[HN Gopher] The darker side of being a doctor
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The darker side of being a doctor
        
       Author : m-ahmed
       Score  : 265 points
       Date   : 2024-04-13 19:10 UTC (3 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (drericlevi.substack.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (drericlevi.substack.com)
        
       | user_7832 wrote:
       | Most of the issues mentioned in the article and the included
       | email are concerning, however they also oddly seem to be common
       | in many places across the globe. The surgeon mentioned was in
       | Australia, I have seen these issues first hand in the Netherlands
       | and am aware of very similar of the first 2 out of 3 issues
       | (caused by overwork/understaffing/over-fatigue etc) in Belgium,
       | Germany, the UK, India and god knows how many other places.
       | 
       | However, fields like aviation have strict workload limits. You
       | cannot be on call/duty for too long because fatigue kills. Issues
       | like alarm fatigue are studied by agencies, and folks at
       | Boeing/Airbus then implement the findings.
       | 
       | The question is, why is it okay for medical professionals to wear
       | themselves down to the bone (sometimes literally, like in this
       | article), while some other professions take care to avoid it?
       | 
       | (Edit/PS: I added a fairly detailed self-reply below on what I
       | think are some of the common arguments (like on the
       | number/availability of doctors) and why they don't really fly,
       | pun not intended.)
        
         | user_7832 wrote:
         | (My musings/thinking-aloud): One partial hypothesis/answer is
         | that there are far fewer pilots/cabin crew than there are
         | doctors/medical staff, and hence it's easier to treat pilots
         | properly. But fewer people makes it _harder_ to let someone off
         | if they haven 't slept well so I don't really buy that.
         | 
         | Another is that the medical profession is much more
         | "flexible"/fluid in its needs, unlike flights scheduled in a
         | regular manner. However, that doesn't mean it's not possible to
         | give doctors an 8 hour workday, and substitute/bring more
         | doctors for other shifts. In fact, this is exactly what happens
         | in many 24-hour manufacturing plants/operations. Foxconn
         | doesn't let a sleep deprived employee make an iPhone, but it's
         | okay to let a sleep deprived doctor perform life-
         | saving/potentially deadly operations?
         | 
         | Another possibility is that "it would cost more" to have 3 docs
         | instead of 1. Which might be supported by anecdotal evidence on
         | how expensive things (including salaries) are in the medical
         | field. However (especially if you're only familiar with the US
         | healthcare system), this doesn't explain how doctors in say
         | India are overworked.
         | 
         | The "real" reason, I think behind all this? The first part is
         | it's because it's "easy" to compress and push an 8 hour shift
         | to a 24 hour shift, fatigue be damned. The costs are "hidden",
         | it's likely even with fatigue a 99% successful operation is
         | still 95 or 90% successful. Everyone can rationalize it and go
         | about with their day. "Oh, unfortunately people don't always
         | make it".
         | 
         |  _Not_ , "there was a 20% chance they wouldn't have made it but
         | an 80% chance it was because the doctor was fatigued."
         | 
         | When an aircraft crashes, 300 people may die instantly. This
         | gets front page coverage on a newspaper. However, a few deaths
         | "here" and "there" don't really show up, even if they tally up
         | to thousands. This is the second factor, that "hides" and
         | normalizes occasional slip-ups.
         | 
         | </End of this wall of text> I unfortunately don't really have a
         | solution. I'm sure there are brilliant UX designers here on HN
         | who could help ease and streamline the admin workload.
         | 
         | I suppose a dedicated politician/presidential candidate
         | somewhere could take this upon themselves to campaign for.
         | (Seriously, the NHS was part of the discussion behind Brexit.
         | Supporting doctors is a brilliant political strategy, the NWA
         | didn't have a song called "Fuck the paramedics".)
         | 
         | There have been many instances of things catching on once found
         | successful somewhere, be it procedures like the Heimlich or
         | concepts like Lean Manufacturing. Therefore I don't doubt that
         | one good Harvard Review paper showing a 20% decrease in all-
         | cause patient mortality, with trials underway in a few
         | hospitals, is all it will take. Question is, who will bell the
         | cat!?
        
         | uniqueuid wrote:
         | Thanks for the perspective. I have doctor friends and everyone
         | seems to just blindly accept that some jobs are not jobs, they
         | are identities. You never pause being a doctor. But your
         | comment shows that even in life-critical environments, we _do_
         | have ways of organizing work so individuals can bear it. Fire
         | brigades are another example.
         | 
         | Time to push for a change. And time to call some people and ask
         | whether they are truly ok right now.
        
         | Rinzler89 wrote:
         | The understaffed healthcare system works with overworked
         | doctors on the basis that having a tired and overworked doctor
         | is a lot of the times better than having no doctor at all,
         | because (s)he most likely can end up saving more lives than
         | taking with their tired brain. If your operations have a 90%
         | survivability rate it could still be considered a success
         | despite those 10% they end up killing, because 90% is a lot
         | better than 0%.
         | 
         | Meanwhile a tired pilot is more binary, it either can have 100%
         | passenger survivability if things go well or 100% fatality if
         | things go tits up, meaning the risk are too high to take
         | chances.
         | 
         | It's basic game theory.
        
           | uniqueuid wrote:
           | Good point, and you can turn it around: Doctors are never
           | "finished". They could always do more to help patients. So in
           | contrast to aviation, where there is a clear corridor of
           | things to do, doctors have no natural upper bound on their
           | work.
        
           | eviks wrote:
           | but the alternative isn't having no doctor at all, but to get
           | more doctors, so the "basic game theory" is about why the
           | limits on more doctors stay in place despite the higher risk
           | of death etc.
        
             | Rinzler89 wrote:
             | _> but to get more doctors_
             | 
             | Have you found that magic fountain of endless doctors?
        
               | uniqueuid wrote:
               | Sure, it's very easy! Just do things that prevent burnout
               | (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8834764/)
               | and the job gets more attractive, drawing more students
               | and producing less attrition:
               | 
               | - Valuing work gives meaning (money, appreciation)
               | 
               | - Autonomy gives feeling of control
               | 
               | - Managing burden prevents overwork, exhaustion and
               | fatigue
        
               | dirtyhippiefree wrote:
               | > Sure, it's very easy!
               | 
               | I have issues when someone says a complicated issue can
               | be solved easily...realistic expectations...
        
               | user_7832 wrote:
               | The answers to some problems may be easy to know but
               | difficult to implement, due to political/financial will
               | etc. For eg we know _how_ to reduce emissions, but it 's
               | still a challenge. In such cases advocacy and raising
               | awareness can be helpful.
        
               | inglor_cz wrote:
               | "Easy to describe" is very different from "easy to do".
               | 
               | It reminds me of the famous "just eat less and exercise
               | more", the alleged simple solution to the global obesity
               | epidemic.
        
               | nradov wrote:
               | Sounds good, but healthcare already constitutes 17% of US
               | GDP. And with an aging population, spending has been
               | growing faster than the rate of inflation. Most of the
               | funding ultimately comes from governments, self-insured
               | employers, and individual patients. Those groups have no
               | appetite for spending more.
               | 
               | The bottleneck right now in producing more US physicians
               | is lack of Medicare funding for residency slots (graduate
               | medical education). Every year some students graduate
               | from accredited medical schools with an MD but are unable
               | to practice because they don't get matched to a residency
               | program. Congress hasn't significantly increased funding
               | in years.
               | 
               | https://savegme.org/
        
               | novok wrote:
               | The entire medicare residency slot system seems a bit
               | self inflicted, why hasn't an alternative system popped
               | up?
               | 
               | Also this is a global problem, not just the USA. You look
               | at videos of student doctors in the UK for example and
               | there are similar abusive schedules.
               | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KE1XwEMGm0I
        
               | kwhitefoot wrote:
               | Read Adam Kay's "This is going to hurt" [1]. It was made
               | into a miniseries. I read the book and it was so
               | horrifying that I couldn't face watching the
               | dramatisation.
               | 
               | It doesn't seem to be such a big problem here in Norway
               | where things like working time directives are taken much
               | more seriously.
               | 
               | [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/This_Is_Going_to_Hurt
        
               | malux85 wrote:
               | Yeah it's called correct incentives - I look at the over
               | work, and insane stress levels that doctors suffer and I
               | say "NO THANKS"
               | 
               | I am definitely not the only one
        
               | WalterBright wrote:
               | The AMA only allows a fixed number of seats in medical
               | school.
               | 
               | There also can be tiers of medical doctors. Most
               | doctoring work is routine, and can be handled by a more
               | of a medical tech.
        
               | nradov wrote:
               | False. The AMA has no regulatory or accreditation
               | authority over medical schools. Schools can admit as many
               | students as they want.
               | 
               | The bottleneck right now in producing more US physicians
               | is lack of Medicare funding for residency slots (graduate
               | medical education). Every year some students graduate
               | from accredited medical schools with an MD but are unable
               | to practice because they don't get matched to a residency
               | program. Congress hasn't significantly increased funding
               | in years. At one point the AMA did lobby Congress to
               | limit the number of slots but they have since reversed
               | that stance and are now lobbying for higher residency
               | funding.
               | 
               | https://savegme.org/
               | 
               | There are already tiers of clinicians. Much routine care
               | can be delivered by Physician Assistants or Nurse
               | Practitioners working under a Physician's supervision.
               | Specific limits on their services are set at the state
               | level.
        
               | beau_g wrote:
               | Why do residency programs require subsidies, are resident
               | doctors each a large net financial loss to a hospital? I
               | can't think of many other career paths where someone out
               | of school is so underprepared for the job that the
               | business could not employ them without someone else
               | footing the bill, doesn't seem like a reasonable system
               | that will sustain itself in the long term. I suppose
               | pilots are a bit like this but they typically take the
               | financial risk on themselves to some degree or get the
               | taxpayer funded training via the military.
        
               | MichaelZuo wrote:
               | Do residency slots mandate public funding?
               | 
               | Aren't they doing actual useful work same as regular
               | doctors? (albiet with a higher error rate)
               | 
               | So they could be funded through via charging for services
               | rendered.
               | 
               | Of course their effective pay may be close to zero, after
               | malpractice insurance, but it will still attract some
               | number of med school grads who can't get in otherwise.
        
