[HN Gopher] Are Japanese anime robots isometric or allometric?
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Are Japanese anime robots isometric or allometric?
        
       Author : zdw
       Score  : 139 points
       Date   : 2024-05-01 16:21 UTC (3 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (jgeekstudies.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (jgeekstudies.org)
        
       | cicloid wrote:
       | *Excluding Tengen Toppa Gurren Lagann
        
         | omoikane wrote:
         | Related research: "Is the Great Attractor a Tengen Toppa Gurren
         | Lagann?"
         | 
         | https://jgeekstudies.org/2016/05/19/great-attractor-ttgl/
        
           | tetris11 wrote:
           | > the act of throwing a single punch would take a few million
           | years. It would take a few million years more for the pilot
           | of this robot to find whether the punch hit the target or
           | not. It would be a long fight. These practical questions will
           | henceforth be disregarded here
           | 
           | Brilliant
        
         | kibwen wrote:
         | It's possible that that scale image of robot size comparisons
         | might actually depict Tengen Toppa Gurren Lagann, in the same
         | sense that a photo taken by an electron microscope depicts our
         | solar system.
        
         | dclowd9901 wrote:
         | Kept looking for GL's outlier dot in the super robot section,
         | then figured the just left it out so as to not bastardize the
         | results.
         | 
         | For anyone OOTL, the show features robots at an intergalactic
         | scale, such that the crew needs to invent FTL communications
         | and travel just to communicate and move within the ship proper.
        
           | stoperaticless wrote:
           | Searching for GL anime I get "girl love", ehich seems
           | unrelated to space or robots.
           | 
           | Could you provide the full name of the show?
        
             | Twisol wrote:
             | "Tengen Toppa Gurren Lagann", from upthread; the GL is for
             | "Gurren Lagann", which is how it's usually known.
        
           | harry_ord wrote:
           | And gave us the infantitly large scope dog in games
        
             | falsaberN1 wrote:
             | Or Boss Borot vs Anti-Spiral.
        
           | Hamuko wrote:
           | The Gurren Lagann is only 12 metres in height though. Lagann
           | is around the same height as Simon and Gurren is about nine
           | metres on top (technically below) of that.
        
             | Filligree wrote:
             | It gets bigger.
        
       | RhysU wrote:
       | Evangelion has robots...?
        
         | tsujamin wrote:
         | Having just finished watching evangelion rebuild today: it is
         | definitely a robot anime
        
           | xeonmc wrote:
           | attack on titan is also a mecha anime
        
             | lain-dono wrote:
             | definitely not.
             | 
             | Titans are closer to summoned creatures. And they're not
             | the product of technology.
             | 
             | Otherwise, a fight between two pregnant women could be seen
             | as a mech fight.
        
               | YurgenJurgensen wrote:
               | Shingeki no Kyojin is 100% a mecha anime. If you play Fur
               | Elise on an electric guitar it doesn't automatically
               | become Rock'n'Roll, and making the giant robots out of
               | meat does not change the fact trust SnK is full of mecha
               | tropes, is structured like a mecha anime, and the
               | characters treat the titans like vehicles.
        
               | bmacho wrote:
               | Definitely yes. It has nothing to do with summoned
               | creatures, even remotely.
               | 
               | > Otherwise, a fight between two pregnant women could be
               | seen as a mech fight.
               | 
               | No. You are missing the fact that in AoT the pilots pilot
               | the mechas, and not just be there doing whatever embryos
               | do.
        
               | tipsydoo wrote:
               | >Otherwise, a fight between two pregnant women could be
               | seen as a mech fight.
               | 
               | I mean, when you consider what pregnancy does to an
               | expectant mother, hormonally, and the lengths to which
               | some will go to protect their unborn child... It's not an
               | entirely implausible characterization.
               | 
               | But speaking to AOT, specifically, it's real robot with
               | some super robot/fantasy/Abrahamic text characteristics
               | to allow for the setting. Despite the "summoning" aspect,
               | practical considerations of when and how to employ
               | titans, the political, social, and philosophical
               | ramifications of their existence and use, and the fact
               | that the story is ultimately a study of characters caught
               | up in war and history and intrigue, all point to a solid
               | mecha, real robot classification.
        
             | falsaberN1 wrote:
             | My favorite mecha film is Ratatouille.
        
