[HN Gopher] He Lost $36B in a Week. Now Bill Hwang Is Fighting t...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       He Lost $36B in a Week. Now Bill Hwang Is Fighting to Avoid Prison
        
       Author : haltingproblem
       Score  : 60 points
       Date   : 2024-05-04 19:18 UTC (3 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.bloomberg.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.bloomberg.com)
        
       | luma wrote:
       | https://archive.ph/6EkIS
        
       | Animats wrote:
       | But he still has $100 million left.
        
         | mirekrusin wrote:
         | He should put it in Swiss bank so they can't touch it.
        
           | rustcleaner wrote:
           | Better yet: Monero.
        
             | vkou wrote:
             | Hiding money that a court orders you to turn over in crypto
             | is a great way to be held in prison for context of court
             | until the end of your natural life.
        
               | BenjiWiebe wrote:
               | *contempt of court
        
               | codetrotter wrote:
               | Wouldn't putting it in a foreign country bank account be
               | similar?
        
               | blackhawkC17 wrote:
               | Thanks to US pressure, Swiss banks are no longer as
               | secretive as they used to be. They'll quickly give up
               | information about any American when requested by the
               | government.
               | 
               | To add, anyone under indictment and bail is closely
               | monitored. They can't just transfer money to a Swiss Bank
               | without raising an alarm.
               | 
               | HNers enjoy cooking up movie-plot schemes that are dumb
               | in reality.
        
               | matheusmoreira wrote:
               | In my country, there's a guy who actually did it. An
               | anarchocapitalist named Daniel Fraga. Just a completely
               | surreal guy. Police would show up to his house and he'd
               | film himself calling them parasites of the state to their
               | faces. Used to make videos criticizing the system, the
               | government, the courts, the judges. Eventually tried to
               | expose corruption. Government tried to freeze his
               | accounts and discovered he had $1 in them. He had gone
               | all in on bitcoin. To this day I believe the government
               | has not seen the money. One day he just kinda
               | disappeared. He's either in some paradise enjoying his
               | billions or dead.
        
               | matheusmoreira wrote:
               | They're gonna imprison him either way. Being guilty of
               | pissing off the judge is sure to be a lesser crime than
               | whatever it is he's guilty of.
        
             | fHr wrote:
             | I mean you can just trace the source that buys it no? And
             | then hold him in prison for it anyway.
        
               | HeatrayEnjoyer wrote:
               | > I mean you can just trace the source that buys it no?
               | 
               | How would you do that?
        
               | codetrotter wrote:
               | If he uses any of the Centralized Exchanges (Kraken,
               | Coinbase, etc), those exchanges will have KYC info
               | showing that he/his company was the buyer
        
           | ano-ther wrote:
           | Archegos contributed to the demise of CreditSuisse, so I am
           | not sure if the Swiss would welcome him again.
           | 
           | https://www.finma.ch/en/news/2023/07/20230724-mm-archegos/
        
             | mirekrusin wrote:
             | I know, hence the joke.
        
           | TacticalCoder wrote:
           | > He should put it in Swiss bank so they can't touch it.
           | 
           | That era is long gone.
        
           | underlipton wrote:
           | I'd put money in a Swiss bank like I'd put money in Robinhood
           | or Mt. Gox.
        
         | stygiansonic wrote:
         | Reminiscent of a scene from Billions:
         | https://www.reddit.com/r/Billions/comments/czlg4u/need_help_...
        
       | mhh__ wrote:
       | I'm not seeing the market manipulation unless it's some quirk of
       | the formal definition rather than the informal meaning of the
       | term?
       | 
       | I was under the impression that he had an old fashioned value
       | play, levered up to the moon using total return swap (these do
       | have real uses) which blew up on him.
       | 
       | Unless he deliberately mislead his brokers should was it illegal?
        