               | triceratops wrote:
               | > The bottleneck right now in producing more US
               | physicians is lack of Medicare funding for residency
               | slots... Congress hasn't significantly increased funding
               | in years. Much routine care can be delivered by Physician
               | Assistants or Nurse Practitioners working under a
               | Physician's supervision
               | 
               | We should all accept a lower standard of care because
               | hospitals can't find more funding to train doctors? What
               | are all the $20 aspirin paying for? How does every other
               | profession manage to train new members without needing a
               | literal act of Congress?
        
               | yokaze wrote:
               | That's a straw man. We do not need "endless doctors" just
               | more (or some way to use them more efficiently).
               | 
               | The number of doctors are limited by the pipeline to
               | educate them.
               | 
               | Most countries I know, the number of people admitted to
               | study medicine exceeds the number people wanting to study
               | medicine vastly exceeds the positions to do so, and
               | admissions are highly competitive. To a point, I'd say,
               | that it is becoming ridiculous.
               | 
               | So, there is not a lack of people wanting to become
               | doctors, but a lack of people allowed to even start to
               | study to become one.
        
               | eviks wrote:
               | If you didn't cut the "limits" from the quote, you
               | might've found a hint on how to answer your question
               | without any magic involved. For such a small profession
               | the general talent pool is endless indeed unless you...
               | limit
        
           | yokaze wrote:
           | Sorry, that is bollocks. That is the story most people
           | believe, and makes for a convenient story for those people
           | actually to blame. Funnily, it is also the story most doctors
           | themselves seem to chose to believe in.
           | 
           | First, those are not the only choices. There is also the the
           | option of training and hiring more doctors. 2
           | 
           | Probably, there is also an option of making more efficient
           | use of doctors time, but that one is more complicated.
           | 
           | Most of the work of doctors is not life-saving.
           | 
           | I think, you see a standard problem of pushing shit down or
           | up. Government lowers budget, pushes quotas down, which gets
           | pushed down further until it reaches the bottom rank and
           | file, the doctors.
           | 
           | They have to "do more with less" (Not limited to public
           | sector, see Boeing), and that works for a while, until it
           | doesn't.
        
             | closewith wrote:
             | > Most of the work of doctors is not life-saving.
             | 
             | Yes, but working out which parts are and aren't critical is
             | the $64,000 question.
        
               | yokaze wrote:
               | I think, that is a bit besides the point I wanted to
               | make.
               | 
               | Yes, it is very hard to know a priori, what is life-
               | saving, and what not. No, I do not wanted to suggest that
               | the work of doctors it is not important.
               | 
               | The common understanding of doctors (their self-
               | understanding included) is, that their work is very
               | important, to the point that they exploit themselves. Or
               | allow themselves to be "exploited".
               | 
               | In this forum, more commonly you have people here working
               | on productive systems, which can empathize with the
               | feeling the responsibility for the operations and not
               | wanting to drop the ball.
               | 
               | People with that mindset think, they may safe a patient /
               | the system, but working oneself to exhaustion won't solve
               | those problems. And on the contrary, the exhaustion may
               | be a contributing factor of making things worse in
               | various ways. One directly by your actions, the other
               | indirectly by covering up systemic problems.
        
               | Turing_Machine wrote:
               | Indeed. Is that weird mole just a weird mole, or is it
               | skin cancer?
        
             | Rinzler89 wrote:
             | _> They have to "do more with less" (Not limited to public
             | sector, see Boeing), and that works for a while, until it
             | doesn't._
             | 
             | Yes, which brings us back to the point I made about it
             | being a numbers game. IF you start cutting back pilots
             | sleep and planes' QA to boost profits, you'll reach the "it
             | doesn't work" phase (planes dropping from the air killing
             | everyone) much sooner and at a steeper rate than with
             | overworked doctors where the decline is a lot slower and
             | gradual hence why this issue gets ignored more easily by
             | those in charge, because it's so slow that people keep
             | getting used to this as the new normal.
             | 
             | IF a few Boeings fall from the sky, people might stop
             | flying Boeings, but people won't stop going to the doctor
             | just because some people get killed from malpractice (which
             | is statistically more likely than dying in a plane crash).
        
               | sangnoir wrote:
               | It's easier for the public to recognize and be outraged
               | about 237 dead airline passengers compared to 237 dead
               | patients even if both are caused by overtired pilots or
               | "providers" (I hate that word for it's vagueness).
        
             | impossiblefork wrote:
             | I think having more physicians is the core thing.
             | 
             | The US stands out in having so few physicians per capita
             | (per 1000 it's 3.6 in the US, here in Sweden it's 7.1, in
             | Germany 4.5, Spain in 4.6). This has been discussed before
             | here before, and I don't think it was controversial that a
             | sensible solution was to simply have more physicians.
             | 
             | I think one major thing that the US is doing wrong with
             | that which is not so well known is that the training starts
             | rather late in life. Thus you get less out of the
             | physicians you train. Here in Sweden a physician has a MSc
             | in medicine and is ready to meet patients and be trained
             | when he's 23, and I think this has the benefit that there's
             | no need to overwork them.
             | 
             | By the time they're 30 they'll have all the experience the
             | need without having been overworked, and not sleeping
             | enough kills intelligence, memory, drive, all mental
             | qualities one may have.
             | 
             | I think these two policies, ensuring that people graduate
             | earlier-- removing the pre-med and having people start
             | right away with a medicine program, and graduating in 5.5
             | years, that's the right approach.
             | 
             | Physicians would earn less, but they'd have substantially
             | better lives. Being able to start younger also means
             | success younger, and happier families.
        
               | Turing_Machine wrote:
               | This was in Australia (4.1).
        
               | impossiblefork wrote:
               | Ah, thank you.
        
           | malux85 wrote:
           | What about the meta-game, where doctors get burnt out or
           | suicide, and that increases pressure on the remaining
           | doctors, in a negative feedback loop.
           | 
           | We should impose work limits on doctors, just like pilots.
        
             | 317070 wrote:
             | What I don't understand:
             | 
             | Say I'm a doctor, and I declare I will only work my 40
             | hours (or however much a full time is where you are). I
             | will literally leave when my time is up. Oh, and I don't
             | pick up phones outside of work. Or read emails.
             | 
             | What will anyone else do about it? Fire me? Then they have
             | even less doctors...
             | 
             | It seems to me doctors do have the power to change things,
             | even without collectivizing. But for some reason I don't
             | understand, it doesn't seem to work out.
        
               | kwhitefoot wrote:
               | They would earn less money.
               | 
               | > the power to change things, even without
               | collectivizing.
               | 
               | Not really it's a sort of prisoner's dilemma. The one who
               | refuses to work stupid hours gets fired and someone else
               | has their job. If they stood together then it might work.
        
               | 317070 wrote:
               | But there is no one waiting for their job. In most places
               | there is a shortage of doctors.
        
               | flerchin wrote:
               | There's a duty of care* that doctors have. If there's no
               | one else to care for your patient, you're required by law
               | to care for them. (I'm not a doctor, but it's a real
               | thing) It's one thing to risk being fired. It's quite
               | another to lose your profession.
               | 
               | *google "duty of care" for more info
        
           | hinkley wrote:
           | I think someone also did the math and figured out that having
           | fewer handoffs side a patient led to better outcomes so now
           | there's pressure to have two doctors per24 hours instead of
           | three or four.
        
             | user_7832 wrote:
             | That's a very good point. I think 12 hour shifts aren't
             | necessarily bad, but even EMTs/firefighters (in some
             | places, afaik) have downtime after their shift. Maybe work
             | one on one off, or maybe 2 on 3 off. I suspect that's still
             | much better than the practice of 24 hour shifts.
        
             | kwhitefoot wrote:
             | Did they really study how doctors and other staff work in
             | enough countries?
        
           | hello_computer wrote:
           | Not so sure about that. According to a few studies, medical
           | error is the 3rd leading cause of death, behind heart disease
           | and cancer.
           | 
           | Many operations are elective. In such cases, having a tired
           | surgeon or nurse may be worse than delaying the procedure, or
           | even skipping it.
           | 
           | https://www.bmj.com/content/353/bmj.i2139
           | 
           | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28186008/
           | 
           | https://journals.lww.com/journalpatientsafety/Fulltext/2013/.
           | ..
        
             | james-redwood wrote:
             | This has been extensively debunked. Read the original
             | methods of the BMJ article that you linked. They took every
             | single minor error, like prescribing medicine 15 minutes
             | late, and if the patient died, even of an aggressive cancer
             | that they had already, it would be counted in the 'medical
             | error that caused the death' statistic.
             | 
             | https://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/16/upshot/death-by-
             | medical-e...
             | 
             | https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/863788?scode=msp&st=fp
             | f...
             | 
             | https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/medical-errors-2020/
        
             | Mtinie wrote:
             | ...but if you postpone a procedure, the medical facility
             | they work at isn't able to keep up with their revenue
             | targets.
             | 
             | /s
        
           | novok wrote:
           | IMO this is doctors acting as enablers of a toxic
           | administration. They need to refuse outright to not work
           | crazy hours and force the system & administration to come to
           | a crisis. The admins are not working those hours and thus do
           | not feel the consequences of their actions and by enabling
           | their bad behavior they are not getting consequences from
           | their bosses, which are politicians and customers.
        
             | ysofunny wrote:
             | I think it's a matter of the 'tradinionalist' mindset in
             | doctor education
             | 
             | most doctors will think "well, I went through a hardcore
             | intesnse experience in medical school, therefore that's how
             | it should be"
             | 
             | I'm saying they've normalized overwork as part of their
             | specific subculture of modern medical professionals. they
             | really believe they won't be as good doctors without this
             | arguably abusive overwork system
             | 
             | it's yet another group of people who all belive in some
             | form of the "no pain, no gain" mindset; the issue is these
             | groups don't give nobody anything unless there's some harm
             | or pain involved
        
           | lolinder wrote:
           | > If your operations have a 90% survivability rate it could
           | still be considered a success despite those 10% they end up
           | killing, because 90% is a lot better than 0%.
           | 
           | > Meanwhile a tired pilot is more binary, it either can have
           | 100% passenger survivability if things go well or 100%
           | fatality if things go tits up, meaning the risk are too high
           | to take chances.
           | 
           | This isn't how the math works. A tired pilot either kills or
           | doesn't kill their passengers on a given flight the same way
           | that a tired doctor either kills or doesn't kill their
           | patient in a given operation. In both cases it's 100% survive
           | or 0% survive.
           | 
           | Pilots aside, we _also_ have laws about keeping truck drivers
           | from driving too many hours, and accidents involving drowsy
           | truck drivers are unlikely to have fatality counts measured
           | in the hundreds.
           | 
           | The difference between doctors and pilots/truckers isn't in
           | the amount of risk involved, it's that surgeries are
           | _expected_ to have a non-zero fatality rate. A doctor can do
           | their job perfectly and still lose a patient, so it 's harder
           | to prove that the fatality rate would be lower if we gave
           | surgeons more rest. When a truck driver falls asleep at the
           | wheel and kills someone it's obvious because they did
           | something provably illegal or unsafe right before the crash.
           | When a surgeon fails it's a lot harder to prove it was
           | preventable.
        
