[HN Gopher] Hertz is ditching even more electric cars
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Hertz is ditching even more electric cars
        
       Author : belter
       Score  : 38 points
       Date   : 2024-04-27 20:26 UTC (2 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (qz.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (qz.com)
        
       | jseliger wrote:
       | Last time this came up I wrote:
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39934120:
       | 
       |  _A few weeks ago I rented a Model 3 from Hertz in San Diego, and
       | the car didn 't come with an SAE J1772 Charging Adapter (this
       | covers most level 2 stations). That's crazy. I was staying
       | primarily at UCSD for cancer treatment, and there are a million
       | level 2 chargers that I couldn't access without the SAE J1772
       | dongle. The Tesla my wife and I have always has a SAE J1772
       | dongle in the center console. I complained about the lack of this
       | essential part._
       | 
       | Hertz would charge for the dongle and then refund upon its
       | return. The car itself was good!
        
       | jillesvangurp wrote:
       | The question is what will consumers be ditching Hertz for?
       | Electric cars as an economical proposition have already proved
       | themselves. That debate is pretty much over. So, why can't Hertz
       | make it work? And who else can disrupt them and how quickly?
        
         | tuatoru wrote:
         | Repair costs, negative sentiment from customers, much lower
         | than expected residual value. Those are why.
        
         | cjk2 wrote:
         | As a regular Hertz customer, I will still use Hertz. They are
         | mostly zero hassle, even that time I destroyed a Fiat 500 :)
         | 
         | I never rented an EV from them and never would because the
         | charging logistics are a pain in the ass at return. Out of
         | petrol? 10 minutes, run it through the car wash at the same
         | time, sorted. Out of charge? Oh I'm right next to one of the
         | biggest airports in Europe and all the chargers are rammed. No
         | thanks.
        
           | echoangle wrote:
           | What happens when you return it with a lower charge than when
           | you got it? Don't you just have to pay the difference? Is
           | that more expensive than charging it yourself?
        
             | resolutebat wrote:
             | Yup, same as returning an ICE car with a half-empty tank.
        
             | patja wrote:
             | It's a flat fee. I forget if it was $25 or $35.
             | 
             | They were pricing EVs at a discount for a trip I took
             | through Atlanta last month. Still came out ahead with the
             | recharge fee.
        
             | cjk2 wrote:
             | Waaaay more expensive.
        
           | khuey wrote:
           | Do Europeans really return their rental cars washed? The only
           | time I've ever washed a rental car in the US was when I drove
           | it off paved roads in violation of the terms of the rental
           | agreement and needed to hide the evidence.
        
             | Symbiote wrote:
             | I've never washed a rental car, and I've never heard of
             | anyone doing so.
             | 
             | (Fortunately, last time I drove one on a dirt road there
             | was a heavy rain storm the next day.)
             | 
             | </European>
        
             | ghaff wrote:
             | I've never ever washed then though I probably risked a
             | cleaning fee. I've returned some very (externally) dirty
             | cars that were in a bunch of forest roads though mostly not
             | really off-road.
        
             | cjk2 wrote:
             | I mostly do because I tend to make them all shitty.
        
         | lm28469 wrote:
         | What makes sense at an individual level doesn't necessarily
         | makes sense at that scale.
         | 
         | The only time I rent cars is for long trips, I'm about to rent
         | one next month actually, 1200km, no chance I'll get an EV that
         | at most will give me 400km of range
         | 
         | The fact that anything above a fender bender is almost always a
         | total write off probably doest help either
        
         | bdavbdav wrote:
         | The reason cited was the depreciation and reliability. Taking
         | them at face value, presumably all other rental co's would be
         | hit with the same issues, potentially to a greater degree
         | without having the buying power of Hertz
        
         | Stevvo wrote:
         | Hertz doesn't have to pay for gasoline; the customer does. So
         | they loose the main economic advantage of electric cars.
        
           | cm2187 wrote:
           | And you can't really show up back at the airport with a car
           | fully charged.
        
