[HN Gopher] Show HN: An Open Source project for enhancing AI Age...
___________________________________________________________________
Show HN: An Open Source project for enhancing AI Agents in taking
action
Author : wenfengwang
Score : 29 points
Date : 2024-05-02 15:21 UTC (7 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (github.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (github.com)
| wenfengwang wrote:
| Hi, I'm wells, the creator of NPi. NPi aiming to introducing a
| 'middle-layer' between LLMs and Agents, serves as a gateway for
| AI Agents action in virtual world!
|
| NPi is currently under active development, we are eager to
| involve more AI Agent developers for building NPi together.
|
| You could find our roadmap on https://www.npi.ai/docs/roadmap, or
| join Discord channel https://discord.gg/MQTuXtbj play together~
| atlex2 wrote:
| Hello! This sounds interesting, but I wasn't immediately
| understanding it. Does your project enable models like Llama,
| which don't have native tool use, to have tool use? If so, that
| would be super useful!
| wenfengwang wrote:
| YES, support open source model like LLama is our next
| milestone! it will be available in future release, no far
| away.
|
| As far now, NPi only support OpenAI for providing out-of-box
| Tool using API, you could check out how it work:
| https://github.com/npi-
| ai/npi/blob/main/examples/calendar_ne...
| cionut wrote:
| Cool project. Tried to join but the Discord link seems to have
| expired?
| unseenmars wrote:
| Thank you for letting us know.
|
| We have updated the Discord invitation link. Here is the new
| one: discord.gg/wdskUcKc
| wenfengwang wrote:
| Apologized! Thanks for finding it out, just corrected it.
| cionut wrote:
| Thanks! It worked now
| ssddanbrown wrote:
| The project is licensed under a Business Source License [1] which
| wouldn't be widely considered open source due to the limitations
| it's placing on use, so advertising this as open source may be
| misleading to many. Source available is a more common term for
| these kinds of license.
|
| If you're interested in why I think this distinction matters,
| I've written some thoughts about that on my blog [2].
|
| [1] https://github.com/npi-ai/npi/blob/
| 991bdc7e0c9830c89a81b07b0ebabca9b506677a/LICENSE
|
| [2] https://danb.me/blog/open-source-available-distinction/
| wenfengwang wrote:
| Thanks ssddanbrown! We only published our server-side code
| under the BSL 1.1, and granting users using NPi in
| production[1].
|
| Other parties under the Apache 2.0 License. you could check
| them out, SDK[2], Protocol[3]:
|
| [1] https://github.com/npi-
| ai/npi/blob/991bdc7e0c9830c89a81b07b0... [2]
| https://github.com/npi-ai/npi/blob/991bdc7e0c9830c89a81b07b0...
| [3] https://github.com/npi-ai/npi/blob/main/proto/LICENSE
| mlamina wrote:
| Hi wells, I'm working on a project that goes in the same
| direction: https://github.com/PR-Pilot-AI
| wenfengwang wrote:
| Cool project, stared!
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2024-05-02 23:01 UTC)