         | eviks wrote:
         | Complicated question, on potential factor: maybe because the
         | doctors kill one by one instead of in batches, so the
         | ridiculous artificial entry limits that result in very high
         | workload, but results in artificially high pay, doesn't meet a
         | strong enough force to be adjusted?
        
         | closewith wrote:
         | > The question is, why is it okay for medical professionals to
         | wear themselves down to the bone (sometimes literally, like in
         | this article), while some other professions take care to avoid
         | it?
         | 
         | I think the answer here is that if you there aren't enough
         | pilots, schedules can be reduced. You can't scale back (in any
         | ethical way, anyway) the demand for healthcare. People will
         | just die at a higher rate and outcomes will worsen.
        
           | user_7832 wrote:
           | Thank you for your comment, that's a very good point. I self-
           | replied a bit lower with more discussion on this, primarily
           | to the effect that the "solution" in that case would be to
           | hire more doctors. The concept of a "standby" doctor (like a
           | volunteer firefighter) could be used (more), for eg retired
           | former doctors/nurses.
        
             | novok wrote:
             | There is a lot of protectionism & abuse in the doctor
             | system, to the point where I think common tropes are put as
             | fronts to keep up a status quo to hide the reality. You
             | have to look at actions vs. the statements at this point.
             | "The purpose of a system is what it does"
             | 
             | Statement: We need more doctors in Canada.
             | 
             | Actions: It's much harder than 20 years ago to get into med
             | school or a residency (USA medicare). It's even harder to
             | go to med school in Canada than the USA! Doctors from other
             | countries have much higher testing standards than local med
             | school graduates in Canada to get licensed. To the point
             | where they move to the USA because it's easier to start
             | working than it is in Canada itself. Foreign Doctor moves
             | to canada and becomes a taxi driver is a trope in Canada
             | because of the excessively high barriers.
        
         | protastus wrote:
         | I share the same objection about the lack of regulation in the
         | medical profession worldwide.
         | 
         | My best friend from high school became an MD and I witnessed
         | doctors in training being proud of powering through extremely
         | long, back to back shifts with little rest.
         | 
         | Meanwhile, as an engineer I've seen short and strict shift
         | limits on employees operating machinery like trucks and
         | forklifts. Under the obvious principle that insufficient sleep
         | impairs judgement, put lives at risk and creates massive
         | liability.
        
         | nradov wrote:
         | For inpatient hospital care, research has shown that
         | transitions in care are particularly risky for patients. When
         | one doctor goes off shift and hands off a patient to another
         | doctor, sometimes things fall through the cracks. In theory all
         | of the data needed for a smooth transition should be documented
         | in the patient chart, but in practice this doesn't always get
         | done plus there is some tacit knowledge which clinicians build
         | up by observing a particular patient which can't be put into
         | words.
         | 
         | This risk of iatrogenic harm has been used to justify long
         | hours, particularly for residents in teaching hospitals. I'm
         | not saying that it's necessarily a good idea or that there are
         | no better alternatives, just explaining some of the rationale.
        
           | user_7832 wrote:
           | Thanks, I commented a bit above already to a similar
           | response. I would say that there's a balance between very
           | short shifts and 24(or more) hour shifts. 12 hours for
           | example is doable occasionally/with breaks in between shifts.
           | Right now the pendulum is at one extreme.
           | 
           | [0] - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40025540
        
           | tum92 wrote:
           | I haven't read that literature very closely, but will say
           | that I have seen lots of handoffs, and they generally involve
           | someone who has been working 12+ hours, very often 24+ hours,
           | who needs to hand off 10s of patients to 3+ people, all of
           | whom have things to do and can be hard to schedule around,
           | before they can go home.
           | 
           | It is not at all surprising to me that these kind of hand
           | offs result in things being missed, and equally obvious that
           | decreasing the patients per provider and increasing hand off
           | window hours would at least reduce some of those errors, if
           | not outright improve them. Bonus points for putting the peak
           | of handoffs into late morning hours, where much more of the
           | decision making is completed.
           | 
           | Of course, the only way to do that is to either:
           | 
           | 1) drag hours out longer, which I think lots of MDs would be
           | fine with if they weren't expected to turn around and do it
           | again in 18-36 hours, requiring increased staffing
           | 
           | Or 2) increase staffing all around and just maintain more
           | reasonable ratios
        
         | postepowanieadm wrote:
         | It's even worse. In the EU the working week is to be an average
         | of about 48h. ...unless you are an medical professional, then
         | you "may" opt-out and work up to 78h. It's completely legal,
         | and regulated by the law of the EU:)
         | 
         | https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2014_2019/documents/...
        
         | tarkin2 wrote:
         | The cynic in me says they have bad working conditions since
         | they're public funded: governments, to a large extent, don't
         | want to increase or divert taxes to provide better working
         | conditions since they'd rather give their friends in the
         | private sector a slice of the immovable and highly lucrative
         | pie.
         | 
         | A partly-privatised healthcare system only works when all agree
         | to balance the intangible long-term benefits of universal
         | healthcare with tangible private-sector financial-gain. I don't
         | see this happening when the private sector is seen as the
         | panacea of all social-ills and when universal healthcare isn't
         | seen a means to increase productivity.
        
         | derbOac wrote:
         | The answer is implied, right there in the first paragraph: "...
         | I've never been diagnosed with a mental illness."
         | 
         | At least in the US, there's a kind of masochistic pride in the
         | physician community, that everything he described in his essay
         | is laudable, noble, to be emulated. Nowhere does he acknowledge
         | the risks to his patients or whether the costs are worth it in
         | the end, or if a different system might be better. And he's
         | holding up the lack of mental illness diagnosis as if it's
         | something to be proud of, as opposed to never being diagnosed
         | with say, cardiovascular disease or cancer. He's proud he's
         | never sought help or tried to change anything. Sure he mentions
         | problems with patient care in passing, but what he's really
         | upset about is "just being another employee".
         | 
         | In the end in his mindset whatever he's complaining about is
         | better than the alternatives, which is ceding over some of the
         | care responsibilities to others or opening up healthcare to a
         | more competitive market so he's not the only provider who could
         | provide those services (note the comment about denying other
         | physicians income). The AMA and physicians union (yes it's a
         | union) basically guarantees this in lieu of having real
         | competition, decreased income, and so forth.
         | 
         | Why is it different in something like aviation? My guess is
         | because the failures are more visible, they're on the nightly
         | news, people are there posting pictures on social media? For
         | whatever reason, I don't think pilot organizations ever managed
         | to remove themselves from scrutiny in the same way as
         | physicians did. We see pilots as highly skilled professionals,
         | but part of a system, with alternatives, and the subject of
         | fair scrutiny from outsiders who are not pilots: engineers,
         | safety experts, investigators and so forth. In my experience
         | when these kinds of issues come up in healthcare though,
         | everyone defers to physician groups themselves, as if no one
         | else has expertise enough to scrutinize them.
         | 
         | I imagine too at some level, part of the issue is that the
         | pilots themselves are subject to their own mistakes: if a pilot
         | crashes a plane, they take themselves out at the same time. If
         | a surgeon makes a mistake and kills a patient, they still walk
         | home and can rationalize whatever they want, all they want.
         | 
         | I'm growing unsympathetic to these types of essays (the one
         | linked). If physicians want me to empathize with them more,
         | maybe they should stop stigmatizing mental unwellness and
         | recognize it in themselves. Maybe they as a professional group
         | should admit that others could take on some of the load, maybe
         | even better in some situations. It feels a bit like they create
         | a mess out of selfish greed or ego and then expect me to feel
         | bad for them.
        
           | mlyle wrote:
           | > Nowhere does he acknowledge the risks to his patients or
           | whether the costs are worth it in the end, or if a different
           | system might be better
           | 
           | c.f.
           | 
           | "...everything is rushed, and mistakes are bound to occur."
           | 
           | "I am realising more and more that what brings me greatest
           | distress is the relentless administrative pressure which take
           | away the meaningful clinical engagement I have with my
           | patients."
           | 
           | "I was burned out and I couldn't control my emotions at work
           | and at home. I'm not inherently an offensive or rude person,
           | I'm just a person pushed to the limits and set to fail
           | because of the circumstances around my work."
           | 
           | > In the end in his mindset whatever he's complaining about
           | is better than the alternatives, which is ceding over some of
           | the care responsibilities to others or opening up healthcare
           | to a more competitive market so he's not the only provider
           | who could provide those service
           | 
           | This is Australia, which does not have artificial
           | restrictions on the supply of doctors to the same extent. On
           | the other hand, they don't have a surplus of surgeons nor can
           | nurse practitioners do the work
           | 
           | > (note the comment about denying other physicians income).
           | 
           | Yah, he's saying that if he doesn't come in, the backlog gets
           | worse, and other people don't get paid.
           | 
           | > He's proud he's never sought help or tried to change
           | anything.
           | 
           | He says he would like to seek support, but highlights the
           | structural problems that prevent it:
           | 
           | "I know where I can get support, but practically, when and
           | how am I going to get that support?"
           | 
           | "In addition, doctors who scream for help may be formally
           | reported, therefore having restrictions placed on their
           | practice and then incurring higher medical indemnity fees in
           | some situations. Trainees who ask for help may be labelled as
           | underperforming and have to be commenced on probation or
           | remediation. We may not have practical access to the support
           | that are often advertised."
           | 
           | I absolutely am in agreement with you that the things done to
           | artificially lower the supply of residency training in the US
           | are terrible. But those criticisms don't seem to apply to
           | this essay.
        