         | bobthepanda wrote:
         | The SEC is alleging that he did mislead his brokers:
         | https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2022-70
         | 
         | > The complaint also alleges that, as part of the scheme,
         | Archegos repeatedly and deliberately misled many of Archegos's
         | counterparties about Archegos's exposure, concentration and
         | liquidity, in order to get increased trading capacity so that
         | Archegos could continue buying swaps in its most concentrated
         | positions, thereby driving up the price of those stocks.
         | Ultimately in March 2021, price declines in Archegos's most
         | concentrated positions allegedly triggered significant margin
         | calls that Archegos was unable to meet, and Archegos's
         | subsequent default and collapse resulted in billions of dollars
         | in credit losses among Archegos's counterparties.
         | 
         | > The SEC's complaint, filed in federal district court in
         | Manhattan, charges Hwang and the other defendants with
         | violating antifraud and other provisions of the federal
         | securities laws. The complaint seeks permanent injunctive
         | relief, return of allegedly ill-gotten gains, and civil
         | penalties. The SEC also seeks to bar individual defendants from
         | serving as a public company officer and director.
        
         | pram wrote:
         | Supposedly lying about the scale (and risk) of his positions to
         | get more leverage from banks. It's good old-fashioned fraud.
        
           | psaux wrote:
           | Correct, it is underlying assets value and correctness. This
           | fuzzy logic has always confused me
        
         | kjksf wrote:
         | Imagine you have a house and you go to 5 different banks and
         | take 5 different mortgages.
         | 
         | One mortgage is safe for the banks because they can take back
         | the house. Low risk means low rates.
         | 
         | If you could take 5 mortgages, that would be very risky for the
         | banks so they wouldn't give you a loan or charge much higher
         | interest.
         | 
         | Hence you can't take more than one mortgage.
         | 
         | But what if you lie to the bank when you apply for mortgage?
         | 
         | Well, to prevent that we made lying to the banks about such
         | things a crime.
         | 
         | Hwang is accused of a variation of that: he got loans from
         | multiple banks without telling them about other loans i.e.
         | lying to banks.
         | 
         | He made leveraged investments into lousy stocks and when he got
         | called on those loans, he couldn't repay them and banks that
         | gave him loans lost billions.
        
           | notfromhere wrote:
           | There is this notion that white collar crime is complicated
           | but it's really just lying, stealing, or cheating
        
           | waltbosz wrote:
           | Aren't there mechanisms in place to verify Hwang's financial
           | claims?
           | 
           | When I get a mortgage I have to provide proof of income and
           | assets with bank statements.
           | 
           | Did he forge documents, or did the banks just take his word
           | for it ?
        
         | phire wrote:
         | It's not great reporting.
         | 
         | The article seems to be fixated on how he lied to his finance
         | sources, and acts like that was the only thing he did wrong.
         | 
         | If you read the SEC lawsuit [1], the problem is less that he
         | lied to his finance sources and more about what he did with the
         | funds, which was blatant market manipulation:
         | 
         | "Archegos, through Hwang and Tomita, effected this scheme by
         | dominating the market for its Top 10 Holdings, as well as by
         | "setting the tone" (i.e., engaging in large pre- market
         | trading), bidding up prices by entering incrementally higher
         | limit orders throughout the trading day, and "marking the
         | close" (i.e., engaging in large trading in the last 30 minutes
         | of the trading day) and by other non-economic trading, all with
         | the goal of artificially inflating the share prices of its Top
         | 10 Holdings."
         | 
         | I mean, obviously he lied to his finance sources. It's not like
         | he was going to tell them that he was using their funds to
         | manipulation the market.
         | 
         | [1] https://www.sec.gov/files/litigation/complaints/2022/comp-
         | pr...
        
           | waltbosz wrote:
           | Interesting technique. Aren't there sophisticated automatic
           | trading algorithms that enable high speed trades.
           | 
           | I wonder if any of them are designed to watch out for this
           | behavior and avoid those stocks.
        
       | dahdum wrote:
       | He deserves prison of course, but I'd raise a glass to his
       | legend. At least he fleeced the savvy.
        
         | NotYourLawyer wrote:
         | For what?
        