         | jakereps wrote:
         | This comment feels so disconnected from reality that I can only
         | imagine you possibly live in a bubble of EV owners. To offer my
         | anecdotal observation, where I live, I rarely ever see an EV.
         | Maybe a single one on the road per day, if that. Various
         | dealerships have told me everyone getting one around the area
         | recently has been returning them.
         | 
         | While on a time limited event, like a vacation, where I may
         | need a rental car, I have no desire to sit and wait for my car
         | to charge and waste my time, over a 45 second gas fill up.
         | Hotels don't universally offer charging ports (or enough of
         | them, if it even does). EVs have a very long way to go to being
         | generally useful for the non homeowner who doesn't have a
         | charging station in their own garage.
        
           | _fizz_buzz_ wrote:
           | > To offer my anecdotal observation, where I live, I rarely
           | ever see an EV.
           | 
           | Where do you live? I live in a regular German town, nothing I
           | would consider particular techie, and I see so many electric
           | cars. If you only see one ev per day, I think that you might
           | live more in a bubble than OP.
        
             | bobthepanda wrote:
             | i mean urban geographies are for the most part a bubble.
             | 
             | I could see even in different parts of the US wildly
             | different EV adoption rates. They're very common in Seattle
             | but I think I would be surprised if I saw too many of them
             | in Boise. US states are often the size of European
             | countries.
        
               | Symbiote wrote:
               | 83% of the US population lives in an urban area, it's the
               | rural dwellers in the "bubble".
        
               | bobthepanda wrote:
               | each urban region is its own bubble. Spokane looks
               | different from Houston which looks different from Detroit
               | and Baltimore, etc.
               | 
               | any company doing targeting based on just vaguely urban
               | vs. rural would be in for a terrible return on investment
        
               | ghaff wrote:
               | They're pretty common in the Bay Area but, anecdotally
               | while they're becoming more common in the Boston suburbs
               | they're still a fairly unusual sighting other than at a
               | charging station next to a supermarket I shop--which
               | typically has 1-2 cars at it.
        
             | jakereps wrote:
             | One is certainly underestimating. I only mean some
             | insignificant number of vehicles. Far from the "proven"
             | statement about people vying for EV rentals in the OP
             | comment. I realize now that I shouldn't have put an
             | explicit number on an internet comment, as now that number
             | is the target to come after me for.
        
           | Symbiote wrote:
           | There's not much point grumbling about an anecdote and
           | supplying another.
           | 
           | The EU as a whole has 1.68% EVs out of all passenger cars,
           | though it's about 15% of new cars. [1]
           | 
           | Here in Denmark BEVs are 5.68% of all passenger cars, and I'm
           | sure it's higher where I live in Copenhagen. Over half of the
           | taxis and buses are EVs, plus a good proportion of private
           | vehicle. I won't guess, but I do see many EVs every time I go
           | outside.
           | 
           | [1] https://alternative-fuels-
           | observatory.ec.europa.eu/transport...
        
             | jakereps wrote:
             | Agreed, just was too lazy for research and the OP EV praise
             | was eye-roll inducing, so I just quickly offered an
             | alternative perspective. Thanks for the actual numbers!
        
         | xanathar wrote:
         | I have an EV, no gas car and I'm super happy about that.
         | 
         | And yet when I needed to rent a car, I rented a gasoline one.
         | 
         | Why?
         | 
         | Because car rental is pretty much the worst case for an EV.
         | 
         | If I rent a car I'm likely abroad, with zero knowledge of the
         | recharge network and often not great options in terms of costs
         | because most are national (at least, here in Europe, only
         | notable exception being Ionity).
         | 
         | I'm also likely to drive long distances, with no routine, and
         | little planning capacity.
         | 
         | And whatever other reason one would pick an EV for (noise,
         | pollution, fuel cost, one pedal drive comfort etc.) they are
         | all negligible when applied to a 2 weeks vacation.
        