             | lazyasciiart wrote:
             | > which does not have artificial restrictions on the supply
             | of doctors to the same extent
             | 
             | Yes it does. One of the really interesting questions is
             | actually why the same problems have been created in so many
             | otherwise-different systems.
             | 
             | Edit: a post giving details on the Australian medical
             | training constraints https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliamen
             | t/Parliamentary_depart...
        
               | mlyle wrote:
               | > > to the same extent
               | 
               | Your source says that the government sets (indirectly) a
               | limit on the number of places at most public
               | universities, but there are private, full-fee
               | universities that are not so limited.
               | 
               | Internship slots, in turn, are set by disparate
               | government agencies. They've climbed, but probably not
               | climbed enough.
               | 
               | Compare to the US, where congress basically directly
               | controls the number of residency slots and has failed to
               | increase them really at all to keep up with increasing
               | population and increasing need for medical services.
        
           | kwhitefoot wrote:
           | > At least in the US, there's a kind of masochistic pride in
           | the physician community,
           | 
           | But the question is why does the rest of society insist that
           | pilots be properly rested but not doctors? I'm sure a lot of
           | pilots would also work crazy amounts of overtime if allowed.
        
             | ta_1138 wrote:
             | Pilot failures are really visible, and kill hundreds atll
             | at once. Bad medical decisions lead to more deaths overall,
             | but it's far less likely the public will hear it, and even
             | if they do, it's one person at a time.
             | 
             | Far more people die from car crashes than airplane crashes
             | too: It's not even close. And yet, people who have no
             | business behind a wheel drive, and the penalties for being
             | a poor driver are typically minimal. Same difference.
        
             | al_borland wrote:
             | When a pilot or a truck driver fall asleep, it's easy to
             | see the cause and effect. When sleeping, they can't control
             | the vehicle.
             | 
             | With other professions, the people are awake, their brain
             | just isn't functioning properly, so it's easier for people
             | to ignore the true cause, since well rested people can make
             | mistakes too.
        
             | ptsneves wrote:
             | Not only pilots. Truck driver resting time is heavily
             | regulated to the point the need to record start and end or
             | they will be fined at best. Their employers will also be on
             | the hook if drivers are non compliant.
             | 
             | A truck driver! But doctors? No... they are Uberhuman and
             | can make life or death decisions after 24 hours on call and
             | awake. Ridiculous. It is a topic that angers me a lot.
             | 
             | This happens in Portugal as well as Poland, it indeed feel
             | universal. I think the reason is that doctors are kind of
             | like gods: in the hour of your biggest need it is them that
             | can help, therefore they are highly respected and have huge
             | influence over a wide cross section of society. Everybody
             | will eventually need a doctor in their life.
             | 
             | Another pet outrage topic related to doctors is the amount
             | of time they need for training. They train almost 12 years
             | after high school before they are qualified. What a
             | wasteful training. They learn lots of generalities to the
             | specialize in the end. With a 10 or 12 year higher
             | education you are speaking about phd or post docs for a
             | profession that requires 1 for every 1000 citizens. Imagine
             | that ratio of phds and post docs. Is being a GP really
             | requiring such training? I don't think so and agree with
             | above posts that their duties should be broken down, opened
             | and delegated.
        
             | patall wrote:
             | Because when there is no pilot, the airplane simply does
             | not fly. Nobody dies, there is just an economic damage. But
             | if there is no doctor, people still get ill, and then
             | people die. Which makes it ethically easy to impose the one
             | but not the other. And which is also the reason why pilots
             | can go on strike, while the same is much more limited for
             | any kind of (medical) care job.
        
           | The_Blade wrote:
           | I would also add the famous Bert Cooper line, "I never heard
           | the word client in there." He mentions patients, but they are
           | all wrapped up in a woe-is-me section I work so hard and yet
           | I haven't been diagnosed with a mental illness.
           | 
           | He sounds like the kind of person that brags about being
           | mentally sound but is secretly addicted to benzos. Always
           | advocate for yourself!
        
         | Tarq0n wrote:
         | I think it has to do with the cost structure of the good.
         | Healthcare is dominated by labour costs, which means in
         | industrializing economies it lags behind in productivity and
         | labour starts getting squeezed to try and keep prices at a
         | reasonable level. A pilot, despiute being in a highly skilled
         | profession, is only a small part of the puzzle when it comes to
         | the cost of flights.
        
         | simonbarker87 wrote:
         | My assumption is that is a doctor does nothing the situation
         | will get worse. So therefore them doing anything is seen as a
         | step in the right direction, they will improve things over the
         | base line?
         | 
         | A pilot isn't in charge of a deteriorating situation, then
         | doing something could make things worse below the base line (a
         | tiredness induced mistake) so therefore make sure the only do
         | stuff when fit to do so?
         | 
         | Note I've used questions on both of these examples as it's more
         | of a half thought and a feeling that a statement or fully
         | fleshed out thought.
         | 
         | I guess the summary is, I'd rather have a tired doctor work on
         | me in an emergency than no doctor work on me. I'd rather not
         | fly on the plane than have a dangerously tired pilot fly the
         | plane.
         | 
         | That's being said the system clearly needs improving and we
         | need more medical professionals to balance the work load.
        
         | jstummbillig wrote:
         | Compared to aviation, bad outcomes in medicine are a) not news
         | material and also b) taken into account beforehand.
         | 
         | Phobias apart, we simply do not expect to die, when we fly. In
         | contrast, we openly consider % survival rates of medical
         | procedures. These rates have human error already baked in, and
         | would be lower if humans made less errors. And then there is
         | the primal fear of not getting help, if needed, because no help
         | was available, which certainly works on our collective will to
         | action here.
         | 
         | A 50% survival procedure for medicine might work, because it's
         | either that or death. Aviation is always a few plane
         | malfunctions (not even outright crashes) in quick succession
         | away from the entire industry crashing.
        
         | rors wrote:
         | My partner is a surgeon in the UK. She's planning on leaving
         | the profession at the end of the year. We talk a lot about what
         | is wrong with the medical profession.
         | 
         | One issue is the type of person attracted to the profession.
         | They're incredibly academically talented, not driven by money,
         | and desire status and recognition. Surgeons are the most
         | extreme cases of this personality type, as they're harder jobs
         | to get and have a lot of pressure. These people are the types
         | who get their head done, roll up their sleeves, and get on with
         | things. They're not used to asking for help or additional
         | resources. They're the sort of people who care for others!
         | Medicine self-selects for martyrs.
         | 
         | In addition, you have so many hoops to jump through (training,
         | specialisations, etc) with significant time investment that can
         | be lost in moments by pissing off training directors or other
         | senior doctors. My partner ends up working more than her
         | contracted hours because her bosses expect her to, although
         | they would never explicitly enforce stricter rules. If she
         | works her contracted hours she can kiss a consultant job (UK
         | equivalent of attending) goodbye as her bosses won't provide a
         | reference for the role.
         | 
         | Because the stakes in medicine are literally life and death,
         | meaning that it is heavily regulated. There are horror stories
         | around the GMC, the UK regulator, and doctors are terrified of
         | being investigated. They adopt a legalistic mentality where
         | they only treat if they're sure that they won't get prosecuted.
         | It's very different from aviation with its no blame culture.
         | 
         | Finally, another factor that is making medicine so tough is
         | that it is a success story! People live longer, and pathologies
         | that were once fatal can be managed with ever more complex
         | treatments. As demographics lean to older populations, then the
         | demand keeps increasing.
        
       | orangesite wrote:
       | aka The darker side of having people who wouldn't make it through
       | the first four weeks of med school managing health services.
        
         | yazzku wrote:
         | And they got MBAs instead.
        
       | IncreasePosts wrote:
       | I know America strictly limits the number of people who can
       | become doctors every year. Does Australia have a similar system?
       | 
       | It seems insane to me to first limit how many there can be, and
       | then overwork the ones you do allow to become doctors.
        
         | yazzku wrote:
         | >I had worked in a hospital where I didn't get home for days at
         | a time, sleeping overnight in hospital quarters, outpatient
         | clinic benches and in my car. I used to have my sleeping bag,
         | toiletries and change in the boot of my car because I didn't
         | know if I was going to make it home some nights. Plans change
         | every single day at work because of emergencies. I can't even
         | be sure what the next hour will bring when I am on call.
         | 
         | This is absolutely insane. Are we reading a town doctor's tale
         | or a war tale?
        
         | thundergolfer wrote:
         | Though significant restrictions on supply do exist, the problem
         | does not seem to be nearly as bad in Australia as in the USA
         | [1]. In Australia there's ~15 medical graduates per 100k vs ~8
         | in USA.
         | 
         | The doctors in Australia are still definitely overworked
         | though. A decent number of the people I went to school with
         | became doctors in Australia, and though we work roughly the
         | same number of hours (~60-70hrs/week), my work in the software
         | industry is like a stroll in the park.
         | 
         | It was remarkable to hear my male friends who became doctors
         | admitting that they had broken down crying in meetings with
         | their boss because of workplace stress and exhaustion.
         | 
         | 1. https://www.ama.com.au/ama-
         | rounds/13-may-2022/articles/more-...
        
           | genewitch wrote:
           | there's more than 12 times the number of people in the US.
           | Yes i understand this is "per 100k", but this still kind of
           | reads like "adding lanes to highways does not reduce
           | traffic," and that means that there is some other issue. If
           | you have more doctors, more people will go to the doctor.
           | This is good, more people should go to the doctor, because
           | early and preventative care reduces the overall cost burden
           | on the system.
           | 
           | And i don't want to put this in its own comment or even
           | continue reading the defense of doctors (as they stand now):
           | Women get shafted so hard by the medical community. People
           | with mental health issues get screwed by the medical system.
           | Both get their problems written off for non-medical reasons.
           | There are bad practitioners just like there are bad
           | developers and bad general contractors and bad bridge
           | builders and bad pilots. The whole system is not very good
           | and i don't see, necessarily, how merely adding more medical
           | degree holding people to the mix will improve things. There
           | isn't enough patient advocacy, there's too much friction with
           | medical insurance (in the US).
           | 
           | But at least the shareholders are making money.
        
           | candiddevmike wrote:
           | Why do you work that many hours?
        
