[HN Gopher] Ask HN: Which low-budget camera would you recommend ...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Ask HN: Which low-budget camera would you recommend for recording
       podcasts?
        
       Please mention what you like/dislike about particular models, tell
       us why you would recommend it and if you want - also share your
       podcasts! :)
        
       Author : mmathias
       Score  : 33 points
       Date   : 2024-04-06 19:44 UTC (3 hours ago)
        
       | CasperH2O wrote:
       | Ive used my phone (Redmi Note 10S) to record decent video. Post
       | work with KDenlive.
       | 
       | Mind your settings.
        
       | planckscnst wrote:
       | If you have a mid- to upper- range phone made in the last 4
       | years, that's probably the best low-budget option by far. Save
       | your money and get led panel lights instead.
       | 
       | And a good audio recorder will do wonders. Zoom h1n is a quite
       | good budget option. Try searching YouTube for "h1n vs" - there
       | are tons of great options.
        
       | seniorivn wrote:
       | Any camera except a webcam will work. Focus on lighting and
       | microphones, ones you have a reason to upgrade your setup, you
       | might consider dslr cameras that are used for serious video
       | productions
        
       | Valgrim wrote:
       | Sorry,I'm confused. Aren't podcasts audio by definition?
       | 
       | Unless your audience is going to be mainly on a video platform
       | (and even then, the following advice will apply) you should focus
       | your budget on audio equipment, and possibly build a recording
       | booth.
        
         | Retr0id wrote:
         | They're calling them "vodcasts", it's the hot new format.
        
         | Our_Benefactors wrote:
         | Joe Rogan for example is a "podcast" but also films all their
         | episodes so you can watch the host and guests reactions and
         | body language during the segment. "Podcast" doesn't just mean
         | audio anymore, the definition has evolved.
        
           | jimkleiber wrote:
           | What I've seen is that it might be easier to promote a
           | podcast if it has video because the web is a visual space and
           | audio-only can be hard to make visual, unless one creates
           | audiograms with text subtitles, but still not as compelling
           | visually.
           | 
           | Plus, YouTube and other visual platforms seem to have better
           | discoverability.
           | 
           | But I'm open to being proved wrong, as I'd love to record
           | audio only lol.
        
             | coffeebeqn wrote:
             | Exactly. You can much easier make TikToks and such if you
             | already have the video
        
         | 63 wrote:
         | There are a lot of podcasts out there and no good
         | discoverability outside of large platforms. YouTube has some of
         | the best discoverability out there, but YouTube viewers expect
         | video. If you want to run a successful podcast in 2024,
         | recording video and uploading it to YouTube is a must
        
       | imposterr wrote:
       | A used Sony a6000 + kit lens + cheap HDMI to USB dongle.
       | 
       | The nice thing about this sort of setup is that you can upgrade
       | the lens as needed without having to redo the whole system.
       | 
       | As for lighting, DIY some diffusers for and stick them on some
       | lamps.
        
         | Retr0id wrote:
         | On the HDMI-to-USB front, beware of dongles that oversell
         | themselves.
         | 
         | A blue USB connector just means a blue USB connector, it
         | doesn't necessarily mean it's USB 3.0 (they might use weasel
         | words like "USB 3.0 compatible").
         | 
         | Most have an integrated scaler, e.g. will accept 4K input even
         | if they only capture at 1080p - the listing will likely
         | emphasize the former rather than the later.
         | 
         | The MS2109 chip will do 1080p at 30fps, over USB 2.0 (mjpeg).
         | 
         | The MS2130 chip will do 4K at 30fps (mjpeg), or 1080p at 60fps
         | (yuv), over USB 3.0.
        
           | _rs wrote:
           | Some Sony cameras support acting as webcams natively over USB
           | now too, so you can skip the HDMI step. Not sure about which
           | specific models though
        
         | chrisa wrote:
         | This is my exact setup and it's great. Several pros:
         | 
         | - Relatively cheap since the a6000 is an older camera
         | 
         | - The a6000 doesn't have the 30 minute hdmi limit that some
         | other cameras have (this can be fixed with gphoto, but you have
         | to redo it every time you connect)
         | 
         | - When you're ready you can buy more lights, and then
         | eventually a nicer lens if you want
        
       | suyash wrote:
       | Your smartphone with external wireless mic
        
         | coffeebeqn wrote:
         | Why wireless? There are a lot of good wired USB mics that are
         | generally better sounding since the tradeoffs aren't so severe
         | as in wireless and less hassle.
        
       | Aurornis wrote:
       | A recent iPhone Pro or high end Android phone.
       | 
       | I wouldn't recommend getting into more complicated setups until
       | you've tried a recent phone. They're really quite extraordinary.
        
       | aczerepinski wrote:
       | You may have better luck if you specify what low budget means to
       | you. The latest iPhone Pro is better than some of the entry level
       | cameras, especially if you weren't planning to splurge for a nice
       | prime lens.
       | 
       | I think the cheapest you should go is the Sony EV-10 plus Sigma
       | 16mm 1.4 lens. If those are more than you want to spend, stick
       | with your phone camera because you won't see enough improvement
       | to make it worthwhile.
       | 
       | In either case, watch some YouTube videos about podcast lighting
       | because that will matter more than your camera.
        
         | waffleiron wrote:
         | Slightly cheaper but also very similar to the EV-10 would be a
         | second hand Sony a6000/a6300.
        
         | kristianp wrote:
         | When I google the EV-10, I get results for the ZV-E10. I assume
         | they are the same camera, why do people call it the EV-10?
         | 
         | The ZV-E10 can live stream up to 720p over USB-C (1), is that
         | sufficient?
         | 
         | (1) https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/sony-zv-e10-review
        
           | Thorrez wrote:
           | Does it need live stream or would recording to the camera be
           | sufficient? Can it do both at the same time?
        