         | ok123456 wrote:
         | > Electric cars as an economic proposition have already proved
         | themselves. That debate is pretty much over.
         | 
         | Have they? It seems that when rubber meets the road, so to
         | speak, it is not a simple one-to-one replacement for gas or
         | diesel vehicles. The day-to-day ownership is more complicated,
         | planning your itinerary and day around sparse public charging
         | and owning property to have at-home charging. Also, the long-
         | term ownership, having low resale value due to the high repair
         | costs of the electric drivetrain and low overall repairability,
         | makes ownership a poor proposition for most average people.
         | 
         | Electric cars have been on the market for over a decade. Show
         | me one that someone has kept past 200,000 miles. Meanwhile, you
         | can find Toyotas and Hondas well past that benchmark all day on
         | Marketplace.
        
           | resolutebat wrote:
           | As requested: https://www.fleetandleasing.com/leasing-
           | news-1/high-mileage-...
        
           | bdcravens wrote:
           | > Show me one that someone has kept past 200,000 miles.
           | Meanwhile, you can find Toyotas and Hondas well past that
           | benchmark all day on Marketplace.
           | 
           | Even among gas cars, those who buy new rarely keep cars that
           | long. The average is about 8 years. I've owned several Hondas
           | and Toyotas, and I've never hit 100k on one. (even though I
           | have no doubt any of them would still be on the road) (My
           | current car is a Kia EV6)
        
           | cogman10 wrote:
           | I'm at 130,000 now, I'll let you know when I roll over the
           | 200,000 mark.
        
         | foooorsyth wrote:
         | Vehicle rental periods are inherently time constrained. If
         | you're on a business trip or vacation the last thing you want
         | to be doing is waiting for your vehicle to charge. And, you
         | inherently also often do not have access to private charging
         | infrastructure which means you actively have to go out of your
         | way to find a safe and reliable charger. And you have to do
         | this in a strange place that you don't know. Home charging is
         | the critical factor that makes life with an EV appealing.
         | 
         | Vacations are so time constrained that a huge % of ICE renters
         | opt to just get hosed on gas up fees that rental companies
         | charge instead of going to any ubiquitous gas station before
         | dropping the car off. Car drop off with a flight to catch is
         | always a race against time.
        
         | Scoundreller wrote:
         | I wonder if the economics for the rental provider don't work as
         | well: rentals probably get in more collisions (infrequent
         | drivers + unfamiliar environment) and that's a problem if they
         | can't get them back on the road quickly.
        
           | henrikschroder wrote:
           | The economics for rental cars relies on resale value after
           | one to two years, frequency of damage, and cost of repair.
           | 
           | All of these things suck for EVs in general, and Teslas in
           | particular. The recent price cuts have demolished the resale
           | value way more than any other car, rented EVs get damaged
           | more frequently because people are unfamiliar with their
           | behaviour and torque curves and acceleration, and the cost of
           | repair is atrocious for Teslas, since their service
           | infrastructure is severely lacking, i.e. it takes forever to
           | get parts.
           | 
           | And _on top of that_ , rental customers do not want an EV in
           | an unfamiliar place. Everyone can find a gas station and fill
           | it up before returning, but having to schedule your entire
           | trip around charging infrastructure is a complete waste of
           | time.
           | 
           | The only rental customers it makes sense for is people who
           | already have an EV, love it, and know how to live with. But
           | the problem is that Hertz was throwing the Teslas at
           | customers willy-nilly as some kind of "luxury upgrade", with
           | crap results.
        
             | ghaff wrote:
             | I could see renting a Tesla once for the experience but,
             | yeah, it would be unfamiliar both in the handling and the
             | electric gee-gas. Hell, a lot of non-core ICE are already
             | sufficiently non-standard I avoid them when I can in a
             | rental.
        
