[HN Gopher] Show HN: A storybook designed to teach kids about ho...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Show HN: A storybook designed to teach kids about how computers
       work
        
       I've been working on a unique storybook designed to teach kids
       about how computers work, and I would love to get your feedback.
       Set 500 years in the future, the story follows two kids - one a
       robot, the other a human - as they explore the workings of what to
       them is ancient technology: our present-day computers. I've aimed
       to keep each story short and engaging, sprinkling in humor and
       illustrations to captivate young readers.  As an open-source
       project, you're also welcome to check out the source here:
       https://github.com/yong/lostlanguageofthemachines
        
       Author : yawl
       Score  : 58 points
       Date   : 2024-04-19 18:45 UTC (2 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.lostlanguageofthemachines.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.lostlanguageofthemachines.com)
        
       | gabrielsroka wrote:
       | Neat! Thanks for sharing.
       | 
       | In chapter 1, change reminder to remainder.
        
         | mocovc wrote:
         | Thanks!
        
           | severine wrote:
           | And "Simillarly" to "similarly".
        
       | nsonha wrote:
       | "Binary" is a weird place to start. Even adults dont start there.
        
         | card_zero wrote:
         | Yeah, it doesn't appear until page 26 of _The Beginner 's
         | computer handbook_
         | 
         | https://archive.org/details/beginnerscompute0000unse/page/26...
         | 
         | Or page 10 of _Inside the Chip,_ illustrated with Tron cycles
         | 
         | https://archive.org/details/insidechip00hele/page/10/mode/2u...
         | 
         | It's on the cover of _Machine code for beginners,_ but nobody
         | read that one first. (It 's available in full though, BTW.)
         | 
         | https://archive.org/details/machine-code-for-beginners
        
       | graypegg wrote:
       | This is really neat! But if I can make a suggestion, a good and
       | interesting explanation should use a strong analogy. A story
       | wrapped around the explanation doesn't do as much to help with
       | understanding
       | 
       | Check out Code by Charles Petzold for what I personally consider
       | the best example! The analogies build on each other in steps that
       | never feel too complex in order.
        
       | rspoerri wrote:
       | How is explaining something with higher mathematics reasonable
       | for childrens? Exponentials arent something you can use. Also
       | shorter sentences are usually easier to understand.
        
       | citizenkeen wrote:
       | Key question on children's books: Who's the illustrator?
        
       | lionkor wrote:
       | IMO its far too technical for an actual child to want to get
       | into. Starting at a higher level of abstraction would be easier
       | for them
        
       | hasoleju wrote:
       | This is the first time I saw book in the form of a webpage. I
       | really like it. Problem is that my children are don't speak
       | English yet. I wonder if those storybooks also exist in other
       | languages.
        
       | indigoabstract wrote:
       | Learning about programming through storytelling?
       | 
       | Well I'm not in the target audience, but I like the style and I
       | feel it's a lot less intimidating (and more interesting) than a
       | typical book on programming computers. Pretty neat!
        
       | kjellsbells wrote:
       | I really like it. And, please, don't be discouraged by any HN
       | commenters. Creation is the important act, not commenting.
       | 
       | Side note: I get a very Usborne vibe from your story. If you are
       | not familiar, Usborne published a series of introductory computer
       | books for young readers in the late 1980s that were well loved by
       | a lot of us here on HN. You can probably find threads and links
       | to copies of the material here.
        
       | card_zero wrote:
       | The text message conversations between the chapters are good.
       | 
       | The chapters themselves are oddly twee, as if written in the
       | 1950s. I think it's the parts where you talk to the reader in the
       | present tense, to directly describe the characters, that give
       | that impression. It's kind of babying for something generally
       | written at a YA level.
       | 
       | In fact you mix present and past tense from the first paragraph,
       | that's not good, choose one and stick to it.
       | 
       | I'm not at all sure about that cat flipping the switch, either.
       | How does it generate more than one 0 or 1 in a row?
       | 
       | Also: when we mix red paint with green paint, it becomes gray-
       | brown paint, not yellow paint. When we mix red _light_ with green
       | _light_ it becomes (perceptually) yellow light, because that 's
       | additive mixing, which does not apply to paint. OTOH perhaps this
       | future art studio uses digital paint, which might work how you
       | want it to, but that's not made clear.
       | 
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Additive_color
       | 
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subtractive_color
        
       | xandrius wrote:
       | This is for geeky parents who think their kid will absolutely
       | totally get it.
       | 
       | Starting with binary (wonderfully pointless), exponentials and
       | walls of text just show how this is not actually for kids.
        
       | mrbluecoat wrote:
       | > Cat pictures are ageless for little girls like her.
       | 
       | Is that a common stereotype? Felt unnecessary to me, especially
       | for a narrative that bills itself as modern.
        
       | empressplay wrote:
       | Great stuff, reminds me a bit of
       | https://archive.org/details/Gortek_and_the_Microchips_1984_C...
       | 
       | I think your language might be a little too sophisticated for
       | your audience. Try to use shorter sentences and more common
       | words.
       | 
       | Good luck!
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-04-21 23:00 UTC)