         | Gunax wrote:
         | While it's true that there is a limit (really there is a limit
         | to every university study), there is also a limit to the number
         | of people who are qualified and interested.
         | 
         | For instance, there are only about 20k people who score > 510
         | on the MCAT per year (the average matriculant has about a 512).
         | And remember that includes US & Canada.
         | 
         | While I know there are a lot of people rejected from medical
         | school each year, some probably should not be accepted to
         | medical school. I think we could probably increase the number
         | of seats by about 20%.
         | 
         | The American and Canadian medical schools place a high bar on
         | accepting students, so nearly everyone who is accepted
         | graduates. It's uncommon for medical students to perform
         | poorly.
         | 
         | But this isn't true everywhere. Some places prefer to admit
         | many students and let them sink-or-swim.
        
           | robocat wrote:
           | > there are only about 20k people who score > 510 on the MCAT
           | per year
           | 
           | The article clearly shows the skills necessary to work as a
           | doctor are a lot wider than academic ability.
           | 
           | One pleasure/pain of being a software developer is that there
           | is less gatekeeping.
        
             | ejstronge wrote:
             | > The article clearly shows the skills necessary to work as
             | a doctor are a lot wider than academic ability.
             | 
             | Where does the article show this?
        
         | gosub100 wrote:
         | Its not just limiting the numbers, but also the way matching is
         | done. The current way is that upon admission to med school, you
         | must be willing to accept just about any practice specialty.
         | This is another thing that could be flipped on its head by
         | allowing you to be any kind of doctor, provided that you attain
         | the required MD and complete training.
         | 
         | Yes, I know, certain medical specialties are very competitive,
         | but (IMO) they should be forced to admit you if you pay for the
         | training. For instance, if I could be a radiologist, I would.
         | But I dont want to be any other kind of doctor. They could say
         | "ok, you will be eligible for radiology residency upon earning
         | an MD and completing some standardized program proving you
         | learned the book-side of radiology. Upon completion of that,
         | (and , say 1 year of generalist MD work), then some radiology
         | residency essentially has to admit you. Not interview for it,
         | and jump up and down like a puppy, and based on how likeable
         | you are, maybe, they let you in.
         | 
         | This could open the door for non-traditional doctors in
         | general: Word could get around, "hey, this podiatry program is
         | cool, 2 years training, 1 year public service, and you could
         | earn $200k", knowing what kind of dr you will be might have an
         | interesting effect in attracting people who otherwise would
         | have never considered it (to fill the unpopular specialist
         | roles like podiatry or psychiatry).
        
       | bryanlarsen wrote:
       | (At least some) of the new generation of doctors appears to be
       | better about refusing overwork. AFAICT that's a large component
       | of the doctor shortage here in Canada -- the ratio of doctors to
       | patients is better than ever but if a doctor "only" does 40 hours
       | a week you need more of them.
        
       | keybored wrote:
       | > I am realising more and more that what brings me greatest
       | distress is the relentless administrative pressure which take
       | away the meaningful clinical engagement I have with my patients.
       | And I wonder if this is what many young doctors are experiencing
       | as well. Medicine used to be a meaningful pursuit. Now it has
       | become a tiresome industry. The joy, purpose and meaning of
       | medicine has been codified, sterilised, protocolised,
       | industrialised and regimented. Doctors are caught in a web of
       | business, no longer a noble vocation. The altruism of young
       | doctors have been replaced by the shackles of efficiency,
       | productivity and key performance indicators.
       | 
       | tl;dr: professional feels like a proletarian.
        
       | grepLeigh wrote:
       | The three factors mentioned (loss of control, loss of support,
       | loss of meaning) are the pillars of occupational burnout,
       | according to researchers like Christina Maslach.
       | 
       | In many cases, someone experiencing occupational burnout NEEDS
       | extended time away from their work environment to heal. In severe
       | cases, they might not be able to return to work at full capacity
       | for years (or ever). This creates a negative feedback loop for
       | understaffed doctors, nurses, and other healthcare workers.
        
       | npretorius wrote:
       | Have doctor's unions helped before?
        
         | kwhitefoot wrote:
         | Why would they? Did pilot's unions campaign for strict rules
         | regarding pilot's working hours? Or was it the FAA/CAA/etc.
         | that did it?
        
       | hello_computer wrote:
       | There was a philosopher who once wrote " _all regimes exist under
       | the consent of the governed_. " This should go double for the
       | medical profession. They have the brains, the education--and in
       | most cases, the money--to object, weather a fight if need be, and
       | comfortably pivot if they lose. If the situation is intolerable,
       | the person to blame is in the mirror. They are competitive
       | people. The bureaucrats and administrators understand this, and
       | use it to pull their strings--make them dance. _Click. Click.
       | Click._
        
       | bsdz wrote:
       | Something I've never quite understood is why, in the UK, we cap
       | the number of medical students per year. I've known very bright
       | people who aspired to be doctors but had their applications
       | turned down only to go on to do phds and become scientists
       | instead. I'd rather have twice as many doctors who work sensible
       | hours rather than the status quo burn out. Looks like there are
       | calls to change this.
       | https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-...
        
         | kvonhorn wrote:
         | Supply and demand. If you artificially cap the supply of
         | doctors, then the doctors can ramp up their prices.
        
           | KittenInABox wrote:
           | I don't even think doctors want the cap, tbh. Your average
           | emergency physician would take all the qualified help they
           | can get.
        
             | lazyasciiart wrote:
             | Yes, but how many residents can each emergency physician
             | train at once? Doctors are similar to apprentices for the
             | last part of their training.
        
           | hollerith wrote:
           | That explains why doctors like the status quo. Insurers like
           | it, too, because expensive tests and expensive procedures
           | must be ordered by a doctor (at least if insurance is going
           | to pay for it) and if the patient gives up on getting in to
           | see a doctor, then the insurer does not need to pay for the
           | expensive test or expensive procedure. In the US, employers
           | like it, too, because they end up paying the insurance
           | premiums for their employees.
        
             | tmpz22 wrote:
             | And the schools prefer it (at least in the US) - limited
             | highly paid doctors means they can charge exorbitant
             | tuition.
        
               | ejstronge wrote:
               | > And the schools prefer it (at least in the US) -
               | limited highly paid doctors means they can charge
               | exorbitant tuition.
               | 
               | What's the evidence for your position? Researchers who
               | study this question have shown that the cost of medical
               | education is significantly higher than the price assessed
               | to students.
               | 
               | In other words, having more medical students would cost
               | schools money.
        
           | abyssin wrote:
           | There is an article in Le Monde diplomatique of February 2024
           | that briefly tells the story of the first numerus closus in
           | France in the sixties.
        
           | bsdz wrote:
           | Perhaps there's a little of that going on here in the UK.
           | Doctors can certainly command a decent salary especially if
           | they specialise, run private clinics etc. That said, I feel
           | it's probably more complicated than that. Each place costs
           | approx PS230k (only PS65k paid by student by way of loans).
           | This means increasing supply is a costly endeavour. The
           | government also says that they wish to maintain teaching and
           | learning standards; although, I don't really buy that part.
        
             | tim333 wrote:
             | Of course the UK government can avoid the training cost by
             | hiring foreigners. From my personal experience maybe half
             | the NHS doctors are from overseas.
        
           | truculent wrote:
           | I'm not sure this really stands up in a UK context: https://w
           | ww.nuffieldtrust.org.uk/sites/default/files/styles/...
        
         | nradov wrote:
         | Artificially limiting the supply of doctors is one way of
         | rationing healthcare and holding down costs. Healthcare in the
         | UK is largely funded through the NHS. Voters are already
         | financially struggling and don't want to pay higher taxes. In
         | some cases, even emergency patients are waiting hours in
         | ambulances because hospitals are so overloaded.
         | 
         | https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-cornwall-68171254
        
           | nextaccountic wrote:
           | Artificially limiting the supply of doctors drives the wages
           | up. It's a common demand of doctors worldwide
        
           | lolinder wrote:
           | This doesn't make a lot of sense as an explanation for the
           | policy--if there were more doctors trained that doesn't
           | _require_ that they find jobs, but it does make it easier for
           | hospitals to replace their doctors if and when they need to,
           | and likely at a lower price. If healthcare costs were the
           | reason I 'd expect the government to cap the number of
           | doctors they employ now, not try to guess how many doctors
           | they'll wish they could employ in six years.
        
           | robocat wrote:
           | > hospitals are so overloaded
           | 
           | How do you suggest we limit the demand for healthcare?
        
             | phren0logy wrote:
             | In the US, anyone can walk into the emergency room for
             | treatment, but people who don't have insurance are very
             | unlikely to participate in preventative care.
             | 
             | The way to decrease demand For complicated and expensive
             | interventions to preventable problems is to increase access
             | to preventative care.
        
               | robocat wrote:
               | I'm not sure what you mean by preventative care.
               | 
               | In New Zealand "poor" might be a synonym for uninsured?
               | However my peer group is middle aged professionals (not
               | poor) with as variety of healthcare issues. Only a very
               | few would preventative care help. _Prevention_ would help
               | many of my friends. A friend with a cancer scare that
               | keeps smoking. A friend with gout that doesn 't change
               | habits. Multiple friends with issues from drugs that
               | continue to take drugs. All my friends and me that are
               | unfit and eat poor diets. I've given up drinking recently
               | but I'm most definitely an outlier.
               | 
               | Prevention is often the cure.
               | 
               | Assuming you mean prevention when you say preventative
               | care?
        
             | switch007 wrote:
             | In the UK they severely limit access to any diagnostics,
             | and your GP just gives you antibiotics and/or anti
             | depressants.
             | 
             | At the hospital, they just classify your symptoms as "not
             | critical", refuse to admit you and kick you back to your
             | GP, who then refuses to refer you for any investigations, I
             | imagine because there is a gun to their head over targets
             | etc
             | 
             | If your levels are high, you're told oh it's not severe. If
             | it's severe, you're told oh it's not critical etc
             | 
             | We have a system where everyone just gaslights you that
             | you're in fact not sick because you aren't 3 seconds from
             | death
        
               | robocat wrote:
               | That reduces access but it doesn't affect the _demand_
               | for healthcare.
               | 
               | I'm in New Zealand: not a heap better than you describe.
               | Here GPs are overworked and getting an appointment is
               | difficult. The health system has waitlists to control
               | access to a limited number of procedures performed in
               | each specialty. You need to be healthy enough to pass the
               | access requirements and for acute surgery you need to
               | live long enough to get to the front of the queue.
        
