project. Epic won't even clarify
| if you email them, they just tell you you'd better retain a
| lawyer. Every company redefines terms like broadcast,
| performance, media, audience, platform, etc. it's insane
|
| I won't be using ai music. I'm just saying, I wish you could
| license human music in a way where you didn't have to live in
| fear of breaching the terms by accident
| jdkee wrote:
| https://archive.is/oNj9t
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2024-05-06 23:02 UTC)