           | StefanBatory wrote:
           | It is very wholesome anime about mecha fights, right? :)
        
             | HeckFeck wrote:
             | Yep, that's all we mean when we say 'human
             | instrumentality'. The robot is the ultimate human
             | instrument.
             | 
             | t. Gendo and Seele
        
           | consumer451 wrote:
           | Thanks for mentioning this, I didn't know that it existed. I
           | just started watching.
           | 
           | Any other new dubbed mecha anime recommendations would be
           | highly appreciated. Ideally, less child-focused.
        
         | mikepurvis wrote:
         | In the lore they're creatures with armor, but the aesthetics
         | and presentation are entirely within "giant mech" tropes.
        
           | falsaberN1 wrote:
           | And then the production models show up.
        
         | s-lambert wrote:
         | Jet Alone is a pure robot.
        
           | drooopy wrote:
           | That's what I always thought. JA was the only actual robot in
           | the series. Everything else that is human made is a cyborg.
        
       | userbinator wrote:
       | _Then, what is the heaviest movable machine of human
       | civilization? The answer is aircraft carriers. The U. S. Navy
       | Nimitz class aircraft carrier is one of the largest ships, and
       | each ship is about 325 m long and 99,000 t heavy._
       | 
       | Looks like some ships are a few times heavier than that:
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_machines#Sea_v...
        
         | dexen wrote:
         | Surprisingly the difference isn't quite as it seems.
         | 
         | There's an important distinction between mass of the vessel's
         | own structure, the bare necessities like fuel, stores & crew,
         | and its payload. Naval engineering and insurance talks several
         | interrelated measures, for our purposes "light load
         | displacement" is the closest to the weight of the bare
         | structure, while "full load displacement" includes all typical
         | stores, fuel, crew, and payload. Conversely the linked measures
         | "gross weight tonnage" is measure of _volume_ rather than mass,
         | and less relevant for this discussion.
         | 
         | For combat vessels like USS Gerald Ford, most of the weight is
         | in the structure itself, and while we don't have exact measures
         | for the carrier, it's about 100,000 tonnes. For reference, an
         | older generation but comparable carrier USS Nimitz has
         | structure of 78280 tons ("light load displacement"), and all up
         | weight 101196 tons ("full load displacement").
         | 
         | However for transport vessels like the linked Seawise Giant,
         | the structure is small part of all up weight. While the ship
         | plus cargo can go up to 646,642 long tons ("full load
         | displacement"), the structure itself is much lighter: 81,879
         | long tons ("light load displacement").
         | 
         | Also the linked cruise ship, Icon of the Seas, has impressively
         | high "gross weight tonnage" but again that's measure of volume.
         | The displacement is a bit hard to find, people quote variously
         | 100,000t or 120,000t without being specific light load or full
         | load. So while the cruise ship is much larger by volume than
         | the military vessel, the weight of the structure is closely
         | comparable. The later is much more densely packed - keeping
         | size down is a necessity for any combat craft, even the largest
         | ones.
        
           | BolexNOLA wrote:
           | I have nothing to add this was just so fascinating to read.
           | Thanks for that!
        
           | abduhl wrote:
           | In case anyone was wondering:
           | 
           | Long ton = 2240 lb (1016 kg)
           | 
           | Short ton = 2000 lb (907 kg)
           | 
           | Tonne = 2205 lb (1000 kg)
           | 
           | Long tons are rarely used outside shipping. Short tons are
           | what people mean when they say ton in America. Tonne is the
           | metric ton and is what most of the rest of the world means
           | when you hear something that sounds like ton.
        
       | Animats wrote:
       | Mecha seem to have disappeared from Japanese anime. Here's the
       | anime list for Spring 2024.[1]
       | 
       | [1] https://anichart.net/Spring-2024
        
         | spondylosaurus wrote:
         | We got Gundam Witch last year :)
        
           | Dalewyn wrote:
           | And Gundam SEED Freedom this January.
        
         | creamyhorror wrote:
         | Mecha was a 1960s-1980s war-inspired fascination that maybe, if
         | anything, we should be surprised at the longevity of. We
         | haven't really been getting that many giant robots or pilotable
         | mechs in popular media outside of Japanese animation.
        
           | Aerroon wrote:
           | Mecha is never going to disappear. Mecha are great for toy
           | sales.
        
           | harry_ord wrote:
           | I always felt like the big explosion was the 80s, not to say
           | the 70s was unremarkable and the 90s just had a lot of really
           | good stuff like turn A, Eva (I dislike it) and King of braves
           | GGG
        
           | isaacfung wrote:
           | There is an upcoming Mech movie Atlas, starring Jennifer
           | Lopez with a heavy Titanfall vibe.
        