       | falkensmaize wrote:
       | Use your phone and spend your money on lighting and audio (mic
       | and interface). You can make your video look very professional
       | with good lighting. Bad lighting + expensive camera == amateur
       | looking video. No matter how good the image is, with poor audio
       | no one will watch it.
        
         | sneak wrote:
         | Your last sentence is super true, but the audio interface is
         | relatively unimportant. Even onboard headphone jack audio
         | interfaces are 10x more than adequate. Main things to focus on
         | (no pun intended) are mic placement and mic quality.
        
       | Bo0kerDeWitt wrote:
       | If your budget is tight, use your phone for video, and sort out
       | the audio equipment first. Folks will watch mediocre video with
       | excellent audio. They will not watch the reverse.
        
         | coffeebeqn wrote:
         | Halfway decent phone and then some lighting and you should be
         | good to go. It won't look amazing but it also shouldn't hold
         | your content back
        
       | simonbarker87 wrote:
       | Sound is much more important - even if you consider your podcast
       | video first (in which case it's not a podcast but that's another
       | topic) sound is more important. Take whatever smart phone you
       | have and use that for the video and then spend any money you have
       | for the camera and spend it on a decent mic.
       | 
       | People will watch lower quality video with good sound for far
       | longer than they will watch good video with bad sound.
       | 
       | Source: listening to podcasts now for 15 years and grew my own to
       | 5k listens a month across 100 episodes.
        
         | entropie wrote:
         | > People will watch lower quality video with good sound for far
         | longer than they will watch good video with bad sound.
         | 
         | Very true. I can stand bad/pixelated videos but
         | crackling/distorted/unnormalized audio drives me crazy. Still
         | many twitch channels seems not to know, or bother...
        
         | waffleiron wrote:
         | I would even say that room treatment is a lot more valuable to
         | a starting podcast. Sure don't have the cheapest, shittiest mic
         | but especially starting our room treatment grants a lot more
         | value.
         | 
         | Of course, you could record in your closet ;)
        
           | duncan-donuts wrote:
           | Second the room treatment. It should likely be prioritized
           | over everything. Specifically you should look into getting
           | bass traps and a gobo or three. There's budget stuff out
           | there but sound is fickle. Control those reflections.
           | Expensive mics still sound bad if a room sounds bad.
        
           | ARandomerDude wrote:
           | Even easier: get a hypercardoid shotgun mic and speak
           | directly into the front of it. I've had amazing success with
           | the Azden SGM-250H in very poor recording environments (bare
           | walls, tile floors, etc).
           | 
           | No affiliation, and I suspect numerous other similar mics
           | would do well.
        
         | tomaskafka wrote:
         | I wonder why there's still no AI tool that would take okay-ish
         | voice recording and make it sound stellar, just like there are
         | many tools for visual stuff?
        
           | zichy wrote:
           | AI tools can't make okay-ish video recordings suddenly look
           | great.
        
         | zichy wrote:
         | Exactly this. In terms of recording quality, my approach would
         | look something like this:
         | 
         | 1. Use a decent microphone.
         | 
         | 2. Make sure you know how to handle the microphone.
         | 
         | 3. Use closed-back headphones.
         | 
         | 4. Record in a suitable environment/studio.
         | 
         | 5. Consider adding a video track as well.
        
       | skadamat wrote:
       | I've spent a few years fiddling with setups during COVID / remote
       | work. Honestly, in my experience, gear comes secondary to your
       | ENVIRONMENT.
       | 
       | Julie Schiro's videos are a great place to start:
       | https://www.youtube.com/@JulieSchiro
       | 
       | Here are my tiers!
       | 
       | Tier 1: Audio > Video first!
       | 
       | - Get very basic sound treatment done, even just a few panels in
       | front and behind you. ~$100 or cheaper with DIY
       | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q3nS2-HvJMs
       | 
       | - Get a reliable microphone. Samson Q2U is a solid one here if
       | you did step 1.
       | 
       | Tier 2: Improve video
       | 
       | - Improve your lighting. Face a window if you can or get some
       | lamps to balance out lighting.
       | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jiUpK0dhWTE
       | 
       | - Use smartphone with app or cable as your virtual webcam. Or if
       | you have $200 get the Logitech Brio
       | 
       | Tier 3: $$$
       | 
       | - Audio: 3x your sound panelling & sound treatment. Put stuff on
       | the ceilings too. If you still have too much money, get Shure MV7
       | (usb-c which is nice). SM7B honestly isn't needed unless you have
       | a true studio environment with professional sound treatment done.
       | 
       | - Video: Get a Sony a6000 (this is what I use) or a6400 / 6600
       | and a lens with f1.4 on it. This is what I use:
       | https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B077BWD2BB/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b...
       | 
       | - Add-ons: Get a dummy battery that plugs into your wall and can
       | run your camera in 'forever power' mode. Get a camera signal ->
       | USB converter like Magewell or Elgato Camlink (what I use):
       | https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1453840-REG/elgato_sy...
        
         | hellcow wrote:
         | I have the Shure MV7, and I've been extremely impressed with it
         | over USB. Highly recommend it as an entry point to
         | (semi-)professional audio equipment.
        
       | Siecje wrote:
       | What is your podcast going to be about?
        
       | lemonad wrote:
       | Like others have said, get a used Sony a6000 (or higher model,
       | try to get one where the screen can be swiveled to point
       | forward). If you expect to be sitting close to the camera, you
       | can't go wrong with a Sigma 16mm 1.4 lens. If you have the space
       | to place the camera further away, you should probably get a
       | slightly longer lens.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-04-06 23:01 UTC)