           | paulddraper wrote:
           | Fraud
        
         | pbj1968 wrote:
         | Which is the only reason he's being charged with anything
        
       | blackhawkC17 wrote:
       | I'd like to meet Bill Hwang and ask, "What the heck were you
       | thinking?"
       | 
       | All those paper profits would have to be converted into real
       | money at some point, and the massive sales would have dampened
       | the share prices, negating the point in the first place.
       | 
       | He was trading like a WSB subscriber but with actual billions in
       | capital. From what is known publicly, the guy lived frugally and
       | wasn't a status or prestige chaser. He seems more like someone
       | with an excessive risk appetite who got in over his head.
       | 
       | I also find it interesting that Bill Hwang amassed over $30
       | billion, and no one would have known if his family office hadn't
       | fallen apart. This makes me wonder how many Wall Street
       | billionaires are hiding in plain sight, only known by industry
       | peers.
        
       | SuperNinKenDo wrote:
       | I know it's an irrelevant aside, but can I just say, since the
       | article decides to lead with it, that the painting created from
       | his vision is utterly underwhelming. How you could take such a
       | vision and turn it into something so mundane is beyond me. I
       | almost wonder if it's just the classic money laundering through
       | painting valuatiom shtick.
        
         | nicklecompte wrote:
         | Apparently it's not a painting:
         | 
         | > The artwork, commissioned in 2016, is rendered in metal mesh
         | by renowned South Korean artist Seungmo Park. Park also created
         | a larger-than-life depiction of Olympic sprinter Sebastian Coe
         | for Nike's headquarters in Oregon and the facade of Gucci's
         | flagship store in Seoul.
         | 
         | I noticed the texture looked odd when I zoomed into the photo.
         | I suspect Park did the best he could, but the medium itself
         | seems poorly-suited for the vision.
        
       | xorvoid wrote:
       | Why does the intersection of "being into Jesus" and "being into
       | money" always seem so correlated with "fraudster"?
        
         | pavel_lishin wrote:
         | Because Jesus was _very_ clear in his beliefs about money.
        
         | talldayo wrote:
         | In an extremely reductive sense, it's likely because fraudsters
         | envy the control religion exerts over it's adherents. Very few
         | things can make someone change their morals, give up their
         | possessions, and accept their newfound poverty with excitement.
         | It's the morals-inversion framework that makes religion so
         | powerful (and explains the traditional church-state funding
         | relationship). An effective cult-of-personality or even
         | business ultimately strives to achieve the same transcendent
         | relationship. It's dedication that defies logic.
         | 
         | Instead of cracking open _that_ can of worms though, I think it
         | 's more interesting how faith is twisted throughout history.
         | Gnosticism is a favorite example, attempting in many ways to
         | refute the _story_ of the Bible while strictly attempting to
         | follow a faithful logic and gospel-centric narrative. It 's
         | well worth reading into if anyone hasn't seen it, even just for
         | the novelty of it. While it's easy to laugh at today, it's also
         | easy to see how "illusion" and "revelation" focused apocrypha
         | could have shaken the reality of clergymembers in an age when
         | the Internet didn't exist.
         | 
         | And as for the article...
         | 
         | > In his vision, the blood of Christ washes over New York,
         | cleansing the great metropolis of its sins
         | 
         | I think the activeness of Hwang's imagination is more of an
         | indictment of his nutjob-level than his faith. If he told
         | investors the same story sans-Christ, I think we would still be
         | in agreement that he's a huckster trying to spew revelatory
         | nonsense.
         | 
         | It's hard to draw conclusions on something as divisive as
         | faith, but the writing of men is readily and easily imitated to
         | petty ends.
        
         | travoc wrote:
         | There are 2.4 billion Christians on earth, so you could find
         | correlation between "being into Jesus" and any behavior you
         | wanted.
        
         | blackhawkC17 wrote:
         | I'll describe Hwang more as delusional reckless gambler than
         | fraudster.
         | 
         | As the article implies, it's not like he cherished the high
         | life and bought lots of assets. He seems like someone addicted
         | to stock gambling.
        
       | spxneo wrote:
       | Bill Hwang, Masayoshi Son are all just straight up gamblers.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-05-04 23:00 UTC)