           | nullstyle wrote:
           | Patlabor wasn't war-inspired; you might enjoy it's contrast
           | to gundam-type mecha stories. The Labors represent the rise
           | of technological power that can be employed by a single
           | person and all the effects that can have.
        
         | axx8 wrote:
         | Yep. The last mainstream mecha anime were Darling in the FranXX
         | (2018)[1] and 86 (2021)[2]. Anime like Gundam are much more
         | niche if you compare the amount of MAL users.
         | 
         | [1]https://myanimelist.net/anime/35849/Darling_in_the_FranXX
         | 
         | [2]https://myanimelist.net/anime/41457/86
        
           | Hamuko wrote:
           | Gundam, the niche that does 100 billion yen in revenue per
           | year.
        
             | throwaway11460 wrote:
             | The toys are appealing even to children that never saw the
             | anime.
             | 
             | Actually I wouldn't let my kids watch it until they were at
             | least 13 or so, maybe more depending on the child. A lot of
             | war and mass-scale death there, and frankly, a lot of
             | adoration for fascism - the space nazis turn out to be
             | right.
        
               | tipsydoo wrote:
               | Wing (and, by extension, 00) was a fine watch at 10, and
               | G probably would have been, too. They're considerably
               | less fraught in both iconography and philosophy than some
               | of the other series, and quite a bit more hammy. The
               | Build Fighters/Divers series are great, too. Stay far
               | away from AGE, though; cutesy stylings because it was
               | intended to exist alongside series like Yokai Watch, but
               | it ended up being quite problematic.
        
               | tetris11 wrote:
               | Anime and Fascism really do seem to walk hand-in-hand a
               | lot.
               | 
               | Even my beloved Frieren has an unnatural dehumanistic
               | streak against Demons who exhibit intelligence and
               | personalities, which she explains away as mere mimicry,
               | despite the fact that she has learned magic from them.
               | 
               | I guess I know which side of the AI debate she rests on.
        
           | Tarq0n wrote:
           | Attack on Titan is for all intents and purposes a mecha, and
           | one of the most mainstream anime of recent memory.
        
             | tetris11 wrote:
             | It has mecha elements, as well as steampunk and magic
             | elements too.
             | 
             | Other than their kits, everything else they operate is very
             | standard WW1-esque tech.
        
           | tipsydoo wrote:
           | Mecha fandom doesn't necessarily cross over with anime fandom
           | (even though the former is arguably the origin of the
           | latter). I find that there's more crossover with hobbyists
           | (plastic models), military fandom, and gamers. Gundam is
           | almost it's own thing (to Sunrise's simultaneous satisfaction
           | and chagrin), and the Site Which Shall Not Be Named split a
           | Mecha board off of the Anime board almost 2 decades ago. I
           | don't know that the fandom will be represented on MAL, which
           | is itself a niche service for the wider anime-watching
           | community.
           | 
           | Suffice it to say, the multiple life-scale Gundam statues
           | that have been put up/dismantled over the past few years
           | speak to its enduring popularity. I will say that there
           | haven't been as many non-Gundam mecha anime as there were in
           | the 2010s. We did get G-Witch and Bravern last year, and
           | Hathaway on Netflix in 2021. And, as someone said, AOT is
           | essentially Meat Gundam.
           | 
           | EDIT: Also, I don't know that I'd even call 86 mainstream. It
           | felt like it actually got way less recognition than it should
           | have.
        
         | tetris11 wrote:
         | I thought EightySix was pretty good (2021-3)
        
         | Hamuko wrote:
         | Last season had Yuki Bakuhatsu Bang Bravern, SYNDUALITY and
         | Gundam SEED FREEDOM, this season has Shinkalion and next season
         | has Grendizer U. "Disappeared" seems like a strong word.
        
           | falsaberN1 wrote:
           | I watched Shinkalion purely out of desperation and was
           | pleasantly surprised despite being a show for kids and having
           | "terrible graphics".
           | 
           | And yeah there's not much mainstream, but you always get some
           | Mazinger spinoff, some Gundam and other "minor" stuff. The
           | genre is definitely not popular but it's alive.
           | 
           | Super Robot Taisen is also still ongoing, and while it's not
           | a show (although it's been adapted a few times) it's a good
           | way to find stuff that might have escaped your radar. And the
           | originals can help quench the thirst for new cool robots with
           | flashy moves. Lately they have been adding "never animated"
           | stuff like Mazinger ZERO, GaoGaiGar Vs. Betterman and Getter
           | Devolution which is nice too.
        