         | paxys wrote:
         | Because doctors' associations and regulatory bodies (like AAMC
         | in the US) lobby to keep it that way to keep the value of their
         | profession up.
        
           | dmead wrote:
           | And then make young residents work themselves to death.
        
           | ejstronge wrote:
           | > Because doctors' associations and regulatory bodies (like
           | AAMC in the US) lobby to keep it that way to keep the value
           | of their profession up.
           | 
           | This isn't true of the AAMC position in the US today, and
           | when it was true in the 90s, there were many articles about
           | an upcoming oversupply of physicians.
           | 
           | First, US medical school graduating classes are smaller in
           | number than the number of available residency positions. So
           | every year, the US is importing physicians trained in other
           | countries.
           | 
           | Next, residency positions (required to practice in the US)
           | are funded by the US government. You could readily contact
           | your US representatives about the problem you perceive - if
           | this a legitimate concern for you.
           | 
           | Additionally, US residency positions _don 't need to be
           | funded by any government body, at all!_ Hospitals need
           | 'simply' show that there is enough patient volume to support
           | educating additional residents. This is another avenue where
           | you can intervene, if this is indeed something you care
           | about.
           | 
           | Lastly, 'advanced practice providers' are filling in large
           | amounts of the deficits in physicians in primary care
           | providers. So focusing on the number of physicians is to
           | ignore the huge growth of NPs and PAs - some of whom can
           | function without a physician in some parts of their practice.
           | 
           | I see many people blame 'the AAMC' for healthcare problems,
           | but worry that not many appreciate the lack of a role the
           | AAMC plays in the number of providers in America.
        
         | dzink wrote:
         | The training of each doctor takes a lot of resources,
         | especially specific numbers of cases necessary for each of the
         | specialists who do surgery of any kind. If a surgeon does not
         | do a procedure on a regular basis they lose skill in it and the
         | less practice a doctor has had in a field, the worse their
         | outcomes. So if you get 10 whipples in a year in an area and
         | you have too many surgeons or hospitals taking less than 1 per
         | year, without one getting more than a number of cases a year,
         | all of them will be bad and your mortality will be high.
        
         | dogmatism wrote:
         | NHS is in a process of replacing doctors with physician
         | assistants
        
         | arp242 wrote:
         | Your own link contains your answer:
         | 
         | > Expanding the cap on medical and dental school places is
         | complicated by the cost of training, current university and
         | clinical placement capacity, and the current number of
         | clinically qualified academic staff who design and deliver
         | courses.
         | 
         | Furthermore, the NHS actually needs the funds to hire staff.
         | 
         | The core problem is that people are getting older with more
         | complex health care requirements, that more and more conditions
         | become treatable, that healthcare is often expensive, and that
         | no one wants to pay for it.
        
           | bsdz wrote:
           | I don't really feel it does. Sure I can see the costs
           | involved complicate things. However, doubling the cap will
           | likely introduce some economies of scale, surely that would
           | reduce training costs. Also capacity would grow to meet
           | training demand; Universities are always keen for more
           | students. Also increasing the working pool will ultimately
           | lead to more "clinically qualified academic staff". All this
           | might become irrelevant with technology replacing
           | GPs/Physicians. Perhaps in 10 years time we'll be examined by
           | robots at our local pharmacy.
        
             | arp242 wrote:
             | > All this might become irrelevant with technology
             | replacing GPs/Physicians. Perhaps in 10 years time we'll be
             | examined by robots at our local pharmacy.
             | 
             | lolno. Aside from the fact that AI is nowhere near good
             | enough, we can't really build robots anywhere close to the
             | dexterity required to do many of the physical actions. Also
             | people like having human contact.
             | 
             | "Economies of scale" only works well for things like
             | manufacture, and is much more limited for many other
             | things. It certainly doesn't reduce the cost of actually
             | paying a yearly salary to these people, or ensuring you
             | have enough places (hospitals) for the to work at, which
             | isn't cheap either. There are some small advantages one can
             | take here on there, but in general, it scales fairly
             | linearly. This is not just me saying that, your own link,
             | again, says that.
             | 
             | Training 10 junior devs really is about 10 times as much
             | work as training 1. Maybe slightly less because you can
             | group _some_ things, but not too much. And training 20
             | junior devs is about twice as much work as training 10.
             | 
             | It really is just a funding issue - which is what everyone
             | has been saying for years. Labour wants to increase spots
             | by abolishing non-doms - we'll see if that works when they
             | win the election.
             | 
             | Otherwise feel free to stand for election and propose the
             | _n_ % tax hike required for all of this and see how well
             | that goes.
        
         | rr808 wrote:
         | An associated problem is that bright people from rural or poor
         | areas who are really passionate about being a doctor dont get
         | the right grades to get in. Middle class kids in cities get in
         | because its a good career but dont really like it that much and
         | definitely dont want to work outside their city. My brother
         | worked as a doctor until his thirties then quit, such a waste
         | of training.
        
           | jajko wrote:
           | In Switzerland, at least for the french part, most of the
           | doctors are not Swiss anymore. It literally became white
           | collar immigrant job. Wife is one of those and sees the
           | problem very clearly due to speaking about this with both
           | (those few) swiss colleagues and the rest - its simply not
           | attractive career path for locals, too much suffering and
           | risk for relatively little reward.
           | 
           | Those bright enough go to law, IT and similar.
           | 
           | Speaking for my wife, she had to wade through absolutely
           | brutal first 10 years for absolutely no good reason (she
           | ain't no neurosurgeon, just internal medicine GP with FMH),
           | no personal life at all at the prime of her life. 50 work
           | week in contract (when average here is 42), reality with all
           | required bureaucracy goes to 60-70, for everybody,
           | consistently, unpaid (illegal here but who cares, state owns
           | the hospital), often much more and catching up with tons of
           | bureaucracy/billing at home.
           | 
           | Add night shifts, which most of us elsewhere have no
           | experience with, that mess you up for many further days. You
           | are a fraction of yourself, mentally and physically, for
           | easily a week, more if you had to go through say 4-5 in a
           | row.
           | 
           | These are the conditions that we put repeatedly people who
           | have full control over life and death and health of their
           | patients, often without further supervision, hoping they
           | somehow magically never ever make a mistake, and when they
           | do, folks immediately cry a murder and families sue to hell
           | with massive dollar signs in their eyes.
           | 
           | You complain about that, or that you spend whole weekend
           | being on call 48h unable to do anything really for literally
           | 20 USD altogether (price of a canteen lunch here), including
           | when you have to come and work 10-hour shift? You are put
           | under pressure, shushed for being a pussy if you complain,
           | told to toughen up since previous generations had it even
           | tougher, and they somehow got through. Nobody mentions how
           | horrible parents those absent folks were, how burned out they
           | often were, quietly weeping or drinking themselves into
           | oblivion. Well yes, those that didn't just quit, didn't go
           | insane, didn't commit suicide, sure they got through. And now
           | enjoy seeing young going through a bit milder version of the
           | same. Of course there are insane amounts of money involved,
           | but its always between insurance and hospital, doctors get
           | less than capable IT folks for much less work. I am IT guy
           | and consider this utterly fucked up wrong.
           | 
           | A good friend of ours sued the hospital (biggest public in
           | Switzerland) for breaking basic Swiss law consistently like
           | that, he was first but quickly gathered tons of other
           | doctors. IIRC hospital finally caved in, a bit, but he is
           | gone from it for good to private sector. Twice the pay, half
           | the crap.
           | 
           | I could go on and on like this, a lot of doctor friends in
           | our circles. It ain't some dream job, (at least a bit well-
           | placed) IT job is a blessing in comparison.
           | 
           | /rant
        
             | rr808 wrote:
             | I think its similar worldwide. Like I said my brother quit.
             | Its also true that IT people are ridiculously overpaid.
             | Both problems will inevitably revert to the mean.
        
               | catlikesshrimp wrote:
               | Not everywhere though. The life of a doctor is much
               | better in Costa Rica, even in public institutions. The
               | extra time is paid. And the syndicates are strong (which
               | has worked well)
               | 
               | The doctors in Nicaragua, the neighboring country, is as
               | described in your comment, except the economy of the
               | whole country is in shambles, and they also have to
               | "voluntarily" participate in "government" political
               | activities. Oh, and since the country is poor there are
               | no immigrants waiting in line to fulfill those positions.
        
             | peschu wrote:
             | The picture you are painting is way too dark. And does not
             | give a realistic picture.
             | 
             | A lot of what you say is true for doctors in their first
             | 5-10 years into their career, when employed in a hospital.
             | 
             | This not true for doctors which reached a certain level
             | like ,,oberarzt" and above.
             | 
             | This is especially not true for doctors with their own
             | ,,office" (business).
             | 
             | Yeah people may cry, but normally it is very hard to bring
             | a doctor to justice even when there are quite obvious
             | mistakes or misconduct. They are very well protected, suing
             | a doctor not seldom takes 10 years from start to verdict,
             | with a lot of legal costs involved.
             | 
             | And last but not least, it is a very secure profession. You
             | must be really really stupid to end up jobless. So you have
             | 5-10 years with a ,,ok" salary compared to the power you
             | invest. And 20-30 Years with a very good to exceptional
             | salary, especially when compared to the broader population.
        
             | hagbard_c wrote:
             | Same in Sweden, it is rare to meet a Swedish doctor at the
             | 'vardcentral' (group practice). In my infrequent visits
             | with one of my children I've met doctors from Iran, from
             | Iraq, from Germany and from the Netherlands but not from
             | Sweden. Nurses tend to come from Sweden. What seems to
             | happen is that Swedish doctors find work in e.g. Norway
             | where the pay is a lot higher while the working environment
             | is less stressful. That in itself is also a bit of an
             | oddity since Swedish doctors don't see as many patients per
             | day as those in e.g. the Netherlands do.
        
           | lilsoso wrote:
           | We should enforce rigorous qualifications for doctors. We've
           | relaxed the standards far too much already.
        
             | archagon wrote:
             | Qualifications should come at the end of your education,
             | not at the start.
        
               | Wowfunhappy wrote:
               | Educating doctors is really expensive. It would really
               | suck to invest all that money in someone (or in yourself)
               | just for them to fail a final test or whatever.
               | 
               | For what it's worth, I do agree we should train more
               | doctors, but I think it's a complicated problem.
        