         | jajko wrote:
         | It may be over for you, but for most people it isn't. I won't
         | pay the price of new car, any car, ever, even if I can afford
         | it easily. Its just silly when I can pay 20% of premium BMW
         | with say 90k km and use it for another 10 years or 150k km,
         | with very few repairs needed (granted, this depends on the
         | model but knock on the wood this worked for 15 years so far).
         | Used electric cars comfortable for a family of 4, with bigger
         | trunk, can drive at least 800km fully loaded in winter in 1 go
         | without ever thinking about battery state, or chargers network?
         | Please show me one and its price.
         | 
         | Its often the second biggest investment in one's life, after
         | housing. But unlike housing you just throw money at it,
         | expecting pure massive loss, while gaining service. Service new
         | car offers is 100% of used one which is well maintained, minus
         | all potential initial recalls. Its even better for peace of
         | mind - small dents and damage on new car _hurts_ mentally so
         | one becomes a slave to freakin ' piece of plastic and metal, on
         | older one its meh category and I focus on important parts being
         | in good state and high quality wheels connecting me to Earth,
         | while driving much more premium equipped cars than comparable
         | electric ones (granted, ie Porsche is better but at what crazy
         | price).
         | 
         | What electric cars bring within same requirements is 2-4x more
         | expensive just to purchase, and TCO are stratospheric for what
         | I am willing to accept.
         | 
         | Another point is environmental impact on all that battery
         | chemistry destroying ecosystems of some poor countries electric
         | drivers often never even heard of nor visited, it ain't greener
         | car to manufacture by any means, albeit greener to run for
         | sure.
         | 
         | So there you have it, the reason 80% of ICE driver's reasons to
         | stay where they are, at least for another decade or two. And
         | that's just purely civilian family transport. What comes after
         | those decades we can discuss at that time, nobody knows what
         | situation will be at that time.
        
         | alwa wrote:
         | Isn't this specifically a case of Hertz having estimated the
         | economical proposition as proven and positive, and now having
         | to fix that miscalculation as the actual economic results have
         | rolled in?
        
         | bdcravens wrote:
         | EVs are pricey versus comparably equipped cars, and this is
         | reflected in the rates. (I rented two cars on Turo, a
         | 4-cylinder ICE and an EV, and the ICE had a better ROI)
         | 
         | Owning an EV requires some compromises, but you figure it out:
         | you get a charger for home, you learn where the chargers are
         | and what the waits are like, etc. For a traveler renting a car,
         | this is bigger challenge. (I say this being a two-EV household)
        
         | dude187 wrote:
         | > That debate is pretty much over.
         | 
         | In what world and in what way? I don't know anybody who would
         | rent an electric car and I certainly would not
        
       | IshKebab wrote:
       | Yeah, electric cars definitely don't make sense for car hire. The
       | main advantage of electric car ownership is cheaper fuel costs
       | long term if you charge at home overnight. That obviously isn't
       | going to happen for a hire car, and even if it did the fuel cost
       | of a hire car is insignificant compared to the cost of the hire
       | itself.
       | 
       | On top of that, charging is still way less convenient than
       | refueling an ICE car, and when you hire a car it's usually in a
       | situation where you can't afford inconvenience.
       | 
       | I think electric cars are the future and hopefully I'll never buy
       | an ICE car again, but car hire has got to be the _last_ domain to
       | transition surely?
        
         | apgwoz wrote:
         | We use Zipcar for a second car at the moment and the closest
         | one is an EV. I've only used it to go (at most) 10 miles round
         | trip, but I've picked it up at 15% charge before and had
         | anxiety the whole time... I agree that EV is a poor choice for
         | rental.
        
           | Symbiote wrote:
           | Can you not see the charge amount before renting it?
           | 
           | The equivalent services in Copenhagen show the state of
           | charge of the cars on the map, before paying anything.
           | (There's also free minutes for leaving the car plugged in to
           | a charger at the end, and perhaps because of that it's rare
           | for them to be at a low charge.)
        
             | rokkitmensch wrote:
             | This has gotta be the ultimate EV gaslighting I've ever
             | seen. You're clearly not doing EV right, GP!
        
               | Symbiote wrote:
               | The FAQ on Zipcar's website says "Our Electric Vehicles
               | are charged overnight by our team, so they're good to go
               | whenever you are" -- but this isn't the case for the GP,
               | so the failing is with Zipcar.
        
