[HN Gopher] RFI (Radio Frequency Interference) Sleuthing with th...
___________________________________________________________________
RFI (Radio Frequency Interference) Sleuthing with the TinySA (2021)
Author : transpute
Score : 47 points
Date : 2024-04-19 10:08 UTC (1 days ago)
(HTM) web link (ka7oei.blogspot.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (ka7oei.blogspot.com)
| wkat4242 wrote:
| There's also a premium version of the tiny SA that has a bigger
| display and wider frequency range, resolution bandwidth etc. I've
| been thinking of buying that one.
| Citizen8396 wrote:
| Would you mind sharing a link?
| wkat4242 wrote:
| As per above:
| https://tinysa.org/wiki/pmwiki.php?n=TinySA4.Comparison
|
| The Ultra is more than 2x as expensive (but considering the
| prices of regular spectrum analysers, still quite cheap for
| its capabilities!)
| tinix wrote:
| Are you thinking of nanovna? There's only one tinySA afaik ..
| tinix wrote:
| Ahh found it:
| https://tinysa.org/wiki/pmwiki.php?n=TinySA4.Comparison
| wkat4242 wrote:
| Yeah I meant the Ultra. When I wrote that from my phone I
| forgot the exact name.
|
| The nanoVNA is a completely different thing - as mentioned
| in the article also.
| transpute wrote:
| Another directional loop antenna for RFI location (2019),
| https://www.arrl.org/files/file/Antenna%20Book%20Supplementa...
| Here is a simple antenna design that is effective from 3 to 22
| MHz. Based on a resonant magnetic loop, it has high transducer
| gain (high sensitivity), and also very good directionality. You
| can build it cheaply from junk box parts.
| transpute wrote:
| TinySA thread, 50+ comments,
| https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39142560
| luckman212 wrote:
| Can this be used to visualize 802.11ac/ax signals?
| notslow wrote:
| Highly unlikely. 802.11x lives in the 2.4GHz and 5.8GHz ranges
| which are outside of the stated range of the tinySA mentioned
| in the article. Occasionally radios will work outside of the
| stated range with a bit of hacking, but 950MHz to 2.4GHz is
| pretty far. Software-defined radios (SDRs) like the HackRF One
| or BladeRF cover the 2.4GHz and 5.8GHz frequency ranges, but at
| a higher cost. [edit: clarify the frequencies of the HackRF and
| BladeRF]
|
| [edit2: Apparently the tinySA Ultra can cover the higher
| frequencies in certain configurations]
| ckocagil wrote:
| Or one can use a mixer.
| kqbx wrote:
| For this purpose, how does TinySA compare to scanning the
| spectrum with an RLT-SDR (or other low-end SDR)?
| transpute wrote:
| Better portability,
| https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39144472
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2024-04-20 23:02 UTC)