             | casenmgreen wrote:
             | We do not need all doctors to be uber doctors.
             | 
             | We need a range of doctors, _who range in price according
             | to quality_.
             | 
             | That way for simple stuff, which anyone can get right, we
             | go to a cheap, reasonable doctor.
             | 
             | A similar example would be if we only had _uber_ software
             | engineers. Each one had to have a PhD. There were _no_
             | cheap and okay developers who could do say web-sites but
             | not write a programming language from scratch.
        
         | disambiguation wrote:
         | idk why doesn't my startup hire twice as many people? wouldn't
         | we get the work done twice as fast and make twice as much
         | money?
        
           | hazbot wrote:
           | With doctors you can parallelize treating different patients
           | pretty easily.
        
         | gravescale wrote:
         | Training places are already rammed to the gills, there aren't
         | enough places to put substantially more students. Junior
         | doctors already have to compete to get training slots even
         | vaguely where they live and if they miss that they simply have
         | to physically move to a different city. Medical training isn't
         | as simple as just adding a lecture theatre and a few
         | classrooms, or even a whole university building faculty of
         | lecturers and admin. You also need a hospital (and GP surgeries
         | etc) to be attached as well as enough senior staff to train
         | them when they are there. That training is very intensive on
         | trainer:trainee ratios and the senior staff are also in
         | critically short supply as the ones who were trained up when
         | there was training capacity (which, to be fair, was a time when
         | it was far cheaper to train a medical student), are retiring by
         | the thousands and many newer junior doctors quit or emigrate as
         | a result of their experiences up to that point.
         | 
         | Hospitals cost absurdly large amounts of money, especially in
         | the UK where there are consultancies and layers of
         | subcontracting for everything. So the infrastructure costs of
         | adding even a few hundred student places is astronomical.
         | 
         | Due to strategic underinvestment (or ideological sabotage, or
         | governance incompetence, depending on outlook) there is now a
         | self-reinforcing problem: not enough hospitals and staff to
         | train doctors to beef up existing hospital staffing or work in
         | hypothetical new hospitals even if a money firehose was turned
         | on.
         | 
         | Rather than having a tall glass of concrete and doing the hard
         | thing, which will still take decades to manifest, what the
         | government is currently doing is a rerun of Healthcare
         | Assistants where more care is delegated to much cheaper-to-
         | train staff. Plus quite a bit of noise about "AI" bring used to
         | allow them to sweat the asset of the staff they do have by, for
         | example having one radiologist verifying AI findings rather
         | than a pair-based system.
         | 
         | Which will all work "kinda ok" and let them punt the problems
         | at least into the next government's domain when they lose the
         | next election and can spend 5 years screaming from the
         | Opposition benches about the mess. But you cannot do it forever
         | (or the hail-Mary works, there's an AI revolution and you can
         | actually run a hospital with an app, 2 agency nurses, a few
         | smart plugs and an AWS instance).
         | 
         | Of course "doing the hard thing" would be easy to say if it was
         | just the NHS, but there's the same structural degradation in
         | everything. So you also need to spend billions on education.
         | That's the same general problem - shortage of facilities and
         | not enough existing staff to train new staff and the ones you
         | do train quit. Schools are currently one something like a
         | 300-year replacement rate and that's without considering
         | population growth or even the hundreds of schools that need
         | rebuilding because they're made of RAAC. Then roads need
         | billions to repair the accumulating damage. The railways need
         | huge investment and staffing. Energy is the same - virtually no
         | supply of domestic nuclear design engineers mean they get
         | absolutely rinsed on even squinting in the direction of a
         | drawing of reactor (though Hinkley Point C cost spiral is
         | currently EDF's problem, not the taxpayer and green energy is
         | actually a rare success story). Defence is similar (e.g. ships
         | being retired because they need the staff elsewhere). At least
         | some water networks are collapsing into a multi-billion hole
         | after private dividend extraction. So that money firehose has a
         | lot of work to do, even if they would turn it on. Which is
         | ideological poison apparently.
        
         | catlikesshrimp wrote:
         | My life experience showed me that allowing more people in lead
         | to less capable people in. Less capable students graduate as
         | worse doctors. And doctors who came from more wealthy families
         | usually do much better, regardless of their prowess. I won't go
         | into details, it is unnecessary.
         | 
         | The end result is that the health practice degrades overall,
         | and social inequality strenghtens. I think nobody is happy with
         | the former reason.
        
       | DonnyV wrote:
       | This is what happens when everything is financialized. There is
       | no reason that we should be running doctors into the ground.
       | Health professionals are a necessity in a functioning society. I
       | know in the US Government seems to have no problem throwing money
       | at corporations and providing endless tax breaks. But god forbid
       | we proved a functioning health system.
       | 
       | For the US this needs to happen.
       | 
       | 1) Medicare For All - a universal, no pay at service, insurance
       | system, everyone taxed at 4% for it.
       | 
       | 2) People that have the grades to make it to medical school
       | should get a free ride.
       | 
       | 3) Small Private practices should come back with free digital
       | billing with the new health insurance system.
       | 
       | 4) Price regulation on all basic medical supplies and medicines.
       | No more $20 tongue depressors
       | 
       | 5) All medicines researched at public Universities will not be
       | sold or given to private industry. They will be licensed. That
       | money goes back into supporting this system.
        
         | jokethrowaway wrote:
         | Public healthcare doesn't work.
         | 
         | They just get progressively worse and start adding expenses for
         | the patients. The quality is terrible, despite the propaganda.
         | The best companies were offering private healthcare with their
         | offer.
         | 
         | I've seen it happen in two countries, now I live in one which
         | just made most of private healthcare (which is excellent
         | quality) available as public. It's working well for now but
         | they're spending a ridiculous amount of money and it's not
         | sustainable. Doctors are happy, I'm not because my taxes
         | increased from 12.5% to 15%.
         | 
         | Public mismanagement is huge, they'll screw it up.
         | 
         | The USA government needs to stop being in bed with insurance
         | companies to make everything expensive, then your private
         | system will be fine.
        
           | DonnyV wrote:
           | I didn't say Public healthcare. Only the insurance is public.
           | The healthcare system still stays private.
        
           | kwhitefoot wrote:
           | > Public healthcare doesn't work.
           | 
           | It works here.
        
         | IvyMike wrote:
         | It appears that Dr. Eric Levi works in England.
        
       | GiorgioG wrote:
       | You are a body to the healthcare system. My wife is a hospice
       | nurse and they're happy to grind you into the ground as long as
       | it suits them.
        
         | genewitch wrote:
         | as long as the client has money in their savings account*
        
       | willmadden wrote:
       | The answer is simple, mandatory limits on hours and days worked.
       | Also fix healthcare regulation and the process of becoming a
       | doctor so there isn't a supply shortage of doctors and surgeons.
        
       | kingkawn wrote:
       | The profession as a whole is profoundly hostile to any serious
       | considerations of mental health, and it's going to take many more
       | suicides before even the smallest steps are taken toward obvious
       | quality of life improvements.
        
         | genewitch wrote:
         | humanity as a whole is profoundly hostile to any serious
         | considerations of mental health. Dr. Drew once agreed with a
         | rant by cohost adam carolla along the lines of (this is a
         | whisper transcription. blame me for mistranscriptions, idc)
         | 
         | "It just doesn't make any sense to me. What's so bizarre in our
         | culture, if you'd broken your leg when you were a kid and you
         | needed a few years of physical therapy, you'd get it. You'd be
         | running on it, and by the way, people would be applauding your
         | great commitment that you go out and work out every day on your
         | leg, and you make sure that you're going to overcome that
         | problem, and you're going to get back up on skis again and
         | whatever. The same thing is true with our brain, and somehow
         | because it's our brain, no, no, no. Sorry. We'll have none of
         | that. What would [...] tell you to do? Oh, he'd say just decide
         | to change. You just gotta decide to change. You gotta get up,
         | you gotta dust yourself off, you gotta take a long look in the
         | mirror, and you gotta decide to change. I can't change for you,
         | and all the people wishing you'd change around you aren't gonna
         | make you change. There's only one person that can change your
         | life, and that person's name is [...]. You want to lose weight,
         | you're gonna have to burn more calories, and you're gonna... "
        
           | kingkawn wrote:
           | All true. I think doctors as possessors of the monopoly on
           | health spending are uniquely positioned to fuck the whole
           | society up with their own blindness to monumental aspects of
           | health
        
       | andoando wrote:
       | The shit we make doctors go through is unnecessarily insane. It
       | takes 300-400k of debt and grueling 7-8 years on top of a
       | bachelors degree, with bunch of uncertainty on where you'll be or
       | whether you ever make it, just to start working. If you ever quit
       | before then, any progress made counts for zero and you have to
       | start all over again in a new field with a ton of debt.
       | 
       | Why doesnt an MD or even credits at a medical school count toward
       | nursing, physician assistsnt, etc?
       | 
       | Lastly, med school is unnecessarily long. You don't need most of
       | the material to do family medicine for example.
       | 
       | I really don't understand how such inefficiencies could be
       | tolerated.
        
         | nradov wrote:
         | I agree but the education system is starting to improve. Some
         | schools now offer combined Baccalaureate-MD programs which can
         | reduce the education time by up to 2 years.
         | 
         | https://students-residents.aamc.org/medical-school-admission...
         | 
         | Tennessee now allows some physicians to practice without
         | completing a residency program, largely as a way to attract
         | immigrants to work in underserved communities.
         | 
         | https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/993693
        
       | praptak wrote:
       | _" Medicine used to be a meaningful pursuit. Now it has become a
       | tiresome industry. The joy, purpose and meaning of medicine has
       | been codified, sterilised, protocolised, industrialised and
       | regimented. Doctors are caught in a web of business, no longer a
       | noble vocation. The altruism of young doctors have been replaced
       | by the shackles of efficiency, productivity and key performance
       | indicators."_
       | 
       | That's textbook Marxist alienation of work. It was not supposed
       | to happen to middle class workers though.
        
         | lurking15 wrote:
         | Oddly enough medicine has never been more regulated and
         | financed by government so hard to say this is some sort of
         | marxist dynamic, more like the consequences of centralization
         | that happened after (because of) WWII. You see this in the
         | US/UK/Canada regardless of whether they're "socialized" it's a
         | mess everywhere.
        