         | bitmasher9 wrote:
         | Last domain? Maybe not, but it could be among one of the last.
         | 
         | I think heavy loads, cross country, and extremely rural are
         | likely to be among the holdouts.
        
           | thriftwy wrote:
           | There's also the (para)military. I can't imagine an electric
           | Toyota pickup performing in a warzone. Maybe that's why
           | Toyota is not making the leap.
        
           | cogman10 wrote:
           | > extremely rural
           | 
           | Depends on how "extreme" extreme is.
           | 
           | Certainly affordable wouldn't work for rural because range is
           | really needed. However, it's doable now with 300+ range EVs
           | (assuming there's a city within 100/150 miles of your
           | location).
           | 
           | One thing that would change this quickly is if V2H ends up
           | taking off. Then you can ditch your backup generator and use
           | your EV in the event of a power outage. For very rural places
           | or off grid places that could be really valuable.
           | 
           | But totally agree about the other categories.
        
         | cm2187 wrote:
         | The article says the cars are unreliable. I thought one of the
         | selling points of electric cars was reliability over an ICE
         | engine. Anyone knows what they are refering to?
        
           | pitaj wrote:
           | My understanding is that they're better not in reliability,
           | but in lower maintenance (oil replacement etc).
        
           | cogman10 wrote:
           | > I thought one of the selling points of electric cars was
           | reliability over an ICE engine.
           | 
           | They are if you take car of them. Hertz notoriously did not
           | have chargers in their lots and I've read plenty of stories
           | of EV renters getting an EV with 20% of the battery.
           | 
           | If they are letting the cars sit and discharge to 0, yeah,
           | that will look like them being "unreliable" and will
           | ultimately wear the battery.
        
             | Rinzler89 wrote:
             | _> They are if you take car of them._
             | 
             | That also applies to ICEs.
        
               | cogman10 wrote:
               | ICE are more reliable than ICE if you take care of them?
        
         | cogman10 wrote:
         | It depends on the situation.
         | 
         | It would work great with 2 things in place
         | 
         | 1. The rental company has car chargers on the lot and keeps
         | their cars charged at a reasonable level.
         | 
         | 2. You are staying at a hotel/location with car chargers.
         | 
         | If those two things are in play, then electric rental cars make
         | a TON of sense. Even shorter range ones as you are likely
         | mostly puttering around the location where you are renting. In
         | that case, you are likely to want to do the "drive around all
         | day, charge while you sleep" that most EV owners do.
         | 
         | Unfortunately, while some hotels do have chargers, they tend to
         | be the more expensive hotels and they tend to only have 1 or 2
         | slots for charging.
         | 
         | > On top of that, charging is still way less convenient than
         | refueling an ICE car
         | 
         | Really depends. Charging is more convenient if you the place
         | you park your car has a charger. Charging is less convenient if
         | you are driving long distances or you need to recharge with no
         | room for downtime.
        
           | ghaff wrote:
           | I suspect fewer people putter around a location though. At
           | one point if I was just doing a trip with some stops in core
           | Silicon Valley I'd have automatically rented. Generally more
           | likely to Uber it these days.
        
           | dgfitz wrote:
           | I think you're underestimating the number of people who fly
           | into an airport and their destination is 1-4 hours away by
           | car afterwards.
           | 
           | Edit: and their hotel is a solid 45 minutes away from their
           | work site.
        
             | cogman10 wrote:
             | > I think you're underestimating the number of people who
             | fly into an airport and their destination is 1-4 hours away
             | by car afterwards.
             | 
             | I probably am, because I don't think that's super common.
             | Airports are everywhere.
             | 
             | Even for my extreme rural hometown, there's a commercial
             | airport 45 minutes away (Though, granted, we'd go to the
             | airport 2 hours away because it's bigger and we'd have to
             | fly there anyways to get to the 45 minute airport).
             | 
             | The full flights and large planes I've been on haven't been
             | to Pocatello Idaho. Which is what gives me the impression
             | that people aren't typically flying to rural destinations.
             | On the other hand, a flight to Atlanta, Ronald Reagan, or
             | Dallas are always filled to the brim.
        