         | YurgenJurgensen wrote:
         | While I'd like to blame the metastasization of the narou-kei LN
         | adaptation, I think the real reason is the same as why Sci Fi
         | has largely disappeared from visual media in general outside of
         | hangers on from legacy franchises. People have stopped
         | believing in the future.
        
       | hamilyon2 wrote:
       | I thought the word "mecha" is used to describe devices which are
       | operated by humans, like a Gundam. Essentially mecha is
       | anthropomorphic tank.
       | 
       | "Robot" is used to describe autonomous system, like Marvin or
       | Laputian Robot Troopers
        
         | YurgenJurgensen wrote:
         | "meka" refers to any mechanical design. The artists who do
         | "mecha" design in anime will do everything from guns to boats.
         | The English term's meaning changed when it was re-borrowed.
        
           | RobotToaster wrote:
           | > The English term's meaning changed when it was re-borrowed.
           | 
           | Like the meaning of the term "anime" changed?
        
             | Uvix wrote:
             | Depends on which borrowing you're referring to. Japanese
             | uses it like the original French to refer to anything
             | animated, then it was changed when English borrowed it from
             | Japanese to refer specifically to Japanese animation.
        
             | numpad0 wrote:
             | The point is "mech/mecha" as in "biped humanoid machines"
             | is en-US specific. In ja-JP and probably few others it's
             | "robots". "Anime" is more widely understood.
        
               | hnbad wrote:
               | But then OP is correct: mecha/mech refers to humanoid
               | bipeds. The Japanese word is not mecha but meka (meka in
               | romaji).
               | 
               | EDIT: I'm being pedantic. When used in English, "mecha"
               | or "mech" is an English word and the semantics associated
               | with similar words in other languages don't really
               | matter. Where it gets confusing is that it's used in the
               | context of discussing Japanese media (and its foreign
               | derivatives) in English. The reason I'm being pedantic is
               | that my native language is German and not only have
               | German loanwords in English often mutated in ways that
               | trip up German native speakers (e.g. wanderlust is better
               | translated as Fernweh, whereas Wanderlust is more about
               | hiking and being in nature) but the same is true in the
               | inverse, i.e. a lot of English loan words in German have
               | different or narrower meanings than in English (e.g. a
               | Burger is not a type of Sandwich as that specifically
               | refers to a sandwich using white bread and a Hot Dog
               | always includes the bread and topping/sauces whereas the
               | hot dog is just a Wurst and ground beef is never referred
               | to as sausage or burger).
        
         | alexey-salmin wrote:
         | Fun fact is that in Russian the word "mekh" (reads like "mech"
         | or "meh") means "fur". I was thoroughly confused by mighty
         | furry warriors when I found the "Star Guard" book on the shelf
         | around the age of nine.
        
         | jghn wrote:
         | Related to this is something that's always bugged me. Playing
         | games like Battletech, at some point the fandom (largely those
         | who came in from the video games) started talking in terms of
         | enjoying playing with "big, stompy robots".
         | 
         | But they're .... not robots? It's more like "big, stompy
         | powered armor"
        
       | lloeki wrote:
       | Arguably, while of alien making, the Macross flying fortress fits
       | the "real robot" definition and seems to be miscategorised. By
       | and large it's no different than your regular Imperial Star
       | Destroyer except that it can transform to a humanoid form.
        
       | Aeolun wrote:
       | > In contrast, Macross is very unrealistic because Macross is
       | equal to a pile of 182 Nimitz class aircraft carriers in terms of
       | mass.
       | 
       | Is it? It's also 5 times longer (and presumably wider) than the
       | Nimitz aircraft carrier. That would mean that Macross is only
       | about 5-6x denser than the Nimitz aircraft carrier, which isn't
       | entirely out of the realm of reason for a futuristic space
       | battleship. If nothing else, having several tens of meters of
       | dense matter between the innards and the outside where high
       | energy photons are flying around sounds like a great idea.
       | 
       | It was also originally meant to house creatures much larger than
       | humans, which correspondent mass, so the structure of the ship
       | would reflect that.
        
         | mng2 wrote:
         | They do mention the origin story of Macross a few paragraphs up
         | so it seems like an odd criticism. On the other hand, it's kind
         | of neat to see that alien technology is an outlier according to
         | their analysis.
        
       | playingalong wrote:
       | Interesting choice of unit of reference. Admiral Chester Nimitz
       | (who gave the name to USS Nimitz) was the one to sign the
       | Japanese surrender in WW2.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-05-04 23:02 UTC)