[HN Gopher] The Trouble with Soho
___________________________________________________________________
The Trouble with Soho
Author : paulpauper
Score : 37 points
Date : 2024-05-05 16:17 UTC (6 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (www.edwest.co.uk)
(TXT) w3m dump (www.edwest.co.uk)
| rkique wrote:
| > The residents group even stopped a comically ugly post-war
| Tesco from being demolished, pressuring Westminster City Council
| to designate the Dean Street store an 'Asset of Community Value'.
|
| Seems like there's a conflict here between the interests of the
| residents and the general public. I can't imagine eating out
| every night is something affordable or desirable for the locals.
| junto wrote:
| It's a typical classical gentrification problem.
|
| People move in to areas that are famous for their grubby
| nightlife and "liveliness" only to then whine and protest about
| the nightlife and associated noise. Not moving there in the
| first place never crosses their minds.
|
| It's a wonderful hodgepodge of bars, restaurants, clubs, queer
| life, sex clubs, prostitution and general seediness. May it
| remain so.
| parpfish wrote:
| some gentrifiers are pulled into 'grubby, lively'
| neighborhood because they're attracted to those qualities.
| these gentrifiers won't complain and will likely try to
| preserve those attributes.
|
| but there's another class of gentrifiers that aren't pulled
| into these neighborhoods. rather, they are pushed out of the
| places they'd like to live and have to settle for the grubby
| lively neighborhood. these are the ones that complain because
| they don't really want to be there in the first place.
|
| people don't like to talk about this distinction because it
| they like to treat all gentrifiers as invaders/colonizers
| without realizing that many of them are also displaced from
| their neighborhoods
| KaiserPro wrote:
| I know a lot of tech people in london worked in old street and
| dalston, but Soho was actually real. One of the nice things was
| that real people lived and worked _in_ soho. Mostly it was people
| to do with clothing or restaurants.
|
| Soho never really had the influx of twats marvelling at the
| quaintness of poverty, you lived there because you either had a
| workshop, were astronomically rich, had a council house, or
| worked in either sex, drugs, food or booze.
|
| Berwick market is a husk of its former self, and shop rents are
| way to fucking high to allow experimentation on a new idea.
| Moreover all but one of the big VFX shops have moved away.
|
| its a husk of its former self.
|
| It doesn't help that a bunch of rich twats have moved in and gone
| "gosh, its terribly noisy at night".
|
| > The residents group even stopped a comically ugly post-war
| Tesco from being demolished
|
| I suspect the reason for that is because when they did crossrail,
| they knocked down the top end of dean street and replaced pub,
| flats and office blocks with a massive souless glass mega shop.
| which kinda defeats the purpose of soho really. If there was 50
| council flats in the top, then it would be more appealing.
| throwaway22032 wrote:
| My personal view is that local residents and businesses should
| have roughly equal say in how an area is used. People outside the
| area I think should have very little say outside of e.g. national
| regulations on pollution, building standards etc.
|
| In London's case it's weighted too far towards local residents
| IMO which is why Soho and similar areas are turning to shit -
| everything interesting gets pushed out.
|
| The idea I hear espoused a lot though, is the idea that someone
| who lives in Wimbledon should be able to tell residents and
| businesses of Soho how to build, just because they like to visit
| or they'd like to move in. They don't owe you anything, find
| somewhere else.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2024-05-05 23:00 UTC)