         | williamdclt wrote:
         | > the fuel cost of a hire car is insignificant compared to the
         | cost of the hire itself.
         | 
         | That's not true everywhere. I'm currently on holidays: the car
         | rental for 6d was 130euros, insurance 40, and gas will be about
         | 60 for 10-15h of driving. Gas doesn't dominate the price but
         | it's far from insignificant, and it only gets worse as price
         | increases
        
           | Rinzler89 wrote:
           | But you save a lot more time traveling with a gas car since
           | you're not looking for charring stations along the route
           | every 150-350km and waiting hours to charge.
           | 
           | Also, charging at public chargers isn't that cheap or
           | frictionless. At home yeah, but at stations not so much. Not
           | compared to filling up with gas and being on your way in less
           | than 5 minutes.
        
             | cogman10 wrote:
             | > But you save a lot more time traveling with a gas car
             | since you're not looking for charring stations along the
             | route every 150-350km and waiting hours to charge.
             | 
             | While I'm sure it happens, that's never been my experience.
             | You plug your trip into the car's navigation system and
             | it'll plan out the charge stops for you. It's quiet
             | frictionless. Tesla's is really good as it will even plan
             | on sending you to less busy charging stations vs more busy
             | ones (and reroute if that changes).
             | 
             | > Also, charging at public chargers isn't that cheap or
             | frictionless.
             | 
             | Depends on the network. Tesla's isn't terribly expensive
             | and is extremely frictionless. Electrify America is
             | horseshit, both on cost and ease of use.
             | 
             | This is a solvable problem.
             | 
             | > Not compared to filling up with gas and being on your way
             | in less than 5 minutes.
             | 
             | Behavior ends up changing here if you road trip with an EV.
             | Rather than just getting fuel then going somewhere else to
             | eat you'll usually charge while you eat, use the restroom,
             | or go for a walk. If you really don't have anything else to
             | do, you'll probably just catch a tv show on your phone.
             | 
             | That coveted 5 minutes ends up just not being a big deal
             | because you are multitasking with the charging. (Which for
             | me is typically 20->30 minutes).
        
               | Rinzler89 wrote:
               | _> Tesla's is really good ..._
               | 
               |  _> Tesla's isn't terribly expensive and is extremely
               | frictionless..._
               | 
               | I'm sure Tesla is great, but my ICE is excellent in both
               | those categories and cost me 6000 Euros used in mint
               | condition with only 4 years and 40k KM of usage. Which
               | used Tesla can I get in that budget?
        
               | cogman10 wrote:
               | K. That wasn't a part of your original post. Did you want
               | me to start debating the economics of buying EVs?
               | 
               | If I were to advise someone for the best EV to buy, I'd
               | probably suggest holding off for 5 or 10 more years. Even
               | if I were suggesting a new EV to buy, I'd suggest holding
               | off for 1 maybe 2 years in north america because
               | everything is switching over to NACS.
               | 
               | If we are talking about someone in the EU, I'd still
               | probably suggest waiting a couple of years if you can,
               | but if you can't you can probably grab a Nissan leaf for
               | roughly that 6000 euros and that mileage. If you can wait
               | a few more years, especially in the EU, then the used
               | market options are going to explode. I'd probably look at
               | some of the Chinese second hand EVs as they are already
               | pretty cheap and will likely be super cheap used in a few
               | years. And if you are in the EU, EVs that are roughly the
               | same prices as an ICE are going to make a lot of
               | financial sense because of the high petrol prices.
               | 
               | Would I suggest someone get a Tesla today? Eh, depends. I
               | probably will not get one for my next vehicle, but I plan
               | on running this one into the ground (currently at 130,000
               | miles and I plan to keep going until something gives). In
               | the US, I'd suggest today you take a good look at the
               | iconiq if you are buying new. But again, in the US, I'd
               | strongly suggest waiting for a couple of years at this
               | moment.
        