       | maCDzP wrote:
       | My not so generous and extreme take is that the medical
       | profession has a "hero culture".
       | 
       | There is prestige in working your ass of and living for work.
       | Work life balance is for the weak people who can't take it, they
       | are not real health professionals. They don't have what it takes.
       | 
       | I have seen the same culture in aid work.
       | 
       | I find it ironic that both health professionals and aid workers
       | are there to help people, but not for each other. Then it's cut
       | throat.
        
       | jokethrowaway wrote:
       | This can happen in any work.
       | 
       | But I concede, medicine is grueling - not worth the money if you
       | ask me.
        
       | eclectic29 wrote:
       | Thanks for sharing. This is so disheartening. The other day I was
       | debating with my friends how a doctors life is so cool that they
       | don't have to go though grueling coding interviews every single
       | time they want to change jobs, don't have to prove themselves
       | every single quarter, don't have to be answerable to anyone or
       | write performance reviews or be subjected to arbitrary rubrics.
       | Boy, I was so wrong. Every procession has its hazards. This has
       | been a learning for me. Although I do feel that the PCP doctors
       | in US seem to have a simpler life. They leave office at 5 and
       | don't take calls in the night. Happy to be corrected though.
        
         | Turing_Machine wrote:
         | Even PCPs sometimes have to go home with the knowledge that
         | someone died, and (being human) wondering if there was
         | something else they could have done.
         | 
         | Now imagine that happening dozens or hundreds of times over the
         | course of a career.
         | 
         | Unless coders are working on air traffic control or something
         | similarly critical, it's pretty rare for a bug to kill someone.
        
         | dogmatism wrote:
         | US PCP doctors do take calls. It's less common for them to go
         | to the hospital to admit their own patients anymore since the
         | rise of "hospitalists" but they still take outpatient calls and
         | calls from the ER.
         | 
         | Also, PCPs are subject to the most metrics/rubrics of any, and
         | all the crap paperwork that any specialist can foist off onto
         | them, they do. Shit rolls downhill, and PCP's are at the bottom
         | 
         | They may stop seeing patients at 5, but they sure as shit
         | aren't done at 5. Most are logging back in even later doing all
         | the "paperwork" they didn't have time to do during the day.
         | Even has a nickname: "pajama time"
        
       | game_the0ry wrote:
       | I don't understand why doctors that are entering the field need
       | to be over-staffed and over-worked. I have a cousin who is an Er
       | surgeon and she needs works 3 days a week, but that certainly was
       | not the case when she was starting out.
       | 
       | The work culture of the medical profession looks horribly
       | inefficient. What benefit do you get from buying out young
       | doctors?
        
         | jstummbillig wrote:
         | Discipline. (I am not saying it's worth it. I don't know.)
        
         | opinion-is-bad wrote:
         | Poor incentives for the existing members of the system that
         | hold power to implement change. They already cap the number of
         | med students to control salaries, perhaps burning out young
         | doctors fulfills the same purpose, while also (temporarily)
         | covering for the lack of doctors available because of the
         | artificial limit?
        
         | rr808 wrote:
         | Some wards with really sick people benefit from having longer
         | shifts as you see the person progress and have fewer shift
         | changes. Ie with 2 people doing 12 hr shifts is better than 3
         | people doing 8 hours shifts as the doctors and nurses see how a
         | patient is doing and dont have to communicate to next shift.
         | Something like ER where people come and go all day wouldn't
         | benefit from this however.
        
           | jajko wrote:
           | Yes but you _really_ don 't want to be treated at the end of
           | that 12-hour shift, quality of service drops down
           | significantly, they are significantly more tired at that
           | point. Doctors are just humans like rest of us, and those
           | shifts are often brutal.
        
             | game_the0ry wrote:
             | That's what I am trying to say, sleep deprivation causes
             | people to make mistakes.
        
           | dimal wrote:
           | I'd rather have three well-rested people and an additional
           | shift change than two burned out, exhausted people. People
           | who are exhausted make mistakes. Maybe it would be better to
           | focus on improving internal communication.
        
             | rr808 wrote:
             | Maybe, I think we have to trust the medical people that
             | they know what they're doing. My baby daughter was in
             | incubated in ICU twice with severe Bronchiolitis. It was
             | nice to see the same people look after her for a week
             | rather than a continual stream of people clocking on and
             | off.
        
               | krisoft wrote:
               | > It was nice to see the same people look after her for a
               | week rather than a continual stream of people clocking on
               | and off.
               | 
               | Surely those people were sleeping from time to time
               | during the week, weren't they? That is the "people
               | clocking on and off".
        
             | GavinMcG wrote:
             | Have you looked at the research regarding which of those
             | two options leads to better patient outcomes?
        
               | game_the0ry wrote:
               | Have you? I'd love to hear that answer.
        
             | game_the0ry wrote:
             | So would I.
        
       | spxneo wrote:
       | People think doctors are some super human that they can heal
       | themselves but they are people just like you and me. It's
       | despicable that they along with veterans are being treated with
       | ambivalence.
       | 
       | The most recent example of contempt towards doctors described in
       | the article I've seen comes from South Koreans who enjoy a
       | generous, affordable, high quality healthcare that exceeds those
       | in North America complaining doctors make "too much" and that
       | there isn't enough doctors.
        
       | neilv wrote:
       | Especially since the Covid vaccine return to some normalcy for
       | many of us, always in the back of my mind whenever dealing with
       | healthcare providers, is that they're probably the ones that both
       | survived and stuck through that catastrophe.
       | 
       | And, some places, I get the impression they have fewer staff now,
       | and greater financial challenges.
       | 
       | > _If I decide to work less, who is going to cover the hospital?
       | If the hospital aren't employing other doctors, we can't allow
       | patients to go uncovered. I accept the fact that I have a duty of
       | care to be on call._
       | 
       | The hospital also has a duty of care.
        
       | treprinum wrote:
       | Enforcing duration of medical actions must be some of the most
       | idiotic things a healthcare MBA/MPH could come up with. Forcing a
       | surgeon to finish surgery exactly within allocated time is
       | putting lives at risk. The factory model should never be applied
       | to fields like these.
        
       | wuj wrote:
       | One point I resonated with is the high administrative overhead of
       | being a doctor. I can imagine the stress of using an outdated EMR
       | system when the time you have for each patient is so limited. I
       | see lots of AI companies are trying to transform the MedTech
       | industry, but I'm unsure how much of their products useful / are
       | actually adopted by the hospitals. Maybe some experts in that
       | space can enlighten me on that?
       | 
       | I also agree that running hospitals like a private business is at
       | odds with the essence of healthcare. However, this trend might be
       | more indicative of a broader societal shift rather than a
       | phenomenon unique to this sector.
        
         | lukko wrote:
         | One of my old registrars co-founded this company:
         | https://tortus.ai. They are doing a trial at Great Ormond
         | Street at the moment - I haven't tried what they're building
         | but it's an AI assistant that reduces some of the admin burden.
         | 
         | I am really hopeful that systems like this will take off - the
         | reality of being a junior doctor in the UK is that most of your
         | time will be used on quite tedious admin tasks (documenting
         | every patient interaction, filling forms, booking clinics etc.)
         | using very & slow outdated computer systems. I don't think
         | anyone expects this when they apply to medical school, and it
         | can be quite demoralising when you start your first job.
        
         | quasse wrote:
         | > I see lots of AI companies are trying to transform the
         | MedTech industry, but I'm unsure how much of their products
         | useful / are actually adopted by the hospitals. Maybe some
         | experts in that space can enlighten me on that?
         | 
         | My impression (as an outsider with a partner in the medical
         | field) is that the prime function of the "medical industry" is
         | to generate reams and reams of documentation about "care
         | provided" to an insanely granular level. Functionally, this
         | information is mostly bullshit that is irrelevant to providing
         | medical care, but it serves a very important purpose for the
         | medical administrative class so that they can bill the patient
         | for each bandage applied or Ibuprofen administered.
         | 
         | AI MedTech companies mostly seem primed to increase this
         | firehose of bullshit. Whether or not that will take the
         | pressure off front-line medical personnel who are currently
         | tasked with generating it remains to be seen, but you'd be hard
         | pressed to convince me.
        
           | lukko wrote:
           | There are a few other reasons - doctors document every
           | interaction partly for medico-legal reasons - just in case
           | something happens. The notes become especially long and
           | defensive in any situations that have a possibility of being
           | misinterpreted. If it's not written down, it didn't happen.
           | It's obviously also a record for other clinicians /
           | healthcare professionals to read through and see what
           | happened during the admission.
           | 
           | But yep I do worry about any kind of generative AI in this
           | context.
        
       | vehementi wrote:
       | I wonder why this guy has a plug for that home doctor book which
       | looks reeeeally sketchy. I went looking for reviews of it and
       | reddit is filled by spam from just one reddit user
        
       | Havoc wrote:
       | I didn't even consider surgeon as an option. The idea of a life
       | being dependent on my steady hand, skill and knowledge is
       | terrifying. Literally I'm having a bad day, mess up, someone
       | dies?
       | 
       | ...having people brave enough to take that on drown in red tape
       | is a shameful black mark on society.
        
       | worik wrote:
       | Doctors meet better unions in that country
       | 
       | Senior doctors in New Zealan have one of the most powerful unions
       | in the country
       | 
       | Junior doctors are catching up
       | 
       | It is still a punishing career, but not like that.
        
         | H8crilA wrote:
         | In many countries doctors' unions actually encourage this sort
         | of stuff, by restricting the number of spots in medical
         | degrees. Making sure there are as few juniors as possible,
         | making their life more miserable than it needs to be - this
         | sort of stuff.
        
       | skybrian wrote:
       | It's side point, but I'm wondering, why does the blog post start
       | with a link to a book? It looks like an interesting book, but I
       | don't see the relationship. Has Substack started running
       | advertising?
        
       | csbbbb wrote:
       | I empathize in general.
       | 
       | Still, I wonder how much each one of those overbooked surgeries
       | cost the patient. Months' worth of savings? Year's worth of debt?
       | Their life?
       | 
       | At the same time, most established doctors seem to make enough
       | money to easily manage their school debt and afford a privileged
       | lifestyle amongst privileged lifestyles, without worrying about
       | job security.
       | 
       | Considering all this, it's tempting for me to approach doctors
       | with the same implicit deal I get from healthcare system: if you
       | want me to care, it'll cost you.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-04-13 23:00 UTC)