               | Rinzler89 wrote:
               | _> Did you want me to start debating the economics of
               | buying EVs?_
               | 
               | Well, EV growth and adoption is all about economics (can
               | you afford them in your business/lifestyle to replace
               | your ICE or not?) Herz's decision to drop EVs is about
               | economics (is it profitable for them or not?). So yeah,
               | Economics are very important in this discussion so why
               | not talk about it?
               | 
               | You pointing out Tesla, the most premium EV brand with
               | the best chagrin network, as the competition to cheap
               | ICEs is like telling peasants who can't afford bread that
               | they should eat cake. EU voters aren't gonna be happy
               | with this come 2035 if the EV market isn't full of cheap
               | models with long range by then and we might see an
               | exertion of the ICE life, especially since the post 2022
               | conditions has decimated the purchasing power and
               | disposable income of the average European. We might have
               | counted our chickens before they were hatched on this
               | one.
               | 
               |  _> you can probably grab a Nissan leaf for roughly that
               | 6000 euros and that mileage_
               | 
               | Unfortunately, the Leaf's range is pitiful compared to
               | even the most econobox ICE. And range is very important
               | to EU buyers.
        
               | cogman10 wrote:
               | > You pointing out Tesla, the most premium EV brand with
               | the best chagrin network
               | 
               | I pointed out 2 very specific aspects of tesla, the
               | charge network and the ability to route plan with
               | charging stops. 2 things any EV brand can pull off.
               | 
               | And, particularly in the case of the EU, 1 thing that
               | affects all EV brands as there are public charging access
               | laws which mean anyone can use the tesla charging
               | network. It's not just for the uber wealthy. I did not
               | say or suggest in my post that "lol, the poors should
               | just buy teslas" as you suggest. Rather, I rebutted 2
               | specific points you made, that you have to search for
               | charging stations which are far apart (not true in the
               | EU, btw) and that the charging experience is always
               | terrible.
               | 
               | You then went on a wild tangent about how much it costs
               | to buy EVs, which was completely out of scope of the
               | prior discussion and goalpost moving.
               | 
               | > as the competition to cheap ICEs is like telling
               | peasants who can't afford bread that they should eat
               | cake.
               | 
               | Like, sorry, I did not nor have I suggested that the
               | peasants need to go out and buy EVs. Nor am I suggesting
               | that owning one isn't something that today requires more
               | money (as I outlined in my previous post). Owning an EV
               | is not the right move for everyone yet every EV debate is
               | framed as "If it's not good for everyone it's not good
               | for anyone".
               | 
               | > EU voters aren't gonna be happy with this come 2035 if
               | the EV market isn't full of cheap models with long range
               | by then.
               | 
               | I agree. It's still a relatively young industry. My
               | suspicion is that by 2035 things will be a lot more
               | competitive as battery manufacturing has been growing
               | exponentially and we are starting to see EV sales lag.
               | Exponential growth in a supply with a lag in demand
               | translates to lower prices. I can't predict exactly when
               | (or if) this will happen. It's my best guess that it
               | will.
               | 
               | > Unfortunately, the Leaf's range is pitiful compared to
               | even the most econobox ICE. And range is very important.
               | 
               | Important to some, not to all. I wouldn't buy it as a
               | primary car because range is important to me. As a
               | secondary car, sure, it'd work great as a commuter.
               | 
               | But again, in case you want to reframe what I'm saying in
               | a less charitable way, I'm not saying "EVs are for
               | everyone and everyone should own them". Nor am I saying
               | "everyone should buy a tesla". I'm not even saying "Used
               | EVs are fine and there's no reason why someone shouldn't
               | buy them."
               | 
               | We can both agree that ICE boxes aren't without their
               | drawbacks right? We can both agree that there are pros
               | and cons to EVs and ICE right? Or do you just want to say
               | that there is never a good reason to buy an EV?
        
               | m000 wrote:
               | "it'll plan out the charge stops", "depends on the
               | network", "you'll probably just catch a tv show on your
               | phone".
               | 
               | All these combined are a _far-cry_ from frictionless. And
               | good luck if you venture out of the trodden path.
        
               | cogman10 wrote:
               | > And good luck if you venture out of the trodden path.
               | 
               | My family lives out of the trodden path. I visit them
               | often in my EV. I've been all over rural Idaho and Oregon
               | in my EV.
               | 
               | There are certainly some places too rural for an EV, but
               | there's not many places more rural than rural Idaho and
               | oregon.
        
               | dude187 wrote:
               | > If you really don't have anything else to do, you'll
               | probably just catch a tv show on your phone.
               | 
               | That's not changing behaviors, that's distracting
               | yourself because refueling takes forever for an EV
        
               | cogman10 wrote:
               | How is distracting yourself while refueling not a change
               | in behavior? What do you define as "change in behavior"?
        
           | darrylb42 wrote:
           | That seems cheap for gas. 15h driving ~6l/100km 90l of gas.
           | That would be over $200 in gas for me.
        
         | Glyptodon wrote:
         | Fuel costs aren't insignificant, low MPG cars can have fuel be
         | a solid % of the overall rental cost. I think for a moderately
         | efficient (30ish MPG) rental I used for an afternoon a few
         | weeks ago fuel was ~15% of total cost to me. Like $55 in rental
         | fees, $10 in fuel. A rental a had last year for multiple days
         | was closer to like 20%, but I got stuck with a gas guzzler.
        
       | LeoPanthera wrote:
       | Last week on a trip to Florida I rented a Polestar 2 from Hertz.
       | 
       | It was in abysmal shape. Both tires on the left had been
       | installed backwards, with the inside on the outside, and
       | something was badly wrong with the front left wheel, I suspect
       | the rotor was warped because it scraping, loudly, with every
       | rotation.
       | 
       | I read about Hertz having problems with EV maintenance but
       | experience leads me to believe that it's nothing to do with being
       | EVs. They're simply not maintaining them. I told them about the
       | problems on return, and the guy just shrugged.
        
       | WalterBright wrote:
       | EVs are only practical if you have a garage and can charge it
       | overnight.
       | 
       | (Outdoor chargers don't work because thieves steal the copper
       | wires.)
        
         | bdcravens wrote:
         | I agree. I didn't buy my first EV until I bought my house. (And
         | now we are all in, a two-EV household)
        
         | Rinzler89 wrote:
         | Forget about stealing copper, a lot of outdoor public chargers
         | are just defective. Either the connector, the charger, the
         | payment system or the app is wonky. Compared to the speed, ease
         | and reliability of filling up a gas tank, public charging an EV
         | is hell.
         | 
         | Until we fix this, people without a house and garage to have
         | their own charger are going get screwed badly by the forced EV
         | transition.
        
       | daft_pink wrote:
       | To me, the issue with renting an electric car is the news stories
       | where they either don't give you the car fully charged or they
       | expect you to return it fully charged or at the same level of
       | charge as when you receive it.
       | 
       | They should build recharging the car once into the price and only
       | give the customer a fully charged vehicle.
       | 
       | In theory, I would love to try out an electric car and rent a
       | Tesla. When I read the news stories about the hassles, I don't
       | want to add dealing with charging hassles to my busy trip.
        
       | freitzkriesler2 wrote:
       | Got forced into an electric car on a trip. The experience was all
       | around awful. I had to learn how to manage the regenerative
       | braking, the car was a nagging beeper which took even more time
       | to figure out, finding charging stations and then paying for the
       | privilege was a pain, and the biggest FU hertz did for me was I
       | prepay fuel so I can expense it out easier for work. They charged
       | me me 35$ for having it 10% below the charge. Previously the
       | charge for a fuel return at a 1/4 tank prepaid would have been
       | 15$ at most.
       | 
       | I will purposefully not be selecting an electric car for my next
       | rentals. Awful experience all around.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-04-27 23:00 UTC)